Indigo launches direct flight service to Amsterdam from Mumbai
Amsterdam, Jul 2 (PTI) Spreading its wings to Europe, Indian carrier IndiGo on Wednesday launched its flight services to Amsterdam from Mumbai, the airline's second long-haul overseas service to be rolled out in as many days.
The new Mumbai-Amsterdam service will operate thrice weekly with IndiGo's Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner aircraft.
Amsterdam's Schiphol airport is one of the world's busiest airports and a key European hub.
On Wednesday, the airline operated its maiden flight to Manchester from Mumbai, which it termed as a significant move that paves the way for it to become a global airline besides offering enhanced connectivity between India and key global markets.
'Spreading our wings further in Europe, we are delighted to launch our Mumbai-Amsterdam flights, connecting India to the world. This route will not only enhance connectivity for leisure, business, and student travellers, but also deepen the thriving partnership between India and the Netherlands, culturally, economically, and diplomatically,' said Pieter Elbers, Chief Executive Officer at IndiGo.
The Mumbai-Amsterdam route not only bolsters the airline's fast-growing international network but also underlines its commitment to making long-haul travel more accessible, efficient, and affordable for Indian travelers, IndiGo said in the statement on Wednesday.
With this launch, customers flying to and from Amsterdam can seamlessly connect to the entire Europe, North America and Canada; and on IndiGo's domestic network of over 90 destinations within India, it said.
IndiGo has tied up with Norwegian low-cost airline Norse Atlantic Airways for damp leasing of six wide-body B 787-9 aircraft for its international operations, primarily to the UK and Europe. These leased planes are to be delivered to the airline by 2026, with the first joining the fleet from March this year.
The aircraft features a two-class cabin configuration comprising 56 IndiGoStretch (business class) seats and 282 economy seats. PTI RAM MR MR
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
Will the EU delay enforcing its AI Act?
Parts of EU's AI Act due to come into force on August 2 Publication of key guidance document has been delayed Some companies, politicians call for delay STOCKHOLM, July 3 (Reuters) - With less than a month to go before parts of the European Union's AI Act come into force, companies are calling for a pause in the provisions and getting support from some politicians. Groups representing big U.S. tech companies such as Google owner Alphabet and Facebook owner Meta, and European companies such as Mistral and ASML have urged the European Commission to delay the AI Act by years. WHAT IS THE AUGUST 2 DEADLINE? Under the landmark act that was passed a year earlier after intense debate between EU countries, its provisions would come into effect in a staggered manner over several years. Some important provisions, including rules for general purpose AI (GPAI) models, are due to apply on August 2. GPAI, which includes foundation models like those made by Google, Mistral and OpenAI, will be subject to transparency requirements such as drawing up technical documentation, complying with EU copyright law and providing detailed summaries about the content used for algorithm training. The companies will also need to test for bias, toxicity, and robustness before launching. AI models classed as posing a systemic risk and high-impact GPAI will have to conduct model evaluations, assess and mitigate risks, conduct adversarial testing, report to the European Commission on serious incidents and provide information on their energy efficiency. WHY DO COMPANIES WANT A PAUSE? For AI companies, the enforcement of the act means additional costs for compliance. And for ones that make AI models, the requirements are tougher. But companies are also unsure how to comply with the rules as there are no guidelines yet. The AI Code of Practice, a guidance document to help AI developers to comply with the act, missed its publication date of May 2. "To address the uncertainty this situation is creating, we urge the Commission to propose a two-year 'clock-stop' on the AI Act before key obligations enter into force," said an open letter published on Thursday by a group of 45 European companies. It also called for simplification of the new rules. Another concern is that the act may stifle innovation, particularly in Europe where companies have smaller compliance teams than their U.S. counterparts. The European Commission has not yet commented on whether it will postpone the enforcement of the new rules in August. However, EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen promised on Wednesday to publish the AI Code of Practice before next month. Some political leaders, such as Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, have also called the AI rules "confusing" and asked the EU to pause the act. "A bold 'stop-the-clock' intervention is urgently needed to give AI developers and deployers legal certainty, as long as necessary standards remain unavailable or delayed," tech lobbying group CCIA Europe said.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
YesMadam turns everyday wellness into meaningful moments
YesMadam is a startup that's quietly changing the way people think about beauty and wellness. Started in 2016 by brothers Aditya and Mayank Arya, the company was built on a simple idea: why not bring salon and wellness services directly to people's homes, where they feel most comfortable? Over time, this idea has grown into a trusted platform that now operates in more than 55 Indian cities. They aim to give people access to the kind of care they would expect from a premium salon, but in the comfort of their own homes. But what makes YesMadam stand out isn't just convenience — it's how personal their approach feels. One example that recently caught attention was a small birthday surprise planned by a customer named Samarth. He didn't want a big party or flashy lights; he simply wanted to gift his friend a peaceful home spa session. When the YesMadam team heard his story, they went beyond the request. Along with the beautician, they sent a guitarist who played her favourite song, added a cake, a thoughtful gift hamper, and a handwritten note. The entire experience was warm and unexpected. When the video of the moment was shared online, it touched thousands of people who saw in it something real — a reminder of what care really looks like. This kind of story shows what YesMadam is trying to build. It's not just about beauty services; it's about creating space for comfort, connection, and care. Elderly people, new mothers, those recovering from illness, or simply too busy to step out now have access to self-care without having to leave home. It saves time, avoids crowded places, and makes regular wellness routines easier to stick to. At a time when everything feels fast and impersonal, YesMadam is offering something different: a chance to slow down and bring a little bit of calm and relaxation right into your living room.
Mint
35 minutes ago
- Mint
Startup founder revokes ₹22 lakh job offer over candidate's religious remarks, sparks debate
An Indian startup founder has ignited an online debate after he revoked a lucrative job offer worth ₹ 22 lakh per annum over a candidate's alleged derogatory comments targeting religious communities on LinkedIn. Mohammed Ahmed Bhati, founder of recruitment platform Jobbie, shared on the professional networking site that while the candidate had aced the interview process and even went the extra mile to suggest improvements to the company's platform, the offer was withdrawn following a routine background check that revealed 'deeply disrespectful' public remarks. 'No matter how talented someone is, respect and basic decency matter to us more. Talent gets you in the door, but values decide if you stay,' Bhati wrote in a widely circulated post. According to Bhati, the candidate had applied for the job after seeing Jobbie's viral Reddit post about conducting 450 interviews for over 12,000 applicants. The individual stood out not just for their skills but also for their proactive attitude, including building their resume using Jobbie's tools and suggesting platform tweaks. However, just before onboarding, the startup reportedly discovered the candidate had made recent comments on LinkedIn that could be construed as offensive to religious groups. 'We were ready to extend an offer above our budget. But during the final background check, we found public posts that included remarks which could hurt religious sentiments. That's not a value we are willing to compromise on,' Bhati explained. The decision has triggered a sharp divide online. While some praised Bhati for prioritising values over pure technical competence, others questioned whether rescinding a job offer over social media comments is justified. Critics labelled the move an example of 'cancel culture in hiring', arguing that companies should focus on performance, not personal opinions. A user wrote, "Revoking an offer letter for a professional position based on someone's social media activity goes out to show how this cancel culture can actually affect organisation when wrong people get in leadership position. And posting it here isn't virtue signalling either. It simply shows how immature and insecure you are as a leader. Good luck finding good candidates." Another user commented, "You're trying to assert your power, acting like, 'I built this platform, so I decide who gets hired based on whether they align with my beliefs or not.' But I'm sure if someone from another religion did the same against yours, you wouldn't stay silent, you'd be the first to call it out." "Only a fresher can understand what was the importance of this position. There is so much to do and learn, education makes a human being grounded, teaches gratitude and keeps him humble. But now I know why the cultural round is important," the third user wrote. Supporters, however, applauded the stand, highlighting the importance of workplace ethics, inclusion, and cultural sensitivity. "Everyone with a hate comment, I have a question.I mean, would you be comfortable working with/under a racist/casteist or even a sexist? I know I would not. Qualifications should not be the only parameter to assess an employee. Companies generally have zero tolerance policy against the same. It's better to reject candidates before they are hired and cause severe social and emotional damage to others," a user wrote. "Great decision, I would say," another user wrote.
