Woman with 'perfect body' explains cost of her monthly food budget
Woman with 'perfect body' explains cost of her monthly food budget
Karol, 25, was determined to have the perfect physique based on proportions, strength and well-being
Karol has explained how much she spends on groceries
A fitness influencer dubbed the 'perfect' woman has revealed the huge amount she spends on her food shop every month. Karol Rosalin, who has 1.8m followers on Instagram, was named as having the ultimate body by Playboy after AI analysed her proportions, symmetry and overall strength and well-being.
The 25-year-old does 2,500 squats per week and claims to have just 6% body fat. Karol also follows a strict diet of only organic products and top-tier supplements.
'I recently went grocery shopping and the total came to over £800,' she said. 'My food bill is not an exaggeration — it's a commitment to the body I chose to have. I filled up three cars with natural, functional ingredients, including several kilos of chicken breast, trays of eggs, sweet potatoes, yams, broccoli, zucchini and kale, as well as fruits, nuts and oats.
Karol has been dubbed 'perfect'
'Every time I get to the checkout, someone looks at me like I'm feeding a restaurant. One time, a man asked if I was making a donation.
'I laughed and said, 'Yeah — I'm donating to the body I want.' Everything that goes into my cart has a purpose. It's not about luxury, it's about logic.'
Article continues below
Karol will have five to six meals per day, each tailored to her macronutrient goals: protein, complex carbs and healthy fats. She said, 'I use an app to track everything. I have a nutritionist that I check in with regularly, and I stay on top of every detail.
Karol has a diet packed with healthy, organic fruit and vegetables
'For me, eating right is the foundation. Some people spend this same amount of money on parties, clubs, or things they don't remember the next day.
'I invest in something that gives me lasting results — in the mirror, in my health and in my career.'
The full cost of Karol's body maintenance is much higher. Earlier this year, she confessed to having a personal trainer whose only job is to keep her bum looking fit and perky, to the tune of £3,100 per month.
The influencer previously said: 'Some days I go to the gym just for squats, and other days I combine weight training with targeted exercises. I leave the gym exhausted, but it's worth it.
Article continues below
'The results are there for anyone to see.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
26 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
When AI kills off the ScotRail lady, you know we're all in trouble
Then, one Saturday afternoon, when my wife was out, and I was alone, I picked up my phone like some dirty little pervert and downloaded an AI app. I told it my name and that I wrote books and asked if it had read them. 'Yes", the creature replied. Two points: first, I call AI a "creature" as it inhabits that "uncanny valley" between human and automaton which today elicits what's called "the ick". Second, the bugger was reading my books without paying me. Read more by Neil Mackay I asked if it had any ideas which might make a good subject for my next book. It spewed out weird amalgams of what I've already written. One suggestion was: write about an Iraq war veteran who returns to Northern Ireland, becomes a werewolf, and goes on a killing spree. My first book was a non-fiction account of my coverage of the intelligence war in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. My second book was a novel exploring the theme of "nature versus nurture" through a story about two children in Northern Ireland during the Troubles who drift into acts of senseless violence. My third book was also a novel, based on the true story of a serial murderer apprehended in 16th century Germany who was put on trial as a werewolf because the authorities had no understanding back then of psychopathy, so assumed the crimes were supernatural. This AI brute was a mere plagiarist – and a rubbish one at that. I felt slightly disgusted at how pathetic it was – the same sort of feeling I get when Donald Trump tries to talk about actual government policy. AI isn't some god-like intelligence, it's simply the dumb kid copying your class-work in school. I felt like the creature had carved lumps out of me, reduced me down to some stereotype, metaphorically lopped off my arms and legs like the Black Night in Monty Python and the Holy Grail and left me as a half-made caricature of myself. And isn't that precisely what AI does artistically? Look at all that AI slop out there online, drawings and video clips that are simply stereotype after stereotype, a regurgitation of human creativity, mediated through dead digital circuits, which emerges as derivative junk. It's like taking a Picasso, shredding it, feeding the pieces into a machine and then watching the machine puke out "Live, love, laugh" paintings. Is this the thing that's going to replace us? If we're dumb enough to believe that a device this talentless can supersede human creativity then we should just climb into our collective grave now and pull the mud over ourselves as a species. But this creature is replacing us. We are that dumb. Fletcher Mathers, the Scottish actress who voiced ScotRail announcements for 20 years, has just been unceremoniously binned for an AI version. To make matters worse, another actress, Gayanne Potter, has accused ScotRail of using her voice to "train" the replacement AI without consent. When AI kills off the ScotRail lady, you know we're all in trouble. Is this what we want? A world where we disappear and computers pretend to be us? I hate the very thought of that dead, sterile world. I get a visceral reaction now to AI in film or TV. If I see some street scene rendered in AI slop, bang goes the off button. The Oscar-winning movie The Brutalist shouldn't have received any awards. It used AI to make the lead actor, Adrian Brody, sound authentically Hungarian. I want actors to act, not be auto-tuned ventriloquist's dummies. I was looking around the dinner table last night at my family and a shiver went through me for some of their futures under AI. Writer, teacher, police officer, taxman, designer, lawyer. Who's for the chop first? I worry most about the taxman and designer. Keir Starmer has nothing left to offer but some suicidal rush towards an AI-state. Goodbye taxman. Private industry doesn't care if it chucks talent on the scrapheap to jack shareholder dividends. Goodbye designer. If AI was used to enhance humanity, rather than reduce us, I'd embrace it. I've been a technophile my entire life. But from the mid-2010s that love affair turned to technophobia as I saw what social media was doing to us as a species. Now, I'm almost a full Luddite. AI should be used to help doctors perfect cancer diagnoses, town planners eliminate traffic jams, and engineers make energy-efficient buildings to lower bills. Instead, AI is either used to create cultural crap – mountains of manure – or it exacerbates humanity's faults. 'AI is either used to create cultural crap – mountains of manure – or it exacerbates humanity's faults' (Image: PA) Use AI to sift job applications and you'll tend to find the CVs which rise to the top are from white guys. Why? Because earlier successful candidates were white men. AI reinforces our prejudices, as it simply studies those prejudices and repeats them. The same happens with AI and probation decisions. Most white prisoners go free, whilst black prisoners stay incarcerated. Why? Because the AI is simply repeating the bias it learned from all the previous decisions. The horror is: there's no going back. This thing is on the loose and it's in the hands of the maniacs who broke the world already with social media. It won't be the force for good it could be, its destiny is fixed as a force for evil. AI should be used as an obedient assistant which sits beside humanity, helping us make better decisions for ourselves and others. Instead, we're Mickey Mouse in The Sorcerer's Apprentice. The broom is alive, yet it has no soul, no empathy, no mind, so it doesn't care if it destroys the world – and all at our cursed bidding. Incidentally, I deleted the AI off my phone forever. Neil Mackay is The Herald's Writer at Large. He's a multi-award-winning investigative journalist, author of both fiction and non-fiction, and a filmmaker and broadcaster. He specialises in intelligence, security, crime, social affairs, cultural commentary, and foreign and domestic politics.
Evening Standard
an hour ago
- Evening Standard
Super-strength drug warning as opioid 'up to 500 times stronger than heroin' linked to London clubber deaths
The Cause, one of east London's most loved clubs, shared a photo of two pills marked with the number 80 on their Instagram, strongly advising partygoers not to engage with it and to warn their friends.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Chappell Roan's 'actually normal' bikini body revealed: see what the star looks like stripped down
Chappell Roan took to Instagram on Sunday night to share scantily clad photos with her 7.1 million followers. The 27-year-old pop star — who was recently mistaken for Anna Delvey — posed in a black bikini, showing off her stunning figure. One snapshot showed The Giver hitmaker giving fans an eyeful as she posed with her plump bottom on display in high-cut tie-string bikini bottoms. She captioned the carousel post, 'I am actually normal.' But Roan, born Kayleigh Rose Amstutz, looked anything but ordinary as she showed off her striking beauty. Chappell looked typically gorgeous with her flaming-red curly locks falling around her. The images have so far collected 1.3 million likes from the singer's devoted online audience. It comes after earlier this year the entertainer ignited a generational divide when she said in an interview: 'I don't know a single person who is happy and has children at this age.' Recognized for her drag aesthetic and punchy feminist lyrics, Chappell identifies as a lesbian. While appearing on Alex Cooper's Call Her Daddy podcast, she was asked by the host if she would ever have children. She answered unequivocally: 'All of my friends who have kids are in hell. I don't know anyone who's happy and has children at this age.' The star reiterated, 'I have not met anyone who is happy, anyone who has light in their eyes, anyone who has slept [who has a child under five].' The remarks prompted a fiery debate online. Some moms insisted it 'was not an accurate or healthy message to peddle, particularly when the birth rate is down.' One person wrote: 'Chappell Roan going on Call Her Daddy saying none of her friends with kids are happy, is a prime example of why you cannot just vent to anyone.' Someone else wished, 'May the friendship of narcissistic childless women with no sense of loyalty ever find me.' Meanwhile, others related to Chappell's statements, with one person weighing in: 'The people who have made me most scared to become a mother are mothers. 'What Chappell said is all I see because lots of mothers I see are like, "This is miserable" and mothers can also be the most competitive, nasty and judgmental people.'
