
Did Putin's ‘body double' meet Trump? Conspiracy reignites over Russian President's army of ‘six stand-ins'
The high-stakes meeting did not succeed as the leaders could not reach an agreement over the ceasefire. However, the videos emerging from the summit re-ignited a topic which has long been a subject of speculation across the globe: Putin and his 'army of six body doubles'.
On Friday, several netizens expressed their suspicion over Putin sending over one of his doubles to meet Trump. They pointed out that Putin, who usually expresses very little emotion from his expressions, seemed more 'animated' in the videos from the summit.
However, this is not the first time such claims have been made about the Russian leader. Widespread memes and media reports have, over the years, claimed that Vladimir Putin has six body doubles, each performing a particular duty and having a distinct feature.
Around 2010, a meme went viral describing Putin's six doubles. The meme included different images of Putin as well as his alleged body doubles. It suggested that 'Babbler' Putin is deployed for Direct Line shows, "Diplomat" Putin participates in negotiations, "Banquet" Putin is used "for interviews, handshakes, and photos with the public", "Kuchma" Putin can be seen with a "record-breaking chubby chin", and "Udmurt" Putin is used when "Babbler" "needs a vacation".
Russian journalist Oleg Kashin posted this again on Facebook in September 2016, making it more popular.
A netizen on Friday claimed that 'Jovial Putin' had come to meet Trump in Alaska.
'It's literally not even the real Putin. They didn't even send the good double, they sent 'Jovial Putin', the expendable one that usually just makes minor public appearances and went to visit Kim in NK,' the user wrote on social media platform X.
'It will emerge somewhat later that that wasn't even Putin in Alaska. The Russians did care enough to send their No. 1 Putin body double, but the body language is different. Trump couldn't tell,' another user wrote.
'Trump just realized Russia sent Putin's body double's body double,' another one commented on a picture of the two leaders shaking hands.
"Rumours swirling! Was that really Putin in Alaska or his body double? Some even claim Trump wasn't the original at the #TrumpPutinMeeting. Conspiracy theories reaching new heights!" one user said.
Claims have also been made earlier that Putin has been increasingly using his body doubles due to his failing health.
Social media users also cited 2023 'Japanese research,' saying, 'Putin probably had at least one body double.'
After reports of Putin falling sick and using his body double started surfacing during the Covid-19 pandemic re-emerged, the Kremlin in 2023 issued a statement to reject them.
'Everything is fine with him, this is absolutely another fake,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said when asked about an unsourced report by a Russian Telegram channel.
'This belongs to the category of absurd information hoaxes that a whole series of media discuss with enviable tenacity. This evokes nothing but a smile,' Peskov said.
Before that, in 2020, in an interview with TASS, Putin denied using body doubles but accepted that he had been offered the chance to use one in the past for security reasons.
"What double? I don't have doubles. Why do I need them?" he had said to another journalist in 2015.
Following the Trump-Putin meet, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced on Saturday that he plans to meet Trump in Washington next week. Zelenskyy said that he held a 'long and substantive' conversation with Trump on Saturday after the US leader met Putin in Alaska.
He thanked Trump for an invitation to meet in person in Washington on Monday and said they would 'discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Five dangerous fault lines divide Trump and Zelensky
On August 18th Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, will enter the White House to meet Donald Trump and discuss ending the war in Ukraine . For Mr Zelensky it is a perilous moment. Since Mr Trump met Vladimir Putin , Russia's president, in Alaska on August 15th, the American president has put intense pressure on Mr Zelensky, stating that he could 'end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to'. The leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Finland and the European Union fear the White House will sell out Ukraine and Europe, and are rushing to Washington to support Mr Zelensky. 'Never had so many European leaders at one time,' wrote Mr Trump. 'My great honour to host them!' What are the contours of the negotiations? In the past 48 hours there has been a swirl of speculation and public comments by Team Trump. It is hard to know what the president is thinking. But five critical issues for any peace deal are likely to be discussed: sequencing, territory, security guarantees, sanctions and recognition. In each case, America will struggle to bridge the demands of Mr Putin with those of Ukraine and Europe. Map Start with sequencing, where Mr Trump has already all but folded to Mr Putin, dropping his demand that Russia should agree to a ceasefire ahead of formal peace talks. The Kremlin is keen to negotiate while the fighting still rages. On Sunday Mr Zelensky insisted that Ukraine would not begin talks with Russia 'under the pressure of weapons'. But that position—already undercut by Mr Trump's cosy bilateral meeting with Mr Putin—can probably not withstand for long American pressure to force Ukraine to the table. If the discussion moves straight to 'final' peace talks, the second issue is terrain, or what Steve Witkoff, Mr Trump's envoy, calls 'land swaps'. Russia controls all of Crimea, which it seized and annexed in 2014. Mr Trump says that the peninsula will remain in Russian hands. But Russia also claims and has formally annexed four provinces in southern and eastern Ukraine which its troops do not entirely control (see map). One proposal, which Mr Witkoff hinted at on Sunday, is reportedly for Ukraine to cede Donetsk and Luhansk entirely to Russia, including the areas that it does not presently control—and which British defence intelligence suggests could require four-plus years and more than 1.9m casualties to take on present trends. In exchange Russia would freeze the front lines in Kherson and Zaporizhia. It would also withdraw from the pockets of territory that it controls in Sumy and Kharkhiv, two northern provinces. Much of this would be anathema to Ukraine. 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier,' Mr Zelensky has said. The terrain in question in Donetsk and to an extent in Luhansk, is especially important because it is heavily fortified by Ukraine's army. Without it Ukraine would find it harder to defend the rest of the country against future Russian attacks. How to make any agreement on borders binding leads to the third issue: security guarantees. America has suggested that Ukraine's membership of NATO (an aspiration the alliance promised in 2008 to fulfil and which is enshrined in the country's constitution) is off the table. Forswearing NATO membership for Ukraine has long been a key Russian demand. Yet on Sunday Mr Witkoff claimed that America could offer some kind of guarantee, modelled on NATO's Article 5, a mutual-defence clause. Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, put more emphasis on guarantees from Europe. 'It would be a very big move by the President if he were to offer a US commitment to a security guarantee. That will be his decision to make.' But the detail matters: in earlier talks, in 2022, Russia appeared to agree to international guarantees, but demanded a clause that would have given it a veto on any assistance to Ukraine. Closely related to that is the question of boots on the ground. Britain has said it could send troops to Ukraine as part of a peacekeeping force. But whether a European-only force is really credible is open to question. Very few troops have been promised for such a force, despite months of discussion. If America does not take part in a credible security guarantee European countries will push hard to at least secure promises about the supply of weapons from America. Mr Putin may try to push for limits on the flow of arms to Ukraine from the West. A priority for Russia is sanctions relief, the fourth issue. Mr Trump has used both threats of more financial warfare and the promise of future business deals as negotiating tools. On the one hand, he has threatened big importers of Russian oil, such as India, with swingeing tariffs. On the other, he and his team have dangled energy co-operation in the Arctic and other business partnerships. Russia's economy, which has weathered the impact of harsh Western sanctions since 2022, is beginning to feel the strain. Officials, who warn of a recession later this year, badly want the restrictions lifted. Here, Europe has some leverage. America would struggle to ease the economic strain on Russia without the full co-operation of Europe, which has a critical role in global banking, insurance, energy and shipping markets. Furthermore roughly two-thirds of the Russian central bank's foreign reserves that the West froze in 2022— thought to be worth more than $300bn—are are held in Brussels. Europe may be reluctant to release them if Mr Trump's deal weakens Ukraine. The final critical issue is recognition of any deal. Ukraine's constitution would require any 'land swap' to be put to a referendum, in which voters would almost certainly reject it. European leaders would be reluctant to endorse any deal that permanently recognises borders that have been altered by force. Whether America would do so for the sake of a peace deal is unclear. It is possible that America could recognise Russia's claim to Crimea, but not to other areas. Another fudge is for Europe to recognise the ceasefire line as a de-facto border without renouncing its view that Ukraine's pre-invasion border is the legitimate one. Mr Trump's meeting with Mr Zelensky and Ukraine's European allies will be a high-wire act of diplomacy. The brief, separate statements that Mr Trump and Mr Putin gave on August 15th, without taking questions from journalists, suggest that their plans are fragile. Mr Trump says he wants to bring the war to an end. For Ukraine and Europe the fear is that Mr Trump tries to force them to accept bad terms on the five key issues, and then threatens to abandon or punish Ukraine and Europe if they refuse. If this is how the talks turn out, Mr Putin will be the clear winner.


The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
From The Hindu, August 19, 1925: China's coastal traffic
Canton, Aug 18: The Chinese authorities have drawn up rules with regard to the coastal navigation, providing that steamers of any nationality except British and Japanese shall be allowed to run to and from any ports provided that they omit Hong Kong. All steamers entering that port must be inspected by a picket of Anti Imperialist Union. The export of foodstuffs or any other raw material from island will not be allowed.


India Today
14 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump interrupts talks with European leaders to call Putin: Report
US President Donald Trump interrupted a high-stakes White House meeting with European leaders on Monday to place a call to Russian President Vladimir Putin, an EU diplomat told talks are expected to resume afterward, the diplomat added, noting Trump had initially indicated the call would come only after consultations with his European interruption occurred as Trump hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy alongside the leaders of Germany, Britain, France, Italy, Finland, the European Union, and the secretary-general of NATO. Germany's Bild newspaper first reported the 'We'll try to work out a trilateral with the US, Ukraine and Russia,' Trump had told reporters earlier in the day, adding, 'Putin really would like to do something.'The talks with Zelenskyy and European leaders were due to resume after the call. European officials are pushing Trump to secure binding security guarantees for Ukraine, while Zelenskyy has made clear that any peace deal must avoid territorial Zelenskyy and Trump expressed optimism on Monday that high-stakes White House talks with European leaders could open the door to trilateral negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin aimed at ending the war in summit followed Trump's recent meeting with Putin in Alaska, after which he suggested that the responsibility now rests with Zelenskyy to consider concessions that, in his view, could bring the conflict to an end.- Ends