
John Robson: Canada's Temporary Foreign Worker Program Amounts to Slave Labour
Politics famously make for strange bedfellows. But what's with the federal government and the temporary foreign worker program? How are these committed progressives working hand-in-glove with big business to exploit foreigners? And why aren't we upset?
Arguably I don't get out much. But lately when I do travel, short distances or long, I notice that nearly everyone I deal with in hotels, restaurants, etc., and half at the supermarket checkout, are here as slave labour. How's that woke? Or tolerable?
I'm not against people aspiring to a better life, including immigrating to Canada, working hard, and making good. My forebears did. But temporary foreign workers aren't in that category, through no fault of their own.
They're here, toiling, and maybe even saving despite the grisly state of our economy. But they can't stay. The whole plan is to sweat them harder than locals for less money, then kick them out. Is it just me, or does that arrangement sound exploitative?
To some extent, by design, ineptitude, or designed ineptitude, it might be a back-door way to raise immigration still further by people who despise our traditions. Who really believed Canada could absorb a million people a year, 2.5 percent of our population, year after year, many bringing old-country hatreds?
Related Stories
5/19/2025
5/12/2025
Well, the federal government, apparently. Not voters, but they weren't asked. And while giant corporations may not be Hamasniks, they're in it for the money. But what about left-wing politicians? Doesn't it sound like exactly the kind of thing they'd hate?
Part of the deal is that they can foul up productivity, tax policy, inflation, etc., without a big-business revolt because the latter stay afloat with cheap labour. It also sticks a finger in the eye of tradition. And it juices GDP numbers because of flaws in that alleged measure of prosperity, which helps them at the polls, a bit.
There's also the problem of 'regulatory capture,' a boring name for an alarming process. G.K. Chesterton, who I greatly admire despite his economics, did have a point about
Real economists aren't puzzled that a small number of, say, Quebec dairy farmers work far harder to extract tens of thousands of dollars each from the treasury than ordinary people work not to wince at the high price of mediocre butter in the supermarket. Or that it's sold to us by a temporary foreign worker because likewise, a relatively small number of huge companies deploy the best lobbyists and campaign contributions money can buy to lower their salary costs massively.
Also, most Canadians don't seem to be very directly affected, or entirely negatively, since grocery and fast-food prices rise more slowly. But
Maybe some without kids, grandkids, or compassion don't care. They want their lukewarm sandwich cheap and they want it now, and figure they'll contrive to expire before social cohesion disintegrates sufficiently to impair their 'quality of life.' But I assume most of my readers already care, or are starting to make the connection and care.
Even when I was young, pre-internet, summer-job hunting stank. Those government job centres radiated futility. But somehow I found work. Kids today? Not so much.
As Hopper observes, summer job listings are down nearly a quarter just since last year, when the unemployment rate for 15–24s was already double the national average. And the adult number is deceptive, driven by feckless, deeply unsustainable public service expansion while the private sector atrophies.
Also, Hopper confirms that I'm not imagining things at the coffee counter. 'Between 2016 and 2023, the rate of TFWs working in restaurants increased by 634 per cent' and 456 in retail. So it's unfair to them and hurts us, especially youth.
Including in the housing market. The government does its usual job of messing up the supply side, but that flood of cheap-labour foreigners must live somewhere until we boot them out for fresh meat, so demand has gone crazy, and even if young people somehow find work, they can't afford a house. I wonder if they'll become disillusioned, even radicalized?
With hard times upon us and our governments, what to do? What to do? Call me crazy, but I suggest we abolish ill-disguised slavery and build community instead.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Scores Migration Legal Win From Obama and Biden Judges
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal appeals court on Tuesday declined to halt the implementation of a national registry for noncitizens, delivering a procedural victory for the Trump administration in a case that has drawn sharp criticism from immigrant rights advocates. In a ruling issued in the name of the court as a whole (a "per curiam" order), rather than attributed to a specific judge, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected an emergency request from several advocacy groups to block the Alien Registration Requirement (ARR) while litigation continued. Judges Karen Henderson, Robert Wilkins, and Bradley Garcia—appointed by Presidents Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden, respectively—found that the plaintiffs had not met the "stringent" standard for an injunction, pending appeal. Why This Matters The D.C. Circuit's refusal to pause the ARR means the rule will remain in effect nationwide for months while the appeal plays out. For the Trump administration, the decision represents a step toward reinstating strict enforcement measures grounded in decades-old immigration laws. For immigrant rights groups, it signals an uphill legal battle against a policy they say will deter participation in public life and expose millions to heightened surveillance and potential prosecution. The ruling also underscores that the outcome is not being determined along partisan lines—judges appointed by presidents from both parties agreed the plaintiffs had not met the legal standard for an emergency injunction. People gather at the San Antonio City Hall in protest against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids on June 11, 2025, in San Antonio, Texas. People gather at the San Antonio City Hall in protest against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids on June 11, 2025, in San Antonio, Texas. AFP/Getty Images What To Know The regulation, which took effect April 11 after a lower court ruling, requires all noncitizens aged 14 and older to register their fingerprints and carry an identification card or face potential fines or imprisonment. Younger children must be registered by a parent or guardian and re-register upon turning 14. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) estimates the rule could affect between 2.2 million and 3.2 million people, primarily those who entered the country without documentation. Canadians staying longer than one month also fall under the requirement. The panel's decision on Tuesday leaves in place an April 10 ruling by U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee, who determined that the plaintiffs—Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, United Farm Workers of America, Casa Inc. and Make the Road New York—had not demonstrated that the registry would "erode their core missions" and presented only speculative harm. As the plaintiffs didn't have the required standing, McFadden concluded the court could not decide the merits of the case. Broader 'Self-Deportation' Strategy The plaintiffs argue that the policy—which the Trump administration says aligns immigration enforcement with the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act—is part of a broader "self-deportation" strategy. Carl Berquist, general counsel for the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, told Courthouse News that the measure "melds into the administration's entire self-deportation plan of rolling out these [ICE] raids, repurposing the CBP One app into this CBP Home app with a self-deportation tool and trying to roll out some kinds of incentives for people to take action." The policy had a "severe chilling effect" on noncitizens, Berquist added, implicating "their Fifth Amendment right not to self-incriminate" and "their First Amendment right to assemble and to protest," He described the case as "a little bit below the radar" compared with higher-profile immigration disputes but maintained the harm is "substantial nonetheless." The National Immigration Law Center has also warned that enforcement could lead to increased racial profiling. In a statement, the group said: "While their stated targets are undocumented immigrants, the very mechanics of enforcing registration expand the target to anyone who looks or sounds foreign to law enforcement." Newsweek contacted Carl Berquist and the National Immigration Law Center for comment via email on Thursday outside of regular office hours. What People Are Saying DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said: "The Trump administration will enforce all our immigration laws—we will not pick and choose which laws we will enforce." An emailed statement carried by Courthouse News continued: "We must know who is in our country for the safety and security of our homeland and all Americans." What Happens Next According to DHS, certain categories of immigrants—including green card holders, individuals with removal orders, people holding Employment Authorization Documents, those admitted with visas, border crossing card holders, and others—are already considered registered under existing law. The D.C. Circuit has set an expedited schedule for the case, with the plaintiffs' brief due September 16, the government's response due October 16, and a reply from the plaintiffs due November 6. Oral arguments will follow, with a date to be determined. For now, the ARR remains in effect nationwide, and both sides are preparing for a legal confrontation in the fall that could test the scope of federal authority over noncitizen identification and tracking.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oregon tourism suffers as Canadians boycott US over Trump
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — Canadians are skipping Oregon as a vacation destination this year in light of recent actions made by President Trump. The Oregon Tourism Commission, , recently shared some of the messages they received in response to a handwritten post card campaign meant to engage Canadian visitors. 'We will miss our visit and spending money in your lovely state,' said one person in an email. 'As a Canadian, it's my duty to say 'Sorry', but I'm not sure I mean it.' They said that the words and actions of the president have left them no choice but to boycott U.S. goods and services, in addition to cancelling their travel plans to Oregon. 'Due to your President's ongoing threats of tariffs and even threatening to make our country the '51st state' – a literal threat of annexation – my friends and I have decided to cancel our hotel reservations and move our vacation destination to within Canada instead,' another person said in an email. 'Our original plans to the Oregon coast would have seen our 6 families spend around a week on the beautiful Oregon coast likely spending well over $20,000 in direct investment in your economy. Instead, we will spend that money at home in Canada,' the email said. Another person said they had cancelled the trip they were planning to Washington and Oregon later this year. 'The reason is, you see, your president is waging an unprecedented economic attack on my country, Canada. Canada is the United States' largest customer, we've integrated our economies, and shed blood with each other in global conflicts as allies,' they said. 'And now, our country is under siege by your president. Canadians are angry, and they're acting. They are rapidly shifting to non-U.S. products, and canceling trips to America.' Overall visits to the U.S. from Canada have declined 23.7% since the beginning of the year, according to a July 2025 Oxford Economics Tourism Economics report. International visits to the U.S. have declined across the board, but fallout from Canada has been the steepest. Cities located close to the U.S.-Canadian border are the hardest hit. The steepest year-over-year declines are expected in Seattle, Portland and Detroit, according to the report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Hundreds gather for Handshake Across the Border
Canadians and Americans met at the International Peace Garden at the Manitoba-North Dakota border Saturday for a symbolic handshake. Organizers say the event is a reminder of the enduring connection between the two countries, even amid political tensions.