Trump Announces ‘Deal' to Arm Ukraine via NATO
Sometimes Donald Trump says he didn't mean what he said. His repeated promises to end the Russia-Ukraine war on Day 1 of his second-term or sooner were an 'exaggeration' that he 'said in jest,' he told TIME in April. 'I said that figuratively.'
Other times, Trump has shown that he meant what he said. Despite noncommittal responses on the campaign trail when pressed about whether he'd halt U.S. military support to Ukraine, he insisted that 'Europe is not paying their fair share.' (Europe has allocated more total aid to Ukraine than the U.S. has since Russia's invasion in 2022 and surpassed the U.S. in total military assistance earlier this year, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy's Ukraine Support Tracker.)
On Thursday, Trump announced that he 'just made a deal' to make that happen, telling NBC News that the U.S. will be 'sending weapons to NATO, and NATO is paying for those weapons 100% … then NATO is going to be giving those weapons [to Ukraine].'
The arrangement was reportedly first floated during the recent North Atlantic Treaty Organization Summit, where NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte referred to Trump as Europe's 'daddy' and alliance member states agreed to an increase in defense spending.
Read More: The Man Who Wants to Save NATO
About the plan to use NATO as a middleman for U.S. weapons shipments to Ukraine, a Trump Administration official told Axios that the U.S. is 'not sending weapons to Ukraine' but rather 'sending defensive weapons to NATO' and 'NATO can decide what to do with it.' Another source told Axios that the weapons sold to NATO could include offensive weaponry, not just air defense support.
Hours before Trump's interview with NBC News was published, Rutte posted on X: 'Russia's continued massive attacks against Ukrainian civilians are deplorable. Earlier today I urged leaders to go further so Ukraine has more ammunition & air defences. I've just spoken with President Trump & am now working closely with Allies to get Ukraine the help they need.'
The deal to allow European allies to act as an intermediary for U.S. weapons appears to have come at the suggestion of Ukraine, which Politico reported earlier this month had asked the Trump Administration about the potential for such an arrangement despite usual restrictions on the resale of U.S. weapons.
The request from Ukraine came amid a surprise halt by the Pentagon of direct military support to Ukraine, which apparently even blindsided Trump. The Trump Administration has since resumed sending some weapons to Ukraine directly, as Trump has increasingly expressed frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin over the war's continuation.
'I'm disappointed in Russia, but we'll see what happens over the next couple of weeks,' Trump told NBC News, teasing: 'I think I'll have a major statement to make on Russia on Monday.'
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who met with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov at a Southeast Asian diplomatic summit this week, told reporters: 'We need to see a roadmap moving forward about how this conflict can conclude.'
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
An American Man Is Opening Up About Regretting His Vote For Trump After He Was Stopped By Border Patrol
A California man who alleges border patrol agents racially profiled him during a stop in June said in a story Monday that he feels guilty about voting for President Donald Trump in the last presidential election. 'I truly believe I was targeted because of my race,' Jason Brian Gavidia told NBC affiliate KNBC on Monday. 'I believe I was racially profiled. I believe I was attacked because I was walking while brown. Where is the freedom? Where is the justice? We live in America.' Related: Gavidia is one of five people represented in a class action lawsuit by the ACLU of Southern California accusing the Trump administration of racially profiling people while conducting immigration enforcement activities. Last month, a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to stop indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in seven California counties. However, the administration petitioned the Supreme Court last week to lift the order. Related: A video taken on June 12 and published by the Los Angeles Times days later shows two masked border patrol agents in sunglasses pushing Gavidia against a metal gated fence outside a tow yard. 'I am an American, bro,' Gavidia can be heard saying in the video. Related: 'What hospital were you born in?' an agent yells. 'I don't know, dawg,' Gavidia responds, before offering to show his ID. The lawsuit alleges that border patrol agents twisted Gavidia's arm during the public questioning and took his phone. The border patrol agents eventually let Gavidia go, but he was left traumatized from the experience. 'Every time I see it on video, it's like a bad memory that's in my brain,' Gavidia told KNBC. Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin has issued a series of confusing statements regarding the incident. When reached for comment by the LA Times back in June, she claimed Gavidia had been 'arrested' for assaulting border patrol agents. When the Times noted that Gavidia had not been arrested, McLaughlin backtracked, clarifying he had only been questioned and it was actually his friend who was arrested. On Wednesday, McLaughlin sent another conflicting statement to HuffPost, claiming Gavidia 'was arrested for assaulting a law enforcement officer and interfering with agents during their duties.' HuffPost has reached out for additional clarification. McLaughlin's statement to HuffPost also asserted that 'any allegations that individuals have been 'targeted' by law enforcement because of their skin color are FALSE.' Related: Gavidia is one of many Trump supporters who still got caught up in the president's ruthless immigration enforcement policies, despite voting for him in the last election. He told KNBC he now feels guilty about his vote in the last election and believes 'it was a mistake' because Trump 'ran on lies.' 'If this was going to happen, do you think we would have voted? We're humans. We're not going to destroy our community,' Gavidia said. 'We're not going to destroy our people.'This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
China hawks skeptical of Trump chip deal
Trump on Monday agreed to allow tech giants Nvidia and AMD to secure export licenses to sell their advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips in China in exchange for a 15 percent cut of the profits. The White House said Tuesday that more such deals could be on the table. The unusual deal doesn't just raise legal questions. Experts say the U.S. should be wary of turning over American-made technology that could boost its adversary's AI capabilities, at a time when the two countries are fiercely competing for dominance. The security concerns appear to be a two-way street. China urged tech companies there to avoid any purchase of Nvidia's H20 chip, citing security issues. The move once again has Trump at odds with Congress's China hawks, who argue the administration is shortchanging America's national security interests to make a buck. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (Ill.), the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, in a statement said the most troubling part of the deal was a contradiction at the heart of the policy. 'The administration cannot simultaneously treat semiconductor exports as both a national security threat and a revenue opportunity,' he said. 'By putting a price on our security concerns, we signal to China and our allies that American national security principles are negotiable for the right fee.' The same panel's GOP chair, Rep. John Moolenaar (Mich.), said there are 'questions about the legal basis' for such a deal. 'Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the Government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities,' he said in a statement.
Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
D.C. business leaders warn Trump's crackdown may hurt tourism
Restaurant and hospitality groups are pushing back on President Trump 's depiction of the District as a hotbed of "crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor," saying the city is safe — and open for business. Why it matters: Several D.C. industry leaders say Trump's rhetoric could deter visitors and hurt a tourism economy already affected by the administration's policies and mass federal firings. By the numbers: 48 groups have canceled or changed their D.C. plans since October due to political concerns, Destination D.C. tells Axios. Their estimated economic loss for the city: more than $61 million, based on projected hotel room nights. State of play: The tourism marketing organization is planning outreach to groups that have booked events or are considering them, according to the Washington Business Journal. That includes sharing stats that show D.C. violent crime has hit a 30-year low. The organization is also joining in on the viral " love letter" to D.C. trend, where locals share real-life portrayals of the city. Reality check: Destination D.C. tells Axios that the estimated 2025 losses due to political reasons represent just 2% of the projected revenue generated for the city, "so there is still a lot of positive production happening for the city." Meanwhile, the Restaurant Association Metropolitan Washington (RAMW) has a message ahead of Summer Restaurant Week, which starts Monday: "D.C. is open for business." "Next week is crucial for some to make it through Labor Day," RAMW CEO Shawn Townsend says of the weeklong event, which aims to draw diners to offset a typical August slowdown. "Folks may be thinking, 'Why go Downtown when I can do Restaurant Week in Bethesda or Tysons?'" Zoom in: RAMW is telling its members to promote positivity on social media and talk directly to diners if they cancel reservations: "It's like any major city — be careful — but D.C. is not a war zone." It's not just fear of crime — the armed presence may hurt, too. "If I'm coming in from out of town, I wouldn't want to bring my family to a city that has National Guard on every corner," says Townsend.
