logo
Lake County library leaders expect to see more challenged books

Lake County library leaders expect to see more challenged books

Chicago Tribune22-02-2025

When the Crown Point Community Library underwent a building project at its Winfield branch, workers had to move the branch's bookshelves. After they'd been moved, staff found books that had been hidden.
All books that were found had been challenged, said Julie Wendorf, the library's director and president of the Indiana Library Federation.
'They're mostly LGBTQ materials that are found under the shelves,' Wendorf said. 'It's quite suspicious that they would only be of that topic matter.'
The library has seen other methods to remove challenged books, such as finding them in trashcans.
Library staff have found books that aren't challenged hidden as well. In 2023, a patron asked about Christian books, found them near Islamic books and moved more than 30 books throughout the library, either in between or behind shelves.
Wendorf doesn't expect to see the book challenge trend decrease in the next four years.
'Indiana is not alone in this,' she said. 'It's been an issue in Iowa, Texas and Florida. Many states have some similar trends in book banning and limiting materials at school libraries and public libraries.'
A challenge is an attempt to remove or restrict materials, according to the American Library Association. Books are usually challenged to try to protect children from difficult ideas, according to the ALA. Challenges lead to censorship.
In 2023, Indiana House Enrolled Act 1447 required school libraries to implement a process for people to contest books or other materials that are deemed obscene or harmful to minors, according to Post-Tribune archives. School librarians can be charged with a Level 6 felony if they are determined to have shared harmful materials with children, Wendorf said.
Public libraries were originally included in the legislation.
Wendorf spoke against the act, and the Indiana Library Federal negotiated against public libraries being included.
'The major danger in censorship is you're eliminating access to materials,' Wendorf said. 'The items that typically get challenged could include racial books but also often LGBTQ books. (Censorship is) limiting access to books, and those people can't see themselves represented in books.'
In 2023, the ALA reported a record number of book titles that were challenged, seeing 4,240 unique titles targeted in schools and libraries.
Between Jan. 1 and Aug. 31, 2024, the ALA tracked 414 attempts to censor library materials and services. In those, 1,128 unique titles were challenged.
In Indiana, three attempts were made to challenge books in 2023, with three titles mentioned, according to the ALA.
If patrons have an issue with a book, they can go through the library's reconsideration of materials request. Library staff can connect patrons with the person who bought materials, and after that, patrons can fill out a form that says what their concerns are. Wendorf will look over the form and respond with the library's decision.
Patrons can appeal the decision if they don't find it satisfactory.
Typically, people who hide challenged books aren't submitting reconsideration requests, Wendorf said.
As president of the Indiana Library Federation, Wendorf said she's heard other libraries have issues with missing challenged books.
'I think it's something that happens in a lot of libraries in terms of having materials go missing,' she said. 'But, we do have areas where we have very active book-banning movements.'
The Lake County Public Library has seen challenged books go missing, said Executive Director Carol Daumer Gutjahr, but it's difficult to tell if they're missing on purpose.
For instance, the library has two missing copies of 'To Kill a Mockingbird,' which has been included on the ALA's most challenged books list, most recently in 2020.
'We do see books that are lost all the time, but we don't always know the reason for that,' Daumer Gutjahr said. 'That could be because they were actually lost. Maybe they left it, by accident, at the airport when they went on vacation and can't return it to us. Maybe it was damaged, and the condition is too poor to bring it back, so they've just kept it.'
Daumer Gutjahr is sure that people have purposely taken challenged books to get them off library shelves. Library staff know that popular and challenged books might go missing, and they're going to make every effort to replace them.
'If the intent is to steal it and keep others from reading it, it's not going to work,' she said.
The LCPL doesn't track how many challenged books go missing, Daumer Gutjahr said, but staff can find data on lost books in the system.
The executive director said she thinks large library systems have difficulties tracking challenged books that are missing because they have a larger amount of circulating materials.
The LCPL buys materials that are representative of the community and what patrons might find interesting, Daumer Gutjahr said.
'We're making sure that (materials are) properly balancing subjects within our collection,' she added. 'We want to make sure that we have all viewpoints. We don't want to have anything one-sided, we want people to be able to come in and see the pros and cons.'
Daumer Gutjahr doesn't know if libraries will see issues with more challenged books in the next four years. In 2024, the LCPL didn't see more objections to materials, but it's difficult to tell what the future holds.
'Patron involvement is always welcome, but we will look at any request to remove materials very carefully,' she said. 'We will thoroughly look at it before we make a decision.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge blocks Trump order cutting federal funds to LGBTQ nonprofits
Judge blocks Trump order cutting federal funds to LGBTQ nonprofits

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Judge blocks Trump order cutting federal funds to LGBTQ nonprofits

President Donald Trump's war on 'DEI' — programs promoting diversity, equity and inclusion — suffered a setback Monday in a Bay Area federal court, where a judge blocked attempts to cut off federal funding to nine nonprofits serving the LGBTQ community unless they changed their practices and their vocabulary. 'These provisions seek to strip funding from programs that serve historically disenfranchised populations,' U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar of Oakland said in a ruling requiring continued funding of the Los Angeles LGBT Center, San Francisco AIDS Foundation and other organizations across the country while the case continues. It does not apply to other groups affected by Trump's orders. Those orders require federally funded programs to halt any 'equity-related grants or contracts' and 'programs promoting DEI,' apparently barring any aid to racial, ethnic or gender minorities. Another provision orders them to cut off funding for programs that 'promote gender ideology.' That would mean denying 'the very existence of transgender people,' Joe Hollendoner, executive director of the Los Angeles LGBT Center, said in a filing with the court. 'While the Executive requires some degree of freedom to implement its political agenda, it is still bound by the Constitution,' Tigar, appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama, said in his ruling. That means the administration 'cannot weaponize Congressionally appropriated funds to single out protected communities or suppress ideas that it does not like,' he said. A lawyer for the nonprofits, Jose Abrigo of Lambda Legal, said the ruling halts Trump administration orders 'that seek to erase transgender people from public life, dismantle DEI efforts, and silence nonprofits delivering life-saving services.' 'These policies threatened to erase access to lifesaving HIV and health services for transgender, nonbinary, and queer people across the country,' said Dr. Tyler TerMeer, chief executive officer of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation. 'The Court's action gives us the fuel to keep fighting.' Trump's Justice Department argued that transgender advocacy groups, and not the administration, were the ones violating civil rights by allowing people who were born male to compete with female athletes, use women's restrooms and identify themselves as female. Trump is entitled to 'align government funding and enforcement strategies with (his) policy priorities,' Justice Department attorney Pardis Ghelbi said in a filing asking Tigar to dismiss the lawsuit. But the judge said Monday that the administration's explicit goals — including the denial of transgender people's existence — were 'facially discriminatory' and 'not a legitimate government interest.' Trump's orders require federally funded organizations 'who provide specialized services to transgender persons to remove references to those persons — as well as the characteristics that caused those persons to need the services in the first place,' Tigar said. 'It is as difficult to imagine how this would work as it is to imagine a pediatrician not acknowledging the existence of children, or a gerontologist denying the existence of the elderly.'

Southern Baptists target porn and ‘willful childlessness'
Southern Baptists target porn and ‘willful childlessness'

Chicago Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Southern Baptists target porn and ‘willful childlessness'

Southern Baptists meeting this week in Dallas will be asked to approve resolutions calling for a legal ban on pornography and a reversal of the U.S. Supreme Court's approval of same-sex marriage. The proposed resolutions call for laws on gender, marriage and family based on what they say is the biblically stated order of divine creation. They also call for legislators to curtail sports betting and to support policies that promote childbearing. The Southern Baptist Convention, the nation's largest Protestant denomination, is also expected to debate controversies within its own house during its annual meeting Tuesday and Wednesday — such as a proposed ban on churches with women pastors. There are also calls to defund the organization's public policy arm, whose anti-abortion stance hasn't extended to supporting criminal charges for women having abortions. Southern Baptists narrowly reject formal ban on churches with any women pastorsIn a denomination where support for President Donald Trump is strong, there is little on the advance agenda referencing specific actions by Trump since taking office in January in areas such as tariffs, immigration or the pending budget bill containing cuts in taxes, food aid and Medicaid. Southern Baptists will be meeting on the 40th anniversary of another Dallas annual meeting. An epic showdown took place when a record-shattering 45,000 church representatives clashed in what became a decisive blow in the takeover of the convention — and its seminaries and other agencies — by a more conservative faction that was also aligned with the growing Christian conservative movement in presidential politics. The 1985 showdown was 'the hinge convention in terms of the old and the new in the SBC,' said Albert Mohler, who became a key agent in the denomination's rightward shift as longtime president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. Attendance this week will likely be a fraction of 1985's, but that meeting's influence will be evident. Any debates will be among solidly conservative members. Many of the proposed resolutions — on gambling, pornography, sex, gender and marriage — reflect long-standing positions of the convention, though they are especially pointed in their demands on the wider political world. They are proposed by the official Committee on Resolutions, whose recommendations typically get strong support. A proposed resolution says legislators have a duty to 'pass laws that reflect the truth of creation and natural law — about marriage, sex, human life, and family' and to oppose laws contradicting 'what God has made plain through nature and Scripture.' To some outside observers, such language is theocratic. 'When you talk about God's design for anything, there's not a lot of room for compromise,' said Nancy Ammerman, professor emerita of sociology of religion at Boston University. She was an eyewitness to the Dallas meeting and author of 'Baptist Battles,' a history of the 1980s controversy between theological conservatives and moderates. 'There's not a lot of room for people who don't have the same understanding of who God is and how God operates in the world,' she said. Mohler said the resolutions reflect a divinely created order that predates the writing of the Scriptures and is affirmed by them. He said the Christian church has always asserted that the created order 'is binding on all persons, in all times, everywhere.' Separate resolutions decry pornography and sports betting as destructive, calling for the former to be banned and the latter curtailed. At least some of these political stances are in the realm of plausibility at a time when their conservative allies control all levers of power in Washington and many have embraced aspects of a Christian nationalist agenda. A Southern Baptist, Mike Johnson, is speaker of the House of Representatives and third in line to the presidency. At least one Supreme Court justice, Clarence Thomas, has called for revisiting the 2015 Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide. Other religious conservatives — including some in the Catholic postliberal movement, which has influenced Vice President JD Vance — have promoted the view that a robust government should legislate morality, such as banning pornography while easing church-state separation. And conservatives of various stripes have echoed one of the resolution's call for pro-natalist policies and its decrying of 'willful childlessness which contributes to a declining fertility rate.' Some preconvention talk has focused on defunding the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, the Southern Baptist Convention's public policy arm, which has been accused of being ineffective. Ten former Southern Baptist presidents endorsed its continued funding, though one other called for the opposite. A staunchly conservative group, the Center for Baptist Leadership, has posted online articles critical of the commission, which is adamantly anti-abortion but has opposed state laws criminalizing women seeking abortions. The commission has appealed to Southern Baptists for support, citing its advocacy for religious liberty and against abortion and transgender identity. 'Without the ERLC, you will send the message to our nation's lawmakers and the public at large that the SBC has chosen to abandon the public square at a time when the Southern Baptist voice is most needed,' said a video statement from the commission president, Brent Leatherwood. A group of Southern Baptist ethnic groups and leaders signed a statement in April citing concern over Trump's immigration crackdown, saying it has hurt church attendance and raised fears. 'Law and order are necessary, but enforcement must be accompanied with compassion that doesn't demonize those fleeing oppression, violence, and persecution,' the statement said. The Center for Baptist Leadership, however, denounced the denominational Baptist Press for working to 'weaponize empathy' in its reporting on the statement and Leatherwood for supporting it. Texas pastor Dwight McKissic, a Black pastor who shares many of the Southern Baptist Convention's conservative stances, criticized what he sees as a backlash against the commission, 'the most racially progressive entity in the SBC.' 'The SBC is transitioning from an evangelical organization to a fundamentalist organization,' he posted on the social media site X. 'Fewer and fewer Black churches will make the transition with them.' An amendment to ban churches with women pastors failed in 2024 after narrowly failing to gain a two-thirds supermajority for two consecutive years. It is expected to be reintroduced. The denomination's belief statement says the office of pastor is limited to men, but there remain disagreements over whether this applies only to the lead pastor or to assistants as well. In recent years, the convention began purging churches that either had women as lead pastors or asserted that they could serve that role. But when an SBC committee this year retained a South Carolina megachurch with a woman on its pastoral staff, some argued this proved the need for a constitutional amendment. (The church later quit the denomination of its own accord.) The meeting comes as the Southern Baptist Convention continues its long membership slide, down 2% in 2024 from the previous year in its 18th consecutive annual decline. The organization now reports a membership of 12.7 million members, still the largest among Protestant denominations, many of whom are shrinking faster. More promising are Southern Baptists' baptism numbers — a key spiritual vital sign. They stand at 250,643, exceeding pre-pandemic levels and, at least for now, reversing a long slide.

Scoop: Clearwater snubs Pride, backs faith month with anti-LGBTQ+ ties
Scoop: Clearwater snubs Pride, backs faith month with anti-LGBTQ+ ties

Axios

time4 hours ago

  • Axios

Scoop: Clearwater snubs Pride, backs faith month with anti-LGBTQ+ ties

After several years of commemorating LGBTQ+ Pride Month, Clearwater leaders skipped the recognition this year, instead designating June for the first time as "Faith and Family Month." Why it matters: While the celebration on its face seeks to strengthen families through religion, Faith and Family Month's website denies the existence of transgender people and defines marriage as between a man and a woman. It dismisses climate change and critical race theory — a concept that links racial discrimination to the nation's foundations and legal system — as "false doctrines." And it attributes that belief system to the American Pastor Project, a network of church leaders with a mission to "eradicate Wokeism from the American pulpit." What they're saying: The city "is making a statement that they don't want LGBTQ+ people to be acknowledged [or] respected," said Wendy Vernon, a Clearwater resident and the president and founder of LGBTQ+ advocacy group PFLAG Safety Harbor. "That's definitely very hurtful to the community when they're already being shunned away everywhere," Vernon told Axios. She also questioned why city leaders didn't issue a Pride Month proclamation in addition to Faith and Family Month, as was the case in Lakeland. Between the lines: Proclamations are largely symbolic and typically requested by community organizations or city staff. Clearwater's Diversity Leadership Council, made up of city employees, didn't request a Pride proclamation this year due to disruptive protests at a Pride event last year, city spokesperson Joelle Castelli told Axios. "It was very uncomfortable for the members of the committee as they were personally targeted," she said. Committee members instead invited their colleagues to participate in the St. Pete Pride parade this month and offered free tickets to a Clearwater Threshers game. Driving the news: Faith and Family Month was organized by Christian service nonprofit Somebody Cares Tampa Bay, co-founder Daniel Bernard told Axios. Bernard said he was inspired by a discussion with Clearwater Mayor Bruce Rector, who said he wanted to see a pro-family event in the city. At the request of Somebody Cares, Rector presented the proclamation at the May 15 City Council meeting. His support features prominently in promotional social media posts and on Faith and Family Month's website. "We look forward to … celebrating an entire month with family-friendly activities and talking about how faith can help families be stronger," he says in a promotional video. Reality check: Navigate to the website's "Statement of Faith" page, and a much broader belief system comes into focus. Zoom in:"We recognize God's created order, in making male and female, determined by divine imprint, genetically encoded at conception, and changeless," it says, echoing language used by the Trump and DeSantis administrations to deny rights to transgender people. It goes on to say that pastors have a role "to protect our nation from the deceptions of false teaching and anti-Christ agendas," including abortion, CRT and "climate alarmist theory." The statement is attributed to the American Pastor Project, an organization founded by Lucas Miles, an Indiana-based pastor, conservative activist and author of "Woke Jesus: The False Messiah Destroying Christianity." Rector said the purpose of the proclamation was to encourage people of all different faiths and belief systems to "celebrate the importance of faith and families." Had an organization approached the city with a Pride proclamation, he "probably" would have signed it, he said, adding that he presented one last year. He said he hadn't seen the statement of faith until an Axios reporter showed it to him. He also wasn't familiar with the American Pastor Project, Rector said. "We're not trying to come against anybody or do anything of that nature," Bernard said. "We are just promoting the truth as we understand it."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store