logo
Lake County library leaders expect to see more challenged books

Lake County library leaders expect to see more challenged books

Chicago Tribune22-02-2025
When the Crown Point Community Library underwent a building project at its Winfield branch, workers had to move the branch's bookshelves. After they'd been moved, staff found books that had been hidden.
All books that were found had been challenged, said Julie Wendorf, the library's director and president of the Indiana Library Federation.
'They're mostly LGBTQ materials that are found under the shelves,' Wendorf said. 'It's quite suspicious that they would only be of that topic matter.'
The library has seen other methods to remove challenged books, such as finding them in trashcans.
Library staff have found books that aren't challenged hidden as well. In 2023, a patron asked about Christian books, found them near Islamic books and moved more than 30 books throughout the library, either in between or behind shelves.
Wendorf doesn't expect to see the book challenge trend decrease in the next four years.
'Indiana is not alone in this,' she said. 'It's been an issue in Iowa, Texas and Florida. Many states have some similar trends in book banning and limiting materials at school libraries and public libraries.'
A challenge is an attempt to remove or restrict materials, according to the American Library Association. Books are usually challenged to try to protect children from difficult ideas, according to the ALA. Challenges lead to censorship.
In 2023, Indiana House Enrolled Act 1447 required school libraries to implement a process for people to contest books or other materials that are deemed obscene or harmful to minors, according to Post-Tribune archives. School librarians can be charged with a Level 6 felony if they are determined to have shared harmful materials with children, Wendorf said.
Public libraries were originally included in the legislation.
Wendorf spoke against the act, and the Indiana Library Federal negotiated against public libraries being included.
'The major danger in censorship is you're eliminating access to materials,' Wendorf said. 'The items that typically get challenged could include racial books but also often LGBTQ books. (Censorship is) limiting access to books, and those people can't see themselves represented in books.'
In 2023, the ALA reported a record number of book titles that were challenged, seeing 4,240 unique titles targeted in schools and libraries.
Between Jan. 1 and Aug. 31, 2024, the ALA tracked 414 attempts to censor library materials and services. In those, 1,128 unique titles were challenged.
In Indiana, three attempts were made to challenge books in 2023, with three titles mentioned, according to the ALA.
If patrons have an issue with a book, they can go through the library's reconsideration of materials request. Library staff can connect patrons with the person who bought materials, and after that, patrons can fill out a form that says what their concerns are. Wendorf will look over the form and respond with the library's decision.
Patrons can appeal the decision if they don't find it satisfactory.
Typically, people who hide challenged books aren't submitting reconsideration requests, Wendorf said.
As president of the Indiana Library Federation, Wendorf said she's heard other libraries have issues with missing challenged books.
'I think it's something that happens in a lot of libraries in terms of having materials go missing,' she said. 'But, we do have areas where we have very active book-banning movements.'
The Lake County Public Library has seen challenged books go missing, said Executive Director Carol Daumer Gutjahr, but it's difficult to tell if they're missing on purpose.
For instance, the library has two missing copies of 'To Kill a Mockingbird,' which has been included on the ALA's most challenged books list, most recently in 2020.
'We do see books that are lost all the time, but we don't always know the reason for that,' Daumer Gutjahr said. 'That could be because they were actually lost. Maybe they left it, by accident, at the airport when they went on vacation and can't return it to us. Maybe it was damaged, and the condition is too poor to bring it back, so they've just kept it.'
Daumer Gutjahr is sure that people have purposely taken challenged books to get them off library shelves. Library staff know that popular and challenged books might go missing, and they're going to make every effort to replace them.
'If the intent is to steal it and keep others from reading it, it's not going to work,' she said.
The LCPL doesn't track how many challenged books go missing, Daumer Gutjahr said, but staff can find data on lost books in the system.
The executive director said she thinks large library systems have difficulties tracking challenged books that are missing because they have a larger amount of circulating materials.
The LCPL buys materials that are representative of the community and what patrons might find interesting, Daumer Gutjahr said.
'We're making sure that (materials are) properly balancing subjects within our collection,' she added. 'We want to make sure that we have all viewpoints. We don't want to have anything one-sided, we want people to be able to come in and see the pros and cons.'
Daumer Gutjahr doesn't know if libraries will see issues with more challenged books in the next four years. In 2024, the LCPL didn't see more objections to materials, but it's difficult to tell what the future holds.
'Patron involvement is always welcome, but we will look at any request to remove materials very carefully,' she said. 'We will thoroughly look at it before we make a decision.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Debate Over Banning Social Media For Kids Under 14
Debate Over Banning Social Media For Kids Under 14

Buzz Feed

time35 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Debate Over Banning Social Media For Kids Under 14

Last month, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that he plans to ban social media in France for people under the age of 15. "We cannot wait," he said of the ban. In France, it's a pressing issue: Macron's announcement comes in the wake of the murder of a high school teaching assistant who was stabbed to death by a 14-year-old student, which has stirred up a conversation about the radicalization of children online. His plans involve adding age verification to some sites. Online age verification is a big topic in itself at the moment, with the swift implementation of the United Kingdom's Online Safety Act being implemented across the web. These age checks are ostensibly meant to protect minors from pornographic content and other harmful material, and of course apply to websites such as PornHub; however, the law also includes social media sites like X (Twitter), Reddit, Discord, and Bluesky, as well as sites such as Spotify and YouTube. Sites use methods like ID scanning and "AI" facial recognition software to "verify" users' age. In the wake of the implementation of the OSA in the UK, Americans are growing concerned that age verification will soon be implemented in the US, too. Critics worry that "age verification" is a path to censorship, surveillance, and even broader data harvesting than we have now. ...Which brings us to this little tidbit: in Florida this year, a federal judge blocked the enforcement of a state law that banned social media accounts for children under 14. While the judge appreciated concerns about the effect of social media on kids, he stated that the 2024 law was "likely unconstitutional." tuned in to this general conversation, when I saw this post on the popular Ask Reddit page from user Lola_girl_10 asking, "Do you support banning social media for anyone under 14 years old? Why?" I had to know what people had to say. Here are the best comments from the conversation: "I support it in theory, but how do you implement it? Does it require me to use my government ID to use the internet? I want less surveillance, not more…" "Yes. I mean, most platforms require users to be over 13, but kids half that age are addicted to them. But the Online Safety Act isn't the way to do it." "Let's start with the basics. How do you define social media? Is YouTube social media? Is Reddit? Are forums like Stack Exchange or GitHub social media? How about online video games? Niche platforms for marginalized and vulnerable populations?" "No, because we don't live in a world where anyone proposing this type of legislation cares about protecting children. Every single one of these proposals is nothing but a power grab that will be used to further eliminate privacy and control free speech." "Parental controls are available for things like this." "I don't support it because that requires age verification, and that makes it impossible to be anonymous." "In theory, yes. Social media, in my opinion, is like a drug, one to be used responsibly when you have a level of brain development that understands the impact it's having." "Yes, and I think we should also ban online gaming for young children." "Ban phones from schools and classrooms; otherwise, it'll take a cultural shift of parents actually parenting instead of handing their toddler a tablet as soon as they can be entertained by it. Any laws requiring ID or verification should be avoided." "Honestly? I support torching all 'social' media to the ground and salting the earth. They are evil. Facebook and Twitter data centers ought to be nuked." "Not at the expense of my privacy or risking my identity." "I don't support it in the way the UK has just done it. Neither the government nor corporations should be invading the privacy of citizens to make up for the failures of bad parents." "Probably. I listened to a podcast once that made the point that we massively restrict all these things that we know are bad for kids — alcohol, tobacco, etc. — but when it comes to social media, we do nothing, despite research showing a clear link between social media use and child/adolescent suicide." "Yes. But my kids are already banned. If you let your kids loose on the internet, then you're a bad parent." "I have two 13-year-olds and we have explained to them in great detail why they are not allowed to use social media. They. Do. Not. Need. It." "Yes, 100%. But 18 would be better. 'Social'-focused media like Instagram and Facebook are a societal cancer." "Yes, I support banning social media for kids under 14 — and not in a 'boomer killjoy' way, but a protect-your-brain-before-it's-fried kinda way." "No. And I'm not falling into the 'but it's the children!' trap either. The current actions are to establish control, and I feel like it's happening everywhere at the same time, from Australia to the EU and the UK to the US, as if it is a coordinated thing." "Yeah, I support banning social media for anyone under 14 because at that age, kids often aren't emotionally ready to handle the pressure, comparison, and potential dangers online. Giving them more time to develop offline social skills and confidence can help protect their mental health." And finally: "I'm just glad I grew up on the net before all this." So, what do you think about curbing kids' access to social media? Is it a terrible idea, a great idea, or perhaps a good idea that's pretty much unenforceable? I want to hear all your thoughts and opinions in the comments below — or, if you want to write in but you prefer to stay anonymous, you can check out this anonymous form: Who knows — your comment could be included in a future BuzzFeed article. Please note: some comments have been edited for length and/or clarity.

He Stalked Her for 12 Years — Culminating in 14 Hours of Terror Inside a Soundproof Bunker
He Stalked Her for 12 Years — Culminating in 14 Hours of Terror Inside a Soundproof Bunker

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

He Stalked Her for 12 Years — Culminating in 14 Hours of Terror Inside a Soundproof Bunker

Samantha Stites is speaking out about her experience after surviving a kidnapping in 2022 NEED TO KNOW Samantha Stites spoke to ABC News ahead of Hulu's Stalking Samantha: 13 Years of Terror, about her harrowing experience Christopher Thomas pleaded guilty to kidnapping, torture and aggravated stalking in December 2023 Thomas is serving a minimum of 40 years in a Michigan state prison A Michigan woman lived through a nightmare when she was stalked for years by a man who later kidnapped and tortured her. Now, after her stalker was sentenced to decades in prison, Samantha Stites is telling her story. Speaking to ABC News ahead of a Hulu documentary series about the case, Stalking Samantha: 13 Years of Terror, Stites says she first thought her stalker was just "lonely." "At first I think he is just lonely and for some reason finds me an approachable person to talk to," Stites told the outlet. "And then at some point, it kind of changes." According to Michigan prison records, Christopher Thomas, 41, is currently serving a minimum of 40 years behind bars, and faces a maximum of 60 years. Prison records show that that Thomas pleaded guilty to kidnapping, torture and aggravated stalking in December 2023. ABC reported that Thomas first started stalking Stites in 2011, when he went to the same Christian group she attended while she was a college student. Thomas eventually began following Stites for years, going so far as to place GPS trackers on her in 2022, WPBN reported, Thomas was arrested after he kidnapped Stites and held her in a soundproof storage unit for almost 15 hours. Stites was able to escape after convincing her captor to let her go by promising not to report the crime, ABC reported. Thomas was sentenced in 2024 after pleading guilty in December 2023. "Justice is a funny thing. It doesn't necessarily come in the form of prison years," Stites said, according to ABC. "I can't ever go back to before I was kidnapped. And that's something I had to grieve. But knowing that I'm finally turning the page on this and that I should feel safe with him off the street and that I am protected meant a lot. I felt free." Read the original article on People

Teacher at private Christian school arrested after allegedly having sex with child
Teacher at private Christian school arrested after allegedly having sex with child

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Teacher at private Christian school arrested after allegedly having sex with child

A teacher at a private Christian school in Virginia was arrested after allegedly having sex with a child, according to police. Katelin Campbell, a 34-year-old English teacher at the 7th-12th grade CH Friend School in Halifax County, was arrested Thursday and charged with having consensual sex with a child 15 years or older, state prosecutors said, according to WSET. Campbell was fired immediately after the allegations were brought up to school officials, who then reported it to the police. 'We chose integrity instead of it being swept under the rug. Scripture is very clear that if it was done in the dark, it was going to be brought to light,' headmistress Dana Jones told WSET. Advertisement Campbell was arrested Thursday in relation to child sex crimes in Halifax County. Blue Ridge Regional Jail Campbell was an English teacher at CH Friend School. CH Friend School 'We understand that taking it to the police department, it was going to come shine a light on us. We took what we were told to them and let them carry on with their investigation.' Jones would not say whether or not the victim was a student at the CH Friend School. Advertisement Campbell is additionally charged with taking indecent liberties with a child by a person in a custodial relationship. She was booked at the Halifax County Adult Detention Center and was released on bond.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store