‘J&K downgrade without precedent': Rahul, Kharge push for statehood in Monsoon Session; demand 6th schedule status for Ladakh
NEW DELHI: Congress leaders
Rahul Gandhi
and
Mallikarjun Kharge
on Wednesday wrote a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, calling for the immediate restoration of full statehood to Jammu and Kashmir. In a joint letter, they described the demand as a "legitimate" and "constitutional" aspiration of the people.
'This demand is both legitimate and firmly grounded in their constitutional and democratic rights. It is important to recognise that while there have been instances of Union Territories being granted statehood in the past, the case of Jammu and Kashmir is without precedent in independent India. This is the first time a full-fledged state has been downgraded to a Union Territory following its bifurcation," the letter read.
The Congress leaders reminded the Prime Minister of his repeated promises to restore statehood, including public statements made in Bhubaneswar in May 2024 and at a rally in Srinagar in September the same year.
The letter also referred to the government's assurances before the Supreme Court during hearings on Article 370, in which it pledged to reinstate statehood 'at the earliest and as soon as possible.'
In addition to demanding legislation for Jammu and Kashmir, the letter urged the Centre to bring forward a bill to include Ladakh under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. 'This would be a significant step towards addressing the cultural, developmental, and political aspirations of the people of Ladakh, while safeguarding their rights, land, and identity,' it stated.
The letter comes ahead of the
Monsoon Session of Parliament
, which begins July 21.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
30 minutes ago
- Hans India
SP Leader Sparks Outrage By Linking Uttarakhand Floods To Bulldozer Action On Religious Sites
Samajwadi Party leader ST Hasan has ignited a major political controversy by drawing connections between the devastating flash floods in Uttarakhand and the government's bulldozer operations targeting religious structures in the state. His inflammatory comments have triggered widespread condemnation across party lines, with critics accusing him of exploiting natural disasters for political gain and spreading communal discord. The contentious remarks emerged in response to the catastrophic cloudburst incident in Uttarakashi that resulted in five fatalities. Hasan's attempt to correlate the natural calamity with demolition activities against places of worship has been met with fierce backlash from various political quarters, including both ruling and opposition parties who have denounced the statement as inappropriate and divisive. Congress Member of Parliament Imran Masood delivered a particularly harsh rebuke, describing such statements as the product of mental instability. He emphasized that individuals making such inflammatory remarks should fear divine retribution and avoid spreading hatred through their words. His criticism reflects the broader political consensus against using natural disasters as fodder for communal polarization. Despite facing intense criticism from multiple directions, Hasan has remained steadfast in defending his controversial position. He expanded his argument beyond the immediate incident, claiming that various natural calamities are occurring due to severe ecosystem damage and indiscriminate deforestation practices. The SP leader argued that regardless of religious affiliation—whether Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, or Christian—all believers share faith in a divine creator, and consequently, places of worship including mosques, dargahs, and temples should remain protected from bulldozer operations. While acknowledging that authorities might evacuate such structures if necessary, he insisted they should be allowed to remain standing. The backlash against Hasan's statements has been particularly severe from the Bharatiya Janata Party leadership. Uttar Pradesh minister Danish Azad Ansari condemned the remarks as completely inappropriate, arguing that mocking such tragic events does not suit leaders of the Samajwadi Party. He criticized what he perceived as an attempt to score political points even during tragic circumstances, calling upon SP leadership to demonstrate greater sensitivity toward human suffering. BJP spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari launched an even more scathing attack, accusing Hasan of deliberately communalizing what should be treated as a natural tragedy. He alleged that the former SP parliamentarian was insulting Hindu communities while simultaneously downplaying the genuine suffering of Uttarkashi's Dharali village residents who bore the brunt of the cloudburst disaster. Bhandari's criticism highlighted what he characterized as the Samajwadi Party's tendency to view even death and disaster through the lens of Hindu-Muslim divisions. The controversy has exposed deeper fault lines in Indian political discourse, particularly regarding the intersection of environmental issues, religious sensitivities, and political opportunism. While Hasan's concerns about deforestation and ecosystem damage reflect legitimate environmental issues that contribute to natural disasters, his decision to link these concerns with religious demolitions has been widely perceived as crossing acceptable boundaries of political commentary. Environmental experts and disaster management specialists have long warned that uncontrolled development, deforestation, and climate change are increasing the frequency and severity of natural disasters in mountainous regions like Uttarakhand. However, the scientific consensus focuses on these measurable factors rather than drawing connections to religious or political activities unrelated to environmental degradation. The timing of Hasan's remarks has also contributed to the intensity of the backlash, coming as rescue operations were still underway and families were grieving their losses. Political analysts note that exploiting human tragedy for partisan purposes typically generates negative public reaction across ideological lines, as demonstrated by the cross-party condemnation of his statements. The incident reflects broader challenges facing Indian politics, where natural disasters and national tragedies sometimes become vehicles for advancing partisan agendas rather than opportunities for unified response and genuine problem-solving. The controversy surrounding Hasan's remarks illustrates how quickly legitimate policy discussions about environmental protection and religious rights can be overshadowed by inflammatory rhetoric that prioritizes political scoring over constructive dialogue. The widespread rejection of Hasan's comments by leaders across the political spectrum suggests that there remain certain boundaries in Indian political discourse that are considered inviolable, particularly when it comes to exploiting human suffering for electoral or ideological advantage. However, the incident also highlights ongoing tensions between secular governance and religious sensitivities that continue to influence political debates in contemporary India.
The Wire
30 minutes ago
- The Wire
Form 6: Rahul Gandhi's Mahadevpura Exposé Puts Focus Back on Maharashtra's 40.8 Lakh Additions
In this image via AICC, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi addresses the party's 'Vote Adhikar Rally', at Freedom Park in Bengaluru, Friday, Aug. 8, 2025. Photo: AICC via PTI.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Be transparent and release digital voter rolls': Rahul Gandhi steps up attack on EC; launches ‘Vote Chori' website
NEW DELHI: Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Sunday escalated his confrontation with the Election Commission of India (ECI), accusing it of undermining the democratic process and launching a dedicated platform to mobilise public support. In a post on X, Rahul wrote: 'Vote Chori is an attack on the foundational idea of 'one man, one vote'. A clean voter roll is imperative for free and fair elections. Our demand from the EC is clear – be transparent and release digital voter rolls so that people and parties can audit them. Join us and support our demand – visit [ or give a missed call on 9650003420. This fight is to protect our democracy.' The move follows his recent allegations that the 2024 Lok Sabha elections were 'choreographed' by the EC to benefit the BJP, which he described as 'immune to anti-incumbency.' Citing Congress' internal analysis, Gandhi said the party had expected to win 16 seats in Karnataka but secured only nine. He claimed a detailed review of seven unexpected losses pointed to massive 'vote theft' in Mahadevapura constituency, involving 100,250 votes stolen through duplicate entries, fake addresses and bulk registrations at single locations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Unsold 2021 Cars Now Almost Free - Prices May Surprise You Unsold Cars | Search Ads Learn More Undo 'This is Election Commission data. Interestingly, they haven't denied the information. They haven't told the voter list that Rahul Gandhi is talking about is wrong. Why don't you say it's wrong? Because you know the truth. You know that we know that you have done this across the country,' Gandhi said at a press conference last week. The poll body has repeatedly pushed back, urging Gandhi to submit a signed declaration under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, along with names of the alleged duplicate voters. In a statement on Saturday, the ECI said he should 'either give a Declaration as per rules or apologise to the country for his false allegations.' Sources argued that if Gandhi truly believed his claims, he should have no hesitation in signing, ANI reported. The BJP also hit back, with its national spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia accusing the Congress of blaming institutions for electoral defeats without producing evidence. Karnataka Minister G Parameshwara, however, backed Gandhi, saying the state Congress unit would lodge a formal complaint on his behalf. Sharad Pawar, chief of the NCP-SCP, also lent weight to Gandhi's concerns, recalling that two individuals had approached him before the Maharashtra Assembly elections claiming they could guarantee 160 seats out of 288 – an offer both he and Gandhi rejected as 'not our path.'
