logo
Nippon Steel acquires US Steel for $14.9bn after months of struggle

Nippon Steel acquires US Steel for $14.9bn after months of struggle

Al Jazeera11 hours ago

Nippon Steel's $14.9bn acquisition of US Steel has conferred an unusual degree of power for United States President Donald Trump after the Japanese company's 18-month struggle to close the purchase.
The deal closed on Wednesday, the companies said.
Under the deal terms, Nippon bought 100 percent of US Steel shares at $55 per share which was first used in December 2023. A news release on the filing also discloses details of a national security agreement inked with the Trump administration, which gives Trump the authority to name a board member, as well as a non-economic golden share.
Eiji Hashimoto, Nippon Steel's chairman and CEO, thanked the president for his role. He said that Nippon Steel agreed to represent an unusual level of control conceded by the companies to the government to save the deal, after a rocky path to approval spurred by high-level political opposition.
The golden share gives the US government veto authority over a host of corporate decisions, from idling plants to cutting production capacity and moving jobs overseas, as previewed in a weekend social media post by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
The share also gives the government a veto over a potential relocation of US Steel's headquarters from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a transfer of jobs overseas, a name change, and any potential future acquisition of a rival business, the release shows.
The inclusion of the golden share to win approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, which scrutinises foreign investment for national security risks, could drive overseas investors away from US companies, national security lawyers said on Monday.
The acquisition will give US Steel $11bn in investment through 2028, including $1bn for a new US mill that will increase by $3bn in later years.
It will also allow Nippon Steel, which is the world's fourth-largest steel company, to capitalise on a host of American infrastructure projects while its foreign competitors face steel tariffs of 50 percent.
The Japanese firm also avoids the $565m in breakup fees it would have had to pay if the companies had failed to secure approvals.
Nippon Steel said on Wednesday that its annual crude steel production capacity is expected to reach 86 million tonnes, bringing it closer to Nippon Steel's global strategic goal of 100 million tonnes of capacity.
The president described Nippon Steel as a 'great partner'. After the United Steelworkers union came out against the deal last year, both then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, and Trump, a Republican, expressed their opposition as they sought to woo voters in Pennsylvania, a key swing state, in the presidential election campaign.
Shortly before leaving office in January, Biden blocked the deal on national security grounds, prompting lawsuits by the companies, which argued the national security review they received was biased. The Biden White House disputed the charge. The steel companies saw a new opportunity in the Trump administration, which opened a new 45-day national security review into the proposed merger in April.
But Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple 'investment' in US Steel by the Japanese firm to floating a minority stake for Nippon Steel, spurred confusion.
Trump's May 30 rally spurred hopes of approval, and sign-off finally came on Friday with an executive order permitting the companies to combine if they signed an NSA giving the US government a golden share, which they did.
The markets responded positively to the news. Nippon Steel, which is traded under the ticker NPSCY, is up 2.7 percent from the market open as of 11:00am in New York (15:00 GMT).

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Nobody knows what I'm going to do': Trump embraces ambiguity towards Iran
‘Nobody knows what I'm going to do': Trump embraces ambiguity towards Iran

Al Jazeera

time5 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

‘Nobody knows what I'm going to do': Trump embraces ambiguity towards Iran

President Donald Trump has continued to offer mixed signals about whether the United States would directly intervene in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran, which has seen six days of intense bombing. The Republican leader began his Wednesday on the White House lawn, where he installed two giant flagpoles, each 88 feet — or 27 metres — high. During that appearance, however, he was confronted with the question looming over the Middle East conflict: Would the US join Israel in striking Iran's nuclear facilities? 'You don't know that I'm going to even do it,' Trump told one reporter. 'I may do it. I may not do it. Nobody knows what I'm going to do. I can tell you this: Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate.' Later, as he posed for photographs in the Oval Office with the Juventus football club, Trump once again signalled he had not made up his mind — and was unlikely to do so until the last possible moment. ' I have ideas as to what to do, but I haven't made a final [call],' Trump said. 'I like to make a final decision one second before it's due, you know? Because things change, especially with war. Things change with war. It can go from one extreme to the other.' That ambiguity over whether the US may enter the fray has fed uncertainty within the conflict — and led to controversy on the domestic front for Trump. Some Republicans and Democrats have introduced legislation to limit Trump's ability to engage in the fighting between Iran and Israel. Meanwhile, conservative commentator Tucker Carlson has published a video interview he recorded with right-wing Senator Ted Cruz, where the two Trump supporters sparred over whether the US should push for regime change in Iran. Trump himself was asked to weigh in on their debate on Wednesday from the Oval Office. The president signalled that he was sympathetic to Carlson's desire to keep the US out of a costly foreign conflict — but with a caveat. 'I don't want to fight either. I'm not looking to fight,' Trump said. 'But if it's a situation between fighting and them having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do. Maybe we won't have to fight. Don't forget: We haven't been fighting.' The Trump administration has described Israel's initial strike on June 13 as a 'unilateral action'. But the president himself has signalled that he knew of the attack in advance and supported Israel's military campaign. In testimony to Congress, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers that the US military would be ready if called upon. 'President Trump's word means something. The world understands that,' Hegseth said. 'And at the Defence Department, our job is to stand ready and prepared with options. And that's precisely what we're doing.' The current conflict, Trump has repeatedly argued, would have never begun if Iran had agreed to US terms for limiting its nuclear programme. US officials had been meeting with their Iranian counterparts since April to talk about limiting Iran's enrichment of uranium, a necessary step for building a nuclear weapon. But Iran has long denied any ambitions of building a nuclear arsenal and has instead maintained that its uranium is used for civilian energy purposes only. Still, Trump tied the ongoing conflict with Israel to the fear that Iran had gotten close to building a bomb. He warned that, if Iran had a nuclear weapon, 'the entire world will blow up'. 'I've been saying for 20 years, maybe longer, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I've been saying it for a long time, and I think they were a few weeks away from having one,' Trump said on Wednesday. In March, however, Trump's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, testified before Congress that the US intelligence community had assessed 'Iran is not building a nuclear weapon'. She has since walked back that comment, calling her position in line with the president's. Critics have warned that Trump may be building the case for US involvement in the conflict between Israel and Iran by highlighting the risk of Iran's uranium enrichment facilities. Israel too has pointed to the possibility of an Iranian nuclear weapon as its rationale for launching the first strike. A US ally, Israel is widely believed to have its own undisclosed nuclear arsenal. Negotiations with the US, however, came to standstill after Israel's June 13 strike, which spiralled into a heated exchange of missile fire. A scheduled meeting over the weekend was cancelled, and some of Iran's representatives in the nuclear talks were killed in the initial blasts, as were military leaders and scientists. Trump bemoaned the failure of those talks again on Wednesday, blaming Iran for failing to comply with a 60-day deadline he set in April. 'Why didn't you negotiate with me before all this death and destruction?' Trump asked. 'I said to people: Why didn't you negotiate with me two weeks ago? You could have done fine. You would've had a country. It's very sad to watch this.' He confirmed that Iranian officials had reached out to him for a White House meeting since the outbreak of the recent conflict. 'I said it's very late to be talking,' Trump told reporters, relaying his reply. ' There's a big difference between now and a week ago.' Trump's own words in recent days have fuelled fears that the conflict could escalate into a regional war. Just a day prior, on Tuesday, Trump publicly mused that he could kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and called for the country's 'unconditional surrender'. Iran has since responded to Trump's remarks. In an interview with CNN host Christiane Amanpour, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht Ravanchi dismissed reports that his officials were trying to get negotiations with the US back on track. 'We are not reaching out to anybody. We are defending ourselves,' Ravanchi said. 'We can negotiate under the threats. We cannot negotiate while our people are under bombardment every day. So we are not begging for anything.' 'If the Americans get involved directly, definitely our hands will not be tied. We will do whatever is necessary to protect our people and our interests.' Khamenei himself said US involvement in the conflict would have 'serious irreparable consequences' and denounced Trump's threats. Trump himself on Wednesday offered different interpretations of how he saw the conflict ending, the first coming in his appearance on the White House lawn, where he repeated his call for 'unconditional surrender'. 'Unconditional surrender: That means I've had it. OK? I've had it. I give up. No more. Then we go blow up all the nuclear stuff that's all over the place there,' Trump said, again blaming Iran for the fighting. 'They had bad intentions. For 40 years, they've been saying: Death to America! Death to Israel! Death to anybody else that they didn't like. They were bullies. They were schoolyard bullies, and now they're not bullies anymore.' Later, in the Oval Office, Trump indicated the conflict could be resolved simply by assuring Iran did not get its hands on a nuclear weapon. 'We're not looking for ceasefire. We're looking for a total complete victory. You know what the victory is? No nuclear weapon.' He warned that the upcoming week would 'be very big' — though he shared no details about what that meant for the future of the conflict. The death toll in Iran has reportedly risen to 240 people, including 70 women and children.

Russia warns United States against direct attacks on Iran
Russia warns United States against direct attacks on Iran

Qatar Tribune

time7 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Russia warns United States against direct attacks on Iran

Russia has warned the United States against direct involvement on Israel's side in the conflict with Iran. 'It would be a step that would radically destabilize the whole situation,' said Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov at the St Petersburg International Economic Forum, according to the Russian Interfax news agency. Even speculation over US participation is dangerous, the diplomat said. Russia has criticized Israel sharply over its strikes against Iran, accusing the Israeli leadership of leading the world to the brink of a nuclear catastrophe. Moscow and Tehran are seen as close partners in the Middle East. Attacks were continuing on Wednesday, with the world awaiting a decision by President Donald Trump on whether the US will join Israel's strikes on Iran. (DPA)

Trump on Iran: ‘Nobody knows what I'm going to do'
Trump on Iran: ‘Nobody knows what I'm going to do'

Qatar Tribune

time7 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Trump on Iran: ‘Nobody knows what I'm going to do'

US President Donald Trump is not committing to a clear course of action regarding Iran. 'Nobody knows what I'm going to do,' Trump said on Wednesday in front of the White House when asked if he was considering a US strike against Iranian nuclear facilities. 'I may do it. I may not do it,' said Trump. The US President reiterated his demand for Iran's 'unconditional surrender,' but on the other hand, he did not completely rule out further negotiations. He said it was not too late. Trump stated that Tehran has 'a lot of trouble.' He criticized the fact that a solution could have been found earlier. He emphasized that there was 'a big difference between now and a week ago.' Trump claimed that the Iranian side had even suggested coming to the White House. 'That's ... courageous, but you know, it's ... not easy for them to do, but they suggested [it].' (DPA)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store