
The Storage Scam: How Apple, Google and Samsung overcharge you for storage
It was a beautiful early May weekend in the Polish capital of Warsaw and just as I was taking yet another video from a rooftop bar with stunning views, I got the message that storage has once again run out on the iPhone 15 Pro I was using.
Ah! No better feeling that cleaning up storage on my phone during my vacation, right?
Sarcasm aside, I kind of accepted that in that moment as an inevitable fact of life and it only clicked in my mind a couple of days later that life... doesn't really need to be this hard!
The iPhone 15 Pro I was using was the base 128GB model, purchased for a cool $1,000 in 2024. No matter which way you look at it, $1,000 is a lot of money. It should have bought me a stress-free phone for the next few years.
As all good things in life, my vacation was soon over, and I was back at the PhoneArena headquarters engulfed in new phone releases on my reviewer's desk. The two most recent ones right next to me were the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Motorola Edge 60.
And it hit me: the CMF Phone 2 Pro is a $280 dirt cheap phone and EVEN THAT has twice as much storage as my iPhone! That doesn't seem right!
The CMF Phone 2 Pro costs less than $300 and has double the storage my $1,000 iPhone has
I then quickly checked the specs of the Motorola Edge 60 (a beautiful phone that is unfortunately not coming to the US). And what do you know — that $400 phone had 512GB of storage!
I didn't just get angry. I levelled up. I suddenly felt like my $1,000 iPhone was that packet of chips, you open it and it's 85% air.
Yeah... Looking at it this way, flagship phone pricing looks like, well, a scam.
Maybe not legally (phone makers are way too smart for that!). You are technically getting exactly what is advertized and the prices are transparent, so you have no grounds to sue anyone. But knowing that the real cost difference between 128GB of storage and 512GB of storage is around $10 and you are asked to pay $250... well, this type of profiteering feels like it SHOULD NOT BE LEGAL.
Heck, remember when the European Union banned the Lightning cable for a good reason? We all cheered that. Now, maybe we can have some legal limits on profiteering off of storage prices too. Please?
Honestly, I wish we could.
But phone makers have made one clever calculation that makes this impossible.
See, the phone manufacturers are well aware of the main reason why people buy expensive phones and they are guarding that premium feature very carefully, not letting it arrive to cheaper devices. And that secret sauce is all about the camera. Look at all the budget phones around you, do you notice the common thread? None of them has a great camera!
Also, almost no budget phone has a telephoto camera. It's no coincidence. Again, a telephoto camera is not an expensive component, it is not there ON PURPOSE.
This basically allows flagships to always stand out, no matter their cost. Want a good camera? Get a premium flagship. Want a telephoto camera? Come to the dark side and spend at least a $1,000.
And what do you do when you satisfy the most pressing user need (good camera quality)? That's right — you "maximize profits" once again.
So when you arrive at phones-with-good-cameras territory, you suddenly see that all of them are suddenly deprived of... storage. An artificial scarcity to squeeze even more out of those users that are willing to pay more for a camera phone.
We know that Trump's favorite word is "tariffs", but I bet phone maker CEOs far prefer "maximizing profits".
The sad part of all this is that we could have had a perfect camera phone for well under $500 for decades now. But instead of phone pricing falling to a more sensible level, we see this agreement across the industry to preserve profits, maximize them and overcharge customers a bit more every year.
And the only way to avoid that is sadly just to... pay up for a good amount of storage! And then keep your phone for as long as possible. But do let me know if you have better ideas in the comments, I certainly wouldn't mind hearing them.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
iPhone 17 unlikely to be part of Apple's rebrand this year
*Image credit — Majin Bu Apple is apparently going to announce a rebranding of its operating systems at this year's WWDC ( Worldwide Developers Conference ) event in June. However, industry insider Mark Gurman shares in his newsletter Power On that the company is highly unlikely to rename the iPhone 17 as operating systems — including iOS, macOS, iPadOS, and visionOS — will be numbered after current years from now on. To be precise, the operating systems will carry the number of the coming year, similar to how car manufacturers Gurman notes, is probably to give Apple more wiggle room for small software updates every now and then. Also, from a purely marketing perspective, this will make the company's software sound more the iPhone 17 , which will be coming out later this year, is unlikely to be renamed to the iPhone 26. Samsung has done that already with its Galaxy phones when it jumped straight to the Galaxy S20 series for 2020. Gurman believes that consumers are a lot more conscious of the iPhone naming convention, and that this change would be too jarring. Secondly, Apple wouldn't want its phone names to be tied to years because then an older iPhone would feel even more outdated. It's a game of the subconscious and there might be some truth to it, in my opinion. To be fair, Apple did skip the iPhone 9 for the iPhone X. | Image credit — PhoneArena Apple's renaming of its operating systems is part of a much larger rebranding effort at play. The company is redesigning all of its operating systems for an even more consistent experience across its multiple platforms that make up the Apple ecosystem. If reports are to be believed, then the new operating systems will be inspired by visionOS for the Apple Vision also believes that the renaming will help Apple divert focus at WWDC 2025. By making it seem like the software is undergoing major improvements, the attendees may not dwell on how far behind Apple is lagging in AI. Both Samsung and Google — Apple's largest smartphone competitors in the U.S. — offer a much more robust AI experience on their devices. New name or not, the iPhone 17 series will also see design changes and feature 12 GB of RAM as standard, except perhaps for the base model.


GSM Arena
2 hours ago
- GSM Arena
The Realme GT 7 is the new battery life king in our lab tests
Sagar, 01 June 2025 Realme launched the global GT 7 today at an event in Paris, France, a few hours ago. It packs a 7,000 mAh Si/C battery, which is 200 mAh smaller than its Chinese counterpart, but still helped the smartphone become the new battery life king in our lab tests. Realme GT 7 5G We ran our standard tests on the global Realme GT 7 and found it to have an excellent battery life. It achieved an endurance of 30:58 hours for audio calls, 21:37 hours for web browsing, 26:13 hours for video playback, and 12:48 hours for gaming, ultimately managing a total Active Use Score of 21:06 hours, which is currently the highest in our new battery life ratings. The Realme GT 7 is followed by the Apple iPhone 16 Plus and iQOO 13 with Active Use Scores of 18:49 and 18:03 hours, respectively. The global Realme GT 7 Pro, having a 6,500 mAh battery (the Indian model has a 5,800 mAh cell), is fifth on the list with an Active Use Score of 17:31 hours. You can check the complete list here. Realme GT 7 (global model) Realme GT 7 Pro After that, you can read our global Realme GT 7's review here to learn more about it. Its key highlights include the Dimensity 9400e SoC, a 6.78" 120Hz LTPO AMOLED display, a 50MP primary camera, and 120W charging. vivo iQOO 13


GSM Arena
a day ago
- GSM Arena
Apple now rumored to be developing haptic buttons for iPhones, iPads and Apple Watches
Apple has been rumored quite a few times to be developing haptic buttons for iPhones, but obviously they haven't yet launched. Now, a new rumor claims that not only has Apple restarted the haptic button project for future iPhones, but the company has allegedly expanded its reach to also include iPads and Apple Watches. So it pretty much seems like Apple is now going all-in with haptic buttons, for better or worse. Obviously, it thinks their advantages are worth it. These solid-state "buttons" which technically aren't actual buttons reduce mechanical wear (to zero, since they don't move at all), while also letting you (or Apple) set different functionalities for a light press and firm press, or a short press and a long press, or all of the above. Haptic buttons were rumored for the iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max most recently, but plans were allegedly shelved. And now, the shelf is open and development is on the way again, of course, if this rumor is accurate. It doesn't tell us when to expect haptic buttons to reach Apple's products, so it's probably safe to bet that it won't be happening this year. According to the source of this rumor, the reason why Apple hasn't yet launched any devices with haptic buttons is that it hasn't quite cracked the issue of mistouches. Maybe now it will be able to fix it - in time for the iPhone 18 family perhaps? Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Source (in Chinese)