logo
An attack on the medical establishment buried in an 1,800-page regulation

An attack on the medical establishment buried in an 1,800-page regulation

Boston Globe6 days ago
Medicare officials have been loath to change it because it has spared them from needing their own staff and budget to make such pricing decisions, along with the unpleasant politics of adjudicating conflicts between competing groups of physicians.
But a change buried inside a 1,803-page proposed regulation published last Monday suggests the Trump administration would like to move away from this longstanding system. If finalized, it could begin overturning a process that has entrenched pay advantages for certain kinds of doctors.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'We're modernizing Medicare by correcting outdated assumptions in how physician services are valued,' said Chris Klomp, a deputy administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, in an email.
Advertisement
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of health and human services, has emphasized that medicine should focus more on primary care and prevention, and less on the treatment of advanced diseases. He has also crusaded against 'corporate medicine,' and has specifically criticized the American Medical Association. Stat News reported in November that Kennedy was considering policies to disempower the AMA committee.
Advertisement
Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, the AMA's president, was highly critical of the proposed change.
'The American Medical Association believes that proposals to exclude or limit the input of expert practicing physicians and health care professionals in the development of Medicare payment policy would ultimately harm patients and represents a radical departure from the time-tested CMS decision-making process,' he said in a statement.
The current AMA committee, known as the RUC, uses data gathered in surveys of doctors to set formulas for every kind of medical care. The committee suggests payment rates to Medicare's regulators, who almost always adopt them. The system is effectively zero-sum — any increases for one kind of doctor represents decreases for others. While private insurers are free to develop their own formulas for paying doctors, they tend to follow Medicare's lead, making the committee very influential on what kinds of medical care get the largest (and smallest) financial rewards.
The estimates are often outdated. Existing payments are reviewed on average only once every 17 years. A Washington Post investigation in 2013 reported on numerous gastroenterologists who had billed Medicare for more than 24 hours' worth of colonoscopies a day. The reason wasn't fraud. Medicare was still paying the doctors as if each test took 75 minutes to complete, when most doctors were able to complete one in 30 minutes. (The colonoscopy payment has since been adjusted.)
Under the new proposal, Medicare would pay 2.5 percent less for every procedure, operation and medical test in 2026, based on data suggesting there have been improvements in 'efficiency' over the years. Payments for treatments based only on time, like a consultation with a family physician or neurologist, would not be cut. Such adjustments would be repeated every three years.
Advertisement
The proposal also looks to change the kind of data Medicare should consider instead of the relatively small surveys, noting that new sources of health data from hospitals and electronic billing systems could offer more accurate information.
The effort to adjust what doctors are paid for their work is just one part of the large rule, which also contains provisions to broaden coverage for telemedicine, pay for more mental health care, and reduce overpayments for a new and expensive type of skin bandage.
One other provision, meant to better account for the costs of running a medical practice, also affects the relative pay of different medical specialists. In some cases, those changes would reduce payments to the types of medical specialists whom the efficiency adjustments are meant to benefit.
That policy would adjust payments to doctors based on whether they offer services on a hospital campus or in a private practice office, effectively lowering payments in the hospital and boosting those elsewhere.
Taken together, the overall proposal would do more than just increase the salaries of primary care doctors. It would also increase the average pay of an allergist next year by 7 percent, and decrease pay for a neurosurgeon by 5 percent, according to estimates published by Medicare. It would lower pay by 6 percent for infectious disease specialists, who tend to earn low salaries and perform few procedures -- and increase average pay for vascular surgeons by 5 percent.
Dr. Adam Bruggeman, a spine surgeon in San Antonio who leads the council on advocacy for the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, said he was sympathetic to arguments that the current system may be paying for some medical procedures inaccurately. But he said the proposal — which would cut payments for all procedures next year — was too crude a solution to that problem. He described the 'efficiency' changes as 'taking an ax to the whole thing.'
Advertisement
'We're just fighting an arbitrary number with another arbitrary number, and that doesn't help,' he said.
This article originally appeared in
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UnitedHealth Group (UNH) Responds to the Department of Justice
UnitedHealth Group (UNH) Responds to the Department of Justice

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

UnitedHealth Group (UNH) Responds to the Department of Justice

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) is one of the top low volatility healthcare stocks to buy now. On July 24, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) released a statement responding to the Department of Justice after a review of the media reports about investigations into specific aspects of its involvement in the Medicare program. A senior healthcare professional giving advice to a patient in a clinic. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) stated that it has now begun complying with the formal criminal and civil requests from the Department, and has 'full confidence in its practices and is committed to working cooperatively with the Department throughout this process'. It added that UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) has a historical record of 'responsible conduct and effective compliance,' with independent CMS audits showing that its practices are ranked 'among the most accurate in the industry.' Management stated that after a decade-long civil challenge by the Department to aspects of the company's Medicare Advantage business, 'a court-appointed Special Master concluded there was no evidence to support claims of wrongdoing'. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) has launched its own initiative to provide confidence and transparency to stakeholders, focusing on conducting 'third-party reviews of policies, practices, and associated processes and performance metrics for risk assessment coding, managed care practices, and pharmacy services.' UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (NYSE:UNH) provides healthcare coverage, data consultancy, and software services. It operates through the OptumRx, OptumInsight, OptumHealth, and UnitedHealthCare segments, which have solid operations. While we acknowledge the potential of UNH as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.

Key takeaways from the EU-US trade deal
Key takeaways from the EU-US trade deal

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Key takeaways from the EU-US trade deal

EU head Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump on Sunday struck a deal on tariffs, just days before the August 1 deadline when Trump had threatened to impose steep levies on European goods had an agreement not been reached. These are the key takeaways from the deal: EU chief Ursula von der Leyen clinched an agreement Sunday with US President Donald Trump to avoid crippling tariffs from hitting the bloc, with both leaders hailing a 'good deal'. The stakes were high with a looming August 1 deadline and $1.9 trillion transatlantic trading relationship on the line. Many European businesses will breathe a sigh of relief after the leaders agreed the 27-country bloc will face a baseline levy of 15 percent instead of a threatened 30 percent – but the deal will not satisfy everyone. Here is what we know so far: What did EU, US agree on? Both sides confirmed there will be a 15-percent across-the-board rate on a majority of EU goods – the same level secured by Japan this month – with bilateral tariff exemptions on some products. Read moreTrump announces 'massive' trade deal with Japan, 15 percent tariff on exports The deal will bring relief for the bloc's auto sector, employing around 13 million people – and hit by Trump with 25-percent tariffs, on top of a pre-existing 2.5 percent. 'Obviously, it is good news for the car industry. So Germany will be happy. And all the EU members with auto supply chains, they go from 27.5 to 15 percent,' said Jacob Funk Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute For International Economics. A 15-percent levy will remain 'costly' for German automakers, 'but it is manageable', said trade geopolitics expert Elvire Fabry at the Jacques Delors Institute. While 15 percent is much higher than pre-existing US tariffs on European goods – averaging 4.8 percent – it mirrors the status quo, with companies currently facing an additional flat rate of 10 percent imposed by Trump since April. The EU also committed to buy $750 billion of liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels from the United States – split equally over three years – to replace Russian energy sources. And it will pour $600 billion more in additional investments in the United States. Trump said EU countries – which recently pledged to ramp up their defence spending within NATO – would be purchasing 'hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of military equipment'. Are there exemptions? Von der Leyen said the 15-percent rate applied across most sectors, including semiconductors and pharmaceuticals – a critical export for Ireland, which the bloc has sought to protect. Trump in April launched probes that could lead to significantly steeper tariffs on the two key sectors, warning this month he could slap 200-percent levies on drugs. Brussels and Washington agreed a bilateral tariff exemption for key goods including aircraft, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products and critical raw materials, von der Leyen said. The EU currently faces 50-percent tariffs on its steel exports to the United States, but von der Leyen said a compromise on the metal had been reached with Trump. 'Between us, tariffs will be cut and a quota system will be put in place,' she said. It is understood that European steel would be hit with 50-percent levies only after a certain amount of the metal arrived in the United States, but no details were initially provided on the mechanism. What happens next? The deal needs to be approved by EU member states, whose ambassadors will meet first thing Monday morning for a debrief from the European Commission. And there are still technical talks to come, since the agreement needs to be fully fleshed out. Von der Leyen described the deal as a 'framework' agreement. 'Details have to be sorted out, and that will happen over the next weeks,' she said. In particular, she said there has yet to be a final decision on alcohol, critical since France and The Netherlands have been pushing for carve-outs for wine and beer respectively. 'This is something which has to be sorted out in the next days,' von der Leyen said. (FRANCE 24 with AFP)

President Trump 'Not Happy' With His Golf Nickname
President Trump 'Not Happy' With His Golf Nickname

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

President Trump 'Not Happy' With His Golf Nickname

President Trump 'Not Happy' With His Golf Nickname originally appeared on The Spun. President Trump is likely "not happy" with his golf nickname, according to his supporters. The President of the United States has developed a new nickname on the course this weekend. President Trump, 79, played a couple of rounds of golf in Scotland. The President of the United States has a prestigious course, Trump Turnberry, in Scotland, where he has family roots. President Trump, who was in Scotland to work on a deal with the European Union, played a round of golf on Saturday and another round on Sunday. However, video of President Trump potentially getting caught bending the rules is going viral on social media. Video of President Trump's caddie appearing to help him out with a drop is going viral on social media. Was this just a typical golf drop or a bend-the-rules drop? In the wake of the video, President Trump is being referred to as the "Commander in Cheat." He's not going to like that. "PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE CADDY DROPPING A BALL FOR ME! INVESTIGATE OBAMA AND KAMALA HARRIS INSTEAD! STOP CALLING ME COMMANDER IN CHEAT!" one fan joked. "No wonder the Commander in Cheat always wins the championship trophy at his own golf courses. He cheats at everything because he sucks at everything," another fan added. "His caddies also tee him up in the rough, toss his ball out of bunkers, and roll back six footers to him. How else is a 79-y-o fat guy supposed to win championships?" another fan added. "Such a perfect metaphor for our Commander-in-Cheat," one fan added. "Donald Trump's blatant golf cheating, as captured in the video and chronicled in 'Commander in Cheat,' mirrors his lifelong pattern of deceit, from falsifying scores to undermining democracy, proving he's unfit for any fair game or office," one fan added. What do you make of President Trump's nickname? President Trump 'Not Happy' With His Golf Nickname first appeared on The Spun on Jul 28, 2025 This story was originally reported by The Spun on Jul 28, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store