&w=3840&q=100)
Bangladesh: Foreign secretary on his way out for not being 'in sync' with Yunus, Dhaka says not sacked
Bangladesh is reportedly replacing its Foreign Secretary Md Jashim Uddin, eight months after his appointment, because he was 'not in sync' with the country's Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus read more
Cracks in Bangladesh's interim government are becoming more evident after reports are emerging that the government is set to replace its Foreign Secretary, Md Jashim Uddin. According to The Times of India, Uddin is reportedly being sacked from the post because he is 'not in sync' with the country's Chief Advisor Muhammad Yunus and Foreign Adviser Touhid Hossain.
As per the report, Uddin had opposed the initiative of a 'humanitarian corridor' and 'safe zone' for Rohingya refugees , which was being pushed by Yunus and his NSA, Khalilur Rahman and endorsed by the UN.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to the information obtained by TOI, Uddin's views aligned with the military brass, who fear the corridor could compromise the sovereignty of Bangladesh. Sources close to the matter claimed that Yunus and Rahman moved ruthlessly to 'orchestrate' Uddin's removal.
It is pertinent to note that Uddin led the Bangladeshi side at FOC-level talks with Pakistan on April 17. During the talks, he had raised the issue of financial claim worth $4.32 billion from Pakistan as a 'fair share' from assets of undivided Pakistan before 1971.
Bangladesh govt goes into defence mode
Commenting on the foreign secretary's sacking, Foreign Affairs Adviser Md Touhid Hossain said that there is 'no issue of removal,' adding Uddin's responsibility will be changed. According to United News Bangladesh, Hossain told reporters that Uddin himself wanted to leave the role.
'There is no issue of removal. He (FS) wants to leave this responsibility for various reasons. He is in the service. The responsibility will change. He will leave his current responsibility within the next couple of days,' Adviser Hossain told reporters while responding to a question at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. When asked who would be replacing Uddin, the Bangladeshi foreign advisor said: 'You will know this within the next couple of days.'
However, local reports are suggesting that Bangladesh Ambassador to the United States Asad Alam Siam is likely to be the next Foreign Secretary of the country. Siam will reportedly be picked as an acting Foreign Secretary until appointment of the new FS.
'There was a proposed list of three candidates,' a senior official at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs told UNB on Tuesday, noting that Ambassador Siam was chosen as the senior-most of the three candidates. Ambassador and Permanent Representative to Switzerland, Tareq Md Ariful Islam, was also seen as one of the candidates for the role.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
4 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Bangladesh's democratic fabric frays further
On May 16, small bands of Awami League supporters took out flash rallies across at least 30 locations in Dhaka and a few other towns of Bangladesh. These demonstrations were largely defiant in nature – to express their resentment against the May 10 'conditional' ban against the party which was ousted from power in August 2024. The Muhammad Yunus-led interim regime's decision to proscribe the Awami League stemmed from demands by a section of students who led the July-August 2024 movement against the then Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. The ban, invoked under Bangladesh's 2009 Anti-Terrorism Act, was imposed nine months after the Yunus government assumed charge on August 8, 2024. It is being seen as a step that adversely impacts Bangladesh's already fragile democratic fabric which has time and again been subjected to assaults largely – and ironically – by political forces, including the now-proscribed party. Sheikh Hasina's ouster in August 2024 was widely expected to usher in a new era of democracy with better governance, fair elections, protection of human rights, and press freedom. That has not happened. Unkept promise The democratic values the interim administration promised to restore now appear compromised under the weight of its own authoritarian impulses. On its part, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, which had earlier indicated it was not opposed to the Awami League contesting elections, whenever they are held, did a volte face, supporting the ban. The ban on the Awami League raises serious concerns about unconstitutional practices and democratic backsliding. The proscription, to be in place till Awami League leaders are tried in the International Crimes Tribunal, allows the interim government to outlaw organisations deemed threats to national security. While the democratic space has severely shrunk in Bangladesh – there is no clarity on when elections will be held there – the media has not been immune to violent attacks and targeted vilification. Laws such as the 2023 Cyber Security Act (formerly Digital Security Act 2018) continue to be used to suppress dissent, curtail free speech, harass journalists, activists and political opponents. Media offices have been raided by law enforcement agencies, voices of independent bloggers, social media influencers and pro-democracy activists have been muzzled for criticising the interim regime's alliance with Islamist groups. Another alarming aspect of the current regime's conduct is the pattern of deaths in custody and allegations of torture. In its most recent report, Human Rights Watch expressed concern on the imposition of a ban, describing it as an 'excessive restriction on fundamental freedoms'. Political opposition Bangladeshi political parties such as the BNP and the Jamaat questioned the interim government's position as the rightful authority to implement the corridor, with geopolitical implications, without taking prior consent of the people or consulting the Myanmar government. Even Army chief General Waker-uz-Zaman stood firmly against the proposed 'humanitarian corridor', Amid a general sense of disenchantment with the Yunus government, the Awami League's marginalisation is reflected in the inability of its leaders and supporters, who fled Bangladesh in the wake of last year's violence to India, to regroup. Hasina has been using social media to interact regularly with party supporters at home, but there has been no visible attempt at recalibrating the party or even shaking up the organisational structure with a view to reform. Some commentators claim that the Awami League's inability to get a grip on itself and chart a fresh direction is an outcome of the Yunus regime's ' authoritarian excesses '. The ban on the Awami League has been compounded by an Election Commission decision to suspend the party's registration, which effectively prevents it from contesting elections, whenever they are held. The domestic political situation is ' fraught ', and almost explosive. Any delay in holding polls will unleash political forces – such as the Islamist outfits – in a country that has not witnessed a truly free and fair elections for nearly two decades. The Army, considered a powerful stakeholder in Bangladesh's politics, is in no mood to see a prolonged period of uncertainty. In September last year, Army chief General Waker-uz-Zaman had proposed an 18-month timeline for holding elections, but the Yunus-led interim regime has hemmed and hawed. Some government functionaries have advocated holding institutional reforms before holding elections. But now the 'humanitarian corridor' controversy has given the Army a strong reason to not only ensure Bangladesh's sovereignty does not get eroded but also hasten the process to hold early elections so it can ' return to the barracks '. Bangladesh's political firmament reflects a grim paradox – the students' community unseated Sheikh Hasina for being an authoritarian ruler; by the same token, Yunus' interim regime is being seen as increasingly dictatorial even as it continues to be supported by the students. There are allegations that the Yunus-led government is intolerant of dissent and is prepared to use disproportionately strong measures. Far from a transitional administration that was expected to guide the country toward free and fair elections, the interim authority appears to be centralising power. Unless this trend is checked, Bangladesh risks sinking deeper into autocracy.
Hindustan Times
16 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Haitians lament US travel ban amid gang violence
US President Donald Trump's inclusion of Haiti in his administration's list of countries that are banned from travel visas has hit the Caribbean nation struggling with gang violence hard, both there and among its expats. "Haiti will be further isolated. The United States was the first destination for Haitians," said Pierre Esperance, a human rights activist in Haiti's capital Port-au-Prince. Trump on Wednesday announced citizens of 12 countries including Haiti, Libya and Afghanistan will not be allowed to travel to the United States beginning June 9. The nationals of seven other countries, including Venezuela and Cuba, will have face severe restrictions when seeking options to travel stateside. The travel ban, similar to one implanted during Trump's first term, is part of the Republican leader's tough immigration agenda, pouring cold water on migrants who hoped to seek refuge in the United States from crises in their home countries. The news could not come at a worse time for Haiti, which has been in the midst of an ongoing humanitarian crisis spurred by powerful street gangs that have terrorized the population with kidnappings, murders and other crimes for months on end. Pierre Christian Namphy, political director of the NGO Family Action Network Movement, said the ban is "appalling, it's cruel, it's racist, it's xenophobia, and it's singling out individuals by their nationality." Namphy, who is of Haitian origin himself, believes the measure is " an effort to court a racist anti-immigrant base" from Trump's campaign, similar to when the US president spread the baseless claim last year that Haitians were eating cats and dogs in the community of Springfield, Ohio. "The communities of Haiti here are law-abiding communities. We are fleeing the violence of the gangs inside Haiti, we are fleeing the problem. We are not the problem," He added. In the Miami neighborhood of Little Haiti, Klifft Ojour pointed out the importance of the Haitian immigrant community in the United States particularly in Florida, where an estimated 500,000 residents originate from the Caribbean nation. "This is very unfortunate because Haitians immensely contribute to different vital sectors that makes the society function, and especially here in South Florida, such as hospitality or healthcare," Ojour told AFP. Ojour, a 32-year-old businessman who was born in Port-au-Prince, said that while he does not see the benefit of imposing a travel ban, he said it is a wake-up call for Haiti to improve the devastating humanitarian crisis. "It's time that the Haitians start holding public servants accountable for the degrading state of public administration. Because the problem is first and foremost within our country," Ojour said. For the time being, the Haiti Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded to Trump's travel ban by saying "the government is striving, with the help of its international partners, to combat insecurity and strengthen border security. "The MAEC calls attention to the danger posed by armed groups, recently designated as terrorist groups, to Haiti's external relations." str-gma/jgc/sla
Time of India
19 hours ago
- Time of India
Northern crown
Times of India's Edit Page team comprises senior journalists with wide-ranging interests who debate and opine on the news and issues of the day. Govt did well to address some of Ladakh's concerns. Remaining issues must be resolved sensitively GOI did the right thing by introducing a new reservation and domicile policy for Ladakh. Guaranteeing 85% reservations for locals in govt jobs – excluding EWS category – will address local anxiety about high unemployment. It's important to recall that Ladakhis have been peacefully pressing for their demands, in the best traditions of democracy. This was best exemplified by activist Sonam Wangchuk's walk from Ladakh to Delhi and subsequent 16-day hunger strike last year. To its credit, govt did consult Ladakh's civil society organisations before working out the new policies. However, key demands remain unfulfilled. Ladakh's demands stem from the fact that following nullification of Article 370 in 2019 that abrogated special status for the erstwhile state of Jammu & Kashmir – of which Ladakh was a part – the region was hived off and converted to a UT without a legislature. While initially welcomed – because Ladhakis often felt govts in Srinagar were biased against the region – the new setup was soon seen as inadequate in addressing key issues like unemployment, preservation of local culture, and protection of a fragile ecosystem. Hence the demand for inclusion of Ladakh in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. It can't be stressed enough that ecological conservation is central to Ladakh's aspirations. The region is experiencing serious glacier retreat, with some glaciers like Parachik retreating by 12-20 metres per annum. Therefore, development here can't happen the same way as in other regions. We have already seen the adverse impact of non-ecologically compliant infra projects in mountainous states. Also, Ladakh's status as a border region with China and Pakistan brings additional security challenges. Ecology and security are joined at the hip here. Therefore, defence infra projects and people's aspirations must be in harmony. People of Ladakh are our shield. Listen to them. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
