Bangladesh's democratic fabric frays further
The Muhammad Yunus-led interim regime's decision to proscribe the Awami League stemmed from demands by a section of students who led the July-August 2024 movement against the then Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.
The ban, invoked under Bangladesh's 2009 Anti-Terrorism Act, was imposed nine months after the Yunus government assumed charge on August 8, 2024. It is being seen as a step that adversely impacts Bangladesh's already fragile democratic fabric which has time and again been subjected to assaults largely – and ironically – by political forces, including the now-proscribed party.
Sheikh Hasina's ouster in August 2024 was widely expected to usher in a new era of democracy with better governance, fair elections, protection of human rights, and press freedom. That has not happened.
Unkept promise
The democratic values the interim administration promised to restore now appear compromised under the weight of its own authoritarian impulses. On its part, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, which had earlier indicated it was not opposed to the Awami League contesting elections, whenever they are held, did a volte face, supporting the ban.
The ban on the Awami League raises serious concerns about unconstitutional practices and democratic backsliding. The proscription, to be in place till Awami League leaders are tried in the International Crimes Tribunal, allows the interim government to outlaw organisations deemed threats to national security.
While the democratic space has severely shrunk in Bangladesh – there is no clarity on when elections will be held there – the media has not been immune to violent attacks and targeted vilification.
Laws such as the 2023 Cyber Security Act (formerly Digital Security Act 2018) continue to be used to suppress dissent, curtail free speech, harass journalists, activists and political opponents.
Media offices have been raided by law enforcement agencies, voices of independent bloggers, social media influencers and pro-democracy activists have been muzzled for criticising the interim regime's alliance with Islamist groups.
Another alarming aspect of the current regime's conduct is the pattern of deaths in custody and allegations of torture. In its most recent report, Human Rights Watch expressed concern on the imposition of a ban, describing it as an 'excessive restriction on fundamental freedoms'.
Political opposition
Bangladeshi political parties such as the BNP and the Jamaat questioned the interim government's position as the rightful authority to implement the corridor, with geopolitical implications, without taking prior consent of the people or consulting the Myanmar government. Even Army chief General Waker-uz-Zaman stood firmly against the proposed 'humanitarian corridor',
Amid a general sense of disenchantment with the Yunus government, the Awami League's marginalisation is reflected in the inability of its leaders and supporters, who fled Bangladesh in the wake of last year's violence to India, to regroup.
Hasina has been using social media to interact regularly with party supporters at home, but there has been no visible attempt at recalibrating the party or even shaking up the organisational structure with a view to reform.
Some commentators claim that the Awami League's inability to get a grip on itself and chart a fresh direction is an outcome of the Yunus regime's ' authoritarian excesses '. The ban on the Awami League has been compounded by an Election Commission decision to suspend the party's registration, which effectively prevents it from contesting elections, whenever they are held.
The domestic political situation is ' fraught ', and almost explosive. Any delay in holding polls will unleash political forces – such as the Islamist outfits – in a country that has not witnessed a truly free and fair elections for nearly two decades.
The Army, considered a powerful stakeholder in Bangladesh's politics, is in no mood to see a prolonged period of uncertainty. In September last year, Army chief General Waker-uz-Zaman had proposed an 18-month timeline for holding elections, but the Yunus-led interim regime has hemmed and hawed.
Some government functionaries have advocated holding institutional reforms before holding elections.
But now the 'humanitarian corridor' controversy has given the Army a strong reason to not only ensure Bangladesh's sovereignty does not get eroded but also hasten the process to hold early elections so it can ' return to the barracks '.
Bangladesh's political firmament reflects a grim paradox – the students' community unseated Sheikh Hasina for being an authoritarian ruler; by the same token, Yunus' interim regime is being seen as increasingly dictatorial even as it continues to be supported by the students. There are allegations that the Yunus-led government is intolerant of dissent and is prepared to use disproportionately strong measures.
Far from a transitional administration that was expected to guide the country toward free and fair elections, the interim authority appears to be centralising power. Unless this trend is checked, Bangladesh risks sinking deeper into autocracy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Earlier government order did not ban meat sale on August 15: Awhad
While the Opposition has criticised the order, the ruling BJP has defended it, citing a 1988 state government resolution (GR) empowering civic bodies to impose such restrictions. Speaking to reporters in Solapur, Awhad also asked who gave municipal bodies the right to decide what should a citizen eat and when. Pune, Aug 13 (PTI) Amid the row over a few civic bodies in Maharashtra ordering closure of meat shops and abattoirs on August 15, NCP (SP) MLA Jitendra Awhad on Wednesday claimed that an earlier order only spoke of closure of slaughter houses, but did not ban meat sale. Awhad said people belonging to the middle class and the poor generally consume meat on certain days like Sunday, Wednesday and Friday. 'Since August 15 is a holiday, people generally wake up at leisure, buy meat and enjoy it together as a family. It is a tradition,' the former minister said. As the BJP-led government has failed to bring about development, there is an attempt to increase communal disharmony by creating such issues, Awhad alleged. Municipal corporations of Nagpur, Nashik, Malegaon, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar and Kalyan-Dombivli have issued orders directing closure of slaughterhouses and meat shops on Independence Day. Some of them have said these facilities will remain shut on certain other days, too, in view of Hindu and Jain festivals. The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) led by Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar has also questioned the directive. PTI SPK KRK This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
How Bangladesh is slipping back into Pakistan's grip
Half a century after losing the 1971 war, Pakistan is quietly creeping back into Bangladesh-not with tanks or troops, but through intelligence operatives, radical clerics, diplomatic manoeuvres, and a rising tide of Islamist is not an invasion. It is infiltration. And it is happening in plain sight. A Manufactured UprisingThe protests that shook Bangladesh earlier this year were framed as a grassroots revolt over job quotas — the cry of a generation locked out of opportunity. Years of political repression, economic inequality, and public frustration gave the unrest legitimacy. Yet beneath the surface lay the fingerprints of slogans mirrored radical Islamist narratives. The timing was too precise. The organisation too perfect. Behind it was Islami Chhatra Shibir, the student wing of the banned Jamaat-e-Islami. Behind them — Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), allegedly with discreet Western Fall of Sheikh HasinaFor over a decade, Sheikh Hasina kept Bangladesh stable through terrorism threats, coup attempts, and a war on extremism. She defied Pakistan, challenged Islamists, and resisted China's unchecked influence. In doing so, she earned enemies in Islamabad, Beijing-and, increasingly, President Biden, US–Bangladesh relations soured over allegations of democratic backsliding and human rights abuses. Reports surfaced of US-backed pressure campaigns-funding opposition voices, sanctioning Hasina's allies, and mobilising diplomatic influence. The quota protests proved the tipping point. Over 1,400 deaths later, Hasina was forced Muhammad YunusInto the vacuum stepped Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus-a celebrated figure abroad but far less respected domestically. Under Yunus, Jamaat-e-Islami was quietly rehabilitated. Radical networks once suppressed began operating openly. Groups like Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh, Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, and Ansarullah Bangla Team 21 January 2025, Major General Shahid Amir Afsar of the ISI arrived in Dhaka under the guise of medical cooperation. In reality, he met Paresh Barua, leader of the United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA)-a separatist insurgency targeting India's the Eastern CorridorULFA offers Pakistan a backdoor into India. Coupled with Islamist mobilisation in Bangladesh, Rohingya youth recruitment, and terror logistics via JMB, the ISI is constructing a familiar insurgency blueprint-refined in Afghanistan and Kashmir-but this time aimed squarely at India's eastern role is equally significant. Under Hasina, Beijing's influence over ports, infrastructure, and energy was balanced. Under Yunus, it is growing unchecked. Together, China and Pakistan are forging a corridor of influence from Gwadar to Cox's Bazar, leveraging insurgent groups in Myanmar's Rakhine State to secure strategic trade Shrinking Strategic DepthWith Hasina gone, India's secure eastern flank is eroding. Infiltration from Bangladesh is rising. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) reports increased chatter between ISI handlers and sleeper cells in West Bengal. Assam Police have intercepted multiple JMB-linked operatives in recent United States, now under Donald Trump, shows little inclination to intervene. Trump's transactional foreign policy prioritises deals with Islamabad over Delhi's security concerns, especially if Pakistan can offer leverage in Afghanistan or against China in and Ideological RecolonisationUnder Yunus, Bangladesh's economy is faltering. Garment exports are collapsing as Western buyers withdraw, with Chinese firms moving in to fill the gap. This economic dependency risks turning Bangladesh into a client radical sermons are returning to mosques, Islamist student groups are re-establishing themselves on campuses, and extremist recruitment among Rohingya refugees is accelerating. Analysts warn of an 'East Pakistan 2.0'-not born of military conquest, but of ideological infiltration and economic Clock is TickingPakistan has refused Yunus's demands for 1971 reparations and instead offers deepening cooperation-direct flights, military exchanges, visa-free business travel, and port partnerships. It is a textbook case of soft annexation, and the Bangladeshi leadership appears unwilling or unable to India, the threat is immediate. The longer Dhaka drifts into Islamabad's and Beijing's orbit, the harder it will be to reverse. Border security will be tested. Sleeper cells will awaken. And the possibility of another 2008-style attack-or worse-will was a rejection of Pakistan's religious nationalism in favour of linguistic and cultural identity. If Bangladesh forgets why it fought for its independence, that hard-won freedom could quietly be undone-replaced not by foreign flags, but by foreign control.- Ends
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Asim Munir, Yunus, Pannun...: How US is laying a trap to encircle India on all sides; experts say New Delhi paying the price for...
(File) India-US relations have hit their lowest point in the last two decades, especially since US President Donald Trump began his newfound tryst with Pakistan, spewed anti-India rhetoric, and ultimately imposed 50% tariffs on Indian goods. However, experts believe that the seemingly radical shift in US' stance against India is not sudden, but has been simmering for years since the previous Biden administration, as Washington is reportedly upset with New Delhi for not taking an aggressive stance against China, which is what the US wanted. What was US' plan for India? According to US strategic experts, Washington had plans to prop up India as a regional proxy against China, but New Delhi strategically avoided landing in such as situation in view of its geographical, economic and strategic constraints. New Delhi believes fighting a direct war would cause long-term economic loss, and avoided confrontation with Beijing, a policy which reportedly frustrated the Biden administration, who wanted the QUAD alliance of India, US, Japan, and Australia, to become a bulwark against China, says American geo-strategist Rust Kohle. However, India did not fall into the US trap and always refrained from positing the QUAD as a military alliance akin to the US-led NATO, he said. Kohle revealed that in 2024, the Biden administration decided that the US will not help India's development if New Delhi doesn't stand against China, and the Trump administration has taken that policy to a whole another level by essentially downgrading India-US relations. Why US wanted to pit India against China? Notably, all four QUAD members have their own issues with China. Japan has territorial disputes in the East China Sea and conflict with China over sea routes, while Australia's problems are related to trade, investment and political interference. The US wants to maintain its military dominance in the Indo-Pacific and freedom of navigation in the South China Sea and Taiwan, while India's issues with Beijing are multifaceted as the two countries share borders. However, none of the QUAD nations are ready to open a joint, aggressive front against China, with Australia, Japan, and US wanting to pit India against Beijing without openly siding with New Delhi. There is a broad consensus among Indian and American strategic experts that New Delhi is paying for not towing the US' line as Washington is now exacting 'vengeance' by surrounding India with hostile forces from all sides, including support for Khalistani Sikh separatists like Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, an anti-India regime led by Muhammad Yunus in Bangladesh, and building closer ties with Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir. How India can prepare for eventual face-off with US and China? Analysts believe that India needs to achieve self-reliance in defense manufacturing if it hopes to confront two superpowers like US and China in the near future. 'India's biggest challenge is to avoid confrontation with both US and China, but at the same time maintain its strategic autonomy. New Delhi needs a new, more careful method to implement its 'multi-alignment' policy,' says Dr. Manan Dwivedi, Professor, Indian Institute of Public Administration. Meanwhile, renowned Indian geo-strategist Dr. Brahma Chellaney has raised questions about the future of QUAD, saying that it seems highly unlikely that US President Donald Trump would visit India for the QUAD summit later this year. Experts believe that an open confrontation with China can take a toll on India's economy, border security and regional relations, while distancing itself from the US will have a profound impact on the country's technology, defense and investment. Thus, experts suggest that India needs to walk a fine line to maintain strategic yet cautious ties with both Beijing and Washington, while avoiding a complete alliance with either country.
