New York diner shuts down after 76 years
Published: Updated:
Hector's Café and Diner will be closing its doors for the last time after 76 years of business. The iconic restaurant, located in New York's Meatpacking District, is shuttering on July 18 following challenges after the pandemic and demographic changes within the area.
During its heyday, Hector's was a go-to restaurant featured in various films and television shows and frequented by the local meatpacking workers. Co-owner Nick Kapelonis revealed the butchers became 'like family' over the years, and crew members from Law & Order became regular customers.
Now, the diner sits across the street from a row of high-end fashion retailers, and its business has rapidly declined. The restaurant is part of a seven-member co-op run by the city, and everyone part of the structure insisted it was 'time to go.' Kapelonis explained that some of the co-op members plan to retire or move to other areas outside the Meatpacking District while speaking with PIX11 News.
The city plans to have the building become part of an expansion of the Whitney Museum, large offices, and a 600-foot residential tower. The restaurant was founded during a time when there were 260 butchers and 6,000 employees in the area surrounding the district. According to Kapelonis, the diner was opened specifically for meatpackers.
Customers were heartbroken to learn the news about the diner's closure, some calling the eatery the 'last man standing' in the district. 'This was the only place I was really able to afford when working in meat packing. Thanks for yummy meals!,' an Instagram user wrote. 'The only place left in that neighborhood where you don't have to take a loan for dinner,' a commenter added. 'Hectors offered no frills, just quality diner food. So sad to see it go,' a customer responded.
Social media users said they thought this district diner would be the one that stood the test of time. 'I really thought this was the one thing in Meatpacking that would stay forever,' a fan wrote. Architectural photography authors James and Karla Murray were just as heartbroken about the once 24-hour restaurant's shuttering.
'Hector's was able to survive the many changes in the neighborhood/gentrification due in part to the fact that it had a long-term below market lease with the City... We absolutely love their Jumbo Beefburger Deluxe with fries which costs only $15.75,' they wrote. The Murrays included the diner in their 2023 book Store Front NYC: Photographs of the City's Independent Shops, Past and Present and have advised everyone to stop by the diner before it's too late. Hector's is not the only New York landmark restaurant that has shuttered over the years. Manhattan's iconic La Grenouille restaurant closed last year following rising costs and inflation, and Robert De Niro's restaurant Tribeca Grill closed in March after 35 years of business.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Experts reveal the mortgage number that could save US housing market
The housing market is under strain with prices falling as families are unwilling to move and refinance their mortgages at current rates. However, a glimmer of hope arrived when the average daily mortgage rate fell to 6.57 percent on Monday — the lowest in 10 months — according to a new report from Redfin. However, experts have revealed that it will take much lower rates to revive the flagging market. Nationwide mortgage rates would have to fall more than two percent to 4.43 percent to make the typical home affordable for a median-income family, a new report from Zillow claims. The analysis defined affordable monthly payments to be less than 30 percent of a household's income, and assumed a 20 percent down payment. The two percentage point drop would make cities such as Dallas, New Orleans and Nashville affordable, according to the study. On the other hand cities with extortionately high housing costs - such as New York, Los Angeles and Miami - would not become affordable even if rates fell to 0 percent. On the other end of the spectrum areas of the US where home prices are much lower would remain affordable even if rates climbed higher than they are now. For example, the report cites Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania where the average home is $244,928 compared to the national average of $369,147. A median-income family could still buy a home there even if rates jumped to 9 percent, Zillow found. Birmingham Alabama, Detroit, Michigan and Buffalo, New York are also areas that would remain affordable if rates surged above 7 percent again. Even with rates falling Zillow expects prices to end the year two percent lower than the start. 'That small decline won't be much of a setback to most homeowners' equity following the 49 percent increase since 2019,' Zillow economist Anushna Prakash wrote. 'It also won't move the needle very far for first-time buyers priced out of the market,' she explained. 'Home prices and/or mortgage rates would need to drop by massive amounts to make a typical home affordable for a median-income family.' Prakesh added that those waiting for a price crash large enough to make buying affordable shouldn't hold their breath. Without an alarming slowdown in economic growth and a rise in the unemployment rate a correction is unlikely. Investors are now waiting with bated breath to see if the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates at its September meeting. Fed chair Jerome Powell has provoked the wrath of Trum p by continuing to hold benchmark rates between 4.25 and 4.5 percent. The most recent jobs report showed hiring growth dropped dramatically last month and unemployment ticked up , a key metric that may entice the Fed to cut rates. Non-farm payrolls added 73,000 in July, far lower than the 100,000 expected by analysts. The unemployment rate also ticked up to 4.2 percent. Last year the 'Oracle of Wall Street' Meredith Whitney told the Daily Mail that rates need to drop below 6 percent to get the market moving .
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump administration threatens to strip Harvard University of lucrative patents
The latest phase of the Trump administration's offensive against Harvard University is a comprehensive review of the university's federally funded research programs, and the threat to strip the school's lucrative portfolio of patents. In a letter to the Harvard president, Alan Garber, posted online on Friday, Donald Trump's commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, accused Harvard of breaching its legal and contractual requirements tied to federally funded research programs and patents. Lutnick also said the commerce department has begun a 'march-in' process under the federal Bayh-Dole Act that could let the government take ownership of the patents or grant licenses. 'The Department places immense value on the groundbreaking scientific and technological advancements that emerge from the Government's partnerships with institutions like Harvard,' Lutnick wrote. He said that carried a 'critical responsibility' for Harvard to ensure that its intellectual property derived from federal funding is used to maximize benefits to the American people. Harvard did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Friday's letter ratchets up White House pressure on Harvard, which it has accused of civil rights violations for failing to take steps dictated by the administration in response to accusations that student protests against Israel's assault on Gaza were antisemitic. Harvard sued in April after the administration began stripping or freezing billions of dollars of federal research money. In his letter, Lutnick demanded that Harvard provide within four weeks a list of all patents stemming from federally funded research grants, including how the patents are used and whether any licensing requires 'substantial US manufacturing'. As of 1 July 2024, Harvard held more than 5,800 patents, and had more than 900 technology licenses with over 650 industry partners, according to the Harvard Office of Technology Development. Other universities faced with federal research funding losses have signed settlement agreements with the government, including Columbia University, which agreed to pay more than $220m, and Brown University, which agreed to pay $50m. Harvard's president reportedly told faculty that a New York Times report that the university was open to spending up to $500m to settle with the government was inaccurate and had been leaked to reporters by White House officials. The bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act was sponsored by senators Birch Bayh of Indiana and Bob Dole of Kansas and signed into law by Jimmy Carter near the end of his term. Carter said at the time it was important that industrial innovation promote US economic health, and the legislation 'goes far toward strengthening the effectiveness of the patent incentive in stimulating innovation in the United States'. Many civil rights experts, faculty and White House critics believe the Trump administration's targeting of schools for supposedly failing to address antisemitism is a pretext to assert federal control and threaten academic freedom and free speech.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
United Airlines flyer details rookie mistake that cost them almost $100 instantly
The absence of a simple 'back' button on United Airlines' website cost a Canadian traveler nearly $100 while booking flights for her family. The traveler, who shared her story in a Reddit post, was booking tickets that were due to cost #295 when she realized she needed to modify the seat selection. But without a back button, she had to cancel the cart and start over. The same tickets had jumped $30 within minutes after entering all her flight details again. Still hoping for a fix, she tried searching on another computer — only to see the fare rise again, this time to $362. 'On United's website, there is no 'back' button,' she wrote. 'So I basically had to cancel the cart item and redo all the steps.' She concluded the spike, on July 31, was likely due to demand — a suspicion echoed by fellow Reddit users, many of whom shared similar experiences. 'If it makes you feel any better, I made a $500 mistake similar to that,' one traveler replied. Others chimed in with advice and critiques. 'The system might not have released the inventory you held, back into the pool right away. Why didn't you just change the seats after booking,' a commenter wrote. 'It's a demand issue,' another added. 'If there are multiple searches for the same flight, the prices start increasing.'. One traveler said they nearly made a $1,600 mistake by misunderstanding a change fee. 'I thought it was $320 total to move our family's return flight up by four hours,' they wrote. 'Turns out it was $320 per ticket. Thankfully, I called and got everything refunded.' Others noted that United will often refund the fare difference in credit if the price drops after booking. United has faced growing criticism in 2025 for several unpopular changes that have led some travelers to jump ship. The company faced backlash after quietly reinstating a pricing policy that charges solo passengers more than those traveling in pairs or groups. Reddit user chimedon how a quirk on United's website cost a Canadian traveler nearly $100 while booking flights for her family. Data indicated the airline is applying at least an eight percent price hike for solo travelers on weekdays. It also ignited fury by narrowing its check-in cutoff window. Since June, instead of the 30-minute cutoff, all United flyers must check in for domestic flights at least 45 minutes before takeoff. Meanwhile, United continues pushing luxury on international routes. Its new Polaris Studio suites, launching this year on flights from San Francisco to London and Singapore. The suites will include perks such as Cuvée Rosé and designer hoodie pajamas, and will include Wi-Fi from Starlink, a service developed by the Elon Musk 's SpaceX.
