How India's Choice Of August 15 As Independence Day Has A Japan Link
Just two years before August 15, 1947, Japan's emperor surrendered to the Allies, ending World War II. The country's war dead crossed 3 million. The date of Japan's surrender also held significance for Lord Mountbatten, who had fought against the Japanese in the War as a Navy officer in erstwhile Burma.
The Indian Independence Bill was given Royal Assent in July 1947, which was to "make provision for the setting up in India of two independent Dominions, to substitute other provisions for certain provisions of the Government of India Act, 1947". Lord Mountbatten was appointed to chalk up a plan for the transfer of power from British hands to Indian control and for the partition of the erstwhile united India into two countries.
The date decided for transfer of power and partition was decided to be no later than June 1948. Amid rising communal violence and worsening law and order, a change of plans came. The British Parliament decided that the colonial rule in India would end on August 15, 1947.
As a result of the partition, India and Pakistan were born, although exact boundaries were disclosed only by August 17 to avoid unrest. Pakistan's official papers and its founding father, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, originally used the date August 15 to refer to the day of independence. But by 1948, Pakistan had moved its celebrations to August 14 for practical and symbolic reasons.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
3 minutes ago
- Hans India
PM unveils next-gen GST reform draft
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced on Sunday that the Central government has drafted a proposal for the next-generation Goods and Services Tax (GST) reforms and has sent it to the states. He sought the cooperation of state governments to implement the proposal before Diwali this year. Speaking after inaugurating two new expressways in Delhi, Modi emphasised that these reforms would benefit not only the poor and middle class but also both small and large businesses. Modi explained that the proposed changes in the GST law aim to simplify the system and adjust tax rates, which will benefit a wide range of people and businesses. 'This is a major step toward making GST more accessible, especially for businesses and consumers,' he said. The Central government intends to introduce a simplified GST structure and will consider revising tax slabs to reduce the burden on various segments of society. In his Independence Day speech on August 15, the PM had already announced plans for these changes, describing them as a step toward promoting good governance. 'For us, reforms mean moving forward with good governance,' he had said earlier. The Prime Minister reiterated that the government would focus on continuous reforms to make life easier for people and businesses alike. He added, 'In the coming months, we are going to implement several major reforms, and this Diwali, people will get a double bonus from GST reforms.' The draft proposal for GST reforms has already been sent to the states, with the Central government hoping for their swift cooperation. Modi urged the states to complete the process promptly so that the changes could be implemented in time for the Diwali festival. The primary objectives of these reforms are to simplify the GST process and adjust tax rates to benefit a larger section of the population. New GST slabs The Union government has proposed a revised GST system that would streamline the existing tax structure into only two main tax slabs—5% and 18%. The proposal suggests eliminating the current 12% and 28% tax slabs. Additionally, a special 40% tax slab has been proposed for luxury and harmful goods. The new system aims to reduce tax complexity and ensure more efficient compliance.
Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Planning the next leap forward
As the Tricolour was unfurled on India's 79th Independence Day, the country stood proudly as a confident, resilient, and rising nation. It is not just the world's largest democracy, but a country that has successfully crafted its destiny since attaining independence in 1947. Notwithstanding the current headwinds of US President Donald Trump's tariff war, it has weathered many storms in the past. One may recall the sanctions by the US in 1998 after the Pokhran nuclear tests conducted by the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government or the role of the US in sending its Seventh Fleet in 1971, when India's war with Pakistan led to the creation of Bangladesh. India emerged stronger on each occasion. Today, no one can stop India's rise — its time has come. Just look at the last decade, India's GDP has more than doubled. It is projected to reach $4.19 trillion by 2025, making India the fourth-largest economy, behind the United States ($30.5 trillion), China ($19.2 trillion), and Germany ($4.74 trillion) (IMF estimates). Measured in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms, India is already the world's third-largest economy at $17.65 trillion, trailing only China ($40.72 trillion) and the US ($30.51 trillion) in 2025. All this is a reflection of rising aspirations and India's strong resolve to regain its civilisational legacy. Since Independence, poverty levels have plummeted, while literacy, life expectancy, and women's empowerment have seen transformative leaps. From Chandrayaan's historic landing near the Moon's South Pole to the trailblazing Mars mission, Mangalyaan, India has staked its place at the frontiers of space exploration. The meteoric rise of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI), processing over 10 billion transactions each month and inspiring fintech innovations worldwide, reflects a digital revolution. Indian origin leaders such as Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, Indra Nooyi, and many more lead some of the most influential corporations, underscoring India's intellectual and entrepreneurial footprint far beyond its borders. Lal Bahadur Shastri's call of 'Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan,' later enriched by Vajpayee with 'Jai Vigyan' (hail science) and more recently by Modi with 'Jai Anusandhan' (hail research), reminds us that India's progress is rooted in science and technology. As Vajpayee once said, what information technology (IT) is for India, biotechnology (BT) is for Bharat. Independence Day is both a moment for celebration and reflection on the road travelled — and the one still ahead. When India gained independence in 1947, its GDP was around $30 billion. The population stood at 330 million, with an estimated 80 per cent living in poverty. The average life expectancy was a mere 32 years (1947), and literacy levels were just 18.3 per cent (1951). Foodgrain production stood at about 50 million metric tonnes (MMT). Fast forward to 2025: India's population has increased to 1.46 billion, but poverty, measured at the $3/day (2021 PPP) threshold, has fallen to just 5.3 per cent, as per World Bank estimates. Literacy has surged to 77 per cent, while life expectancy has more than doubled to 72 years (2023). Foodgrain production has multiplied sevenfold, reaching 353.9 MMT in 2024-25. India is now the world's largest rice exporter, shipping 20.2 MMT in FY25. Grain stocks with the government exceed 90 MMT, well above buffer norms. Horticulture output has risen 15 times since independence, milk production 11 times, and egg production an astonishing 77 times. From FY15 to FY25, under the Modi government, India's real GDP has grown at an average of 6.5 per cent annually, while agricultural GDP has expanded by 4 per cent per year, well above the population growth rate of under 1 per cent. As a result, India is a net exporter of agriculture, unlike the US and China, which are both net importers of agriculture. These are not mere statistics; they narrate the story of a country in motion. However, even as India has achieved food security, there are still many challenges: Nutritional security, especially of children under the age of five, remains pressing. This calls for a sharper focus on women's education, improved maternal health, and continued emphasis on sanitation. The Modi government deserves compliments for making India open defecation free (ODF), which will help improve child nutrition. In the agri-food space, however, much more can be done. In particular, rationalising food and fertiliser subsidies needs to be put on high priority. Together, these account for nearly Rs 3.71 lakh crore in the 2025–26 Union Budget — Rs 2.03 lakh crore for food and Rs 1.67 lakh crore for fertilisers. While these subsidies are meant to shield vulnerable populations, they are plagued by large inefficiencies. Studies suggest that at least 20 to 25 per cent of these subsidies fail to reach intended beneficiaries. Though politically tempting, these subsidies come at the cost of productive investments. The next leap forward has to be rationalising subsidies and increasing investments in agri-R&D and efficient value chains. India's future lies in empowering its citizens to innovate, invest, and generate sustainable incomes. Environmental sustainability has to be central to this journey. The quality of India's soil, water, and air needs to be protected to attain the Viksit Bharat vision by 2047. As we reflect with pride on our progress, it is equally important to look outward. While India has surpassed Pakistan and Bangladesh in per capita income — both in nominal and PPP terms — it remains far behind China, which began its journey around the same time. China's per capita income in 2025 is $13,690 (PPP $28,980), while India is at $2,880 (PPP $12,130). However, for India, democracy remains its compass, setting it apart from its neighbours. India's story is still a work in progress. The world watches it closely. It has lessons for many countries in Asia and Africa, and in many high-tech sectors, it competes with the best. The vision of the Modi government for a Viksit Bharat by 2047 can be realised only if we remain focused on accelerating growth in an inclusive manner, cut down bureaucratic hurdles, and adopt a scientific culture as the guiding principle, backed by investments. Gulati is Distinguished Professor and Juneja is a Research Fellow at ICRIER. Views are personal
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Mossad chief visits Qatar: Why this gulf state is the new hub of deals and diplomacy
The chief of Israel's spy agency Mossad, David Barnea, last week visited Qatar in what is being seen as an effort to restart Gaza peace talks. Qatar along with Egypt has been the main mediator in the repeatedly faltering negotiations to end the devastating war in Gaza. While Egypt is a neighbour of Israel and Gaza, why is Qatar involved? The answer lies in a recent trend. From backchannel talks with the Taliban to hush-hush negotiations between Washington and Tehran, this small Gulf state is emerging as the planet's go-to middleman, with its deep pockets and strategic ambiguity. Why is Qatar doing this, and what has helped it position itself as a diplomatic first responder? It wasn't always this way. Half a century ago, Qatar was a footnote in British imperial maps. It had neither the religious heft of Saudi Arabia nor the cultural power of Egypt. Even decades after gaining independence in 1971, Qatar remained an inconspicuous state, under a conservative and inward-looking monarchy. The 1990s changed much. First came the gas boom. The discovery and exploitation of the world's largest natural gas field, shared with Iran, gave Qatar not just riches, but leverage. Then came a palace coup in 1995. Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, the current emir's father, overthrew his father and set out with a bold vision: to put Qatar on the global stage. Within a year, he launched Al Jazeera — a channel that broke the mould of state media in the region. Outspoken, pan-Arab, often controversial, it reshaped the political discourse of the Arab world and made Qatar a household name from Morocco to Malaysia. He opened up the country's foreign policy, bought up Harrods, Paris Saint-Germain, and Miramax. Qatar secured the rights to host the 2022 World Cup. 'The leadership saw diplomacy as a tool of national security and identity-building,' Dr. Rajarshi Chakraborty, an international relations scholar trained at Jawaharlal Nehru University, said. 'They knew they couldn't rely solely on their military or economy to assert influence.' How Qatar became the relationship broker Rather than picking sides, Qatar cultivated ties with everyone, from Washington to Hamas, from the Taliban to Israel. It earned Doha praise as a pragmatic neutral in some corners, and suspicion as a double-dealer in others. In 2008, Qatar helped end an 18-month political crisis in Lebanon. In 2012, it hosted the exiled Syrian opposition. In 2020, it facilitated the US-Taliban peace agreement. Over the past year alone, Qatari diplomats have hosted ceasefire talks for Gaza, brokered prisoner swaps between the US and Venezuela, mediated the return of Ukrainian children from Russia, and even convened leaders of the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda to sign a peace deal in Washington. Unlike other Gulf monarchies, Qatar has resisted joining full-blown military campaigns, like the Saudi-led war in Yemen, and instead offered to host talks. This new doctrine was formalised in the country's 2003 constitution, which stated that Qatar's foreign policy would be anchored in 'strengthening international peace and security.' Geography helped. Tucked between regional giants Saudi Arabia and Iran, Qatar sits at a volatile fault line. Diplomacy was as much a survival strategy as it was ambition. The 2017 blockade by its Gulf neighbours, who accused it of funding terrorism and getting too close to Iran, only reinforced that instinct. Rather than back down, Qatar doubled down on independent diplomacy, built new alliances, and came out stronger. Its wealth helped too. With a $450 billion sovereign wealth fund and the world's third-largest natural gas reserves, Qatar could buy visibility and goodwill. It sponsored global summits, invested in Western capitals, and built world-class infrastructure. Hosting the 2022 FIFA World Cup was only the most visible example of this projection. But perhaps its greatest asset was discretion. It was willing to mediate quietly, often without fanfare. This low-key style appealed to parties who needed cover to talk. As of July, the country is running ten simultaneous mediations. And the man orchestrating this is Dr Mohammed bin Abdulaziz al-Khulaifi, Qatar's Minister of State and chief mediator, a figure rarely in the same timezone two days in a row. 'Whenever there is a conflict,' he told a reporter of The Guardian recently, 'you will see us.' Chakraborty said, 'Qatar's mediation game isn't only about borders or recognition, it's a deeper quest for meaning. As an Islamic state, it blends faith with diplomacy to carve out a distinct global identity. Faith gives Qatar a language of moral legitimacy. When it talks about peace and negotiation, it's not just political, it's civilisational.' The costs and calculations Still, neutrality has its price. Chakraborty cautioned, 'Qatar's future as a diplomatic mediator may face growing scrutiny over perceived biases stemming from its US alliance and relationships with controversial groups. Regional rivalries could resurface and undermine its influence.' Indeed, Qatar's reliance on US backing, including the large Al Udeid Air Base, has raised eyebrows. While it buys strategic protection, it also ties Doha's fortunes to Washington's agenda. In a world shifting toward multipolarity, this could become a liability. During the recent escalation involving the US, Iran, and Israel, Tehran fired missiles not at Israel or US targets, but at Qatar itself. It marked the first direct military attack on Qatari soil in modern times. Qatar closed its airspace, readied defences, and intercepted all but one of the 14 missiles, the only one that landed caused no harm. However, it didn't retaliate. Doha condemned the attack, but recognised it for what it was: Iran's need for a symbolic win. By absorbing the blow, Qatar gave diplomacy the space it needed. Within hours, Trump was back on the phone with Doha. Israel had agreed to a ceasefire. The Iran conflagration ended not with a ceremony, but with phone calls brokered by Doha. 'Too much US dependency is working in its favour right now,' Chakraborty said, 'but in the long run, China is perceived to be the global power. So it would be prudent for Qatar if their leaders start scouting for new allies in case the USA withdraws its support someday.' Qatar's mediating role also risks alienating traditional partners. Its willingness to engage with Hamas, the Taliban, and others has made Israel, Egypt, and parts of Europe wary. Failed negotiations could damage its credibility. The challenge for Qatar will be to adapt without overextending, to remain flexible, but not appear fickle.
