Brit arrested in Bali on drug charges avoids death penalty and is sentenced to 10 months in jail after ‘taking a package of drugs from a taxi driver'
A British man arrested in Bali for allegedly taking a package containing just over a kilogram of MDMA from a taxi driver has avoided the death penalty.
Thomas Parker, from Cumbria, was arrested near Kuta beach in January after allegedly collecting a package from a taxi driver at a nearby street.
The package contained slightly over a kilogram of MDMA, a party drug and the main ingredient in ecstasy, according to a lab test result cited in court documents.
Parker, a 32-year-old electrician by trade, was initially charged with drug trafficking and could have faced the death penalty by firing squad if found guilty.
But the trafficking charge was dropped after police investigators determined that the package was not directly linked to him.
On Tuesday, the Denpasar District Court reportedly handed him just 10 months for drug possession.
Parker repeatedly expressed his remorse in his final plea last week, and asked the panel of three judges to consider his situation and impose a lenient sentence.
'I am very sorry and apologise, I know it was a mistake,' Parker said, 'I promise not to repeat it again, because I really didn't know that (the package) was drugs.'
According to the court document obtained by The Associated Press, Parker was noticed 'acting suspiciously' by officers while he was collecting the package.
He allegedly discarded it in a panic and fled when police approached him. He was traced back to the villa where he was staying and was arrested.
But Parker, in court, has maintained that he did not order the package and had initially refused to collect it, doing so only after a friend assured him it was safe and would not endanger him.
The package was sent by a drug dealer friend, identified only as Nicky, who Parker had known for around two years and spoke to regularly through the Telegram messaging app.
Parker was told someone would pick it up shortly from him, his lawyer, Edward Pangkahila said.
Parker was not promised money or anything else by Nicky in return, Pangkahila said.
During the police investigation, Parker was able to prove that he did not order the package.
Authorities reduced the charge from trafficking to the less serious offence of hiding information from authorities.
Prosecutors on May 6 sought a one-year prison term for Parker.
However, under Indonesian legal system, judges have an important role as legal determinants in a trial.
They could seek further charges if applicable laws are unclear or non-existent, meaning that the trafficking charge could be reinstated.
Pangkahila said that Parker last met Nicky a year ago when he was on vacation in Thailand.
As his friend was a dealer, Parker worried the package was filled with drugs.
He panicked when he saw police officers on the street and and was approached by them, Pangkahila said.
He was traced back to the 7 Seas Villas in North Kuta, where he was arrested.
Police showed the discarded package to Parker, who allegedly admitted it was the package he had received earlier.
They claimed they had found a light-brown powder inside later identified as MDMA.
Police took the suspect to the narcotics office for processing back in January, and he has been remanded in custody since.
The case went unreported until authorities showed a handcuffed Parker at a news conference on March 6.
A spokesperson for the Foreign Office previously told MailOnline they were supporting a British man detained in Bali and are in contact with the local authorities.
Indonesia has very strict drug laws and convicted traffickers can be executed by a firing squad.
About 530 people are on death row in Indonesia, mostly for drug-related crimes, including 96 foreigners, the Ministry of Immigration and Corrections' data showed.
Indonesia's last executions, of an Indonesian and three foreigners, were carried out in July 2016.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
14 minutes ago
- NBC News
Judge tells Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni to work out dispute over dismissal of emotional distress claims
Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's legal squabble over her claims of emotional distress hit a roadblock Tuesday when a federal judge refused to let Lively dismiss them on her preferred terms, instead telling both sides to reach an agreement. The recent dispute between the 'It Ends With Us' co-stars, who have been entangled in a high-profile legal battle for months, arose after Baldoni's lawyers requested Lively's medical and mental health records to defend against her claims that he intentionally and negligently inflicted emotional distress while they were on the set of the film. Lively's initial complaint in December accused Baldoni of sexual harassment, as well as retaliation, after she raised issues about his on-set behavior — allegations Baldoni's lawyers have denied. Since then, the two stars have been embroiled in a tense legal standoff, with each accusing the other of having orchestrated a smear campaign. Rather than provide medical and mental health records requested by Baldoni's team, Lively offered to drop her emotional distress claims, according to court documents filed Monday. In response, Baldoni's lawyers Monday disputed her request to dismiss the claims 'without prejudice,' meaning she would be able to refile them later. In a court filing, Baldoni's team argued that Lively should permanently dismiss her claims if she will not provide the medical records it requested. In its own court filing hours later, Lively's team called Baldoni's motion a 'false and plainly improper public relations stunt' and asked the court to deny and strike the motion entirely. On Tuesday morning, U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman of the Southern District of New York denied Lively's request but wrote that she can file a formal motion asking for dismissal without prejudice. Otherwise, Liman wrote, Lively's and Baldoni's teams must agree among themselves whether the dismissal would be with or without prejudice. He also denied Baldoni's motion to force Lively to provide her medical records, saying the request is rendered moot now that Lively is withdrawing her emotional distress claims. Liman's ruling pressures Lively to dismiss her claims either way, as he wrote that 'if the claims are not dismissed, the Court will preclude Lively from offering any evidence of emotional distress.' In a statement, Lively's lawyers Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb wrote that Lively offered to dismiss those claims 'because they are no longer necessary, and she will continue to pursue emotional distress damages through other claims in her lawsuit, including sexual harassment and retaliation.' 'In addition, the Baldoni-Wayfarer strategy of filing retaliatory claims has exposed them to expansive damages under California law,' Lively's lawyers wrote. (Wayfarer Studios, the production company behind 'It Ends With Us,' which Baldoni co-founded, is a defendant along with Baldoni.) 'This is exactly where both parties were before the Baldoni-Wayfarer Parties rushed to file this utterly pointless motion to compel, all searching for yet another press moment,' Lively's lawyers wrote. Lawyers for Baldoni did not immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday. Baldoni's filing Monday argued that Lively was trying to avoid providing her medical records while preserving her claims of intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. 'Ms. Lively cannot have it both ways. If Ms. Lively wants to withdraw her frivolous IED [intentional infliction of emotional distress] Claims, the Wayfarer Parties are entitled to a dismissal with prejudice to ensure they will not be re-filed,' Baldoni's lawyers said in the filing. 'If Ms. Lively is unwilling to stipulate to the dismissal of her IED Claims with prejudice, then the Wayfarer Parties will continue to defend against them, and she must produce her medical information and documents as set forth herein.' Baldoni's lawyers were specifically seeking the names and addresses of her health care providers, their treatment notes and signed privacy forms authorizing the release of her records. They wrote in their filing Monday that because she claimed emotional injuries, Lively has placed her mental condition 'at issue' and thus 'waived any doctor-patient privilege.' Lively's lawyers countered Baldoni's motion in their response Monday, arguing that Lively voluntarily agreed to withdraw her emotional distress claims 'in good faith' to streamline the case. They added that Baldoni's team had conceded that that means their request for medical records would become moot. Lively's filing also claimed that Baldoni's lawyers did not raise any objections to her proposed revisions to the joint stipulation for dismissal during a conference call Monday. It alleged that Baldoni's team instead rushed to file a 'clearly pre-written Motion the minute that the teleconference concluded.' 'Almost immediately thereafter, tabloid media began reporting 'exclusively' on Ms. Lively's 'shock' move, claiming that she has 'sensationally' dropped her IIED claim, quoting extensively from the Motion,' Lively's filing said. Aside from asking the court to deny and strike the motion, Lively's lawyers had asked Liman on Monday to consider sanctions for the opposition's 'continued abuse of this Court's docket.' 'The Motion was filed for a single audience: the media,' Lively's filing said. 'There is nothing for this Court to compel.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Luigi Mangione's defense team asks court to remove shackles and bulletproof vest from UnitedHealthcare CEO murder suspect
Luigi Mangione has asked the judge to allow him to appear in court without handcuffs or a bulletproof vest because he has been a 'model prisoner.' The 27-year-old is accused of shooting UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson outside of a New York City hotel in December. He has attracted a significant fan following and recently became a millionaire after his crowdfunding campaign exceeded $1 million in May. Mangione's lawyers filed a motion on Tuesday requesting he be allowed to sit at the defense table unshackled and in 'court appropriate clothing without a bulletproof vest' at his June 26 hearing, Fox News reported. His defense team claimed forcing the Maryland native to wear the garb contributes to a prejudice campaign against him. 'The authorities - both state and federal - have already prejudiced Mr. Mangione in the media more than virtually any defendant in recent memory,' filing said. 'These same authorities should not use Your Honor's courtroom and Mr. Mangione's court appearances to perpetuate a false narrative that Mr. Mangione is an unusual danger requiring extraordinary security measures.' Mangione's legal team argued forcing him to wearing handcuffs and a bulletproof vest impedes his right to effectively defend himself. 'There is no disputing that he has been a model prisoner, a model defendant in court, and has treated everyone in the court and prison system with cooperation and respect,' the lawyers said. 'These deeply prejudicial security measures, which are invariably photographed and circulated to the public, including potential jurors, are unnecessary and should not continue as they are damaging to Mr. Mangione's right to a fair trial.' Mangione is facing charges in New York and at the federal level where prosecutors intend to seek the death penalty. The murder suspect pleaded not guilty to all federal stalking and murder charges brought against him on April 25 in Manhattan federal court. Before he entered a plea for the federal charges, Mangione pleaded not guilty the New York state murder and terror charges.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sellafield nuclear clean-up too slow and too costly, say MPs
MPs have warned about the speed and cost of cleaning up the Sellafield nuclear waste dump and raised concerns over a 'suboptimal' workplace culture at the site. Members of parliament's public accounts committee (PAC) urged the government and bosses at the sprawling collection of crumbling buildings in Cumbria to get a grasp on the 'intolerable risks' presented by its ageing infrastructure. In a detailed report into the site, the PAC said Sellafield was not moving quickly enough to tackle its biggest hazards; raised the alarm over its culture; and said the government was not ensuring value for money was being achieved from taxpayer funds. In 2023, the Guardian's Nuclear Leaks investigation revealed a string of safety concerns at the site – including escalating fears over a leak of radioactive liquid from a decaying building known as the Magnox swarf storage silo (MSSS) – as well as cybersecurity failings and allegations of a poor workplace culture. The PAC – which heard evidence in March from Sellafield and its oversight body, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) – found that the state-owned company had missed most of its annual targets to retrieve waste from several buildings, including the MSSS. 'As a result of Sellafield's underperformance [the MSSS] will likely remain extremely hazardous for longer,' the MPs said. The ultimate cost of cleaning up Sellafield, which contains waste from weapons programmes and atomic power generation, has been estimated at £136bn and could take more than 100 years. Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, the chair of the PAC, said: 'Unfortunately, our latest report is interleaved with a number of examples of failure, cost overruns, and continuing safety concerns. Given the tens of billions at stake, and the dangers on site to both the environment and human life, this is simply not good enough.' He added: 'As with the fight against climate change, the sheer scale of the hundred-year timeframe of the decommissioning project makes it hard to grasp the immediacy of safety hazards and cost overruns that delays can have. 'Every day at Sellafield is a race against time to complete works before buildings reach the end of their life. Our report contains too many signs that this is a race that Sellafield risks losing.' MPs noted that one project, a now-paused replacement of an on-site lab, had resulted in '£127m wasted'. The cost of cleaning up Sellafield has caused tensions with the Treasury as the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, attempts to tighten public spending and spur growth. Sellafield, which is home to the world's largest store of plutonium, said in February that nearly £3bn in new funding was 'not enough'. Last year, Sellafield apologised and was fined £332,500 after it pleaded guilty to criminal charges over years of cybersecurity failings. The PAC noted that the timeline for a government project to create a long-term deep underground store for nuclear waste, including that held at Sellafield, had slipped from 2040 to the late 2050s. The government is considering sites in Cumbria and Lincolnshire, although Lincolnshire county council is expected to withdraw the latter from the process after vocal local opposition. The MPs said they had found 'indications of a suboptimal culture' at Sellafield, and noted that the NDA paid £377,200 in 2023-24 to settle employment-related claims. Alison McDermott, a former HR consultant who raised concerns over bullying and a 'toxic culture' at the site, said she felt 'vindicated' by the report. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The PAC urged the government to set out how it would hold the NDA and Sellafield to account over its performance. It said Sellafield should report annually on progress against targets and explain how it is addressing the deteriorating condition of its assets. The NDA should publish data on the prevalence of bullying and harassment at nuclear sites, it said. Clifton-Brown said there were 'early indications of some improvements in Sellafield's delivery' but said the government needed to do 'far more' to ensure bosses safeguard the public and taxpayer funds. The NDA's chief executive, David Peattie, responding on behalf of Sellafield, said: 'We welcome the scrutiny of the committee and their report. We will now look in more detail at the recommendations and consider how best to address them. 'We take the findings seriously, and the safety of the site and the wellbeing of our people will always be our highest priorities.' A spokesperson for the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: 'We expect the highest standards of safety and security as former nuclear sites are dismantled, and the regulator is clear that public safety is not compromised at Sellafield. 'We continue to support the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority in its oversight of Sellafield, while driving value for money. This is underpinned by monthly performance reviews and increased responsibility for overseeing major project performance, enabling more direct scrutiny and intervention. 'We have zero-tolerance of bullying, harassment and offensive behaviour in the workplace – we expect Sellafield and the NDA to operate on this basis, investigate allegations and take robust action when needed.'
