Judge tells Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni to work out dispute over dismissal of emotional distress claims
Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's legal squabble over her claims of emotional distress hit a roadblock Tuesday when a federal judge refused to let Lively dismiss them on her preferred terms, instead telling both sides to reach an agreement.
The recent dispute between the 'It Ends With Us' co-stars, who have been entangled in a high-profile legal battle for months, arose after Baldoni's lawyers requested Lively's medical and mental health records to defend against her claims that he intentionally and negligently inflicted emotional distress while they were on the set of the film.
Lively's initial complaint in December accused Baldoni of sexual harassment, as well as retaliation, after she raised issues about his on-set behavior — allegations Baldoni's lawyers have denied. Since then, the two stars have been embroiled in a tense legal standoff, with each accusing the other of having orchestrated a smear campaign.
Rather than provide medical and mental health records requested by Baldoni's team, Lively offered to drop her emotional distress claims, according to court documents filed Monday. In response, Baldoni's lawyers Monday disputed her request to dismiss the claims 'without prejudice,' meaning she would be able to refile them later. In a court filing, Baldoni's team argued that Lively should permanently dismiss her claims if she will not provide the medical records it requested.
In its own court filing hours later, Lively's team called Baldoni's motion a 'false and plainly improper public relations stunt' and asked the court to deny and strike the motion entirely.
On Tuesday morning, U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman of the Southern District of New York denied Lively's request but wrote that she can file a formal motion asking for dismissal without prejudice. Otherwise, Liman wrote, Lively's and Baldoni's teams must agree among themselves whether the dismissal would be with or without prejudice.
He also denied Baldoni's motion to force Lively to provide her medical records, saying the request is rendered moot now that Lively is withdrawing her emotional distress claims.
Liman's ruling pressures Lively to dismiss her claims either way, as he wrote that 'if the claims are not dismissed, the Court will preclude Lively from offering any evidence of emotional distress.'
In a statement, Lively's lawyers Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb wrote that Lively offered to dismiss those claims 'because they are no longer necessary, and she will continue to pursue emotional distress damages through other claims in her lawsuit, including sexual harassment and retaliation.'
'In addition, the Baldoni-Wayfarer strategy of filing retaliatory claims has exposed them to expansive damages under California law,' Lively's lawyers wrote.
(Wayfarer Studios, the production company behind 'It Ends With Us,' which Baldoni co-founded, is a defendant along with Baldoni.)
'This is exactly where both parties were before the Baldoni-Wayfarer Parties rushed to file this utterly pointless motion to compel, all searching for yet another press moment,' Lively's lawyers wrote.
Lawyers for Baldoni did not immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
Baldoni's filing Monday argued that Lively was trying to avoid providing her medical records while preserving her claims of intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
'Ms. Lively cannot have it both ways. If Ms. Lively wants to withdraw her frivolous IED [intentional infliction of emotional distress] Claims, the Wayfarer Parties are entitled to a dismissal with prejudice to ensure they will not be re-filed,' Baldoni's lawyers said in the filing. 'If Ms. Lively is unwilling to stipulate to the dismissal of her IED Claims with prejudice, then the Wayfarer Parties will continue to defend against them, and she must produce her medical information and documents as set forth herein.'
Baldoni's lawyers were specifically seeking the names and addresses of her health care providers, their treatment notes and signed privacy forms authorizing the release of her records. They wrote in their filing Monday that because she claimed emotional injuries, Lively has placed her mental condition 'at issue' and thus 'waived any doctor-patient privilege.'
Lively's lawyers countered Baldoni's motion in their response Monday, arguing that Lively voluntarily agreed to withdraw her emotional distress claims 'in good faith' to streamline the case. They added that Baldoni's team had conceded that that means their request for medical records would become moot.
Lively's filing also claimed that Baldoni's lawyers did not raise any objections to her proposed revisions to the joint stipulation for dismissal during a conference call Monday. It alleged that Baldoni's team instead rushed to file a 'clearly pre-written Motion the minute that the teleconference concluded.'
'Almost immediately thereafter, tabloid media began reporting 'exclusively' on Ms. Lively's 'shock' move, claiming that she has 'sensationally' dropped her IIED claim, quoting extensively from the Motion,' Lively's filing said.
Aside from asking the court to deny and strike the motion, Lively's lawyers had asked Liman on Monday to consider sanctions for the opposition's 'continued abuse of this Court's docket.'
'The Motion was filed for a single audience: the media,' Lively's filing said. 'There is nothing for this Court to compel.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment 'evil' rapist soldier is caught hiding in toilet after assaulting woman twice in brutal street attack
This is the moment an 'evil' rapist was caught hiding in a railway toilet after raping a woman in a doorway in the early hours of the morning. Private John Harvey, 25, targeted a woman, who was not known to him, before dragging her away from a street in Shrewsbury, Shropshire. In a 'horrific' 20-minute attack, he raped the victim, who cannot be named or identified, twice in the historic Mardol area of the market town on July 6 last year. A shocking clip, released by West Mercia Police after Harvey shows officers ordering the disgraced soldier to open a cubicle door after committing a sexual assault. He was then arrested by officers, who forced open the door, at the Shrewsbury before brazenly asking if he could go to the bathroom first. During a nine-day trial, where he was sentenced to nine years behind bars, it was heard Harvey, who missed his last train, went back towards the woman after the assaults. However, the court was told he was 'put off' as she was on the phone to police, so he went to the station, where he hid in a cubicle toilet. Of the 999 call from the 'vulnerable' woman, Judge Richard McConaghy said: 'She walked away and rang 999, audio of that call in the state that she was in is harrowing to listen to.' Following his arrest, Harvey made a full confession to police after accosting and attacking the young woman as she walked through Shrewsbury town centre. But he then pleaded not guilty and forced the victim to 'relive the worst moment of my life' by giving evidence at a nine-day trial. Harvey, of Clive Barracks in Tern Hill was found guilty of two counts of rape and one of assault by penetration in February. The 25-year-old appeared relaxed in a video-link from HMP Hewell at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court on Thursday, as the judge said the offence was aggravated by the fact he was drunk and the 'vulnerable' woman was walking alone at night.. Harvey, who was also ordered to serve an extended three-year period on licence after his eventual release, was described by the judge to be an 'educated man with a degree' and to have had a 'respectable career' at the time of the attack. In a victim impact statement to the court read by counsel, the woman, who cannot be identified, said her 20-minute ordeal had left her with post-traumatic disorder. The woman said: 'My home has become the only place I feel calm. The offender has convinced me terrible people who can do terrible things are everywhere.' 'I was forced to endure rape. The offender also forced me to fight my corner in a trial. I was forced by him to relive the worst moment of my life repeatedly. 'This event from the beginning to the end is the worst and hardest thing I have ever had to endure.' Sentencing Harvey, the judge said: 'You co-operated on arrest and made full admissions to having raped her. 'You however chose to throw that mitigation away by contesting the trial in the face of very strong evidence and made her give evidence despite your own confession of what you had done.' Following the sentencing, Detective Constable Sam Jones said: 'I am extremely pleased with the sentence that has been given to Harvey by the judge today, as he is a danger to the wider public, in particular, women. 'In July last year Harvey committed a purely evil crime, and despite admitting to the offences during a police interview when he was arrested, he then changed his story at court, subjecting his victim and her loved ones to sit through a trial and relive that awful night. 'I would like to take this opportunity to thank the victim for her bravery and resilience throughout the entire investigation and trial.' No details of Harvey's military service or his employment by the Army were disclosed at his sentencing hearing. Clive Barracks is the long-term home of the 1st Battalion of the Royal Irish Regiment. In a statement which did not confirm details of Harvey's unit, an Army spokesperson said: 'We can confirm that Private John Harvey appeared for sentencing at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court on June 5 2025, convicted of a sexual offence. He was sentenced to nine years imprisonment.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Blake Lively offers to do FUNERAL arrangements for fans in bizarre It Ends With Us themed post amid lawsuit
Blake Lively left fans perplexed over her latest social media post as she playfully offered her floral arranging services to fans amid her legal war with Justin Baldoni. Although she has certainly had her hands full navigating her ongoing lawsuit against her former It Ends with Us costar, 41, the Gossip Girl star, 37, took a much-needed break from defending herself to show off one of her many talents. 'My flowers babies, from seeds, to cutting, to arrangement,' she wrote on her Instagram Story, alongside an innocuous picture of peonies and Russian sage placed into a vase on her dining room table. In a bizarre move, the mother-of-four, who has an estimated personal net worth of $30 million, joked that she was open for business to create floral arrangements for her followers' 'next graduation, funeral or wedding.' During her press tour for It Ends With Us last year, in which she a florist named Lily Bloom, Lively shared her love for floristry as a form of 'straight-up peace' to her. Prior to filing her sexual harassment lawsuit against Baldoni, who denies all her claims, the Another Simple Favor actress admitted she's 'always thought' of herself as a florist, well before playing one. 'I buy corner store flowers, take them home, reassemble them & give them new life,' she revealed on Instagram. 'Ever since I moved to the city at 19, that's been one of my creative and meditative anchors. It's design, it's interacting with nature, it's a multi sensory joy.' She continued: 'Whenever I get the opportunity to garden from scratch and assemble fresh arrangements, I feel like the luckiest person on the planet. It's straight up peace. No there's no joke coming. Just me being earnest about flowers. Ugh pure sincerity. I hate it here.' In an interview with People last August, Lively also reflected on how flowers played a meaningful part in how her husband Ryan Reynolds wooed her. 'When my husband and I first got together, he would send me a bouquet of flowers every week but he would always send a card and it would just be a sentence of something that had happened that week. Something funny or emotional that one of us said,' she gushed. ''It was just a little quote of the week. It was such a beautiful, romantic thing.' Lively and Reynolds first met on the set of The Green Lantern in 2010 and exchanged vows in 2012. They're the proud parents of three girls James, 10, Betty, 8, and Inez, 5, and one son - Olin, 2. Her latest post comes just days after suffered another courtroom blow in her ongoing legal battle with Baldoni. Earlier this week, a New York judge threw a curveball in her attempt to withdraw her 'emotional distress' claims against the actor Court filings obtained by the Daily Mail reveal the two parties had been slugging it out over the actress's claims that her co-star had caused her emotional distress, with Baldoni's team demanding she provide proof from her medical records. Lively's team instead then attempted to quietly drop that element from her blockbuster lawsuit on Friday but, critically, without prejudice – meaning the claim could be refiled at a later date. She also filed a motion on Monday to block Baldoni's request for her medical records arguing that she voluntarily sought to withdraw the claim in 'good faith to streamline the dispute'. On Tuesday, Judge Lewis Liman agreed to deny Baldoni's motion based on Lively's decision to drop the claims, however, he also ruled that both sides will now have to negotiate whether her emotional distress element will be dismissed from the case permanently. In another blow, Judge Liman said even if the claims are not dismissed, Lively's team will no longer be able to produce evidence of emotional distress in court. The 24-hour legal spat has already seen claims and counterclaims traded by both sides, with Baldoni's team saying Lively is trying to 'have it both ways'. On Monday, legal representatives for Lively hit back with a furious statement accusing Baldoni of orchestrating a 'press stunt' and saying they had offered to drop the emotional distress claims in 'good faith.' In a statement released to the Daily Mail, attorneys Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb said: 'Once again this is a routine part of the litigation process that is being used as a press stunt. 'We are doing what trial lawyers do: preparing our case for trial by streamlining and focusing it; they are doing what they do: desperately seeking another tired round of tabloid coverage. 'The Baldoni-Wayfarer strategy of filing retaliatory claims has exposed them to expansive new damages claims under California law, rendering certain of Ms. Lively's original claims no longer necessary. 'Ms. Lively continues to allege emotional distress, as part of numerous other claims in her lawsuit, such as sexual harassment and retaliation, and massive additional compensatory damages on all of her claims.' Then, in a fiery letter obtained by the Daily Mail, Gottleib and Hudson attempted to have Baldoni's motion to compel medical records dismissed, arguing it was based on 'two brazenly false assertions.' But that move failed thanks to Judge Liman, with Lively's emotional distress claims now off the table. Despite the win, Baldoni will still have to defend himself over her other claims which include sexual harassment and the orchestration of a smear campaign against her. The 41-year-old is also pursuing a $400million countersuit of his own that also claims defamation and accuses the glamorous blonde of damaging his reputation and career. The legal spat has produced months of negative headlines for Lively who has also had to look on as her friendship with superstar bestie Taylor Swift deteriorates in public, largely due to the singer's fury at being dragged into the case. Last month, the singer found herself on the receiving end of a now withdrawn subpoena and in the middle of a row over whether Lively had tried to force her to issue a supportive message by threatening to release a decade's worth of text messages. The former provoked a stinging response from her rep who said the megastar had had nothing to do with It Ends With Us beyond providing a song for the soundtrack. The statement read: 'Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie, she was not involved in any casting or creative decisions, she did not score the film, she never saw an edit or made any notes on the film, she did not even see It Ends With Us until weeks after its public release, and was traveling around the globe during 2023 and 2024 headlining the biggest tour in history.' Her spokesperson added: 'The connection Taylor had to this film was permitting the use of one song, 'My Tears Ricochet. 'Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift's name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
North Carolina judge revokes bond for house party shooting suspect
A North Carolina judge ordered Thursday that a defendant accused in last weekend's shootings at a house party that left one person dead and 11 others injured stay in jail while awaiting trial. The decision came the day after another judge had set a $200,000 bond for Garon Nathaniel Killian, 20, of Lenoir, who is charged with one count of attempted first-degree murder related to the shootings. Prosecutors on Wednesday had asked that no bond be allowed. Killian had not posted the amount to be released. On Thursday, when Killian had a court date for charges involving a different altercation in April, District Court Judge Scott Conrad revoked the $200,000 bond related to last weekend's violent fracas, according to the Catawba County Clerk of Court's office. Investigators of the shootings that happened early Sunday believe at least 80 shots were fired in a crime scene that spanned several properties along a road in the usually quiet residential neighborhood. FBI agents spent this week at the scene examining bullet trajectories. The Catawba County Sheriff's Office has said that beyond Killian three people have been arrested and charged with crimes related to the party or shootings, and that authorities were seeking on Thursday two other men also wanted on attempted first-degree murder. Giving Killian on Wednesday the chance to post bond had angered local law enforcement leaders. Hickory city police announced previously that Killian and another young man had been charged with many counts — including attempted first-degree murder and assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill — for an April 6 altercation in a parking lot that led to shots being fired into a crowd. No one was injured. Catawba Sheriff Don Brown said on Wednesday at a media briefing that while Killian was freed by posting bond several days later he 'should have never went back on the street," and called the situation 'frustrating' and 'infuriating.' Shawn Patrick Hood, 58, of Lenoir, was killed in last weekend's gunfire. He was the oldest of the victims, who ranged in age from as young as 16, the sheriff's office said. Two of the other three people arrested were charged with three counts of helping someone underage 21 by allowing the possession of alcoholic beverages. The charges are related to the planning and promotion of the house party, the sheriff's office said. There were many juvenile or underage attendees, the state Division of Alcohol Law Enforcement said Wednesday. The other person arrested was charged as an accessory to attempted first-degree murder after the fact, the sheriff's office said.
