Consumers has the final say about retiring Campbell, but Ottawa County is worried
'An overwhelming majority of Ottawa County does not want the Campbell Plant to be closed in 2025,' said Jenison resident Joseph McCarter during a meeting of Ottawa County Planning and Policy Committee on Tuesday, Feb. 11.
Though he didn't cite statistics, McCarter doesn't speak alone. An effort to "Save the Campbell" in Ottawa County, started by McCarter, has been underway since Consumers Energy announced the facility in Port Sheldon Township was slated for an early 2025 retirement in 2021. Initially, at least one portion of the plant was meant to stay online until 2040.
More: What's the future for Campbell Power Plant? Consumers announces 20-year partnership
More: 'Save the Campbell' is about far more than utilities — here's why
McCarter is also joined by local officials in his concerns.
'It's voluntary for the Campbell Plant to be closing (this) early,' said Commissioner Allison Miedema. 'That was a voluntary decision. This wasn't a mandate that was put on them.'
The decision was instead spurred by Consumers Energy's Clean Energy Plan, which calls for eliminating coal as an energy source in 2025. The plan was released in the wake of state law requiring Michigan to produce 100% of its energy from clean sources by 2040.
The J.H. Campbell Plant began operations in 1962, generating nearly 1,500 megawatts of electricity on a 2,000-acre property. The plant closure will mark the end of Consumers' electricity generation from coal.
Retirement and restoration of the property is expected to begin later this year, and last until 2030. Work includes the removal of coal residuals, backfilling the cold pile with clean fill, ash remediation with Ashcor, removal of warm water discharge pipe and relocation of multiple bird boxes.
The west side of the property will be available for reconstruction sooner than the east side, thanks to ash remediation. It also includes a public access point open April 15-Oct. 15, which will continue to be maintained by Consumers until 2069.
Port Sheldon is already grappling with how the loss of such a large taxpayer will impact the municipality. In partnership with McKenna, local officials have engaged with residents on future plans for the site, with a "final" vision expected soon.
Under the original plan from Consumers, only two of three units at the Campbell Plant would shutter in 2025. The third was meant to remain operational until 2040. According to Dena Isabel, a representative who spoke Tuesday, that plan just wasn't economical.
'It doesn't make sense to run Unit Three without One and Two,' she said. 'We decided we were going to retire all three units.'
Miedema estimated 90% of residents in Ottawa County would be supportive of a delay in closing the plant, though she, too, didn't cite statistics. She said State Sen. Roger Victory supports keeping Unit Three running until 2045.
Isabel clarified that customers won't see a change in service after the facility's retirement. That's because, she said, renewable energy sources will be added to the grid, which are cheaper to run. In the end, keeping the plant open would increase rates, she said, because customers are paying for excess generation they don't use.
'So, it's cheaper to eliminate this plant and build 8,000 megawatts of solar (energy) than to keep an existing, already built plant?' Commissioner Jordan Jorritsma asked.
Jorritsma is worried about where, exactly, solar panels might be placed. Under new state law, Michigan has the power to override local authorities in placing a renewable energy source on suitable land, under certain conditions. The existing 2,000 acres on which the Campbell Plant sits aren't suitable for solar energy, according to Isabel.
'We look for flat, open spaces,' Isabel said.
'Farmland,' Jorritsma countered.
Commissioners are worried about energy demand and grid stability without the Campbell Plant, which operates on the Midcontinent Independent System Operator. MISO is responsible for power across 15 states and one Canadian Province. In 2024, 26% of the authority's energy came from coal.
According to the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, MISO is listed as "high risk," meaning shortfalls to the energy supply can occur at normal peak conditions. That's the worst ranking on NERC's Risk Area Summary for 2025-2029 — and MISO is the only grid that's earned it.
'The only way the lights can come on is if there's enough power into the grid serving our area collectively,' said Commissioner Josh Brugger. '... I don't like coal. I think there ... are other options, green energy, natural gas — but at the same time, we've got business, we've got industry, we've got residents all throughout the grid that need that power.'
'I understand you guys are a business. It's a for-profit thing. I'm not big on the government telling you what you can and can't do with your business. I would just ask on behalf of everybody on the MISO grid to stay online longer.'
Committee Chair Phil Kuyers moved to continue discussions during the next full board meeting Tuesday, Feb. 25.
— Cassidey Kavathas is the politics and court reporter at The Holland Sentinel. Contact her at ckavathas@hollandsentinel.com. Follow her on Twitter @cassideykava.
This article originally appeared on The Holland Sentinel: Pleas to 'Save the Campbell' continue from Ottawa County Board
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Fed's Bostic Gets Earful on Tariff Costs, Consumer Pain on Tour
Raphael Bostic had two key takeaways from a recent tour through a stretch of the southeast US overseen by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta — consumers are growing more stressed, and tariff costs are real. In conversations with bankers, educators and business owners based in northern Alabama and Mississippi, Bostic, who is president of the Atlanta Fed, also heard about the burden of higher borrowing costs squeezing businesses' profit margins and making it harder for families to buy a home. Employer struggles to find and retain workers was another refrain.
Wall Street Journal
17 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Americans Pull Back From an Epic Credit-Card Binge
Americans are starting to pull back from a pandemic-era credit-card binge. After a surge in credit-card spending that pushed Americans' card balances above $1 trillion, growth is now moderating. Credit-card spending has been growing more slowly than debit-card spending since late last year, the first such stretch in nearly four years, according to the latest spending data from Visa and Mastercard.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT About Tariffs — And Here's Who It Said Is Impacted Most
You can't scroll through your phone without seeing the word tariffs. It appears in every other headline. Everyone from TV pundits to social media stars are duking it out over whether they're good for the country and for consumers' wallets. At this point, you're sort of embarrassed to admit that you don't know what a tariff is, how it works or who it's going to really hit. Find Out: Read Next: Instead of asking your one know-it-all friend, who will give you an unnecessarily complex explanation, there's another route you can take: ChatGPT. While you don't want to use ChatGPT as the end-all, be-all of your investigation, it can provide a baseline of information that will help guide you in deeper research. To get a foundation into tariffs, your friendly neighborhood GOBankingRates writer (that would be me) asked ChatGPT to explain tariffs to me in very rudimentary terms — along with who should expect to be impacted the most. A Definition in a Nutshell ChatGPT's basic definition of a tariff is very simple, which is exactly what I wanted: 'A tariff is a kind of tax a government puts on products that come from other countries. It makes those foreign products more expensive so that people might buy stuff from their own country instead.' Just to double-check this information before moving on, I visited the Tax Foundation website. Its definition aligns with what ChatGPT gave me: 'Tariffs are taxes imposed by one country on goods imported from another country.' The Tax Foundation website concurred with ChatGPT's definition but offered greater specifics about the function of tariffs in trade: 'Tariffs are trade barriers that raise prices, reduce available quantities of goods and services for US businesses and consumers, and create an economic burden on foreign exporters.' Learn More: Tariffs in Action To give me an idea of how tariffs work in practice, ChatGPT gave me a real-world example — one that feels like it could come to a news broadcast near you sooner than you'd think. So, the U.S. imports steel from China, let's say for $100 per ton. Without tariffs, U.S. businesses buy Chinese steel at that set price. Pretty easy, right? Now, here's a wrinkle in that situation (or should we say, a dent in the steel): The U.S. government puts a 25% tariff on that Chinese steel. At $100 plus a $25 tariff, that same steel now costs $125 per ton. If the same American businesses balk at the new expense, they might go to U.S.-made steel that costs $110 — because it's now cheaper than imported steel. Why Are Tariffs Imposed? Ostensibly, tariffs are imposed to protect local businesses. As ChatGPT put it, 'tariffs make imported goods more expensive, so local products seem cheaper in comparison.' It gives me another real-world scenario: 'If cheap clothes from another country flood the market, local clothing companies might go out of business. A tariff helps them compete.' Needless to say, if tariffs can help local businesses keep their doors open, that's good news for employees. And when I asked ChatGPT why tariffs are imposed, it did mention that, when local companies are protected, they might be more likely to keep or hire more workers. ChatGPT offered another scenario, which is that tariffs can be implemented as a means to influence, or even outright punish, other governments. It returned to the theme of tensions between the U.S. and China to offer another example. 'The U.S. imposed tariffs on Chinese goods during trade tensions to pressure China on trade practices,' it wrote. What's the Controversy? Even if you haven't fully understood what tariffs are, you're still likely aware that they can be controversial. Some pundits tout their ability to make American businesses more competitive, while others say that they're only passing higher costs of popular goods onto consumers. ChatGPT shared that tariffs also have the potential to limit the choice that everyday shoppers enjoy. 'If tariffs make foreign products too expensive, stores might stop selling them,' it wrote. 'So you have fewer brands or types of products to choose from.' Another concern involves trade wars. According to ChatGPT, sometimes countries respond to tariffs with retaliatory tariffs of their own, which can make a wider range of products more expensive for all consumers while putting the hurt to businesses that rely on overseas sales. Who Gets Impacted the Most? Tariffs impact a broad swath of people and organizations, some more positively than others. Of course, domestic producers face less competition from cheaper imports, while consumers find their options limited and more expensive. Importers and retailers also take it on the chin, according to ChatGPT, since they have to pay more for goods or even switch suppliers. There's also the possibility that they can lose out on business if customers don't want to pay higher prices. With their products becoming more expensive, exporters could potentially lose sales because their products become too expensive — however, other countries have the option to retaliate with their own tariffs. To explain, ChatGPT offered the following example: 'After U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods, China imposed tariffs on U.S. soybeans — hurting U.S. farmers.' There isn't really one type of person who will be hit hardest by tariffs — and some of the impact depends on what other countries do. More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact Retirees4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT About Tariffs — And Here's Who It Said Is Impacted Most Solve the daily Crossword
