
HAM-handed or not? Kerala road collapses raise questions on how national highways are built
Should other highway construction modes have been considered instead? What do experts have to say?
National Highway projects are executed on mainly three modes—Build Operate and Transfer (BOT), Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM) and Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC).
In an EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) mode, the Government pays private players to build roads, and gives them no role in ownership, toll collection, or maintenance.
In the BOT (Build, Operate, Transfer) mode, private players build, operate, and maintain roads for a specified period, arranging finances and collecting tolls or annuity fees.
The HAM (Hybrid Annuity Model) mode, meanwhile, is a combination of EPC and BOT, where 40% of the project costs are funded by the government and 60% by the developer. HAM aims to balance risks between developers and the government, providing a more sustainable financial mechanism for road development. But has it ended up being HAM-handed instead?
Why HAM came into play
In the early 2000s, the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) relied on the Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) model to build roads without spending much money. Private contractors built the roads, collected tolls, and handed them back to the government after 20-30 years. However, by 2014, the BOT model had collapsed due to unrealistic traffic projections, delayed land acquisition, and hesitant financiers.
The Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM) was introduced in 2016 to revive private-sector investment in the road sector, which had dwindled due to the challenges faced by the BOT model. Under HAM, the government provides 40% of the project cost as construction support during the construction period, while the remaining 60% is paid as annuity payments over the operations period, along with interest, to the concessionaire. This model aimed to expedite National Highway construction by rekindling private developer interest in highway projects.
Another major factor behind the introduction of HAM was the growing liabilities of the NHAI. Its debt burden increased rapidly and touched Rs 3.35 lakh crores by 2024, putting the authority in a tight spot. Interestingly, NHAI's debt did not reflect in the Union Government's total debt as it had an "Autonomous" status.
Suprio Banerjee, Vice President and Co-Group Head, ICRA Ltd told The New Indian Express that the HAM model was introduced in 2016 to address the challenges faced by road developers in execution and funding tie-up for BOT-toll projects and to encourage private sector participation.
"Since its introduction, the road ministry has awarded more than 19,000 km length of projects under the HAM model to more than 100 developers with a cumulative BPC (bid project cost) of more than Rs 5 lakh crore till March 2025. The awarding also improved over the years with healthy share of awards in HAM mode since FY2021," he added.
"Banks weren't funding BOT projects, and financial closure wasn't happening. The assumption of 8-10% annual traffic growth was off, as parallel road, air, and rail infrastructure development affected it. EPC was draining NHAI's coffers, so they introduced HAM. HAM is a win-win for all three stakeholders - government, contractors, and banks - as the risk is shared among them. It picked up well..." said Ankita Shah ,Vice President at Elara Capital.
Contractors gaining 100% profit without any risk?
But after several stretches of road, including service roads, collapsed under the rains in Kerala, the Congress party released a scathing critique of the Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM).
The Congress claimed in a social media post that the Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) model has been largely defunct since 2016, with most projects now being executed under the Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM) or Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) model. They pointed out that the HAM model essentially amounts to companies lending to the government at an interest rate 3% higher than the bank rate.
The party also highlighted that EPC contracts reveal the true cost of construction, including the contractor's profit, which typically assumes a standard operating profit margin of around 20%.
Citing the example of the Azhiyur to Vengalam stretch of NH-66, the post noted that the original contractor was awarded the contract for Rs 1,838.1 crore but the work was subcontracted for Rs 971 crore. This raises questions about the risk taken by the company and the excessive profits earned.
The X handle @INCKerala highlighted that the contract for the Azhiyur-Vengalam project excludes the cost of operation and maintenance (O&M) for 15 years, which will be paid separately by NHAI to the company, adjusted for inflation annually. Specifically, the contractor has quoted an annual O&M amount of Rs 8.65 crore for this project.
Further scrutiny, the party said, reveals that the actual construction cost of the Azhiyur-Vengalam stretch is approximately Rs 23.7 crore per kilometre, less than half of the awarded amount of Rs 45 crore per kilometre. This stark difference underscores the windfall profits enabled by the Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM) over 15 years, despite construction costs aligning with those of EPC projects, the Congress went on to allege.
The post emphasised that executing projects through EPC, with the government taking loans directly, would be significantly cheaper.
KPCC General Secretary (Organisation) M Liju told The New Indian Express, "Think about the overall loot happening in the name of highway construction. It would have been much cheaper if all projects were executed through EPC, with the government taking loans directly. The 60% annuity payment is essentially a loan from companies to the government at a higher interest rate than the bank rate. Instead of directly taking a loan at Bank rate of 8%, NHAI takes a loan from construction companies at 11%. What's the risk taken by the company to warrant such lucrative rewards?"
Costlier, but still the better option?
Interestingly, speaking at a panel discussion a senior official of the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) had highlighted some months earlier that the HAM is costly to the government, involving upfront grants and repayment of funds with interest.
According to Suprio Banerjee, "A HAM project requires more funding from developers compared to EPC projects, but less than BOT-Toll projects. However, the authority can recover some costs through toll collection, as it retains toll rights under HAM."
He further noted that over the last three years, EPC has been the preferred route, accounting for 65-70% of total road awards, while HAM projects comprised 25-30%. Although HAM's share declined to around 13% in FY2024, it's expected to rebound to over 25-27% in FY2026, driven by projects above Rs 500 crore being awarded in BOT (HAM or Toll) mode.
In a paper Comparative Study of Bot And Ham Models of Public Private Partnership published in the International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Nikhil Kumar and Akash Agrawal argue that compared to BOT model, HAM turns out to be a better alternative for the highway construction project. Here, the risk allocation is minimum and financial burden is also shared to a great extent to both public and private and moreover such HAM projects have a better future.
"The main reason which has made HAM so popular is its ability to handle risk with regard to financial management. In this aspect government is liable to pay only 40% of the overall cost in five instalments and the rest 60% is the burden of the private party. They can raise the fund by means of equity, loans or any debt and the financial support is given to them only when a certain target is achieved in due course of time otherwise penalty would be imposed over them," the paper says.
"The cost of building remains the same across EPC, BOT, and HAM projects; the difference lies in how the investment is recovered. In HAM, no single party bears the entire risk, as both the promoter and the government have a stake. In contrast, EPC and BOT models carry counterparty risks," Ankita Shah said.
"The success of these models ultimately depends on traffic volume, which can be unpredictable due to changing government policies and circumstances. For instance, toll plazas are often kept open during elections, affecting revenue. In HAM, the government shares the risk. The future of road construction likely lies in a mix of all three models, with BOT suitable for high-traffic stretches and EPC for socially necessary projects with lower traffic volume," she added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
26 minutes ago
- Hans India
MA &UD focuses on projects in urban areas under PPP mode
Vijayawada: The municipal administration and urban development department, led by principal secretary S Suresh Kumar is accelerating urban development in the state through innovative financing models like Public-Private Partnership (PPP), Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM), and Viability Gap Funding (VGF). These efforts aim to implement revenue-generating infrastructure projects to enhance urban livability and sustainability. During a review meeting at the Secretariat on Tuesday, Suresh Kumar evaluated 30 projects across urban local bodies (ULBs), focusing on sectors such as solid waste management (waste to energy), urban mobility, road Infrastructure, solar energy, green infrastructure, treated water supply for industries, and commercial development of urban land under PPP. Senior officials, including the commissioner and director of municipal administration, finance department representatives, Andhra Pradesh Urban Infrastructure Asset Management Limited (APUIAML), and ULB commissioners, attended the meeting. Suresh Kumar stressed on the innovative land monetisation and mixed-use development strategies to optimise underutilised urban assets, ensuring long-term financial sustainability and improved citizen services. The state government is prioritising strategic projects under PPP and HAM models, including city road development in Visakhapatnam and Vijayawada to enhance traffic management, road safety, and urban transport. The Visakhapatnam Metropolitan Region Development Authority (VMRDA) is spearheading tourism-friendly initiatives, such as the East Coast Habitat Centre at Madhurawada, a mixed-use urban node integrating residential, commercial, and institutional facilities. Other projects include the Vizag Experience & Virtual Reality Arena with a hotel, India's first immersive digital tourism zone, and eco-tourism facilities like Eco Cottages, a 360° Revolving Restaurant, and Bay View Café at Kailasagiri. Additionally, a 50-storey residential tower at Madhurawada aims to redefine Visakhapatnam's skyline, while affordable housing for middle-income groups and a Boat Club at Gambhiram Lake will promote inclusive growth and eco-tourism, generating sustainable municipal revenue.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Container Terminal Road work drags on, commuters fume
K ochi: In Aug 2024, the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) began the redevelopment of the 17-km Container Terminal Road in the city at an estimated cost of Rs 129.5 crore. The project aimed to transform the stretch into an accident-free corridor with over 1,100 streetlights, metal crash barriers at embankments and adequate reflectors. However, nearly a year later, the project is turning out to be a nightmare for daily commuters and residents. Locals allege the work is progressing at a snail's pace, with only a few stretches showing visible improvement. Traffic remains restricted to one-way movement across three key bridges, leading to frequent traffic blocks, especially during peak hours. Frustrated by the prolonged delays, residents staged a protest at Vallarpadam on Monday, demanding that the bridges be opened and normal traffic restored. Two of the bridges—Pizhala Bridge (connecting Moolampilly and Kothad) and the bridge linking Kothad and Cheranelloor—fall under the jurisdiction of the Goshree Islands Development Authority (GIDA). GIDA has urged NHAI to speed up the work. "I have spoken to NHAI officials and requested that they complete the work at the earliest," said K Raghuram, secretary of GIDA. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Write Better, Work Smarter With This Desktop App Grammarly Install Now Undo Poor road conditions have also sparked frequent altercations at the toll plaza, where many commuters refuse to pay the Rs 65 toll, citing the dismal state of the road. "We are facing strong protests from travellers who are struggling due to incomplete stretches and closed bridges," said Sion Sebastian, a toll plaza staff member. This is the first major repair work on the corridor since its inauguration in 2015. As part of the redevelopment, service roads spanning 10.4km are also being renovated to address safety concerns, including accidents caused by poor lighting and the illegal parking of container trucks. Although repairs on much of the main road have been completed, work on three major bridges remains unfinished. The commissioning of streetlights is also pending, fuelling local anger. Many parts of the four-lane road remain closed and the one-way traffic system continues to cause heavy congestion. The Kerala Latin Catholic Association (KLCA) recently held a protest in Vypeen, demanding the reopening of a bridge on a stretch managed by the Cochin Port Authority. "The delay affects thousands commuting from Vypeen to the city. Only a handful of workers are on site. NHAI must press the contractor to expedite the work," said KLCA's Sibi Joy. Local MLA K N Unnikrishnan said he has asked district collector NSK Umesh to convene an emergency meeting to address the ongoing delays. "A section of people in the Vypeen region have already started protesting as the bridge connecting Bolgatty and Vallarpadam has been closed for months. We hope the resurfacing work will resume after the rains," he said. Meanwhile, a senior NHAI official said that the work is expected to be completed only by the last week of Sept. "We completed retarring and other major works, including the installation of more than a thousand street lights. Resurfacing of the bridges is all that remains. KSEB has asked for an additional transformer and streetlights will be commissioned once it's installed," the official added.


NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
US Warns China On Russian Oil Purchases That Could Bring 100% Tariffs
Washington: U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday said he warned Chinese officials that continued purchases of sanctioned Russian oil would lead to big tariffs due to legislation in Congress, but was told that Beijing would protect its energy sovereignty. Wrapping up two days of U.S.-China trade talks in Stockholm, Bessent said he also expressed U.S. displeasure at China's continued purchases of sanctioned Iranian oil, and its sales of over $15 billion worth of dual-use technology goods to Russia that have bolstered Moscow's war against Ukraine. Bessent said legislation in the U.S. Congress authorizing Trump to levy tariffs up to 500% on countries that purchase sanctioned Russian oil would draw U.S. allies into taking similar steps to cut off Russia's energy revenues. Trump on Monday shortened a deadline for Moscow to make progress toward a Ukraine war peace deal or see its oil customers slapped with secondary tariffs of 100% in 10 to 12 days, reflecting his growing frustration with Russia's actions. "So I think anyone who buys sanctioned Russian oil should be ready for this," Bessent told a news conference. Chinese officials responded by saying China was a sovereign nation with energy needs, and oil purchases would be based on the country's internal policies, Bessent said. "The Chinese take their sovereignty very seriously. We don't want to impede on their sovereignty, so they'd like to pay a 100% tariff," Bessent said. China remains the largest buyer of Russian oil, at about 2 million barrels per day, followed by India and Turkey. Bessent said he also has warned his counterpart, Vice Premier He Lifeng, that China's continued sales of goods to Russia that wind up in weapons will hurt its efforts to boost trade ties with Europe. "I pointed out to them that it is very much hurting their public perception in Europe that they are contributing to the war on the European border," Bessent said.