logo
France is making something that's legal in UK illegal on July 1

France is making something that's legal in UK illegal on July 1

Daily Mirrora day ago

A new law will make it illegal to do something that's common in the UK - and holidaymakers could face a hefty fine if they are caught breaking this rule.
People jetting off to France for their summer getaway must be aware of this crackdown on a common behaviour that some won't think twice about. From July, French police could hand out fines every time they spot someone breaking the rule.
A BBC report shared that, from July 1, France will get tougher on smokers and implement a major ban on smoking in public places, including beaches, parks and outside schools. The clampdown aims to protect children from the harmful effects of second-hand smoke, reports Wales Online.

According to the NHS, second-hand smoke or passive smoke can damage their health of those around you. The health trust claimed: "People who breathe in secondhand smoke regularly are more likely to get the same diseases as smokers, including lung cancer and heart disease."

Ignorance won't be an excuse for rule-breakers who could face a €135 penalty (that's about £113 or $153). France's minister for children, health and family, Catherine Vautrin, said enforcement duties have been passed onto the police, but with a nudge that the public should also aim to "self-regulate."
She told Ouest-France daily: "Tobacco must disappear where there are children". With around 16.4 million residents in France over the age of 15 smoking, it is a habit deeply ingrained in French culture, revealed by a Global Action to End Smoking stat.

The French government isn't taking this ban lightly, and plans are in the works to ensure people take note through signs and campaigns promoting good practice. This move extends the smoke-free zones already in place across parts of France, which has seen smoking banned in restaurants and clubs since 2008.
Brits visiting France may find it tricky to break their habits with the new rule, as the UK's smoking laws only apply indoors. Since July 2007, smoking in enclosed public spaces and workplaces has been banned in the UK.
However, in 2024, the BBC reported that the UK Government is contemplating similar measures by extending legislation in England to outdoor areas like playgrounds and hospital grounds to "protect children and the most vulnerable from the harms of second-hand smoke".

In France, once the new law is in place, smoking will still be permitted in outdoor areas of cafes and bar terraces. While electronic cigarettes are not included in the ban, the country is set to tighten vaping regulations soon.
Hotels typically allocate a few rooms for smokers. If you don't specify you want one upon booking, you'll be placed in a non-smoking room, according to the French Rivera Traveller.
The BBC said that, according to the French Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, nearly a quarter (23.1%) of the French population smokes daily. France's National Committee Against Smoking adds that over 75,000 smokers die annually from tobacco-related illnesses - 13% of all deaths.
A recent report by the French cancer association La Ligue Contre le Cancer reveals that almost 80% of French people support a ban on smoking in public places like woodlands, beaches, parks, and terraces.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is the most common mental health misinformation on TikTok?
What is the most common mental health misinformation on TikTok?

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

What is the most common mental health misinformation on TikTok?

Thousands of influencers peddle mental health misinformation on social media platforms – some out of a naive belief that their personal experience will help people, others because they want to boost their following or sell products. As part of a Guardian investigation, experts established clear themes to the misinformation contained in videos posted with a #mentalhealthtips hashtag on TikTok. Several videos about borderline personality disorder suggest symptoms that are everyday experiences – such as feeling anxiety when people change plans, experiencing mood swings, a fear of abandonment and mirroring people's behaviour to be liked. Another video purports to show how depression manifests in the workplace as a lack of concentration, feeling tired, having low energy levels, a loss of appetite and irritability. 'While some of the 'symptoms' overlap with depression, these can be attributed to a range of afflictions and struggles,' said Liam Modlin, a therapist and psychology researcher at King's College London. One video said that people with bipolar disorder experience mood swings because their emotional pendulum swings more widely and rapidly than most. However this is a misunderstanding, since people experience extended mood changes over periods of weeks rather than rapid 'mood swings'. 'This is an example of misappropriating a mental health diagnosis to wrongly explain or justify behaviour,' said Dan Poulter, a former health minister and NHS psychiatrist. 'A person with bipolar disorder may find this trivialising of their experience of living with a debilitating and serious mental illness.' Another popular video suggests that when someone is about to die by suicide they become 'almost bipolar' – 'language [that] can further stigmatise mental health', said Prof Rina Dutta, a consultant psychiatrist and psychiatry professor at King's College London. Another video claims signs of abuse are constantly apologising; breaking down during small disagreements; needing reassurance; struggling to be open; being hypersensitive to criticism, and hiding feelings. 'The behaviours it describes, while potentially present in abusive dynamics, are not exclusive to abuse and may occur in a variety of other contexts,' said Modlin. 'By presenting these signs without sufficient context or diagnostic nuance, the video risks encouraging viewers to self-diagnose or mislabel complex relational struggles as abuse.' This was the most common form of misinformation contained in the videos. One video promotes a method it said was cheaper than therapy and had fewer side effects than antidepressants that could enable people 'to heal from trauma in an hour' and involved writing about the traumatic experiences for 15 minutes non-stop. 'No research suggests this is sufficient for cure, definitely not in an hour, and there is risk of independently forcing oneself back into this traumatic mindset without the support of an experienced therapist,' said Amber Johnston, an accredited psychotherapist. Another clip suggests that crying is self-soothing and good for processing emotions, including by stimulating the release of cortisol. 'Cortisol changes related to crying are complex and cannot be distilled down in this way,' said Amy Durden, a psychotherapist. 'Crying can bring relief but not always. It can be self-soothing but if the person crying judges their crying negatively, they do not experience this benefit and may feel acute shame.' Several videos featured glib quotations that the experts viewed as unhelpful such as: 'If you're not changing, you're choosing', while another popular quotation said: 'When you feel like everyone hates you, sleep. When you feel like you hate everyone, eat. When you feel like you hate yourself, shower. And when you feel like everyone hates everyone, go outside.' 'This is a huge oversimplification of how to address complex emotional states,' said Durden. 'It seems to be pulling from behavioural activation in CBT, but without any context or individualisation.' A specific breathing technique for treating anxiety was promoted in another video. 'There is no single, universally effective breathing technique that is helpful in all cases,' said David Okai, a consultant neuropsychiatrist. 'If performed incorrectly, the exercises can be the equivalent of hyperventilation, which can be extremely unpleasant and exacerbate anxiety.' Another video suggests depression is caused by alcohol, tobacco, MSG, caffeine, sugar and hydrolysed wheat. Modlin said that although lifestyle factors can contribute, 'this framing is overly simplistic and potentially misleading', since there are complex interwoven factors, including genetics and neurobiology, psychosocial stressors, childhood adversity, medical conditions and personality styles. Other clips promote supplements including saffron, magnesium glycinate and holy basil extract to ease anxiety. Although the psychiatrist Famia Askari said there are some studies showing benefits to some of these, there is not sufficient consensus for these to have become part of clinical practice – they are also manufactured supplements, in contrast to the 'natural' claims that featured. Two videos recommend admission to psychiatric units based on personal experience, including one suggesting someone had considerably improved after six days, and another offering a template for children to ask their parents to have them admitted. Poulter said this was 'misleading' and can 'create misconceptions' about the benefits of inpatient admission. 'Inpatient admission can in fact create and reinforce maladaptive coping mechanisms,' he said. 'It is also very rare that someone would be driving themselves into mental health hospital in the way depicted by the video.' Another video depicts someone in a hospital gown in what appears to be a psychiatric ward stating: 'I was too honest with my psychiatrist.' This could be harmful as it is 'potentially encouraging people to not be honest and open with healthcare professionals about their mental health', said Poulter. In another clip, a woman gives her strategies for managing anxiety, including eating an orange in the shower. 'There is no evidence-base for eating citrus in the shower as a means to reducing anxiety, and I would worry that this would lead on to an ever-increasing spiral of unusual behaviours,' said Okai.

Denying joint operations to obese patients is counterproductive
Denying joint operations to obese patients is counterproductive

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Denying joint operations to obese patients is counterproductive

We fear that there are going to be many more stories such as this about the National Health Service before the wounds of a decade of underfunding followed by the coronavirus pandemic start to heal. Rebecca Thomas, our award-winning health correspondent, reports today that obese patients are being denied life-changing hip and knee replacements, and being left in pain as the NHS attempts to cut costs. One-third of NHS areas in England and some health boards in Wales are refusing joint replacement operations to patients who exceed a given body mass index. This is contrary to guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the body responsible for deciding whether treatments are value for money. Of course, as long as healthcare is rationed, difficult choices will have to be made. And the blunt truth is that all expensive treatments on the NHS are rationed, as they have to be in a system of limited resources. Instead of being rationed by ability to pay, the usual mechanism for rationing in the NHS is queueing. At the same time, however, treatments are also rationed by need, and it is the role of NICE to help to decide which groups of patients should be prioritised over others. We can understand why some parts of the NHS might de-prioritise obese patients for hip and knee replacements. It might be argued that obesity is the cause of joint problems and that therefore treatment should focus on weight loss, or else the problems are likely to recur with the artificial joints. But the NICE guidelines recognise that causation may not be all one way and that for many patients joint problems contribute to obesity rather than the other way round. In which case, joint replacement is the key to reducing weight, allowing patients to exercise more. This is a field of healthcare undergoing rapid transition, as the availability of weight-loss drugs such as Ozempic has changed the options available to patients, offering hope of treatment without surgery. But it remains important that overweight patients do not face a sweeping ban on joint replacement operations on the basis of arbitrary body mass index counts – especially as these BMI limits vary from area to area across the NHS. It is devoutly to be wished that this new government is beginning to turn the NHS round. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, will confirm at the spending review on 11 June that the health service will be allocated substantial increases in resources over the next four years. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has already taken the risk of overclaiming the improvement that has been made in just 11 months since the election. He claimed that waiting lists had fallen for six months in a row, only for the latest figure, for month seven, to show a small increase. His claim of having met his target for the number of new appointments 'seven months early' was undermined by figures obtained by Full Fact, the fact-checking charity, suggesting the rate of increase has in fact been slower than last year. We hope that resident doctors will vote against strike action, in order to allow these early, if overstated, signs of improvement to turn into real progress. In the meantime, difficult choices about whom to treat, and whom to treat first, will continue to beset the health service. In making those decisions, doctors must avoid unfair and discriminatory blanket bans based on arbitrary weight limits.

Obese patients denied knee and hip replacements to slash NHS costs
Obese patients denied knee and hip replacements to slash NHS costs

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

Obese patients denied knee and hip replacements to slash NHS costs

Obese patients are being denied life-changing hip and knee replacements and left in pain in a bid to slash spiralling NHS costs, The Independent can reveal. One third of NHS areas in England and multiple health boards in Wales are blocking patient access based on their body mass index (BMI). The move, deemed 'unfair' and 'discriminatory', goes against guidance from the National Institute for Care Excellence (Nice), which states BMI shouldn't be used to restrict patients' access to joint replacement surgery. Patients are instead being told they must lose weight before they are eligible but waiting lists for NHS weight loss programs have ballooned, with some people waiting up to three years to be seen while other services have shut, unable to cope with demand. The Royal College of Surgeons criticised the policy, saying that denying patients care could cost them their mobility and cause their health to deteriorate, while Tory peer and former health minister James Bethell called on the government to do more to tackle the obesity crisis and end the 'misery for millions'. More than 64 per cent of adults in England were overweight or living with obesity in 2022-23, up from 63 per cent the year before, the most recent data from the Office for National Statistics shows. The news comes as 7.4 million people were waiting for NHS treatments in March, while health service leaders have warned they are being forced to cut services to meet tough savings demands from the government. The shocking revelation of surgery refusals was uncovered in an audit of referral criteria used by NHS bodies in England by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). It found 15 of 42 areas are restricting access to surgery by BMI, while The Independent discovered at least two health boards were doing the same in Wales. Thresholds varied by area, with some limiting access to those with a BMI of less than 35 (patients who are obese) or 40 (severely obese). Dr Joanna McLaughlin, lead researcher and NIHR clinical lecturer at the University of Bristol, told The Independent that through her research, policymakers, commissioners and surgeons 'acknowledged that NHS financial pressures were a main driver for BMI threshold policy use, and that they didn't have confidence that the policies were based in evidence of health benefits'. The research also found that NHS weight management support services were 'inadequate' and could not ensure that those excluded from surgery could be supported to lose enough weight. Some patients had resorted to paying privately for surgery. Dr McLaughlin said: 'The variety in the BMI limits and in the requirements to prove patients have made attempts at weight loss chosen by different ICBs [integrated care boards] highlights the postcode lottery and inequalities created by these policies.' Several ICBs identified by the study told The Independent that some patients with a high BMI could still access care if they passed an assessment, while others said they would need to prove they were 'fit for surgery'. But medics told The Independent that BMI should not be used as a sole restrictive measure. Tim Mitchell, president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, said losing weight before surgery could reduce the risk of complications, and patients should be supported in this. However, he said that 'BMI alone should not be a barrier', adding: 'We must not penalise those who are less fit but still eligible for surgery, as this approach is unfair and ignores clinical guidance.' Mark Bowditch, president of the British Orthopaedic Association, said: 'Losing weight before surgery can be very difficult for people with limited mobility issues. 'Furthermore, obesity is more likely in people from certain socioeconomically deprived areas or ethnic groups, so care must be taken to avoid unintentionally disadvantaging certain patient groups.' Deborah Alsina, chief executive of charity Versus Arthritis, said: 'We hear heartbreaking stories from people desperate for the pain to stop, and accounts from people who face barriers to access even when they are referred for the surgery they urgently need. 'We frequently hear of people denied a referral, or being taken off the waiting list because of their weight, with body mass index being cited as a rationale. We must make sure this discriminatory practice doesn't become standard.' Lord Bethell said the row over BMI thresholds for operations showed the NHS 'needs to make a choice' over preventing disease with weight-loss jabs, which cost £100 a month, or to treat obesity-related diseases, such as those that lead to hip operations, which can cost £10,000. He said the government has a choice to either crack down on 'Junk Food Britain' with a tough food strategy or to give the NHS a lot more money to pay for the consequences of a sick population. He added: 'It's one or the other. Ducking this choice will cause misery for millions, the bankruptcy of our nation and the end of the Starmer administration.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said it expected ICBs to comply with Nice guidance. They added that the department's 'Plan for Change' for the NHS includes rolling out weight loss drugs to 'those who need it most'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store