
Two years later: Sedibeng's missing mayoral chain still a mystery
Despite formal inquiries and political pressure, neither Sedibeng District Municipality, nor the Emfuleni Local Municipality has provided clarity — and the chain itself is still missing.
What first appeared to be a simple case of theft has since become a bizarre story of what appears to be municipal mismanagement, blurred lines of responsibility, and official silence.
A golden symbol vanishes
The gold mayoral chain — a ceremonial symbol of office — was last seen on June 23, 2023, following Sedibeng's State of the District Address (SODA). According to a February 2024 press statement by DA Emfuleni North Constituency Head, Kingsol Chabalala MPL, a criminal case of theft was only opened on November 12, 2023, prompting concerns about the delayed response.
The Democratic Alliance questioned why the chain's disappearance was not immediately reported to police, raising suspicions of negligence or possible cover-up. They also noted that Mayor Lerato Maloka had previously been linked to another incident involving sabotage of her municipal vehicle.
The twist: The chain belongs to Emfuleni
In March 2025, Sedibeng councillor Lynda Parsonson revealed a startling twist: the missing chain may never have belonged to Sedibeng at all. According to her, a former Sedibeng mayor — Simon Mofokeng — allegedly swapped Sedibeng's original chain for Emfuleni's during his time in office.
'After official engagements, it was generally handed over to security officials to be secured in the municipal safe,' Parsonson wrote. 'However, after one event, the mayor decided to retain the chain and instead lock it in a cupboard in her office. The chain has not been seen since.'
Even more striking, Parsonson stated that councillors were not informed of the disappearance until much later and that council is still waiting for a police report.
Municipal Silence
To verify this complex situation, Vaalweekblad sent formal queries to Sedibeng Communications Coordinator Reggie Moiloa and Spokesperson for the Emfuleni Local Municipality Makhosonke Sangweni on March 25, requesting responses to 12 specific questions regarding:
*The chain's ownership,
*Whether the asset exchange was documented or authorised,
*The timing and nature of the theft report,
*Cooperation with police,
*Insurance claims, and
*Possible consequences for the municipality.
Initially, neither municipality responded. However, in a brief reply to a follow-up enquiry, Sangweni stated: 'The matter belongs to Sedibeng District Municipality and all we know is that the matter is before courts and shall await for the final outcome.' No further details were provided, and Sedibeng has remained silent. This limited response comes despite The Citizen reporting in February 2024 that the chain belonged to Emfuleni — and despite ongoing public calls for accountability.
No resolution, no accountability
To date no arrests have been made, no offical explanation has been provided for the delayed theft report and neither municipality has confirmed responsibility or insurance coverage.
The chain remains unaccounted for
What should have been a straightforward investigation has devolved into a bureaucratic mystery. The public, meanwhile, is left in the dark about how a R465,000 asset could vanish — apparently without consequence.
A Symbol of Dysfunction
Beyond the missing gold, the case seems to reveal deeper issues: poor asset management, confusion over municipal property, and a worrying lack of transparency. If the chain was never Sedibeng's to begin with, why did they use it? Why did they report it stolen under their name? And why, nearly two years later, are basic questions still being ignored?
Unless authorities speak out, the chain will remain not only missing — but a symbol of dysfunction in Sedibeng's leadership.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Woman saved from suicide attempt in bid to escape greedy loan shark
A woman has been saved from a suicide attempt after a loan shark demanded interest of R100,000 on a R20,000 loan. The woman from Phoenix, KwaZulu-Natal, had recently attempted to kill herself twice before she was saved by Reaction Unit South Africa (Rusa) from jumping off a bridge on Monday. 'Rusa received several calls from friends and family of the victim. According to the family, the loan shark had lent her the cash and changed the interest rates from 50% to 400% when the debt was almost settled. The lender then threatened to send a group of men to repossess her car if the money was not paid,' said Rusa spokesperson Prem Balram. He said the woman then borrowed smaller amounts and paid them over to the loan shark, but he made further demands. 'The mother of a minor daughter made calls to family earlier this week, informing them she intended to jump off a bridge, explaining that she had become overwhelmed in debt. She requested that family care for her child.' Rusa said in recent weeks several people have been intimidated, assaulted and had their valuables forcefully taken from them after they failed to pay back exorbitant interest on borrowed money.

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
The risks of omitting pending criminal cases in job applications
The Labour Court ruled in favour of the Office of the Chief Justice for not recommending a candidate for a job as court manager. Image: File The failure to disclose a pending criminal case when asked to do so during a job application can have dire consequences, as an applicant who applied for the position of a court manager discovered. Siphephelo Luthuli applied for two posts in the Eastern Cape as court manager. He was recommended as he was deemed the best candidate. He denied on his application form that he had a criminal record or any pending cases against him. But it was later discovered that there was a pending case relating to alleged driving under the influence of alcohol. The Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) then withdrew its recommendation that Luthuli get the job. Luthuli took the matter on review before an arbitrator, who ruled in his favour and found that the OCJ was guilty of unlawful labour practice. The OCJ was ordered to compensate him by paying him R61,000, but the office took the matter on review to the Gqeberha Labour Court. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The court was told that in 2019, the OCJ advertised two positions for court managers at the Bhisho and Mthatha High Courts. Luthuli applied, and he was required to indicate if he had ever been convicted of a criminal offence or whether any cases were pending, and his response was 'no'. The OCJ, however, subsequently established that he was arrested in respect of a case of driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. Luthuli conceded that he knew about the matter but relied on the fact that the matter was not enrolled by the prosecutor's office. According to the police, the matter was still under investigation. The panel that interviewed him considered the matter and felt he had to disclose that the matter was still pending. As a result, they withdrew their recommendation for his appointment. The arbitrator found this to be irrational, arbitrary, and capricious and ordered that the OCJ compensate Luthuli. The arbitrator found that the definition of 'pending case' or 'pending' was not informed by an objective definition either provided for in legislation or policy.


Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Joshlin Smith: Former accused-turned-state witness Lourencia Lombaard returned to the dock
CAPE TOWN - Former accused-turned-state witness in the Joshlin Smith trial, Lourencia Lombaard, has on Tuesday returned to the dock. The court has heard arguments as to why she should be granted indemnity. The missing girl was six years old when she disappeared in Saldanha Bay in February last year, and in May, her mother, Kelly Smith, her mother's boyfriend, Jacquen Appollis and his friend, Steveno van Rhyn, were handed life sentences for human trafficking. Lourencia Lombaard may only hear on Wednesday whether she'll be granted indemnity from prosecution. During the argument in her favour, the court heard she had testified, frankly and honestly, as a State witness. ALSO READ: Joshlin Smith: NPA says Lourencia Lombaard should be indemnified from prosecution Huge personal sacrifices were also highlighted, as she and her children were uprooted from their lives and community to be placed under witness protection. Lombaard's testimony proved pivotal in the conviction and sentencing of Kelly, Appollis and van Rhyn. She told the court she witnessed Smith sell her daughter to a sangoma for R20,000 in February 2024. The court is also hearing applications for leave to appeal the convictions and sentences handed down in May, but the convicted traffickers are not present in court.