logo
Trump, Putin hint at trade revival, but biz environment remains hostile

Trump, Putin hint at trade revival, but biz environment remains hostile

Hundreds of foreign companies left Russia after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, including major US firms like Coca-Cola, Nike, Starbucks, ExxonMobil and Ford Motor Co.
But after more than three years of war, President Donald Trump has held out the prospect of restoring US-Russia trade if there's ever a peace settlement. And Russian President Vladimir Putin has said foreign companies could come back under some circumstances.
Russia wants to do large scale TRADE with the United States when this catastrophic bloodbath' is over, and I agree, Trump said in a statement after a phone call with Putin.
There is a tremendous opportunity for Russia to create massive amounts of jobs and wealth. Its potential is UNLIMITED.
The president then shifted his tone toward Putin after heavy drone and missile attacks on Kyiv, saying Putin has gone absolutely crazy and threatening new sanctions. Recent comments from Putin warning Western companies against reclaiming their former stakes seemed to reflect reality more accurately that it's not going to be a smooth process for businesses going back into Russia.
That's because Russia's business environment has massively changed since 2022. And not in ways that favor foreign companies.
And with Putin escalating attacks and holding on to territory demands Ukraine likely isn't going to accept, a peace deal seems distant indeed.
Here are factors that could deter U.S. companies from ever going back: Risk of losing it all Russian law classifies Ukraine's allies as unfriendly states and imposes severe restrictions on businesses from more than 50 countries. Those include limits on withdrawing money and equipment as well as allowing the Russian government to take control of companies deemed important. Foreign owners' votes on boards of directors can be legally disregarded.
Companies that left were required to sell their businesses for 50% or less of their assessed worth, or simply wrote them off while Kremlin-friendly business groups snapped up their assets on the cheap. Under a 2023 presidential decree the Russian government took control of Finnish energy company Fortum, German power company Unipro, France's dairy company Danone and Danish brewer Carlsberg.
Even if a peace deal removed the US from the list of unfriendlies, and if the massive Western sanctions restricting business in Russia were dropped, the track record of losses would remain vivid. And there's little sign any of that is going to happen.
While the Russian government has talked in general about companies coming back, there's no specific evidence of any one company saying that they are ready to come back, said Chris Weafer, CEO of Macro-Advisory Ltd. consultancy. It's all at the political narrative level.
Russia's actions and legal changes have left long-lasting damage to its business environment, says Elina Ribakova, non-resident senior fellow at the Bruegel research institute in Brussels.
She said a return of US businesses is not very likely.
We need to strangle them In a meeting at the Kremlin on May 26 to mark Russian Entrepreneurs Day, Putin said that Russia needed to throttle large tech firms such as Zoom and Microsoft, which had restricted their services in Russia after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, so that domestic tech companies could thrive instead.
We need to strangle them, Putin said. After all, they are trying to strangle us: we need to reciprocate. We didn't kick anyone out; we didn't interfere with anyone. We provided the most favorable conditions possible for their work here, in our market, and they are trying to strangle us.
He reassured a representative from Vkusno-i Tochka (Tasty-period) the Russian-owned company that took over McDonald's restaurants in the country that Moscow would aid them if the US fast food giant tried to buy back its former stores. Asked for comment, McDonald's referred to their 2022 statement that ownership of the business in Russia is no longer tenable.
Not much upside On top of Russia's difficult business environment, the economy is likely to stagnate due to lack of investment in sectors other than the military, economists say.
Russia has one of the lowest projected long-term growth rates and one of the highest levels of country risk in the world, says Heli Simola, senior economist at the Bank of Finland in a blog post. Only Belarus offers an equally lousy combination of growth and risk.
Most of the opportunity to make money is related to military production, and it's unlikely US companies would work with the Russian military-industrial complex, said Ribakova. It's not clear where exactly one could plug in and expect outsize returns that would compensate for this negative investment environment.
Repurchase agreements Some companies, including Renault and Ford Motor Co, left with repurchase agreements letting them buy back their stakes years later if conditions change. But given Russia's unsteady legal environment, that's tough to count on.
The Russian purchasers may try to change the terms, look for more money, or ignore the agreements, said Weafer. There's a lot of uncertainty as to how those buyback auctions will be enforced.
But what about the oil and gas? Multinational oil companies were among those who suffered losses leaving Russia, so it's an open question whether they would want to try again even given Russia's vast oil and gas reserves. US.. major ExxonMobil saw its stake in the Sakhalin oil project unilaterally terminated and wrote off $3.4 billion.
Russia's major oil companies have less need of foreign partners than they did in the immediate post-Soviet era, though smaller oil field services might want to return given the size of Russia's oil industry. But they would have to face new requirements on establishing local presence and investment, Weafer said.
Some never left According to the Kyiv School of Economics, 2,329 foreign companies are still doing business in Russia, many from China or other countries that aren't allied with Ukraine, while 1,344 are in the process of leaving and 494 have exited completely. The Yale School of Management's Chief Executive Leadership Institute lists some two dozen US companies still doing business in Russia, while some 100 more have cut back by halting new investments.
EU sanctions could remain even if US open US sanctions are considered the toughest, because they carry the threat of being cut off from the U.S. banking and financial system. But the EU is still slapping new rounds of sanctions on Russia. Even if U.S. sanctions are dropped, EU sanctions would continue to present compliance headaches for any company that also wants to do business in Europe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rubio Speaks To Lavrov, Reiterates Trump's Push For Continued Direct Russia-Ukraine Talks
Rubio Speaks To Lavrov, Reiterates Trump's Push For Continued Direct Russia-Ukraine Talks

News18

time33 minutes ago

  • News18

Rubio Speaks To Lavrov, Reiterates Trump's Push For Continued Direct Russia-Ukraine Talks

Last Updated: Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov and US Secretary of State Rubio discussed de-escalation of Moscow-Kyiv tension ahead of peace talks in Istanbul. A day before Moscow and Kyiv's peace talks, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio discussed prospects for de-escalating the tensions between them. The Russia-Ukraine talks were set to be held in Turkey's Istanbul on Monday, Lavrov's ministry said. 'The situation linked to the Ukraine crisis was discussed," the ministry said in a statement on its website. 'S.V. Lavrov and M. Rubio also exchanged views on various initiatives concerning a settlement of the Ukraine crisis, including plans to resume direct Russian-Ukrainian talks in Istanbul on June 2," the statement further read. The US State Department reiterated Donald Trump's call for continued direct talks between Russia and Ukraine to achieve 'a lasting peace." US noted the call was at Russia's request. The statement mentioned that as the two leader held talks over phone call, Rubio expressed condolences over deaths that occurred when two bridges were blown up in separate Russian regions bordering Ukraine. 'It was stressed on the Russian side that competent bodies will proceed with a thorough investigation and the results will be published. The guilty parties will be identified and will without doubt be subject to a worthy punishment," the statement further read. Reuters, citing Russian officials, reported that at least seven people were killed and 69 sustained injuries when the two bridges were blown up on Saturday. Further, hours ahead of the peace-talks, tensions escalated between Russia sand Ukraine after the latter launched a massive drone attack against Moscow on Sunday, prompting it to shoot down many of Ukrainian drones. Russia's health ministry confirmed the retaliatory action on Monday morning. 'Air defence systems intercepted and destroyed 162 Ukrainian drones" between 1710 GMT and 2300 GMT on Sunday, news agency AFP quoted the Russia's health ministry's statement. The statement mentioned that majority of the drones were brought down over regions bordering Ukraine, with 57 intercepted over the Kursk region and 31 over the Belgorod region. First Published: June 02, 2025, 15:08 IST

UK to build attack subs as part of major defence review
UK to build attack subs as part of major defence review

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

UK to build attack subs as part of major defence review

UK prime minister Keir Starmer (Image credit: AP) LONDON: Britain announced it will build 12 new attack submarines as it was set to unveil Monday a major defence review to deal with "growing" Russian aggression and the changing nature of warfare. Prime Minister Keir Starmer told BBC radio that "there is greater instability on defence and security than there has been for many, many years, and greater threats." His Labour government will later publish its Strategic Defence Review, a document that will assess threats facing the UK and make recommendations. The review warns that Britain is entering "a new era of threat" as drones and artificial intelligence transform modern warfare, The Guardian newspaper reported over the weekend. "I wanted a review that told me the challenges we're actually facing and likely to face for the foreseeable future," Starmer told the BBC Monday. "And the principles are clear: war-fighting readiness, integrating our forces... and a Nato first approach," he added. The UK has been racing to rearm in the face of the threat from Russia and fears that US President Donald Trump will no longer help protect Europe. Starmer said it would serve as "a blueprint for strength and security for decades to come". Daily attacks: His government pledged in February to lift defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027 in the "largest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the Cold War". And despite budget constraints, it aims for spending to rise to three per cent in the next parliamentary term, due in 2029. The Labour government has said it will cut UK overseas aid to help fund the spending. Based on the recommendations of the review, which is led by former Nato secretary general George Robertson, the government said Sunday that it would boost stockpiles and weapons production capacity, which could be scaled up if needed. This includes £1.5 billion ($2 billion) for building "at least six munitions and energetics factories", procuring 7,000 domestically built long-range weapons, and spending £6 billion on munitions over the current parliamentary term. The government also said late Sunday that it would build up to 12 new attack submarines as part of its Aukus military alliance with Australia and the United States, and invest £15 billion in its nuclear warhead programme. The defence ministry last week pledged £1 billion for the creation of a "cyber command" to help on the battlefield. "We're in a world that is changing now... and it is a world of growing threats," defence secretary John Healey told the BBC in an interview Sunday. "It's growing Russian aggression. It's those daily cyberattacks, it's new nuclear risks, and it's increasing tension in other parts of the world as well," he said. Sophisticated challenge: The last such defence review was commissioned in 2021 by the previous Conservative government, and was revised in 2023 after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. While launching the new review, Robertson said it would tackle threats from Russia, China, Iran and North Korea, calling them a "deadly quartet". But in an op-ed in The Sun newspaper, Starmer did not mention China, while warning that "The Kremlin is working hand in hand with its cronies in Iran and North Korea." The softer rhetoric on China is in line with the Labour government's efforts to thaw relations with Beijing, which reached new lows under former prime minister Rishi Sunak 's Conservative government. The review describes Russia as an "immediate and pressing" threat, but calls China a "sophisticated and persistent challenge", according to The Guardian. At a time when Washington is demanding that its Nato allies bolster their own defences, Britain is considering strengthening its deterrent by buying nuclear-missile capable aircrafts from the United States, The Sunday Times reported. Without confirming or denying, Healey said Sunday that "strong deterrence is absolutely essential in order to keep Britain and the British people safe".

How a Harvard-educated Japanese Admiral planned Pearl Harbour attack on US
How a Harvard-educated Japanese Admiral planned Pearl Harbour attack on US

India Today

time36 minutes ago

  • India Today

How a Harvard-educated Japanese Admiral planned Pearl Harbour attack on US

In what could be a defining moment in the Russia-Ukraine war, Kyiv launched one of the biggest drone attacks under Operation Spider's Web and struck 4,000 km deep in Russian territory, destroying 41 strategic bombers, some of which were reportedly aircraft capable of carrying nuclear weapons. The Russian media and several pro-Kremlin bloggers referred to the attacks as Russia's "Pearl Harbour" moment, referring to the Imperial Japanese Navy's surprise attack on the US Pacific Fleet in Hawaii in we dive into the historic Pearl Harbour attack, here's why the latest drone attack by Ukraine is being compared to the World War II the special forces' operation on Sunday, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said took "over a year and a half" of planning, Ukraine hit two Russian air bases in Olenya, Murmansk and Irkutsk, Siberia – over 6,000 km apart in different time zones. Such was the magnitude of the drone attack that over 30% of Russia's bomber fleet — Tu-95 and Tu-22s and A-50 airborne radars — was destroyed, suggest the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbour, this drone attack could also change the course of the war. The drone attack comes even as Russia hit Kyiv with missiles last week after Russian President Vladimir Putin's plane was reportedly targeted by Ukraine, a surprise escalation to the war after talks of a US AND JAPAN ENDED ON OPPOSITE SIDES IN WWIIadvertisementThe US foreign policy in the late 1930s hinged on support for China. However, at the beginning of the next decade, in 1941, Japan was deeply embroiled in a war with China to expand its empire across Southeast Asia, mainly for resources such as oil, metals, and per American policy then, aggression against China by Japan meant that Japan would come into direct conflict with the United States. Simultaneously, the Japanese had entered into an alliance with the Axis powers — Germany and the wake of these developments, the US, along with Britain and the Netherlands, imposed severe economic sanctions, including an oil embargo, which threatened Japan's military operations, which by July 1941 had occupied all of Indochina. The US government by this time had severed all commercial and financial relations with JAPANESE ADMIRAL PLANNED PEARL HARBOUR ATTACKJapanese leaders, particularly Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, believed a pre-emptive strike against the US Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbour, Oahu, Hawaii, would not only hold back the US naval power long enough for Japan to secure its Asian conquests, but also force Washington into negotiations with who had studied English at Harvard and served as a naval attache in Washington, understood America's industrial potential but gambled on a full-blown per Seymour Morris Jr, the author of 'American History Revised: 200 Startling Facts That Never Made to the Textbooks', if Washington had done some serious background checking into Yamamoto's student days when he was a student at Harvard from 1919 to 1921, they would have uncovered useful clues to his psychological makeup, mentions Harvard Magazine's official magazine makes mention of a psychological trait of Yamamoto, quoting Morris, who said, "When they (Yamamoto's classmates) introduced him to the game of poker, he became a fanatical poker player who would stay up all night, winning hand after hand. And what did he do with his poker winnings – lead the good life? No, not at all: he hitchhiked around the country during the summer, exploring America". The Harvard Magazine also mentions that years later, as a naval attache at the Japanese embassy in Washington DC, and still a compulsive poker player, Yamamoto gambled with members of the US military. "Spurred on by his victories," Morris wrote, "he developed contempt for the mental agility of his American naval opponents at the poker table."Two decades later, as the admiral of the Japanese navy, Yamamato's strategy was akin to playing a hand of poker — a surprise aerial assault on Pearl Harbour, using carrier-based planes. Japanese pilots began training extensively in shallow-water torpedo attacks, as Pearl Harbour was only 40-feet FLEET AT PEARL HARBOUR CAUGHT BY SURPRISEOn December 7, 1941, the war drums rolled and the first wave of Japanese attacks came, lasting almost 50 minutes, from 7:55 am to 8:45 am. The ships, which were moored together, made them easy targets for the Japanese. Over 180 Japanese warplanes from 6 aircraft carriers struck US airfields and battleships in the first wave of the attack, a 1,760-pound armour-piercing bomb hit the USS Arizona's magazine, causing a massive explosion, killing 1,177 sailors. Soon, torpedoes sank the USS Oklahoma, killing 429 naval men. Just five minutes later, a second wave of attacks came with over 160 warplanes that targeted the remaining vessels, the shipyards, and other US intelligence reports suggest they suspected a conflict soon after sanctions against Japan, but they were caught off guard by such a massive assault. An Army radar operator spotted the incoming planes but was told they were expected to be US attack left 2,403 US soldiers dead, and 1,178 wounded. A total of eight US battleships were sunk in the attack and 188 aircraft were next day, on December 8, 1941, the United States entered the Second World War, declaring a war on Japan. Four days later, Axis powers Germany and Italy declared war on the US on December Pearl Harbour attack finally made the US join World War II and changed the course of the war. The attack on its Pacific Fleet also contributed to the US emerging as a global leader in the coming decade. As the OG Pearl Harbour changed the course of history, the "modern Pearl Harbour" could change the shape of things to come.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store