Ocasio-Cortez receives death threats, campaign office vandalized, aide says
Ocasio-Cortez campaign manager Oliver Hidalgo-Wohlleben said the New York Democrat has also has faced death threats in recent days.
The New York Police Department (NYPD) confirmed to The Hill that officers responded to a 911 call regarding a 'criminal mischief incident' at the campaign office early Monday morning.
'Upon arrival, officers observed the facade of the location defaced with red paint. There are no arrests and the investigation remains ongoing,' an NYPD spokesperson said.
Hidalgo-Wohlleben wrote on social platform X later Monday that the lawmaker's team was in the process of cleaning the mess.
'Our office is a hub in the community and we want it to be a safe space for all of our neighbors,' he wrote. 'In the past few days, we also have received multiple threats on the Congresswoman's life and we are treating this seriously with our security partners to make sure she, our staff, and volunteers are safe.'
The Hill has reached out to Ocasio-Cortez's campaign office and Congressional office for additional details.
Photos of the vandalism posted online show red paint splashed across the office facade and a sign hung that reads: 'AOC funds genocide in Gaza.'
An anti-Israel group known as the 'Boogie Down Liberation Front' claimed responsibility for the vandalism, according to an X post that included a photo of the offenders in action.
Ocasio-Cortez has not directly responded to the vandalism or threats, but she has pushed back on claims about her votes on defense spending.
'Google is free. If you're saying I voted for military funding, you are lying,' she wrote Monday on X. 'Drag me for my positions all you want, but lying about them doesn't make you part of the 'left.''
'If you believe neo-nazis are welcome and operating in good faith, you can have them!' she added.
Ocasio-Cortez recently voted against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.)'s effort to cut U.S. funding for Israel's missile defense system, while other progressives in 'The Squad' — Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) — voted for it. The amendment was quashed in a 422-6 vote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel Accused of Using US Munitions to Attack Gaza School Shelters, Killing Hundreds
Human Rights Watch Report claims Israel has used US munitions to target school shelters in Gaza, killing hundreds.
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Law scholars say Gov. Abbott's bid to oust Rep. Wu is unprecedented, lacks legal basis
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Legal scholars called Gov. Greg Abbott's petition to the Texas Supreme Court, which seeks to remove Rep. Gene Wu, 'unprecedented and said it lacks a legal basis.' One of the experts said he's doubtful it will succeed, but could envision the court siding with the Governor. Quorum breaking has a long history in Texas; however, Gov. Greg Abbott's Tuesday petition to the state's Supreme Court is unprecedented and lacks evidence, legal experts tell KXAN. Abbott's counsel filed a 'petition for writ of quo warranto' on Tuesday, which is a request for the Texas Supreme Court (SCOTX) to remove a public officer of the state from their position. Specifically, the petition accuses State Rep. Gene Wu, D-Houston, of allegedly taking or soliciting a bribe to break quorum, and that Wu abandoned his office by leaving the state for an 'indefinite period.' Other Democrats who broke quorum were not named in the petition. However, it may serve as a pilot for future petitions. Quinn Yeargain, a Michigan State University law professor specializing in states' constitutional law, said the petition lacks sufficient evidence and asks SCOTX to take the governor's argument as 'common sense.' 'Abbott's basic argument is that by purposely leaving the state to prevent the House from having a quorum and being able to conduct business, Rep. Wu … abandoned his office, and therefore it is vacant, and he should be entitled to call a special election to fill the vacancy,' Yeargain said. Does Texas Governor Greg Abbott have the power to vacate Texas House seats? Seth Barrett Tillman, a U.S. Constitutional law professor, also talked with KXAN about the filing. President Donald Trump's legal team cited Tillman's work in their case before the U.S. Supreme Court over Colorado's decision to remove Trump from the ballot in 2024. 'The filing is professional. It's put together well,' Tillman said. 'The governor has some arguments, but ultimately, I'm not convinced.' Are legislators public officials? Experts say SCOTX rulings say no Yeargain explained to KXAN that elected state legislators aren't public officers in the way Abbott's filing imagines they are. Abbott's counsel cites a 1893 case, which Yeargain said was irrelevant to the petition. 'The argument that Abbott makes in his filing, is that a state legislator is 'clearly, obviously a public official or a public officer,'' he said. 'It's actually not clear, and they're just trying to bluff their way through it.' The Texas Government Code has been used for more than 100 years, and as recently as 1999, to argue the opposite of what Abbott's filing argues, Yeargain added. '[Abbott] is not able to cite any relevant case that involved anything similar in the past … and there's a mountain of case law that suggests that that is not an appropriate use of this kind of legal threat,' Yeargain said. 'We're talking about executive branch officials in this kind of situation.' Tillman also said he's not sure quorum breaking is an example of what state law defines as 'official influence.' 'Official influence is the governor calling up a commissioner and saying, 'Get this guy the relief he wants.' I don't know that [quorum breaking] is official influence,' he said. The petition argues that Wu and other quorum breakers have left Texas for an indefinite amount of time, and thus vacated their seats. This doesn't hold up with what the quorum breakers have said, which is that they do intend to return to their primary residences in their districts. Texas Democrats leave the state to block vote on redrawn House map backed by Trump 'Usually, when we talk about abandoning office, we want them to have an intent of not coming back; not having an intent for a specific date to come back, isn't really the same thing,' Tillman explained. 'I don't see any evidence that [Wu] doesn't plan to return. He just wants to return in his own good time under conditions that he's satisfied with. What the governor says is, 'I want you to return and debate whether you like those conditions or not.'' What could happen? Speculating in 'unprecedented times' The filing's bribery allegation, which Tillman called 'a fairly weak claim,' cites article 16, section 41 of the Texas Constitution. 'Given the gravity of what the governor is asking the court to do, which is, in effect, to override an election … against his party and political opponents, I think the [Texas] Supreme Court is going to want a very close adherence to the language in that constitutional provision,' he said. Both scholars said they used narrow and originalist perspectives while analyzing Abbott's petition. They each said that the current SCOTX justices, many of whom were Abbott appointees, lean towards these interpretations in their rulings. 'The Texas Supreme Court is really serious about history. It's very interested in historical practice and consistency with that practice,' Yeargain said. 'The fact that Abbott isn't able to point to … any historical analog in the slightest is jarring. It is stunning, because the scope of what he's asking for is massive.' Yeargain declined to speculate on how SCOTX might rule on the petition in these 'unprecedented times.' Tillman said he could imagine a majority of the justices siding with Abbott, but remains doubtful of that outcome. 'The Constitution of Texas doesn't say that because the governor has the power to convene the legislature, any particular member of the legislature, including Rep. Wu, has a specific duty to show up that day and on time,' Tillman said, 'to the extent that there are provisions that govern punishments, like the $500-a-day provision, that might very well be interpreted as the limit of what could be done against these people.' If SCOTX issues a writ in this case, it would open a 'can of worms' and make the state's highest court into 'ordinary run of the mill partisan politics,' Yeargain added. The petition, according to Yeargain's reading, is Abbott asking the court to engage in judicial activism. '[Abbott's] asking for something that the court doesn't have the power to do. He's asking for something that has never been done before, and he can't point to any example of it having been done before,' Yeargain said. 'He's asking the court to step into a political dispute and to arrive at his desired political outcome. That's entirely inappropriate and something that in almost any other context, he would condemn.' 'What he's saying is, 'if they're going to frustrate my power, they should lose their office.' But that's essentially a political question. That's one that should be left to the voters,' Tillman said. Without consequences, couldn't another quorum break happen? A talking point by some around the current quorum break is that if legal action isn't taken at some point, won't this just happen again? It's a fair point, since our state legislature has seen a few other quorum breaks in its recent past. Tillman argued that super majority quorum rules inherently carry the risk of quorum breaking by the minority party. Texas Legislature: What is a quorum? 'That's the risk you take when you build a provision like that in,' he said. 'Some people might even go further and say it's not just a risk, that's the intent, to make sure that anything that passes has super majority support. Or, at least if it doesn't have super majority support, it doesn't cross the red lines of the dissenting party.' Quorum breaking isn't just a Texas thing, Yeargain noted. In 2019, Oregon Senate Republicans staged a six-week walkout over an environmental bill. In response, Oregonians successfully voted to amend the state's constitution to ban lawmakers with a certain number of absences from running for office again. In 2024, the Oregon Supreme Court upheld that rule, barring a third of those Republicans from reelection runs. Texas lawmakers could send such an amendment to the ballot for voters to approve, if they wanted a constitutional obstacle in the future. Yeargain also had other ideas for the Texas House to consider, such as redefining quorum in its rules or increasing existing penalties for breaking quorum. In fact, the House added fines for quorum breaking to its rules in 2023 to discourage the action. It also has the power to issue warrants for absent representatives. And, as both scholars point out, the Texas Constitution already allows the state's Legislative branch to remove members on a two-thirds vote. The Texas House nearly underwent such a vote in 2023 against former House Republican Rep. Bryan Slayton; he resigned prior to the vote. 'There's no tradition in the United States … that if a member's conduct is egregious enough, any federal court, even of the same state or the same district, could just remove that member, even if he commits a crime, right? That's not how we do it,' Tillman said. 'God forbid we should expand that and allow the courts all over the United States to decide for themselves what sort of conduct constitutes expulsion. The very fact there's already several remedies provided by law in Texas, in my mind, raises serious doubts.'
San Francisco Chronicle
38 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Independent candidate for Michigan governor is betting on partisan fatigue in the midterms
DETROIT (AP) — Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan spent his political career as a Democrat, leading Michigan's largest Democratic stronghold. But now, he's become a target of his former party, whose leaders are furious about his decision to run for Michigan governor next year as an independent. Detroit is a power base for Democrats in the battleground state, and some fear Duggan will draw support from their nominee and potentially help the Republican candidate. Democrats have launched attacks against Duggan, accusing him of being bankrolled by allies of President Donald Trump. But Duggan — who is soon leaving the office he has held since 2014 — says voters of all leanings are tired of partisan fighting. 'It doesn't actually matter where I go in the state,' Duggan said. 'People are angry that their problems are not getting solved because the two parties are so consumed with fighting with each other.' Duggan had been a major Democratic figure in Michigan with a close working relationship with former President Joe Biden. While there is precedent for independent governors in the U.S., none are currently in office and there has never been one in Michigan. Why run as an independent? He announced his bid a month after Democrats suffered heavy losses in the 2024 election. But, midterm elections tend to favor the party not in power. Democrats have now seized on cuts to Medicaid and SNAP benefits as winning issues in races across the country. Duggan doesn't see it that way. 'I mean, it would have been easier to win as a Democrat, but then I'd have just been part of the partisan problem,' Duggan said. As an example, Duggan pointed to Michigan's split Legislature, with Republicans in control of the state House and Democrats controlling the state Senate. Only six proposals have become law this year, and the state operating budget is still hung up. Duggan's campaign has focused on his independency from both parties and education in the state. Duggan derided Michigan House Democrats who voted against a measure to restrict cellphone usage in schools. 'I don't really intend to get involved in the national Republican versus Democratic talking points,' he said. Tariffs in Detroit, and abroad Several companies in Michigan's auto industry, centered in Detroit, have reported major losses and expressed worry about tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. Auto parts often move across the border between the U.S. and Canada multiple times during manufacturing. Duggan said tariffs on China and Mexico could push manufacturing to Michigan. However, tariffs on Canada are 'devastating,' he said. 'When you put a tariff on Canada, you put a tariff on Michigan,' he said. He also critiqued the ever-changing nature of Trump's tariff policies, saying they prevent companies from making educated, long-term investments. President Trump Duggan praised current Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer for her work with the Trump administration, opposing the tariffs on Canada and working with him to get new fighter jets for an air force base. Some Democrats have criticized Whitmer for appearing with Trump multiple times this year. 'I think it's exactly the right kind of approach,' he said. Elon Musk Democrats in Michigan have frequently tied Duggan to Elon Musk; an attempt to undercut Duggan by association with the divisive public figure. Musk, a former Trump ally, said in July that he would create a third political party. When Duggan responded to Musk on X saying 'Now you've got my attention,' the Michigan Democratic Party said the mayor was 'cozying' up to the richest man in the world. When asked about exchange, Duggan said his bid is 'exactly the opposite' of a third party and said he wants no part of one. As an independent, he would not be responsible for any party majority, he said. 'I'm going to work with whoever wins to build bridges,' he said. Arab American voters Michigan is home to one of the largest populations of Arab American voters in the U.S., many of whom are disillusioned with both political parties over Israel's military offensive in Gaza which has resulted in a devastating humanitarian crisis. 'The governor doesn't make policy 6,000 miles away,' Duggan said. 'The governor has a great deal to say about the tone of hate speech and threats to individuals — whether it's the Jewish community, the Arab community — in the state of Michigan.' Who else is in the race? Whitmer is term-limited and cannot run for reelection. The crowded field vying to replace her includes three Democrats — Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist II and Genesee County Sheriff Chris Swanson — and four Republicans — U.S. Rep. John James, state Senate Leader Aric Nesbitt, former state Attorney General Mike Cox and former Speaker of the state House Tom Leonard. Running as an independent allowed Duggan to avoid the Democratic primary, but he gave up access to the party's resources. He's well-known in Detroit and the surrounding areas but largely lacks statewide name recognition. Recent fundraising numbers showed Duggan was competitive with Benson, James and Nesbitt. Only Benson's campaign raised more than Duggan's, thanks to $1.1 million she transferred from her Secretary of State campaign account. National Democratic groups, though, are certain to prioritize the Michigan race and pour money in if needed. 'A lot of people in the state are fed up with a two party system,' Duggan said. 'And it's not going to change by electing another Republican or Democrat.'
