
Hanuman Chalisa recited in UK Parliament for the first time during Dhirendra Shastri's visit
'For the first time in the history of London's Parliament… Shri Hanuman Chalisa recitation by the revered government… All guests present in the Parliament recited with devotion…," Bageshwar Dham said in a post on X.
This marks the first occasion that a Hindu religious text has been recited inside the British Parliament.
Earlier in April this year, members of the Indian diaspora gathered outside the Pakistan High Commission in London and recited the Hanuman Chalisa following tensions between Indian and Pakistani groups in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack, which left 26 people dead.
Pandit Dhirendra Krishna Shastri has previously drawn attention for his style during international visits. During his trip to Australia, he was trolled online after photos showed him wearing trendy sunglasses, a high-end jacket on a flight, and even relaxing on a cruise.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
Starmer Branded Cringe For 'Awkward' Long-Distance Video Call With Lionesses
UK PM Sir Keir Starmer mocked for his 'awkward' video call with the Lionesses. The UEFA Euro 2025 champions were hosted at 10 Downing Street, the residence of British PM, on Monday. However, missing from action was the Prime Minister himself during the celebratory reception. Busy with U.S. President Donald Trump, Starmer joined celebration virtually from Scotland. He congratulated the newly crowned football team and posted a video of the moment as well. But his virtual meet-up was met with mockery as netizens branded it cringe and 'more like AI'. Watch- Read More


Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Sanctions, exemptions and assurances: A cautionary note on India's trade deal strategy
Casinos and betting companies around the world might as well start offering odds on US tariff rates across goods for different countries and for how long the rates will stick. If one were lulled into complacency about understanding the current state of affairs, the Trump administration is sure to throw a few wildcards into the mix to keep everyone on their toes – and this includes analysts as well as trade negotiators. A few other countries, including Europe, have agreed on a trade deal with the US, and analysing its structure and form can give a strong indication of how the Indian deal might play out. Finally, a free trade agreement with the UK that was recently signed and one with Australia that was signed a few months ago give India a minor edge in the proceedings. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte recently threatened India, along with China, Brazil and others with 100 per cent secondary sanctions if they continue doing business with Russia, including buying Russian oil. Simultaneously, US Senator Lindsey Graham is pushing for the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, a bipartisan legislative proposal. The bill, backed by Trump and 170 other lawmakers, threatens an unprecedented 500 per cent tariff on all goods exported to the US by countries that buy Russian oil, gas, petrochemicals or uranium. This is part of an overall strategy to choke the Kremlin's war bank and economic lifelines. Trump has warned that if Russia does not stop its military offensive within 50 days, nations trading with Russia will receive trade penalties. India imports 90 per cent of its crude oil needs, of which 35-40 per cent comes from Russia. Recall that in 2020, the share of Russia in India's crude oil imports was less than 1 per cent. The response by the Indian administration has been mixed. India's foreign secretary hit back at NATO's double standards for both buying Russian gas and for buying refined oil from India, which uses Russian crude as inputs. He has also indicated that India might not readily fall in line, as securing India's energy needs is the top priority for this government. Elsewhere, there's a tacit acknowledgement of the cost-benefit analysis. India's Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri has implicitly acknowledged that India is prepared to 'deal with these sanctions' when they are passed. What helps is that India now has diversified its import sources to 40 countries, as opposed to 27 in the past, which means that India can reduce its imports from Russia, should the sanctions be passed. While diversifying imports to other countries can turn out to be slightly more expensive, a 500 per cent (or even 100 per cent) tariff rate would kill India's competitiveness with the only major trading partner with which India has a trade surplus. India will have to assess the probability of Trump keeping his word on the secondary tariffs. The oil spot markets called his bluff, as the price for Brent crude barely moved from $69 per barrel. If the secondary sanctions stick and Russian oil (which accounts for 10 per cent of the total global oil supply) is shut out of the global markets, the price could shoot up to $120 per barrel. This would derail Trump's domestic low-energy prices agenda. Moreover, if secondary tariffs on Chinese (mainly) and Indian goods stick, it would result in a significant increase in prices of imported goods and cause runaway inflation in the US. Will the acronym TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out) be validated again? Along with the threat of secondary tariffs, Trump has also separately imposed tariffs on auto and auto parts. He is also threatening tariffs on pharmaceutical imports and a 10 per cent additional tariff on all products from BRICS countries for attempting to 'destroy' the US Dollar. These additional tariffs would make the Indian side wary of signing a deal with the US, given that it may be superseded at any time by such ad hoc measures. A trade deal would mean very little if there's a new threat of tariffs every other day. To mitigate this, the Indian side would want explicit assurances that no new tariffs will be imposed once a Bilateral Trade Agreement is finalised. India should now insist on the agreement including renegotiation clauses, or compensation from its trading partner in case of a tariff increase. It could even insist on a clawback clause, which allows India to withdraw benefits if the US reneges on the deal. Though it would be rather foolhardy to speculate, it can be instructive to look at some of the other trade deals that the US has recently signed to get an idea of what may lie in store for India. Though some of these details are yet to be publicly confirmed, what we know so far is that trade deals with the UK, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, Japan and the EU have been finalised. The big takeaway is that a 10 per cent tariff rate is the new zero or the base rate. In addition, each country faces different additional tariffs. The UK pays no extra charges, while Vietnam faces an additional 10 per cent (bringing their total to 20 per cent, down from the originally threatened 46 per cent). Indonesia and the Philippines each pay an additional 9 per cent, resulting in total rates of 19 per cent (compared to threatened rates of 32 per cent and 20 per cent, respectively). Japan and the EU receive the most favourable treatment with only an additional 5 per cent, for a total rate of 15 per cent. In exchange for these negotiated rates, most of these countries have eliminated all tariffs on US products and opened their markets to American companies. Note that sectoral tariffs are exempted from the reciprocal tariffs. Thus, auto and auto parts tariffs of 25 per cent will apply on top of the base 10 per cent, but these countries have negotiated on some of these sectoral tariffs. Japan was able to reduce auto tariffs to 15 per cent, reduced from the threatened 25 per cent, and the UK got it reduced to 10 per cent. India should pay attention to this and negotiate on pharma and auto products to get exemptions. The writer is an Economics Professor at the Takshashila Institution, an independent and non-partisan think tank and school of public policy
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
5 minutes ago
- First Post
'Gupt' and 'Mohra' director Rajiv Rai on 'Saiyaara' success: 'Ahaan Panday deserves Rs 100 crore for his film because...'
Saiyaara title track has swiftly surpassed Justin Bieber's Daisies in its race to clinch the number 1 spot of the Spotify's Top 50 Global chart. Saiyaara is the only Indian song to have entered top 5 of the global music chart read more Rajiv Rai is the master of masala films who helmed blockbusters like Tridev, Vishwatma, Mohra, and Gupt. His films Pyaar Ishq Aur Mohabbat and Asambhav bombed at the box-office. He gears up for a comeback after two decades. In an interview with Bollywood Hungama, the filmmaker spoke about the success of Saiyaara and said, 'I would blame the producers because they are willing to pay. An actor can even quote Rs 1,000 crore. It's basic demand and supply. Since there's more money in the market now, everyone's chasing glamour over substance.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rai added, 'Here's how I calculate an actor's fee: whatever I pay them, they must recover for me on Day 1. If I want to be generous, I'll give them three days. If I've paid Rs 100 crore to an actor, then the film must make that back within three days of release. That's when they truly deserve the money.' On Ahaan Panday Ahaan Panday deserves Rs 100 crore for his film simply if he is able to bring in that money. So, when someone comes to me and asks for Rs 10 crore, I simply say: I'll give you my first day's collection. Saiyaara title track has swiftly surpassed Justin Bieber's Daisies in its race to clinch the number 1 spot of the Spotify's Top 50 Global chart. Saiyaara is the only Indian song to have entered top 5 of the global music chart. On Monday, Saiyaara beat Daisies for the fourth spot. Fans of the blockbuster film along with Ananya Panday, Faheem Abdullah, Arslan Nizami, Tanishk Bagchi and Mohit Suri are hoping the song hits the number 1 spot. The title song is sung by Faheem and co-composed by Faheem, Tanishk and Arslan. The song marks the Bollywood debut of Kashmiri singers, Faheem Abdullah and Arslan Nizami.