Tired of apartments with no fridges? California bill would require landlords to supply them
Tired of scouring Craigslist and Facebook Marketplace for a decently used refrigerator because your new apartment didn't come with one?
This headache could become a thing of the past with a new bill in the California Legislature that, if approved, would require landlords to provide refrigerators and stoves in their rentals.
The simple answer is landlords don't have to provide a refrigerator.
Existing California law requires any building with a dwelling unit to maintain "certain characteristics in order to be tenantable," which includes maintenance of adequate heating and hot water systems.
Even though cooking and storing food might seem like a necessity in order to live in any kind of housing situation, legally the appliances are categorized as amenities.
The number of Californians who have entered new leases without such luxuries is far greater than any other state, according to a Times analysis in 2022.
Read more: Why do so many L.A. apartments come without fridges? Inside the chilling mystery
Research showed that Los Angeles and Orange counties "offered the fewest number of apartments with refrigerators among nearly two dozen large metropolitan areas nationwide."
It's the added cost of purchasing the appliance.
The average monthly rent in the city of Los Angeles is $2,347, higher than the national average of $1,995, according to Zillow.
But the highest average rent in the surrounding area is $4,500, in Ladera Heights.
When entering a lease, you're providing the landlord with the first month's rent and a security deposit. If a refrigerator isn't provided, you're looking at spending on either a new appliance or searching online for a used one.
Product analysts say the average price of a new refrigerator is between $600 and $2,300, the basic one is between $200 and $600 and the high-end one is between $2,300 and $5,000.
If you're in the market for a used refrigerator, the cheapest listing The Times found on Facebook Marketplace is $25 for a two-door Whirlpool. The seller described it as not "looking so good on the outside but perfect for a garage or even outside."
When Assemblymember Tina McKinnor (D-Hawthorne), whose 61st District covers communities from Inglewood to Marina del Rey, introduced Assembly Bill 628, she realized refrigerators and stoves were legally labeled as amenities. She decided to make it a necessity with the new bill.
The bill, if passed, would add a stove and refrigerator in good working condition and capable of safely generating heat for cooking and storing food, respectively, as a requirement of landlords starting Jan. 1, 2026.
Read more: The Times podcast: Why L.A. has fridge-less apartments
McKinnor said she has regular town halls with her communities and the main topics of concern she's heard from constituents are affording rent, rising grocery prices and everyday bills.
"We know that people are really struggling out there with the high cost of food, gas, household goods, and on top of that, lots of people spend more than half their income on rent," she said.
She wants renters to have one less payment to think about when entering a new lease.
If the bill is approved, a landlord "cannot have you in a rental without a refrigerator just like they can't have you in there without hot running water or a heater" starting next year, McKinnor said.
There are some rentals that come with the appliance, but McKinnor wants everyone to have the much-needed item.
Similar to a heater in need of repair or replacement, McKinnor said the landlord will be in charge of fixing or replacing a refrigerator.
Read more: L.A. housing authority turning luxury Woodland Hills apartments into affordable housing
In the city of L.A., landlords can increase the rent once every 12 months by the allowable rent increase percentage required by the Rent Stabilization Ordinance.
Rentals that are not subject to the Rent Stabilization Ordinance include:
Single family homes
Affordable housing or luxury housing units exempted by the Los Angeles Housing Department
A rental built after Oct. 1, 1978
A converted commercial building that converted to rental units after Oct. 1, 1978
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Waymo halts service in downtown Los Angeles amid ICE protests
The autonomous ride-hailing service Waymo has suspended operations in downtown Los Angeles after several of its vehicles were set on fire during protests against immigration raids in the area. At least five Waymo vehicles were destroyed over the weekend, the company said. Waymo removed its vehicles from downtown but continues to operate in other parts of Los Angeles. A Waymo spokesperson told The Times the company was working with law enforcement regarding the incidents. Read more: Waymo vehicles set on fire in downtown L.A. as protesters, police clash Protests related to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity escalated on Sunday after President Trump sent National Guard troops to the city. Demonstrations on Sunday were largely peaceful, according to Los Angeles Police Department Chief Jim McDonnell, but escalated where demonstrators clashed with law enforcement. Waymo does not think the protests were directly related to its vehicles, the company said. E-scooters operated by Lime were also set on fire. "We do not believe our vehicles were intentionally targeted, but rather happened to be present during the protests," a Waymo spokesperson told CBS News. Waymo's fleet of driverless electric Jaguars has become a familiar sight in Los Angeles, where they have operated since November. The taxi service first launched in San Francisco and Phoenix and plans to expand to Miami, Atlanta and Austin, Texas. The company got its start as the Google Self-Driving Car Project, which began in 2009 and put its first autonomous car on the road in 2015. The project rebranded as Waymo in 2016 under Google's parent company, Alphabet, and launched its driverless ride-hailing service known as Waymo One in 2020. Read more: Waymo is getting ready to tackle Los Angeles' freeways. How have the robotaxis fared so far? Waymo vehicles had driven nearly 2 million miles in Los Angeles as of January, but have been frequent targets for vandals. In January, a group vandalized one of the self-driving taxis in Beverly Grove. In February 2024, a Waymo was set ablaze with fireworks in San Francisco's Chinatown. In July, also in San Francisco, a Castro Valley resident was charged with vandalizing 17 Waymos over three days, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. Waymo has not indicated when it plans to resume service in downtown Los Angeles. Protests in California began Saturday after ICE raids in the Los Angeles Fashion District and continued Sunday. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has called Trump's decision to deploy National Guard troops "unlawful." Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Los Angeles Times
10 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Waymo halts service in downtown Los Angeles amid ICE protests
The autonomous ride-hailing service Waymo has suspended operations in downtown Los Angeles after several of its vehicles were set on fire during protests against immigration raids in the area. At least five Waymo vehicles were destroyed over the weekend, the company said. Waymo removed its vehicles from downtown but continues to operate in other parts of Los Angeles. A Waymo spokesperson told The Times the company was working with law enforcement regarding the incidents. Protests related to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity escalated on Sunday after President Trump sent National Guard troops to the city. Demonstrations on Sunday were largely peaceful, according to Los Angeles Police Department Chief Jim McDonnell, but escalated where demonstrators clashed with law enforcement. Waymo does not think the protests were directly related to its vehicles, the company said. E-scooters operated by Lime were also set on fire. 'We do not believe our vehicles were intentionally targeted, but rather happened to be present during the protests,' a Waymo spokesperson told CBS News. Waymo's fleet of driverless electric Jaguars has become a familiar sight in Los Angeles, where they have operated since November. The taxi service first launched in San Francisco and Phoenix and plans to expand to Miami, Atlanta and Austin, Texas. The company got its start as the Google Self-Driving Car Project, which began in 2009 and put its first autonomous car on the road in 2015. The project rebranded as Waymo in 2016 under Google's parent company, Alphabet, and launched its driverless ride-hailing service known as Waymo One in 2020. Waymo vehicles had driven nearly 2 million miles in Los Angeles as of January, but have been frequent targets for vandals. In January, a group vandalized one of the self-driving taxis in Beverly Grove. In February 2024, a Waymo was set ablaze with fireworks in San Francisco's Chinatown. In July, also in San Francisco, a Castro Valley resident was charged with vandalizing 17 Waymos over three days, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. Waymo has not indicated when it plans to resume service in downtown Los Angeles. Protests in California began Saturday after ICE raids in the Los Angeles Fashion District and continued Sunday. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has called Trump's decision to deploy National Guard troops 'unlawful.'
Entrepreneur
14 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
Why Your Beautiful Product Might Be Failing
Here's why users say they want beauty but always choose the ugly product that actually works. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Here's a fun fact about Craigslist. It looks like it was designed in 1995 because, well, it basically was. Purple links, wall of text, zero visual hierarchy. Design students use it as an example of what not to do. And yet it processes millions of transactions every month while dozens of beautifully designed competitors have died trying to dethrone it. This should bother you. It bothers me. As product managers, we're supposed to know better. We talk about user experience, design thinking, and all that jazz. But then Craigslist sits there, ugly as sin, making money hand over fist. The uncomfortable truth is that entrepreneurs and product teams fall in love with the wrong things. We obsess over pixel-perfect interfaces while users just want to get stuff done. We debate typography while competitors with Comic Sans eat our lunch. This isn't just about aesthetics — it's about fundamentally misunderstanding what makes products succeed. Take Google's homepage circa 1999. Sparse. Brutal. Just a logo and a search box. Meanwhile, Yahoo was building this gorgeous portal with news, weather and stock quotes. Yahoo had the better design by every conventional measure. More features. Better visual hierarchy. Actual graphics. Google looked like a student project. Guess which one won. Related: Good Product Design Is More Than Aesthetics — How to Balance Pretty With Practical to Attract More Investors Design theater The psychology behind this is fascinating. A significant 34.6% of visitors worldwide indicate that they strongly favor information structures that are simple and easy to understand. Yet somehow, when we're building products, we convince ourselves that users want something more sophisticated. More elegant. More beautiful. It's what I call "design theater" — when form becomes performance art rather than purposeful function. You see it everywhere. Startups spending months perfecting their onboarding animations while their core product barely works. Enterprise software companies hiring expensive design agencies to create "delightful experiences" for users who just need to export a spreadsheet. Reddit is another perfect example. Reddit has 234 million unique users, 8.19 billion monthly pageviews and 25 million daily votes — all while looking like it hasn't been updated since 2005. The site works because it delivers exactly what users want: content, conversation and community. Not gradients. Not micro-interactions. Just the stuff that matters. Stated preference vs. actual behavior But here's where it gets interesting. Users say they want beautiful design. They really do. In surveys and focus groups, they'll tell you they prefer the prettier option every single time. Then they go home and use the ugly one that actually works. This disconnect between stated preference and actual behavior is critical for product managers to understand by leveraging data and emerging techniques like conversational interfaces to tailor interactions and anticipate user needs. The data tells a different story than the focus groups. Always trust the data. Related: Your Product's Design Could Be Costing You Customers. Here's What You're Doing Wrong (and How to Fix It). How do you know when to prioritize form versus function? Here's my framework. First, understand the job your product is doing. Clayton Christensen's "jobs to be done" theory applies perfectly here. Nobody hires Craigslist to have a beautiful browsing experience. They hire it to sell their couch or find an apartment. The ugliness actually helps — it signals that this is a no-nonsense marketplace where real people do real transactions. Second, find your threshold of acceptable ugliness. Yes, that's a real thing. Every product category has a baseline aesthetic requirement. Dating apps need to look better than tax software. But even within categories, there's surprising flexibility. Hacker News looks terrible and thrives. Designer News looks beautiful and struggles. Same audience, same purpose, different outcomes. Third, test your assumptions ruthlessly. Not with surveys. Not with interviews. With actual behavior. Launch an ugly version and a pretty version. See which one converts better. You might be surprised. I've seen this play out dozens of times — the "worse" design wins because it loads faster, works better on mobile or just gets out of the user's way. The challenge for product managers is pushing back on design-first thinking without becoming the villain. You don't want to be the person who killed joy. But you also can't let your team spend six months polishing something that should have shipped in two weeks. Here's what works Frame everything in terms of user outcomes. Instead of debating whether the button should be four pixels or six pixels from the edge, ask what user problem you're solving. Instead of arguing about color schemes, talk about cognitive load. Make the conversation about effectiveness, not aesthetics. Also, celebrate ugly wins. When Reddit's valuation hits another billion, mention it. When Craigslist outlasts another competitor, bring it up. Build a culture that values results over refinement. This doesn't mean you should make ugly products on purpose. Delightful design can certainly make good products great, but that only matters if the product is actually useful, usable and reliable in the first place. The point is to sequence your priorities correctly. Function first. Then form. Always in that order. Related: The Art of Creating Great Products The most successful products find the sweet spot — just enough design to not actively repel users, but not so much that it gets in the way of the job to be done. They understand that sometimes, ugly is exactly what users need. Your beautiful product might be failing because you're solving the wrong problem. You're making it pretty when you should be making it work. That's the trap. And now you know how to avoid it.
