logo
Tired of apartments with no fridges? California bill would require landlords to supply them

Tired of apartments with no fridges? California bill would require landlords to supply them

Yahoo04-04-2025

Tired of scouring Craigslist and Facebook Marketplace for a decently used refrigerator because your new apartment didn't come with one?
This headache could become a thing of the past with a new bill in the California Legislature that, if approved, would require landlords to provide refrigerators and stoves in their rentals.
The simple answer is landlords don't have to provide a refrigerator.
Existing California law requires any building with a dwelling unit to maintain "certain characteristics in order to be tenantable," which includes maintenance of adequate heating and hot water systems.
Even though cooking and storing food might seem like a necessity in order to live in any kind of housing situation, legally the appliances are categorized as amenities.
The number of Californians who have entered new leases without such luxuries is far greater than any other state, according to a Times analysis in 2022.
Read more: Why do so many L.A. apartments come without fridges? Inside the chilling mystery
Research showed that Los Angeles and Orange counties "offered the fewest number of apartments with refrigerators among nearly two dozen large metropolitan areas nationwide."
It's the added cost of purchasing the appliance.
The average monthly rent in the city of Los Angeles is $2,347, higher than the national average of $1,995, according to Zillow.
But the highest average rent in the surrounding area is $4,500, in Ladera Heights.
When entering a lease, you're providing the landlord with the first month's rent and a security deposit. If a refrigerator isn't provided, you're looking at spending on either a new appliance or searching online for a used one.
Product analysts say the average price of a new refrigerator is between $600 and $2,300, the basic one is between $200 and $600 and the high-end one is between $2,300 and $5,000.
If you're in the market for a used refrigerator, the cheapest listing The Times found on Facebook Marketplace is $25 for a two-door Whirlpool. The seller described it as not "looking so good on the outside but perfect for a garage or even outside."
When Assemblymember Tina McKinnor (D-Hawthorne), whose 61st District covers communities from Inglewood to Marina del Rey, introduced Assembly Bill 628, she realized refrigerators and stoves were legally labeled as amenities. She decided to make it a necessity with the new bill.
The bill, if passed, would add a stove and refrigerator in good working condition and capable of safely generating heat for cooking and storing food, respectively, as a requirement of landlords starting Jan. 1, 2026.
Read more: The Times podcast: Why L.A. has fridge-less apartments
McKinnor said she has regular town halls with her communities and the main topics of concern she's heard from constituents are affording rent, rising grocery prices and everyday bills.
"We know that people are really struggling out there with the high cost of food, gas, household goods, and on top of that, lots of people spend more than half their income on rent," she said.
She wants renters to have one less payment to think about when entering a new lease.
If the bill is approved, a landlord "cannot have you in a rental without a refrigerator just like they can't have you in there without hot running water or a heater" starting next year, McKinnor said.
There are some rentals that come with the appliance, but McKinnor wants everyone to have the much-needed item.
Similar to a heater in need of repair or replacement, McKinnor said the landlord will be in charge of fixing or replacing a refrigerator.
Read more: L.A. housing authority turning luxury Woodland Hills apartments into affordable housing
In the city of L.A., landlords can increase the rent once every 12 months by the allowable rent increase percentage required by the Rent Stabilization Ordinance.
Rentals that are not subject to the Rent Stabilization Ordinance include:
Single family homes
Affordable housing or luxury housing units exempted by the Los Angeles Housing Department
A rental built after Oct. 1, 1978
A converted commercial building that converted to rental units after Oct. 1, 1978
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dems reject Newsom's cuts to healthcare for undocumented immigrants
Dems reject Newsom's cuts to healthcare for undocumented immigrants

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Dems reject Newsom's cuts to healthcare for undocumented immigrants

Nearly a month after Governor Gavin Newsom proposed pausing the expansion of publicly funded healthcare for undocumented Californians, Democratic lawmakers are drawing a line in the sand. This week, legislative leaders in both the Assembly and Senate advanced a new budget proposal that pushes back against some of the governor's most controversial cuts. At the heart of the disagreement is Newsom's plan to pause the 2026 Medi-Cal expansion for low-income undocumented residents and require the 1.6 million undocumented Californians already enrolled to begin paying $100 monthly premiums. Citing the state's projected $12 billion deficit, Newsom has said these proposals are difficult but necessary. 'There are investments we're making we cannot continue to make,' Newsom said during his budget presentation last month. But state Senate Budget Committee Chair Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) assured the public this week, 'No one is going to be kicked off healthcare.' Wiener argued that undocumented Californians – who work, pay taxes, and have deep roots in their communities – deserve continued access to Medi-Cal coverage. The Democrats' budget plan would delay the Medi-Cal pause until summer 2027 and reduce proposed premiums from $100 per month to $30. Senator Akilah Weber-Pierson (D-San Diego) emphasized that maintaining coverage was a promise California made: 'We are not disenrolling anyone from Medi-Cal.' Republicans, however, have raised concerns about cost. Senator Kelly Seyarto (R-Murrieta) warned that healthcare spending for undocumented individuals – estimated at $10 to $12 billion – is unsustainable. 'We have to figure out how to make that work better… this is the second runaway train,' Seyarto said, making a passing reference to the state's unfinished high-speed rail project. To help close the budget gap, some Democrats are now discussing the possibility of raising taxes on large corporations. Senators Caroline Menjivar (D-San Fernando Valley) and Sasha Renée Pérez (D-Pasadena) said it's time to consider taxing the wealthiest businesses rather than cutting services for vulnerable populations. 'If corporations are getting huge tax breaks at the federal level, we need to start talking about taxing them at the state level,' Pérez said. Still, Republicans insist spending reforms should come first. Senator Roger Niello (R-Fair Oaks) dismissed the idea of a tax hike, saying, 'That's not a viable solution. Clearly it is a spending problem.' The legislature and governor have until June 15 to finalize and pass a budget. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

California DMV warns of new vehicle registration support scam
California DMV warns of new vehicle registration support scam

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

California DMV warns of new vehicle registration support scam

Above: FOX 5 report on how to get a REAL ID in California. SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — The California Department of Motor Vehicles is urging drivers to be wary of a new online scam offering assistance to renew vehicle registration at a discounted rate. DMV officials say the latest scam uses social media posts to advertise help that could save people up to 50% on vehicle registration renewal fees. Those who respond are asked to give their license plate, Vehicle Identification Number and the customer's full name, as well as to make a payment through an online platform like CashApp. System error may have affected traffic court notices in California. Are you impacted? According to the department, requests for these details or payments will never be made through unofficial channels. They further encourage drivers to only conduct business with the DMV or with an authorized business through the Business Partner Automation Program. A list of businesses that participate in this program can be found on the DMV's website. An example of what the advertisement looks like can be found below. 'The safest way to renew your vehicle registration is directly through the official DMV website,' DMV Director Steve Gordon said in a release earlier this month. 'We do not offer discounts, and we never conduct official business through social media or other unofficial channels.' To avoid falling victim to this scam and others that have been circulating in recent months, the DMV encourages Californians to take these precautions: Steer clear of offers offering discounted DMV services — the department does not offer special deals through unauthorized third-parties or on social media. Do not respond to unsolicited or suspicious texts. Verify the source if you are unsure whether something you come across is official or if you have concerns. Officials encourage Californians do this by contacting the department's customer service team at 800-777-0133. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

State Senators Overwhelmingly Vote to Raise Car Dealership Fees 488%
State Senators Overwhelmingly Vote to Raise Car Dealership Fees 488%

Miami Herald

time19 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

State Senators Overwhelmingly Vote to Raise Car Dealership Fees 488%

California's state Senate has approved legislation allowing car dealers to charge buyers up to 1% of a vehicle's purchase price in document processing fees, with a $500 cap. This $500 limit represents an increase of nearly 500% from the current cap of $85, and the average starting price of a new car in May was $48,656, Cox Automotive reports. The bill passed with only one Senator voting against it, and its supporters, including California's New Car Dealers Association, say the fee is necessary since the $85 cap hasn't kept pace with the state's rising business costs over the decades. Processing paperwork that the added costs would help pay for includes loan documents, fraud protection forms, and Department of Motor Vehicles registration. Anthony Samson, the California New Car Dealers Association's lobbyist, said in April that other businesses can recoup similar costs through service charges, but dealers can't. "If we believed we could simply recover our costs and the price of the vehicle, I assure you that we would not be here today asking for your support on this measure," Samson said, according to Cal Matters. However, Senator Dave Cortese said he's working with the California New Car Dealers Association to lower the fee's ceiling when it's heard in the Assembly. Senator Henry Stern was the only Senator who voted against the bill, noting he feels that car sellers have undermined the state's efforts to protect consumers and the environment with actions like lobbying for the U.S. Senate to pass federal legislation blocking California's electric vehicle mandates. "The car dealers haven't earned the trust to justify this major increase in junk fees," Stern said, according to Cal Matters. Ray Shefska, CarEdge Co-Founder, added that "This bill reinforces that in America, whether it be national, state, or local, we have the best politicians money can buy. When things are already barely affordable, let's by all means make it even more difficult for people buying cars in California." The California New Car Dealers Association has donated $2.9 million to the state's lawmakers since 2015, according to Digital Democracy's database. One California Senator, Carolyn Menjivar, didn't vote on Tuesday but stated: "If we're looking to help everyday Californians with affordability, why are we looking at helping an industry that is making a healthy profit?" California is one of the most expensive states to buy a car since it charges the highest sales tax rate at 7.25% and imposes significant registration fees. The document processing fees vote occurred amid reports of auto dealers using incentive strategies to sustain profits without raising vehicle prices in reaction to Trump's tariffs. State government vehicle purchases are exempt from the document charge. House Assembly members still have to vote on the car dealer fees bill before it heads to California's Governor for approval or veto. If the House Assembly approves the legislation in its current form, a $500 cap could increase Governor Newsom's chances of vetoing it. Florida has the highest car dealer document fees in the U.S., with its $999 cap, followed by Virginia at $799, and Colorado registering third at $699. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store