‘Stand for Truth': Gulf of Mexico Map Stirs Controversy in Crowdfunding Bid
What's in a name? How much does changing the name of a body of water really matter?
These are the questions that irked U.S.-based cartographer Michael Hermann when President Donald Trump renamed the Gulf of Mexico the 'Gulf of America.' Hermann and his wife had been traveling throughout Mexico for years, and he became increasingly fascinated by the immense scope of the Gulf's history.
While visiting Mexico's Yucatan peninsula several years ago, Hermann — the founder of Purple Lizard Maps — had an ambitious idea. What if he tried to make a 'story map' that visualized 10,000 years of the Gulf's history, from ancient civilizations to modern oil extraction?
The idea crystallized when Trump changed the Gulf's name on the first day he returned to the presidency. Hermann didn't like how Trump depicted Mexico only as a place 'filled with gangs and murderers and rapists.' He didn't like Trump changing North America's highest mountain from its Indigenous name (Denali) to Mt. McKinley.
Those actions fuel a 'nationalistic narrative' with 'all the overtones of white colonial power,' Hermann told GearJunkie this week. So Hermann launched a Kickstarter to fund his vision for a new map of the Gulf of Mexico.
'Maps tend to shape things like memory and meaning,' Hermann said. 'They can tell stories, and this lets us tell a deeper story about the Gulf.'
Trump wasn't content with just issuing an executive order changing the Gulf's name. He has instructed federal agencies to ban or limit the phrase 'Gulf of Mexico.' When the Associated Press (the country's oldest news organization) continued using 'Gulf of Mexico' in its stories, Trump banned AP reporters from the White House.
Amid all the rhetoric, however, it became clear to Hermann that few people really understood the uniqueness of the Gulf itself.
After all, it's the place where a meteor struck the Earth 66 million years ago, killing all the dinosaurs. It's where ancient civilizations like the Olmec, Maya, and Aztec developed for thousands of years in the lands that eventually became Mexico. The Gulf was critical to the arrival and expansion of colonial powers from Europe.
Then it became crucial to U.S. political power, and finally an international hub for extracting the oil — created from all those dead dinosaurs.
His vision for the map includes not only markers, but also brief explanations of history and culture similar to iconic maps from National Geographic.
'People think of the Gulf from the traditional American perspective, like spending a week in Cabo,' Hermann said. 'This will show the whole landscape, from the earth science and cultural side of it, as well as the modern day, with metrics of the oil and gas industry.'
It will also be printed. That may sound obvious for a map, but Hermann thinks that printing historically accurate maps is more important than ever. He pointed to the Trump administration, which has begun rewriting web pages of the National Park Service (NPS), one of several federal agencies charged with preserving U.S. history.
When Trump's administration updated an NPS page devoted to the Underground Railroad this month, they removed a photo of Harriet Tubman and any mention of the word 'slavery.' Hermann sees the same revisionist history in Trump's name change.
'According to Google Maps' official statement, if you're in Mexico, it says Gulf of Mexico, and if you're in the U.S., it says Gulf of America,' Hermann said. 'So, where is the truth? We're being fed different geographic names based on where we're standing.'
Despite the 'political subtext' to his idea, Hermann maintains that his project is still 'just a map.' But not everyone is stoked about it.
When Hermann promoted the Kickstarter through the email list for Purple Lizard, which mostly focuses on trail maps and outdoor recreation, it angered some of the company's longtime fans. And when Hermann promoted the campaign on Facebook, he received lots of support — and also quite a bit of vitriol. One person called the project 'an exhibition of pure stupidity,' while another labeled Purple Lizard a 'liberal company that doesn't want to sell' to conservatives.
'It's the Gulf of America now, dips—t,' another user commented. 'Your types aren't wanted in America anymore. 77 million Americans said so. Bye bye, traitor.'
For Hermann, the pushback is more interesting than worrisome.
'The idea of this map is threatening to certain people in the population, and I find that fascinating,' he said. 'When we did a map of Shenandoah National Park, we never got pushback about what we were doing. Nobody came at us with obscenities.'
Ultimately, Hermann doesn't know if the Kickstarter will get funded. He still has 23 days to go, but only about $12,000 of his $65,000 goal. It's the kind of project that could normally get funded through academic institutions. But with Trump punishing universities that don't agree with him, that option doesn't seem viable, Hermann said.
Moreover, Trump's name changes aren't likely to end with the Gulf of Mexico and Denali. In his initial executive order, Trump mentioned the 250th anniversary of the U.S. in 2026 as another opportunity for 'restoring names that honor American greatness.'
For Hermann, Trump's insistence on renaming geographies has a 'symbolic power' that 'sets the stage for a distorted truth.'
'Purple Lizard Maps doesn't have the ability to fight for due process, or for international students having their green cards revoked just because they're international students,' Hermann said. 'Making a map is something we can do. For many people, this seems unimportant compared to other things. But we're cartographers. This is what we do.'
Early-bird pricing for Purple Lizard's Gulf of Mexico map starts at $29.
Trump Opens Pacific Marine Monument to Commercial Fishing, Sparking Conservation Backlash
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
26 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 11, 2025, 12:44 IST In what appears to be a shift in tone, Elon Musk on Tuesday posted that he regrets some of his recent remarks about President Donald Trump, saying, 'They went too far.' I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025 This comes just days after Trump addressed their ongoing feud, stating he wished Musk 'very well' and suggesting the tech mogul might be seeking a conversation. In a gesture that caught attention, Musk had responded with a heart emoji on X (formerly Twitter), sparking speculation about a possible reconciliation. Tensions between the two escalated last week after Musk called Trump's proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' a 'pork-filled abomination' and accused the President of suppressing Jeffrey Epstein-related files. The latter post, which Musk later deleted, reportedly infuriated Trump, who retaliated with harsh criticism and even threatened to sever government contracts with Musk-led firms. The feud intensified when Musk countered by threatening to halt NASA-linked SpaceX missions and claimed Trump would have lost the 2024 election without his support. He also floated the possibility of impeachment. However, Musk's latest message—posted at 12:34 PM on June 11—marks a notable departure from his confrontational stance, possibly signaling the beginning of a de-escalation. While no official conversation has been confirmed, both camps appear to be softening their positions, leaving the door open for future dialogue. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.

29 minutes ago
Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress includes more than tax breaks and spending cuts — it also seeks to pour billions of dollars into the administration's mass deportation agenda. Republican leaders capitalized Tuesday on the demonstrations in Los Angeles, where people are protesting Trump's immigration raids at Home Depot and other places, to make the case for swift passage of their sprawling 1,000-plus-page bill over staunch Democratic opposition. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers 'much-needed reinforcements,' including 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, $45 billion to expand migrant detention facilities and billions more to carry out at least 1 million deportations a year. 'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families," he said. "It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.'
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump
(Reuters) -Billionaire Elon Musk said on Wednesday that he regrets some of the posts he made last week about U.S President Donald Trump, in a message on his social media platform X. "I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote. Trump and Musk began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination." Musk's post comes days after Trump said his relationship with Musk was over.