
KEY FACTS: What we know so far about the Northvolt bankruptcy
What has happened?
Northvolt's board voted on Tuesday to file for bankruptcy in Sweden, with the company then on Wednesday filing bankrupcty applications to Swedish courts for five companies: Northvolt AB, Northvolt Ett AB, Northvolt Labs AB, Northvolt Revolt AB and Northvolt Systems AB.
The immediate trigger was the deadline to pay 291 million kronor to the Swedish Tax Agency, but the bigger problem was the company's failure to secure a further round of financing or find a buyer for the ailing business.
What happens now?
The court today accepted Northvolt's application and appointed the company's nominee, Mikael Kubu, chief executive of the Swedish insolvency and reconstruction specialist Ackordscentralen, to act as trustee over the business.
What will happen to people who are working at Northvolt?
Tom Johnstone, the company's interim chairman, said at the press conference that there were close to 5,000 people still employed at Northvolt and that he was "hopeful that operations would continue to a certain degree".
"Let's focus on working with the trustee to secure continued production, to secure jobs, we hope, for a number of people there," he said.
If Kubu manages to find a buyer for one or more of the businesses, some of these may be able to stay working at the factory.
"We are looking at what the conditions are like for maintaining production," Kubu said in an interview with TT on Wednesday.
On paper, he said, all of the employees will lose their jobs even if the factory continues to operate as the business will need to be passed to a new owner.
"The redundancies usually take a bit of time, but all staff are normally made redundant in a bankruptcy. The operation can of course live on, but then it will be as a new company," he said.
If no buyer can be found or if Kubu decides that there needs to be a staff reduction to make one or more of the units viable, then workers will lose their employment.
When companies go bankrupt in Sweden, employees are protected by a so-called 'wage guarantee', which determines how much of any unpaid salaries, holiday pay and notice pay you are entitled to receive from the bankrupt company.
In 2025, the maximum wage guarantee is 235,200 kronor. The exact amount employees receive is decided by the bankruptcy trustee.
How realistic is it that the factory can be rescued?
Johnstone said at the press conference that the company had been making progress in overcoming its production problems, doubling cell output from serial production lines and improving its production yield by 50 percent since September.
"We have had problems in the manufacturing. We've been very open with that," he said. "The trajectory is very good within the factory just now. It is moving absolutely in the right direction. It's not solved, but the trajectory is good just now."
If this is true, a buyer, perhaps Chinese, perhaps European, may want to take over the factory.
Some, however, question whether a remote location such as Skellefteå was ever the right place for such a plant.
What does this mean for the founders or the company?
Peter Carlsson, the former Tesla executive who co-founded the company in 2015, is in a relatively secure position, having sold a total of 198.1 million worth of his shares in the company between 2019 and 2021, according to research by Dagens Industri.
When he was asked about this after the press conference on the bankruptcy, he became combative, denouncing the journalist for asking "an unbelievably stupid question".
What does this bankruptcy mean for Swedish industry?
This is being described in Swedish media as the "largest Swedish bankruptcy in modern times," with Swedish pension funds losing billions of kronor in savings as a result.
The company's total debt is estimated to be around 60 billion kronor.
Sweden's four AP funds, which manage Swedish pension savings, have invested 5.8 billion kronor in the company, or around 0.3 percent of the funds' total capital.
That money was assumed to have been lost when the company went into reconstruction, and the new bankruptcy filing means it is gone for good.
The company's owners stand to lose the most money, however, as they are estimated to have put around 90 billion kronor of capital into the company.
The bankruptcy is also a heavy blow for Scania, the Swedish truck maker owned by Volkwagen, which had invested heavily in Northvolt and had hoped to rely on it as its sole supplier of batteries.
As well as initially investing hundreds of millions of kronor in the company, Scania lent Northvolt 1.1 billion kronor last year as the troubled company battled to stay afloat.
More importantly, the bankruptcy will raise questions over other projects in the so-called 'green transition', such as the green steel start-up Stegra, which, like Northvolt, had Vargas Holding as its intitial investor.
What does the bankrupcty mean for Skellefteå?
Lorents Burman, the mayor of Skellefteå, the city which had invested heavily in helping Northvolt get established, described the bankruptcy as "a nightmare" for the local municipality.
The municipality has over the past ten years pushed for rapid development of new housing areas to house the expected Northvolt employees.
Skellefteå Kraft, the power company owned by the municipality, has also invested some 100m kronor in readying the Northvolt site, and risks losing its most important new industrial customer.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Local Sweden
7 days ago
- Local Sweden
Sweden steps up rules against Russia's Baltic 'shadow fleet'
Sweden on Saturday announced new rules upping checks on foreign vessels in the Baltic from July 1, reinforcing a crackdown on Russia's "shadow fleet" of tankers deployed to circumvent sanctions on its oil trade. Advertisement Since the Western-led sanctions imposed after its 2022 all-out invasion of Ukraine, Moscow has been relying on hundreds of such ships, that operate under murky ownership and dodgy insurance. European governments frequently blame the vessels for damaging -- deliberately or not -- undersea cables, and of posing a maritime environmental threat. The Swedish government said in a statement that the new rules "reinforce checks on foreign vessels by requiring insurance information". It said the effort "aims to fight against this fleet and, in so doing, improve maritime safety and environmental protection". The Swedish coast guard and maritime authorities will be tasked with scrutinising insurance details not only of ships docking in Swedish ports, "but also those crossing Swedish territorial waters, or its exclusive economic zone", which extends some 200 nautical miles from shore. Sweden and Finland -- both of whom recently joined NATO -- are alert to Baltic Sea incidents impacting energy and communication infrastructure, after several instances of damage in late 2024. Advertisement "We are seeing a growing number of concerning incidents in the Baltic Sea, which requires... us to prepare for the worst," Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said in Saturday's statement. He added that information gleaned under the new rules checking vessels would be shared with allies and could be added to databases used for sanctions enforcement. The European Union last week adopted a 17th sanctions package against Russia that targets nearly 200 vessels in the "shadow fleet".


Local Sweden
28-05-2025
- Local Sweden
Ex-Northvolt CEO suspected of negligence in worker's death
The ex-CEO of Swedish battery maker Northvolt, which went bankrupt in March, will be questioned over suspicions a failure to follow safety protocols caused a factory worker's death. Advertisement Peter Carlsson, former chief executive of the once buzz-generating startup, is being investigated along with others over an explosion at the company's factory in Skellefteå in northern Sweden in November 2023. A 25-year-old employee suffered severe burns and died after fighting for his life for several weeks. "He will be questioned by the police today, Friday or next week," Prosecutor Christer Jarlås told AFP, adding an appointment had been made with the suspect's lawyer. Jarlås said Carlsson would formally be informed that he is suspected of a "work environment offence" and "causing the death of another" in connection with the interrogation. The prosecutor said he intends to make Carlsson a formal suspect on the basis of his personal responsibility as CEO for making sure safety protocols were adhered to. "This is an offence where a person in a position of responsibility within the company failed to take all the measures required by workplace safety legislation," Jarlås said. "And this led to the death of an employee. If all the legal measures had been taken, it is very likely that the victim would have survived," he added. Advertisement The failure stemmed from an inadequate analysis of the risks associated with the workplace, according to the prosecutor. The factory, Northvolt Ett, was not classified as an area with a risk of explosion or fire, but only as one where there was a risk of exposure to chemicals. The 25-year-old man "was wearing protective clothing suitable for this type of risk, but not clothing designed to protect against fire or explosions", Jarlås said. "The clothes he was wearing also caught fire, which contributed to his injuries and subsequent death in hospital." Founded in 2016, Northvolt had been seen as a cornerstone of European attempts to catch up with Asia and the United States in the production of battery cells, the crucial component of electric vehicles. Northvolt had struggled under a mountain of debt, slow demand and production delays, when it applied for bankruptcy in Sweden on March 12. The court-appointed trustee managing the bankruptcy had intended to maintain production at Northvolt as they searched for a buyer, but announced earlier this month it would halt production at the end of June – as it only had one customer, truck maker Scania.


Local Sweden
28-05-2025
- Local Sweden
'Disaster for customers': EU's plan to cut flight compensation provokes anger
Representatives for the bloc's 27 countries are to discuss the idea, which proponents say will result in fewer flight cancellations, on Wednesday in Brussels. Carriers currently must pay air travellers in Europe up to €600 ($682) for delays of more than three hours, or if a flight is cancelled less than 14 days before departure. Supporters see the rules dating back to 2004 as an example of the European Union's prowess in defending consumer rights. But airlines say they face a hefty bill, which "perversely" often leads them to cancel flights rather than run them with a long delay -- with the knock-on effect on flight schedules. "Extending the so-called delay thresholds will give airlines more time to move planes and crews across Europe to save flight schedules," said Airlines for Europe (A4E), an industry group. Poland, which currently holds the EU's rotating presidency, has picked up plans for reform that have languished since a 2013 commission proposal failed to bear fruit. Advertisement Warsaw initially mooted upping the maximum non-sanctioned delay to five hours, according to several people familiar with the discussion. But some member states, including Germany, oppose the idea and negotiations are ongoing to find a compromise, several European diplomats told AFP. "Long flight delays are a real nuisance. They ruin the start of well-deserved holidays. They disrupt important plans. They cost valuable lifetime," said Stefanie Hubig, Germany's consumer rights minister. Berlin could not agree to any changes "unilaterally aligned" with airlines' interests "just before the holiday season," she added. More flights, less money Upping the threshold to five-hours could save almost 50 percent of flights that are currently cancelled, according to A4E, which represents Air France-KLM, Lufthansa and other companies accounting for more than 80 percent of European air traffic. It would also strip about 75 percent of passengers of the right to compensation, said Europe's BEUC umbrella consumer rights group. Advertisement "This is an unacceptable step back from the current level of protection," it said in a joint statement with consumer associations. Delays and cancellations could cost airlines up to €8.1 billion this year, according to the European Commission. Yet, agencies that help passengers get money in exchange for a fee note that of the millions of passengers eligible for compensation, only a fraction each year file a claim. "For European customers this is a disastrous change," Tomasz Pawliszyn, the head of one such firm, Airhelp, told AFP of the planned reform. Since the three-hours threshold has been adopted in other jurisdictions, such as Canada, Turkey and Britain, the changes would generate "confusion" and potentially lead to some European carriers being allowed longer delays than their non-European rivals on some of the same routes, he added. 'Blackmail' The proposed change is part of a broader package of reforms. This includes some clearly passenger-friendly moves, such as barring airlines from charging for hand-luggage of a standard size and weight. It has nevertheless enraged some European lawmakers, as the Polish presidency of the European Council is seeking to push it through with a rarely-used expedited procedure that limits parliament's say. "The first word that comes to my mind about the council behaviour is blackmail," Andrey Novakov, a lawmaker with the centre-right EPP and the parliament's rapporteur on the issue told AFP. "Everyone who is not a pilot here in the parliament will need some time to digest" the reform and come up with suggestions that "could serve both passengers and airlines". "This is not happening when you have a time pressure," he said.