logo
‘You've got to learn': Young Aussie reveals how a simple idea turned into a multi-million dollar business

‘You've got to learn': Young Aussie reveals how a simple idea turned into a multi-million dollar business

News.com.au5 hours ago

Raquel Bouris has built up a multimillion-dollar perfume empire, but even she still makes mistakes that can cost her six figures.
Ms Bouris, 31, is the founder of Who Is Elijah, a genderless fragrance brand that describes itself as 'bold, timeless and unapologetic' and has been widely successful since its launch in 2018.
Well, almost since launch. When Ms Bouris originally launched the brand on Shopify, she made 'zero sales,' which ended up being both the making of her and the business.
'It was one of those garage to global stories,' she told news.com.au.
Who Is Elijah came to be after Ms Bouris attended the Coachella music festival back in 2017 and met a woman who she said smelled amazing.
It was so good that even after she returned to Australia, she couldn't stop thinking about the other woman's perfume.
It prompted her to track down the smell, which the fellow Coachella-goer said was from India, and once she started wearing it back in Sydney, she began getting constant compliments.
'I had over 100 people asking me what the fragrance was,' she said.
The compliments she received on the fragrance made her realise how much Aussies craved a good scent.
The 31-year-old found an Aussie perfume partner to work with and then launched her fragrance on Shopify – to zero sales.
If anything, the failure motivated her because she knew the product was good, so she started hitting the pavement.
'I just started walking into stores and introducing myself and nine out of ten times they'd start stocking the fragrances and I very quickly built up stockists,' she said.
Two years later, she quit her full-time job, and at that point the Who is Elijah brand was being stocked in over 50 stores.
'I was making $20,000 a month in revenue,' she said.
Ms Bouris said when quit her job she is 'embarrassed to say' she didn't fully understand the business yet.
She didn't even know the difference between profit and revenue, but she did see that her perfume business was bringing in money.
'No one was teaching me what profit and loss was. I quit right after I got into David Jones, and then around that time, I got a bookkeeper and accountant,' she said.
From there, the business just boomed, from making $1 million a year to $10 million a year, and last year, it made $20 million in revenue.
It's the kind of crazy success people only dream about but Ms Bouris said it comes with making so many mistakes.
For instance, this year, they've focused on scaling back rather than growth. They went from being stocked with over 600 stores to only 100.
The business founder said she wants to focus on getting the 'structure right' and that being stocked in fewer stores hasn't impacted revenue.
Perhaps what separates Ms Bouris from her peers is that she's prepared to acknowledge a mistake and rectify it rather than keep going down the same path to avoid admitting she was wrong.
She's also recently regretted 'paying ridiculous, like six-figure amounts of money' to people to do something that she should have just done herself.
She wants to be open about that though, because in her opinion growing a business doesn't involve getting everything right.
'When I first started and I'd listen to other founders and I'd look up to them so much and I thought they were amazing, and then I got to know these people, and they'd come to me for advice,' she said.
'I'm very honest with our journey, and it has stuck with me that people in business don't like to admit that it is hard and they've made mistakes.'
Ms Bouris said she feels like the last six years of business have ultimately been about learning 'lesson after lesson' but that is part of it.
'I started this when I was 23, I knew nothing about owning my own company. You've got to learn and there's a lot to learn.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lowes heir Josh Penn and Ben Palmer's Point Piper home sells
Lowes heir Josh Penn and Ben Palmer's Point Piper home sells

News.com.au

time40 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Lowes heir Josh Penn and Ben Palmer's Point Piper home sells

Lowes heir Josh Penn and his husband Ben Palmer have sold their Wyuna Rd, Point Piper mansion for $23.5m. The couple, with son Brooklyn, 6, and daughter Blake, 4, are now understood to be focusing on renovating the Penn family's palace at Cap 'd'ail in the south of France, where they're intending on spending some time next year. And they're also now debating whether to move to their former Double Bay home, now rebuilt, or to another eastern suburbs mansion they've apparently purchased, that's 'quite substantial'. Hush-hush sale hits 2025 record Penn and Palmer are listed as co-owners on the land title for Capri, the Edwardian residence at 4 Wyuna Rd bought for $16m in 2021, alongside Penn's parents David and Linda Penn who have 70 per cent ownership. But it's now sold via Monika Tu and Jad Khattar of Black Diamonz, with Tom Penfold of Cohen Handler known to have introduced the buyer. There'd initially been hopes of $28m. Penn and Palmer had been living in Capri during the three-year rebuild of their own home at 7 Carlotta Rd, Double Bay, bought for $6.7m in 2020, which is apparently 'incredible' and nearly ready to move into. No clue yet as to the location of this other 'quite substantial' property, which is yet to settle. The Wyuna Rd residence was previously owned by nursing-home scion Mark Moran and his interior decorator wife Evette. The historic home on a 723sqm block had harbour views, an internal lift, multiple balconies, manicured grounds and a pool. Penn and Palmer had initially intended to do major renovations, but ended up doing just landscaping the garden and adding lighting. Their good taste in furniture helped give the home extra zing. Josh Penn and mother Linda, the highly regarded philanthropist and CEO of Lowes Menswear that's worth $800m, recently raised a whopping $84.3m at the recent Gold Dinner for the Sydney Children's Hospital foundation.

‘Need a lie down': NSW parliamentary inquiry erupts over Labor's workers comp reforms
‘Need a lie down': NSW parliamentary inquiry erupts over Labor's workers comp reforms

News.com.au

time40 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

‘Need a lie down': NSW parliamentary inquiry erupts over Labor's workers comp reforms

NSW's nominal insurer is 'plunging further into insolvency' by more than $6m a day the state's Treasurer has revealed, as Labor's controversial workers compensation reforms face another round of public inquiry. Treasurer Daniel Mookhey revealed during an heated parliamentary inquiry on Tuesday that icare was tipped to rise from a deficit of $4.9bn at the end of 2024 to $6bn on July 1 absent reform. 'The nominal insurer is likely to hold $0.78 in assets for every dollar of future liability, meaning it is plunging further into insolvency at a faster rate,' Mr Mookhey said. 'Or, to put it even more simply, the scheme is no longer going backwards by $5m per day, it is going backwards by more than $6m every day.' The state government's plan to reform workers compensation in NSW hit a major hurdle earlier this month when a strange coalition of the Liberals, Greens and the independents joined together to force another public inquiry. The Liberals have proposed a number of amendments to the Bill, namely staying the lifting of the threshold of permanent whole person impairment (WPI) for psychological injury, and have called on the government to provide costings. After hours of hearings, sparks immediately flew over modelling for the amendments between opposition treasury spokesman Damien Tudehope and Mr Mookhey who said 'the government is co-operating with this inquiry'. Mr Mookhey and Mr Tudehope clashed again over the WPI, which Labor proposes lifting to 30 per cent. The Opposition claims doing so would harm workers injured psychologically to such an extent they may never work again. NSW Treasury Secretary Michael Coutts-Trotter earlier told the committee there was a 'well developed pathway' for those people who, once completing their 130 weeks of payments, would instead transition to the NDIS scheme. Labor claims the changes would not only help reduce the burden on the beleaguered state self-insurer, but would also allow injured workers access to lump sum payments should they wish, instead of remaining on compensation. It was over the WPI that Mr Mookhey faced his second heated argument, this time with Greens MLC Abigail Boyd who asked if he knew the change 'would make us the harshest jurisdiction in Australia and one of the harshest in the world'. Mr Mookhey said he didn't 'accept the characterisation'. He claimed that at 130 weeks, 88 per cent of psychologically injured workers were back at work and accused Ms Boyd of being 'deliberately misleading' in claiming it would cut off '90 something per cent of people' currently on the scheme. Consultant psychiatrist Dr Michael Epstein told the committee earlier on Tuesday afternoon that in comparison with other states, NSW's lifting of the WPI to 30 per cent would make it the 'harshest' in the country. 'NSW is going to take the crown,' Dr Epstein said. Ms Boyd went on to summarise the evidence presented to the committee in three ways: she disputed the projected $2.5bn cost to the self-insurer, said there was 'no imminent danger of scheme collapse', and that the proposed WPI threshold was 'unbearably cruel'. 'I'll just make the point, you're entitled to vote against the legislation,' Mr Mookhey said in reply. Ms Boyd went on to accused Mr Mookhey of using 'misleading language' in referring to payments made by the state government to the self-insurer as a 'bail out', and asked him to 'admit you were wrong'. In response, Mr Mookhey said: 'No'. Following the heated exchange, Ms Boyd said: 'I think we need a bit of a lie down now'. A range of practising psychiatrists, insurance industry representatives and leaders from NSW Treasury and the nominal insurer, icare, gave evidence during the hours-long hearing on Tuesday. Mr Mookhey has warned the state self-insurer is tipped to cost the budget $2.6bn over the next five years, while premiums for the nominal insurer have already been set for eight-per-cent for the next financial year. Exactly how the state government will deliver savings through the scheme was under the spotlight during the hearing, with leaders from NSW Treasury and the nominal insurer grilled over costings for the proposed amendments. Largely, though, the numbers were not available.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store