
Israel's Aid Blockade To Gaza 'Unacceptable': Red Cross
The Red Cross on Thursday denounced the human cost of the war raging in Gaza, slamming Israel's "unacceptable" full blockade on aid into the besieged and conflict-ravaged Palestinian territory.
Aid agencies have repeatedly warned of a growing humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, which they say has been exacerbated by an Israeli blockade on all aid since early March.
"It is unacceptable that humanitarian aid is not allowed into the Gaza Strip," Pierre Krahenbuhl, director general of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), told reporters in Geneva.
"That's just fundamentally against anything that international humanitarian law provides."
The situation in Gaza is on a "razor's edge" and "the next few days are absolutely decisive", he added.
"There's a moment where we will also run out of anything that's left in terms of medical supplies and other" aid, he said.
Israel resumed military operations in Gaza on March 18 after talks to prolong a ceasefire stalled.
The country denies a humanitarian crisis is unfolding in the Gaza Strip, where it plans to expand military operations to force Hamas to free hostages held there since the Iran-backed group's unprecedented October 2023 attack.
"What we would need is an immediate return to a ceasefire situation to ease the pressure," Krahenbuhl said.
"I think everybody should feel deep indignation about what is happening in Gaza. I can't reconcile myself with the human cost of this conflict," he said.
"Frankly, if this is the future of warfare, we should all be terrified, and we should all be aware that this questions the very foundations of our humanity."
Israel is reportedly aiming to shut down the existing UN-led aid distribution system in Gaza, forcing all deliveries to go through Israeli hubs.
Krahenbuhl stressed that "there is no monopoly among humanitarian organisations" to deliver aid. "States can undertake it."
But he insisted that any delivery of aid must respect humanitarian principles "such as the impartiality of aid, that it actually reaches people, that it's not politically motivated and directed".
Every effort to get aid to Gazans in need should be "taken seriously", Krahenbuhl said.
"But right now, the most effective way to get aid to people is to lift... actions or decisions that were taken to prevent aid from reaching" inside Gaza.
"There are huge quantities of aid that are on the borders of Gaza that can go in tomorrow," he insisted.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
3 hours ago
- DW
US-backed Gaza aid group says 5 killed in Hamas attack – DW – 06/12/2025
Skip next section Israel's parliament rejects preliminary vote to dissolve itself 06/12/2025 June 12, 2025 Israel's parliament rejects preliminary vote to dissolve itself Israeli lawmakers early on Thursday rejected a preliminary vote to dissolve the parliament, the Knesset said in a statement. The bill submitted by the opposition was voted down 61-53. A 61-vote majority was needed in the 120-seat parliament. The vote could have been a first step leading to a snap election. Polls have predicted that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ruling coalition would lose at the ballot box.


DW
16 hours ago
- DW
Poland: PM Tusk's pro-EU government wins confidence vote – DW – 06/11/2025
Tusk's call for a confidence vote came after right-wing nationalist Karol Nawrocki was elected president, narrowly beating the Tusk-backed candidate. The opposition had said the lost election would be Tusk's downfall. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk won a parliamentary vote of confidence in his pro-European government on Wednesday, just days after a stinging presidential election defeat. The confidence vote, called by Tusk himself, came as right-wing nationalist Karol Nawrocki, backed by the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party, narrowly beat his candidate Rafal Trzaskowski. Nawrocki also has the backing of US President Donald Trump. Announcing the vote, Tusk said his party is prepared for the challenge, understands the stakes, and does not "intend to take a single step back." "The vote of confidence should be a new opening," Tusk said. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk calls no-confidence vote To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video PM battled to deliver on key reforms Behind the call for a confidence vote is Tusk's aim to rally support for his pro-European coalition. Tusk's governing coalition has sought to reverse the previous PiS government's judicial reforms, which the European Union said undermined democracy and the rights of women and minorities. However, the outgoing President Andrzej Duda blocked those efforts, and Nawrocki is expected to maintain this position. This inability to deliver on key reforms — which also includes abortion rights — despite holding a parliamentary majority, has been a dark cloud over Tusk's government. Critics point out that since coming to power in December 2023, little change has been seen under Tusk's government. Will Tusk survive? In Poland, the prime minister, chosen by parliament, holds most day-to-day power, while the president, as the head of state, can influence foreign policy and veto legislation. Now Tusk finds himself in the same position with Nawrocki as he did with Duda, whose veto power blocked the PM from fulfilling his promises. So, while Tusk has framed the vote as a "new beginning" and promised a cabinet reshuffle in July, negotiations with his coalition also loom. Opposition leaders have seized the moment to signal Tusk's downfall. Former Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro told reporters, "The lost presidential election is the end of Donald Tusk. His fate is already sealed." Edited by: Kieran Burke


DW
a day ago
- DW
Pakistan: 'Security state' on the rise amid regional tension – DW – 06/11/2025
Shamil Shams | Manaf Siddique both in Karachi 06/11/2025 June 11, 2025 The conflict with India over Kashmir, the crisis in the Middle East, and the US-Iran tensions have once again put the army in the driver's seat in Pakistani politics. What does it mean for the nation's fragile democracy?