logo
UAPA accused dies in Sangrur jail, kin allege murder

UAPA accused dies in Sangrur jail, kin allege murder

Hindustan Times05-08-2025
Two days after an undertrial, caught under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), was found dead in Sangrur jail, his family accused the police of murdering him. The police have already claimed that the 35-year-old man ended his life. Jail superintendent Ramandeep Singh Bhangu has denied the allegations.
The man, who was arrested on UAPA charges in 2018, died on Friday. His brother said the family was informed by police regarding it on August 2. 'We think the police have tortured and killed him,' he said.
Expressing dissatisfaction with the post-mortem procedure in Sangrur, he said the family wanted it either in PGI, Chandigarh, or Rajindra hospital in Patiala while fearing cops' influence in Sangrur. The family said it has met with cabinet minister Laljit Singh Bhullar to seek justice.
The undertrial had been held in Sangrur jail for over two months followed by Kapurthala and Amritsar jails since his arrest in 2018. According to his brother, he used to express fears for his safety. 'He used to complain of being alone in jail, demanding that two or three others be added along with him. His pleas were ignored. He would tell us that they would kill him,' he said.
When contacted, jail superintendent Ramandeep Singh Bhangu, who took charge a day after the incident on Saturday, denied the allegations. 'There is nothing like that. A judicial inquiry is going on. There have been no suspensions or transfers related to the incident. Such orders were already there prior to the death,' he said.
Former superintendent of Sangrur jail, Kulwant Singh, was relieved of his duties three to five days before the incident. The deputy superintendent of jail, Jaspreet Singh, who was in-charge of the jail at that time, said, 'There is no such thing. A judicial inquiry is going on. There are CCTVs in jail.' He further informed that the deceased had been lodged in high-security jails, along with nine other inmates in Sangrur jail, for the past two months.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dalit youth, father-in-law brutally beaten in Gujarat for ‘upper-caste' moustache; 5 accused on the run
Dalit youth, father-in-law brutally beaten in Gujarat for ‘upper-caste' moustache; 5 accused on the run

New Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Dalit youth, father-in-law brutally beaten in Gujarat for ‘upper-caste' moustache; 5 accused on the run

AHMEDABAD: A shocking case of caste-based violence has emerged from Gujarat's Junagadh district, where a Dalit youth and his father-in-law were brutally assaulted for keeping a beard and moustache that their attackers claimed were reserved for "upper castes." The incident, which occurred on August 11 in Khambhaliya (Ozat) village, has sparked outrage, with police registering a case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The victims, identified as Sagar Makwana, a labourer from Mangnath Pipli village, and his father-in-law Jivanbhai Wala, were allegedly attacked by a group of men who hurled casteist slurs and mocked Sagar's appearance. According to the complaint, Sagar had gone to Khambhaliya to get his bike repaired but found the garage closed. As he was returning home, he was stopped near a railway bridge by Shailesh Jebaliya from Navi Chavand village, who allegedly knocked him off his bike and began abusing him for his beard and moustache. Fearing further assault, Sagar called his father-in-law for help. However, when Jivanbhai arrived, a silver car without a number plate pulled up, carrying Lalo Bhupat and three unidentified men. The group allegedly intensified the casteist abuse before launching a violent attack—beating Sagar with a car wheel while punching and slapping Jivanbhai. The assailants fled only after villagers began gathering, but not before issuing threats.

Hyderabad police arrest Pakistani man over affair, wife alleges forced conversion
Hyderabad police arrest Pakistani man over affair, wife alleges forced conversion

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Hyderabad police arrest Pakistani man over affair, wife alleges forced conversion

A Pakistani man, Fahad, was arrested in Mount Banjara Colony, Banjara Hills in Hyderabad after his extra-marital affair was exposed. Fahad had married a woman, Keerthi, in 2016, convincing her to convert to Islam and changing her name to Doha couple had been living together in Hyderabad when Keerthi reportedly discovered Fahad in an extra-marital relationship with another woman from the same company. She informed the police, leading to the arrest of both Fahad and the other woman claimed that Fahad came to India from Pakistan in 1998 and had settled in Hyderabad. She alleged he frequently visited the Commissioner's office for passport renewals without disclosing details to her. Keerthi has demanded justice, accusing Fahad of forcing her conversion, marriage, and betraying her trust through the another incident last week in Kerala, Sona Eldhose, a 23-year-old Teacher Training Course student from Kothamangalam, Ernakulam, died by suicide. In her note, she accused her boyfriend, Ramees, of assault and forcing her to convert to Islam. Police have arrested Ramees and registered a case under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Act, which covers sexual intercourse under false promise of marriage. Investigations into forced religious conversion are ongoing.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Hyderabad

IIT Roorkee data breach: A wake-up call for higher education institutions
IIT Roorkee data breach: A wake-up call for higher education institutions

Indian Express

time6 hours ago

  • Indian Express

IIT Roorkee data breach: A wake-up call for higher education institutions

By Paakhhi Garg and Nachiketa Mittal In an alarming data breach, the sensitive personal data of around 30,000 students and alumni of IIT Roorkee was reportedly found to have been compromised. The leaked database reportedly contains their mobile numbers, caste, financial status, email addresses, photographs and other data. IIT-R's administrative systems seem to have turned a blind eye to cyber safety standards. It could happen to any other higher education institution (HEI). In many cases, it may already have happened, with us remaining oblivious — exposing people to the threat of cybercrimes despite no negligence on their part. Lakhs of students, parents and employees share sensitive personal data with HEIs. However, do HEIs have cyber security standards and the requisite infrastructure, training and institutional accountability measures in place? The IIT-R episode must be a clarion call to all HEIs in the country to be steadfast in protecting data. This is no longer a choice as the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023 has both the teeth and the legislative intent to penalise non-compliant institutions. Critical vulnerabilities have been allowed to grow because of the notion that academic prominence somehow correlates with digital security. The IIT-R breach was caused by a fundamental breakdown in data security. Our HEIs must take note of it. That's why a three-pronged strategy is required. First, legal safeguards. Strict compliance with legal standards must be the cornerstone of any effective cybersecurity plan. With laws like the Information Technology Act, 2000, Sensitive Personal Data or Information (SPDI) Rules, 2011 and now the DPDP Act, India has achieved significant progress. This legislation requires organisations, who are referred to as 'data fiduciaries' or 'bodies corporate' to employ 'reasonable security safeguards' to secure personal/sensitive data. This implies many things for HEIs, including that institutions must be transparent about the what, why and how of the data. All this information has to be shared in the form of a clear privacy notice and policy for external users and internal staff respectively. The HEIs must obtain explicit consent from all users whose data they are collecting and store only the data necessary for their purpose. Under the Information Technology Act, a breach must be reported to CERT-In within six hours. However, the IIT-Roorkee event shows a notable failure in this area, with a third party allegedly having found the vulnerability. Ideally, the law will hold the institution financially accountable for this 'breach' or 'contravention' in the absence of 'reasonable security practice', as stated in SPDI Rules and the IT Act respectively, with penalties. Second, technical a solid technological basis, legal compliance is pointless. The IIT-R event has exposed an essential digital hygiene breakdown. A practical approach must be much more than a firewall and antivirus program. All vital systems, such as student portals, administration databases and financial records, ought to require multi-factor authentication. To further reduce the possibility of internal data breaches, role-based access control should guarantee that employees only have access to the limited data. To monitor traffic and stop illicit activity, HEIs need to use advanced network security measures, such as modern firewalls and intrusion detection/prevention systems. Every device should have endpoint detection and response software installed to offer an extra line of defence against malware and zero-day attacks. All sensitive data, whether stored on servers ('at rest') or transmitted across networks ('in transit'), must be encrypted. This simple measure can render stolen data useless to attackers even if they manage to exfiltrate it. The practice of waiting for a breach to be discovered by an external party is a grave dereliction of duty. Institutions must conduct frequent, independent penetration testing to proactively find and address vulnerabilities. An incident response plan is a playbook for what to do before, during and after a cybersecurity incident. It should outline roles and responsibilities, communication strategies and technical steps to contain and recover from the breach. Finally, organisational safeguards. Even the most sophisticated technology can only be as effective as the people and procedures that use it. A robust organisational structure is possibly the most important component of the cybersecurity jigsaw. Every HEI must establish a clear governance structure for cybersecurity. A dedicated data protection officer (DPO) who reports directly to senior leadership needs to be part of the team. Institutions must create and implement transparent rules for handling data, managing passwords, granting remote access and responding to incidents. Effective communication and frequent updates are also required. The human element is often the weakest link. All students, faculty and staff must receive mandated and continuous cybersecurity training from HEIs. Phishing simulators may be a valuable tool for raising awareness and testing. A harsh lesson about the high cost of negligence may be learned from the IIT-R event. All Indian HEIs should take the time to reflect and acknowledge that they can no longer claim to be purely academic institutions creating knowledge — they collect the sensitive personal data of lakhs of individuals including minors, and hence are clearly responsible under the law for creating a digital infrastructure and security system for data protection. This law, the DPDP Act, will offer no immunity to HEIs when it comes to compliance. Chancellors, vice-chancellors, deans and institutional heads must act with urgency before we see a sequel. Garg is director, trainings, World Cyber Security Forum, and Mittal is registrar and professor of Law, NLU, Tripura

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store