ZF's Modular EV Range‑Extender Set to Launch in 2026
Unlike a conventional plug-in hybrid, ZF's range-extenders never use the engine to drive the wheels. Instead, the gas engine powers a generator, which in turn charges the battery or powers an electric motor. The base eRE drives the rear wheels, while the eRE+ adds a planetary gearset, differential, and clutch to support front-wheel assist - or full four-wheel drive.The result is a modular, software-defined drivetrain that works with either 400V or 800V vehicle architectures. The eRE produces between 94 and 148 horsepower, while the eRE+ scales to 201 hp. Carmakers supply their own engines and batteries - ZF handles the rest.It's a concept that echoes similar efforts across the industry. ZF's own range-extender push has been framed as a way to extend EV range without resorting to larger, heavier batteries - a particularly useful idea in midsize crossovers, pickups, and vans where space and weight are major concerns.
ZF isn't alone in this line of thinking. Volkswagen recently revised its future EV platform - the Scalable Systems Platform (SSP) - to accommodate optional range extenders. While SSP was originally designed as a pure BEV solution, the company now views a generator-equipped fallback as a pragmatic "safety net" against softening EV demand. The SSP will remain electric-first, but the range-extender update shows just how much the industry's tone has shifted.Likewise, Scout Motors - the VW Group-owned electric off-road brand - is developing its own version of this concept. The upcoming Scout Traveler SUV and Terra pickup will be available with a "Harvester Range Extender" that promises to boost range to 500 miles. As with ZF's eRE setup, the Harvester system uses a gasoline engine strictly as a generator, not as a means of direct propulsion.What they all share in common is intent: extending range through smarter architecture, not just bigger batteries.
ZF's system is ready for global adoption. Manufacturing begins in 2026, with the company targeting automakers across Europe, China, and North America. BMW is reportedly trialing range-extender concepts with its iX5 hydrogen test vehicles, while other brands - particularly those not developing ground-up EV platforms - are evaluating ZF's solution as a retrofit-friendly option.The company previously worked on range-extender setups for London black cabs and is now investing heavily in modular, powertrain-agnostic components that help manufacturers adapt without overhauling their entire production line.For consumers, that could mean EVs that charge less often, cost less upfront, and offer better winter performance - all without forcing a compromise on driving feel or emissions targets.
The EV narrative isn't collapsing, but it is correcting. Range anxiety hasn't gone away, and infrastructure rollouts are lagging behind adoption rates. Rather than wait for the grid to catch up, companies like ZF are finding ways to meet drivers where they are - with practical, affordable tools that bridge the gap.Range-extenders won't replace pure EVs or hybrids entirely, but as part of a broader strategy, they may prove to be the missing link - a smart compromise in a world that's still figuring out how to plug in.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
F1 Engines Don't Last Long, And Replacing One Isn't Cheap
You're here because you find automotive technical minutiae fascinating. While there's plenty of cool engines in passenger cars -- oddities like the Honda S800's roller bearing crank that needs no oil pressure or the Volkswagen Beetle's magnesium engine block and transmission come to mind -- Formula 1 is where engine tech nerds drool themselves to dehydration. Despite the incredible engineering that goes into F1 engines, they are short-lived. After all, these F1 powertrains generate thrust like you wouldn't believe. 1,000-hp 1.6-liter turbocharged hybrids push these cars to stupendous speeds. Sparks glitter in the dark from the titanium skid blocks that prevent the cars from bottoming out. All this power means these engines will only last for around seven or eight races before they need to be replaced, which means the engine will last about 1,500 miles. This takes into account eight 190-mile races, but not any qualifying or practice. So, the real distance is certainly a bit more. The engines aren't cheap, either, with estimates ranging from $11 million to just over $16 million per engine. That's more than most of us even dream of spending on cars in our lifetimes, much less an individual engine. Those millions could easily fill a garage with Ferraris, Bentleys, some rare muscle cars, and maybe a six-pack of tricked-out Honda Accords to boot. Extrapolate that across the four engine allocation each team gets for the 2024 and 2025 seasons -- Formula 1 used to restrict teams to three engines -- and you're looking at $44 million to $64 million. The teams are probably happy that the current $135 million-per-year spending cap doesn't apply to engines. Read more: Everrati's Electric Porsche 911 RSR Has Me Driving Into The Future With Open Arms The Money F1 Teams Actually Spend On Engines That may not be the whole story, however. According to former racer Scott Mansell, who discussed the subject on his Driver61 YouTube channel, F1 teams spent about $16 million in 2023 purchasing engines, but that's when teams still operated under the three-engine-per-season cap. Beyond that, the numbers we hear about how much an F1 engine costs have more to do with development than purchasing. Look at Forbes' 2019 write-up on F1 engine development costs. The article claimed that developing an F1 engine cost around $1.4 billion, using the Mercedes V6 as an example. Forbes went on to report that Williams and Racing Point spent an estimated $37 million each per year purchasing engines from Mercedes, meaning that if each team had the same budget, they were both forking over $18.5 million. Where F1 engine costs skyrocket is in the design and manufacturing. Engineers work tirelessly to extract every last horsepower from the allowed parameters, and the machining of each part must be unfathomably precise with tolerances usually measured in double-digit microns. Manufacturing processes must be strictly controlled to prevent inconsistent results. For instance, maintaining a stable temperature keeps thermal expansion at bay. Scott Mansell's video How Formula 1 Pistons Are Made shows a clip of Dave Herbert, a production engineer for legendary engine builder Cosworth, saying, "If you just held the piston for about ten seconds, it'll go out of tolerance." To ensure parts can be reused after a race, teams will tear the engine down and X-ray parts to ensure there aren't any defects, among many other tests. Shocking Durability And Relatively Plain Materials Until 2004, F1 teams could use as many engines as they wanted. Today, the 2025 Power Unit Component Allocation limitations for a 24-race season include eight exhaust systems, four internal combustion engines, four turbochargers, two energy stores, and two sets of control electronics. Exceed these numbers, and expect grid penalties. Being able to replace an engine every race meant that those screaming V10s back in 2003 weren't the most durable. Don't hold your breath on V10s coming back, either, as hybrids are here to stay in F1 -- for now, at least. Teams would only get an average of 250 miles out of an engine, and considering that's only 60 miles more than the race itself, that meant the engine was essentially designed to last one race. What's surprising is how conventional the materials are in F1 engines. There's no Vibranium or Adamantium -- McLaren tried using beryllium in its pistons until the FIA banned it in 2001. F1 engines can use aluminum alloys for the block, crankcase, and pistons. Iron-based alloys -- basically steel -- are used for the crankshaft, connecting rods, and cams. Finally, nickel, cobalt, iron, or titanium alloys compose the valves. This is ostensibly to keep manufacturing costs non-exorbitant and avoid safety concerns with exotic materials, as was the case with the FIA's banning of beryllium. So, with reasonably conventional aluminum and iron alloys and no meteorite metals, F1 engines handle internal temperatures that can far exceed 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, not to mention incredible pressure. Those pistons have to change direction constantly, as well, at up to 15,000 times per minute. Honestly, it's impressive that F1 engines don't tear themselves apart faster than they do. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
European automakers face profitability squeeze in 2025: Fitch
European carmakers are expected to face a decline in profitability in 2025 due to the combined impact of global trade tensions, weakening demand in China, and the accelerating transition to electric vehicles (EVs), according to Fitch Ratings. Fitch said recently announced U.S. tariffs will have negative consequences for automotive production and sales, prompting manufacturers to reassess their global manufacturing strategies and cut fixed costs. Rising raw material prices and ongoing cost pressures from suppliers are expected to further strain margins. These developments add to Fitch's prior expectation of a low-single-digit decline in European vehicle sales. The credit rating agency warned that tariff risks are especially significant for companies exporting vehicles from Japan, Korea, and Germany to the U.S. Volkswagen is expected to be particularly affected, with its high-margin luxury brands — Audi and Porsche — likely to face pressure on free cash flow and rating headroom. Mercedes-Benz also faces downside risk, as its U.S. production hub for sport utility vehicles could be exposed to retaliatory Chinese tariffs. Fitch noted that while the burden of higher tariffs is likely to be shared between suppliers and automakers, the latter are expected to shoulder the larger share. Disruptions in production may also hit suppliers' cash flows, particularly those highly dependent on automaker volumes. Although a recently announced EU-U.S. trade agreement appears consistent with Fitch's expectations, details remain unclear and require approval from EU member states. Structural challenges also persist. European auto production remains 15%–20% below pre-pandemic levels and is unlikely to recover soon. Fitch attributes this to a slower-than-expected EV transition, growing foreign competition, and shifting consumer preferences. Carmakers like Volkswagen and Stellantis have begun rationalising operations through plant closures and layoffs, which will weigh on short-term cash generation. One-off restructuring costs are expected to amount to roughly 1% of median free cash flow. In China, German premium brands continue to lose market share to domestic players and are experiencing intensifying price competition — even in the typically more resilient premium segment. While some European automakers are partnering with Chinese firms in areas like autonomous driving and software to stem further losses, Fitch does not expect significant improvement in competitive positioning in the near term. On the EV front, Fitch expects European automakers to rebound from a sluggish 2024 with increased battery EV sales in 2025, driven by new model launches and competitive gains against non-EU rivals. However, this growth will come with tighter margins as Chinese brands expand their market presence and infrastructure in Europe. As a result of these pressures, Fitch said profitability and free cash flow generation declined in 2024 and will likely deteriorate further in 2025. The agency has issued Negative Outlooks and taken negative rating actions across the sector. Nevertheless, most investment-grade manufacturers retain solid balance sheets, supported by strong capital structures and net cash positions, which provide some buffer against ongoing challenges. "European automakers face profitability squeeze in 2025: Fitch" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Motor 1
a day ago
- Motor 1
The Secret Volkswagen Sports Car That Never Happened
Picture this. It's 2017. Dieselgate is in full swing. Volkswagen is trying to divert attention from the messy scandal surrounding its emissions-cheating TDI cars by rolling out a flurry of ID. concepts. The original ID. showcar had already debuted a year earlier, followed in 2017 by the I.D. Crozz as an early look at what would become the ID.4. But behind the scenes at the design studio, something far more exciting was taking shape: a sports car. Never-before-seen sketches reveal a thrilling take on the VW Group's MEB platform. Štěpán Řehák , Spokesperson for Design & Concept Cars, recently shared striking drawings on LinkedIn of a fully electric sports car. Designed by Tibor Juhasz, the performance EV aimed to pay homage to the SP2. No, not Ferrari's Monza SP2 supercar, but Volkswagen's own sports coupe from the 1970s. Photo by: Volkswagen Developed and built in Brazil, the original SP2 was based on the existing Type 3 to keep costs down. It featured a rear-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout. Its spiritual successor, though never realized, ditched the air-cooled engine and four-speed manual in favor of an electric motor, presumably mounted at the back, since all MEB-based cars so far are rear- or all-wheel drive. While the original SP2 wasn't styled by Giorgetto Giugiaro, the ID. sports car drew inspiration from the legendary designer behind the first Golf, Passat, Scirocco, Jetta, and the wild W12 supercar concepts. In a LinkedIn post, Tibor shared the vision behind his modern-day SP2 sketch, created back in 2017: 'My SP2 proposal was born from pure intuition. It envisioned an electric future powered by progress, yet deeply rooted in classic values. My goal was clear: build forward without losing what defines us. Emotion, energy, and vision came together to create something that still resonates today.' But the low-slung coupe with its muscular arches never made it past the drawing board. VW had bigger fish to fry than launching what would've ultimately been a niche product. Instead, it focused on high-volume EVs like the ID.3, ID.4, ID.5, and ID.7. Even so, it found room to play with the ID. Buzz , though sadly, the sports car was left on the proverbial cutting room floor. Photo by: Volkswagen This unnamed performance EV isn't the first exciting concept from VW in modern times that never reached production. Since we brought up Dieselgate, some may remember the 2009 BlueSport, a mid-engined roadster with a 2.0-liter TDI. Before that came the 2005 EcoRacer, another diesel-powered concept. Then there was the 2014 XL Sport , fitted with a V-2 engine from the Ducati Superleggera. Yet all of them pale in comparison to the legendary W12. With Europe's sales ban on new cars with combustion engines looming, it's too late for VW to launch a new sports car with a combustion engine. Still, this spiritual SP2 successor offers a glimmer of hope that a dedicated performance model might one day materialize. Wolfsburg has promised to carry the GTI and R badges into the electric era, but a standalone sports car in the mold of this two-door concept would be even more exciting. Sure, it wouldn't sell like a hatchback, let alone like a crossover. But a sports car could do wonders for VW's brand image after years of damage. Audi is gearing up for its 'TT Moment 2.0," so maybe it's time for the mainstream sibling to follow suit? VW And EVs: VW's New EV Platform Still Supports Combustion Engines Volkswagen Is Making Less Money Because It's Selling More EVs Gallery: VW SP2 (1974) 3 Source: Volkswagen Sources: Stepan Rehak / LinkedIn , Tibor Juhasz / LinkedIn Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
