HS2 has suffered ‘significant cost' from legal challenges by public bodies
HS2 Ltd was given the power to construct the railway when the High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Act received royal assent in February 2017.
The most recent of the nine legal challenges the project has faced from other public bodies since then was launched by North Warwickshire Borough Council in relation to the extension of the under-construction Bromford Tunnel.
In May, the High Court rejected the council's bid for a judicial review.
Since royal assent was obtained, there have also been 25 appeals relating to the HS2 planning regime.
In a six-monthly written update to Parliament on HS2, Ms Alexander acknowledged it is 'right there are checks and balances embedded in our legal and planning systems', but expressed concern these are being used to 'frustrate the delivery of consented projects'.
She wrote: 'The delivery of HS2 has continued during this period to be the subject of both legal and planning challenges, which have added significant cost, uncertainty and potential for delay.'
She added: 'The Government continues to monitor this issue closely and will consider further interventions where appropriate, alongside its wider work on planning reform.'
Ms Alexander also announced that she has lifted safeguarding on the majority of land protected for HS2's former Phase 2b eastern leg between Birmingham and Leeds, which was cancelled in November 2021.
Safeguarding is used to stop land from being developed in a way that would conflict with future schemes.
More than 550 properties were acquired by HS2 Ltd ahead of the planned construction of Phase 2b's eastern section.
Removing safeguarding means the process of selling them can begin.
Former owners of property within the safeguarding zone, which was acquired by HS2 Ltd will be given the opportunity to buy it back at the current market value.
HS2 has suffered repeated delays and soaring costs.
Ms Alexander announced last month there was 'no route' to meet the target date of having HS2 services running by 2033.
In her update to Parliament, the Secretary of State said her department is working with HS2 Ltd chief executive Mark Wild to 'reset' the project, with the aim of providing an 'updated delivery baseline and funding envelope in 2026'.
She went on: 'Until this work is completed, this Government is not in a position to say with confidence how much HS2 will cost or when it will be delivered.
'That is a deeply unsatisfactory position, but it is necessary to complete the hard work we have embarked upon.'
HS2 was originally planned to run between London and Birmingham, then on to Manchester and Leeds, but the project was severely curtailed by the Conservatives in power because of spiralling costs.
The first phase was initially scheduled to open by the end of 2026, but this was later pushed back to between 2029 and 2033.
In 2013, HS2 was estimated to cost £37.5 billion (at 2009 prices) for the entire planned network, including the now-scrapped extensions from Birmingham.
In June last year, HS2 Ltd assessed the cost for the line between London and Birmingham would be up to £66 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Data sovereignty must be more than a slogan
Nutanix is a Business Reporter client Why business leaders must build digital exit strategies before regulation or geopolitics forces their hand. Not long ago, cloud strategy was all about performance, price and scale. Today, something far more fundamental is at stake – control. In boardrooms across Europe, business and public sector leaders are asking the same question: how can we ensure our data stays within reach, and outside the grip of foreign companies and powers? This is the question at the heart of digital sovereignty, a concept that has shifted from technical jargon to strategic imperative in record time. For the UK, it is becoming a defining issue of the post-Brexit digital economy. For the rest of Europe, it is a response to growing fears that foreign control over digital infrastructure represents not just a business risk, but a national one. And for all of us, it raises a critical truth. If we cannot walk away from our digital providers, we don't really own our data. We're only renting it and hoping the landlord stays friendly. The legal reality behind the cloud The urgency behind digital sovereignty isn't ideological. It's legal. Businesses may believe that hosting their data in a local or regional data centre provides protection, but legal jurisdiction often overrides geography. Take the United States CLOUD Act. This legislation compels US-based technology companies to provide access to data, no matter where that data is physically stored, if requested by US law enforcement or intelligence agencies. Crucially, it can also prohibit providers from disclosing those requests to customers. That creates a chilling scenario for European organisations. A UK business using a US-owned cloud provider might find its data accessed by US authorities without ever being notified. And if services are suspended, whether due to sanctions, litigation or political pressure, there may be no immediate recourse. This isn't theoretical. It's happening. One high-profile incident this spring saw Microsoft temporarily restrict access to services for the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, reportedly in response to US sanctions. Whether politically motivated or not, it proved a point: legal control trumps marketing claims, and companies are more exposed than they realise. Sovereignty demands mobility Digital sovereignty is not about avoiding the cloud. It's about being able to move if you need to. And that's where many businesses are still unprepared. Over the past decade, enterprises have become deeply dependent on hyperscale cloud platforms. That's not a criticism as those platforms offer incredible agility and innovation. But it also means many organisations lack a plan B. They have no practical, tested way to exit a provider if trust breaks down, prices spike or the geopolitical climate shifts. In fact, we increasingly see governments stepping in. In Norway, regulators have begun requiring public institutions to develop exit strategies for their cloud services. In Germany and Switzerland, digital infrastructure investment is being weighed not only on technical merit but on the legal independence of the provider. The UK, too, is moving. A bill currently under discussion would require stress-testing of organisational data strategies. This reflects a growing recognition that resilience must include the ability to change providers, quickly and cleanly, without downtime or data loss. What boards need to ask today Is this really an IT problem, or is it a C-suite issue that demands board-level attention? Senior leaders must now assess their organisation's digital dependencies as carefully as their financial exposure. Can you move your workloads if you need to? Do you have contracts that support rapid migration? Have you mapped where your data resides and who has legal access? Do you have the internal capabilities to operate hybrid or multicloud environments? Visibility remains a major challenge. According to the 2023 Nutanix Enterprise Cloud Index, only 13 per cent of public sector IT leaders say they completely understand where their data is located and under which jurisdiction it falls. That lack of clarity introduces unacceptable risk in a landscape where legal access matters as much as physical access. These are not questions to leave for later. In a crisis, it's already too late to design a safe exit. Sovereignty is not something that can be switched on. Instead, it must be built into the architecture of your business. The opportunity in resilience The good news is that a better approach is emerging. Modern, cloud-native platforms are enabling businesses to operate across multiple providers without lock-in. Hybrid multicloud infrastructure makes it possible to move data and applications across environments, without sacrificing performance or compliance. This is more than a future vision: it is already the direction of travel. To this point, 84 per cent of public sector organisations globally now view hybrid multicloud as their ideal operating model. The appeal is clear: the ability to combine flexibility, resilience and compliance within a single architecture. At Nutanix, we work with customers across Europe who are building exactly this kind of resilience. Whether in financial services, public sector or healthcare, these organisations recognise that sovereignty is not about cutting ties with the global cloud ecosystem. It is about making sure those ties are balanced, reversible and governed by clear terms. One such example is the UK's Department for Work & Pensions (DWP), which has embraced a modern cloud strategy to ensure operational continuity and flexibility at national scale. As one of the country's largest public service departments, DWP's ability to manage critical infrastructure with both agility and control speaks to the strategic importance of sovereign-ready digital platforms. We are also seeing growing momentum from policymakers, regulators and industry leaders who want to ensure European organisations can retain digital self-determination without cutting themselves off from innovation. This is the real goal. Not isolation, but independence. Now is the time to act In times of stability, it's easy to overlook hidden dependencies. But we are not in a stable time. From economic volatility to political fragmentation, the risks of inaction are growing. Sovereignty cannot be retrofitted. It must be planned for, budgeted for and tested, just like any other pillar of enterprise risk management. That process starts with visibility, continues with strategy and succeeds only with executive support. European business leaders, especially in critical sectors such as government, finance and healthcare, now face a choice. Treat data sovereignty as a compliance box to tick or as a competitive differentiator. This is no longer a niche concern, as 72 per cent of public sector decision-makers now say their top priority for cloud deployment is the ability to move workloads freely across environments. Because in the digital age, true sovereignty is not just about where your data lives. It's about whether you can take it with you. For more information, visit
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Conservatives defeat Reform to win Wyesham ward by-election
The South Wales East Senedd Member's defection was unveiled in a shock announcement by party leader Nigel Farage at the Royal Welsh Show and resulted in acrimonious comments from some of her former colleagues. But the Conservatives are now celebrating after defeating a Reform UK candidate in a by-election for the Wyesham ward on Monmouth Town Council. Ms Jones had previously represented the area on Monmouthshire County Council. It is the second community council by-election in Monmouthshire in a week in which the Conservatives have seen off the challenge from Reform UK with two more by-elections, in separate Monmouthshire villages, to be held over the coming fortnight. Conservative candidate Xavier Turner topped the poll in the election to the volunteer council while Reform's Robert Kavanagh came in last behind independent candidate Jem Lin Jenkins-Jones. The 22-year-old winning candidate said: 'I'm incredibly grateful to the residents of Wyesham for putting their trust in me. I'm ready to work and make sure your voices are heard.' Councillor Richard John, who leads the Conservative opposition group on Monmouthshire County Council, described the new community councillor as a 'breath of fresh air' and said his victory means the county, which voted to remain in the European Union at the 2016 referendum, is still 'Reform free'. 'Reform were confident of winning in Wyesham, a ward previously represented by their Reform MS, so coming last is quite a humiliating defeat,' said Cllr John. 'Residents could clearly see there's no substance behind their soundbites and they don't offer any solutions to the challenges experienced by families in Monmouthshire. Monmouthshire remains a Reform-free zone.' Ms Jones had represented Wyesham on Monmouthshire County Council, as part of the group led by Cllr John and previously current Conservative MS for Monmouthshire Peter Fox, before stepping down at the 2022 council elections. The county council seat was won by independent Emma Bryn, who defeated both Labour and Conservative candidates. During the campaign Ms Jones had posted a photograph of herself with Cllr John and other local Conservative activists and endorsed the Tory candidate as 'a strong local voice'. It is understood Ms Jones hadn't campaigned in her former ward since switching to the Reform party. An X post shared by Laura Anne Jones of her and campaigning with then Conservative colleagues in Wyesham during the July, 2025 by-election campaign. The town council by-election was caused by the resignation of Labour councillor Alice Fletcher. Though town and community councils aren't run on political lines councillors can stand under party banners and Monmouth Town Council has 19 members from five wards which have the same boundaries as the county council wards. Monmouth Town Council has eight independent members, six Labour members and five Conservatives including Cllr Turner. A by-election is due to be held in the Leechpool ward to Portskewett Community Council on Thursday, July 31 with only a Reform UK and a Conservative candidate nominated, while both parties, and two unaffiliated candidates, will contest the Goytre ward election to Goetre Community Council on Thursday, August 7. Any registered voter, aged 16 or over, can vote in council elections and there is no requirement to show voter ID to do so. Result Monmouth Town Council, Wyesham ward by-election JENKINS-JONES Jem Lin Independent: 184 KAVANAGH Robert James Andrew Reform UK: 124 TURNER Xavier John Pierre Local Conservatives: 201 (Elected) Spoilt: 2 Turnout: 30 per cent
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Warning: wellbeing retreats may be bad for your health
A £2,250 retreat. Past trauma resurfacing. A lawsuit. They sound like plotlines for the next series of The White Lotus, but in fact they're the basics of a claim being made in the High Court. This week it was revealed that a dance teacher from Richmond is suing a Luton-based yoga firm, alleging that she was 'retraumatised' after self-exploration exercises triggered memories of her adoption. She claims she suffered a mental breakdown and gained excessive weight. Lawyers for the yoga company, meanwhile, deny that any staff were at fault and say there wasn't a psychological element to their yoga training. The row is the latest sign of how retreats have taken over the holiday market: wellness tourism is predicted to be worth about $1.35 trillion in 2028. But expectations can often vary wildly from the reality — as any seasoned retreater knows.
