Eviction bill now focuses on squatters in Texas House rewrite
'I'm celebrating the fact that a significantly worse bill could have passed and didn't,' said Mark Melton, an attorney who leads the Dallas Eviction Advocacy Center.
Senate Bill 38's backers said the legislation is meant to help property owners oust squatters who illegally occupy a property. Before the 85-49 vote to preliminarily approve the bill Friday, House members agreed to strip a provision that tenants' advocates warned could oust renters from their home without knowing their landlord filed for eviction or being able to fight the matter in court.
Under the change House members made Friday, the expedited eviction process could only be used in bona fide squatting cases. House members pared back some of the more controversial aspects amid pressure from housing advocates and concerns from some lawmakers.
SB 38 still makes moves to reduce the meager safety net Texas renters have had in the past, its opponents said. For one, the bill would effectively bar the Texas Supreme Court and Gov. Greg Abbott from tweaking eviction proceedings during an emergency like the COVID-19 pandemic, when they required judges to pause those proceedings to allow tenants to tap emergency rental assistance.
SB 38 supporters say existing laws don't adequately help landlords get rid of squatters. Landlord groups like the Texas Apartment Association told lawmakers they've had increased encounters with squatters. Cracking down on squatting is a top priority for the state's top three Republican officials — Gov. Greg Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and House Speaker Dustin Burrows.
Chris Newton, who heads the Texas Apartment Association,hailed the bill's passage as 'a significant reform aimed at fixing the state's civil eviction process to prevent unnecessary delay and unlawful occupation of property.'
'The bill seeks to protect both property owners and residents by creating a more efficient path to address clear cases of illegal squatting while maintaining existing renter protections,' Newton said in a statement.
The most crucial change came to a part of the bill that initially sought to give landlords ways to evict tenants without going to trial. Under the change House members made Friday, that process could only be used in bona fide squatting cases. Tenants would even get a slight reprieve if they miss a rent payment and had never done so before.
The bill still makes changes that chip away at tenants' rights and grant them fewer protections in the future, housing advocates said. Under state law, landlords must give tenants written notice three days before they file for eviction. The bill would relax rules for how landlords may deliver that notice to tenants.
The bill also aims to allow a landlord to proceed with an eviction even if federal law would otherwise bar them from doing so, a provision tenants advocates and legal experts said is unconstitutional.
'There is no part of this bill that is good and no part of this bill is needed,' said Ben Martin, research director for Texas Housers, a research and advocacy group.
Disclosure: Texas Apartment Association has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who will win the White House in 2028? JD Vance favorite, but Dems have better odds
Donald Trump is a little more than halfway through his first year in office, and already people are jockeying for position for the 2028 presidential election. It was about a year ago when Trump overtook Democratic nominee Kamala Harris as the favorite to win the election and he cruised from that point on. The tides have turned once again, and now democrats are favored to win back the White House in 2028. But last July, Harris was the overwhelming favorite to defeat Trump, so things can change in a hurry. According to a Democrat is -110 to win the 2028 Presidential Election. Republicans come in at +100. So while the lead is ever so slight, it is noteworthy that for the first time in about a year, Democrats are favored to win the next presidential election. If you think an independent can win, that's where the real money is. Independents are +2000 to win. 2028 presidential betting odds When it comes to individuals, nobody has really been able to pull away from the pack. Vice President JD Vance remains the top choice on the betting market. He comes in at +250. Trump himself comes in at No. 2 in betting odds at +900. Right now he can't run again, but Vegas believes that could change. On the Democratic side, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are the top two favorites, both coming in at +900. Bettinglectionodds also has their odds. That site has Vance as the favorite to be the next president with a 23.9 percent chance of winning. He's followed by Newsom (8.2 percent), Ocasio-Cortez (6.6 percent), Pete Buttigieg (4.9 percent), Josh Shapiro (3.7 percent), Ron DeSantis (2.5 percent) and Ivanka Trump (2.4 percent) as the favorites. This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: 2028 presidential betting odds: Vance, Trump, Newsom, AOC favorites


The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Thune: Deal on nominees up to Democrats and White House
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said Friday afternoon that whether a deal is reached on 160 stalled nominees hinges on talks between the White House and Senate Democrats, and didn't sound confident that an agreement could be reached before the weekend. Thune said 'a number of people involved' from the White House are in discussions with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who is under heavy pressure from the Democratic base to draw out the floor proceedings on Trump's nominees as long as possible. 'That will be up to the discussions between White House and Schumer and the Democrats,' Thune said when asked about the prospect of getting a deal on nominees to allow senators to begin the four-week August recess, which is scheduled to begin Saturday. Republican senators are growing increasingly pessimistic about reaching a deal to avoid working over the weekend. They spent Friday churning through lower-level nominees who would ordinarily get confirmed by unanimous consent or voice vote. The Senate voted earlier in the day to end debate on Brian Nesvik to serve as director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and to confirm Casey Mulligan to serve as chief counsel for advocacy for the Small Business Administration. Senate Republican Whip John Barrasso (Wyo.) blasted Democrats on the floor for 'unprecedented obstruction of the Senate nomination process.' 'President Trump is the only president in modern history not to have a single nominee confirmed by voice vote or unanimous consent. Not a single one. Even the most routine nominees are being filibustered,' he said. 'Positions that used to fly through by voice vote or unanimous consent are now treated and taken as political hostages. This isn't normal. This is petty partisan politics at its worst,' he said.


Boston Globe
22 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
N.H. Governor Kelly Ayotte signs bills banning gender-affirming care for minors
Proponents have said the ban is an important way of protecting children from treatments they believe to be harmful and irreversible. But opponents say the new law discriminates against transgender youth, removing treatments they view as life saving, and interfering with doctors' ability to make appropriate medical decisions with families. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up Violations of the new law will go before New Hampshire's board of medicine, which can take administrative disciplinary action. Advertisement The new law also allows someone who was harmed by receiving this care to bring a lawsuit against the person who provided the care and violated the law. The new ban comes as legislative efforts targeting transgender people have grown in recent years. Last year, New Hampshire lawmakers passed a bill banning gender-affirming genital surgeries for minors, even though providers have said such procedures are exceedingly rare in New Hampshire. All of the other New England states have laws protecting access to gender-affirming care, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a Colorado-based think tank that promotes equality. Advertisement Some New Hampshire families with transgender children have been warily watching as the bill advanced and, in some cases, have been Republican lawmakers in New Hampshire who championed the ban were encouraged by a But some attorneys say there are still avenues for pursuing a possible legal challenge of New Hampshire's new law. That could include a challenge based on the New Hampshire constitution, arguing that the intent of the law was to harm transgender people, or a challenge on the basis of parental rights, according to Chris Erchull, a senior staff attorney at GLAD law. Ayotte also signed a second bill banning gender-affirming surgeries for minors. The bill explicitly prohibits 'transgender chest surgery' for minors as part of a gender transition. Violating the law is classified as unprofessional conduct and would be subject to discipline by the board of medicine. The law also allows minors to sue for damages if they received such a treatment in violation of the law. And the attorney general can bring a suit to enforce compliance with the law. Amanda Gokee can be reached at