Suspended solicitor Declan O'Callaghan loses challenge over disciplinary tribunal procedures
Declan O'Callaghan,
which could have further delayed a bid to have him struck off the roll of solicitors for professional misconduct over his handling of a land deal in Co Mayo.
Mr O'Callaghan had brought a judicial review challenge over the procedures adopted by the
Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
in reaching its findings last year of professional misconduct over the 2007 land deal.
Barrister Ruadhán Ó Chiaráin, for Nirvanna, the company that brought the complaint against Mr O'Callaghan to the tribunal, had argued the 'convoluted judicial review' by Mr O'Callaghan was not permissible and was an attempt to delay the hearing of his High Court appeal over the tribunal's findings.
If Mr O'Callaghan loses his appeal, the High Court will then consider whether or not to grant an application by the Law Society to strike him off.
READ MORE
His challenge to the tribunal's procedures, which included claims it breached his right to fair procedures, was heard by the High Court president, Mr Justice David Barniville, on Thursday.
Having heard submissions from Michael Mullooly, for Mr O'Callaghan, and from Mr Ó Chiaráin, the judge said he was rejecting the challenge and would give his reasons for that in a written judgment next week.
His decision clears the way for the hearing, on a date to be fixed, of the appeal and, if that is unsuccessful, the strike-off application.
The Law Society has agreed with the tribunal recommendation that Mr O'Callaghan be struck off, but the final decision on whether or not to grant a strike-off order must be made by the High Court president.
The three-member tribunal had last summer found Mr O'Callaghan guilty of four counts of professional misconduct over his handling of the 2007 land deal involving a company of Co Mayo businessman Tom Fleming.
Now aged 80, Mr Fleming claimed Nirvanna never received €250,000 for selling the land to a now-deceased businessman. Mr O'Callaghan denied the sum was owed, and disputed the transaction was for 'sale' of the lands.
The tribunal upheld the Nirvanna complaint, finding professional misconduct on grounds Mr O'Callaghan breached his duty of care to the company, provided inadequate professional services, and purported to act for vendor and purchaser in a transaction where there was 'a clear conflict of interest'.
In recommending strike-off, the tribunal also had regard to two findings of professional misconduct previously made by it against Mr O'Callaghan, suspended as a solicitor since 2018 arising from a separate Law Society investigation into matters at his now defunct practice Kilrane O'Callaghan & Co, which was based in Ballaghderreen, Co Roscommon.
The suspension was imposed pending a tribunal hearing of the society's application for an inquiry into matters arising from its investigation. Concerns raised in an independent solicitor's report for that investigation included that Mr O'Callaghan withdrew substantial fees from the estate of a bereaved child.
Findings of professional misconduct were previously made against Mr O'Callaghan in 1990 and 2019. The 1990 finding was on grounds including Mr O'Callaghan had, improperly and knowingly, applied clients monies for personal benefit, purchase of a private dwelling residence and a car, and the making of repayments to a building society. That led to a High Court direction in 1991 he should practice for some three years under the supervision of a more senior solicitor.
In November 2019, the tribunal found him guilty of professional misconduct over findings including he failed to remit costs and outlays to a law firm arising out of litigation between their client and a deceased person, resulting in Circuit Court proceedings being issued against the complainant firm's client.
Mr O'Callaghan was censured and ordered to pay €10,000 to the Law Society's compensation fund, plus €7,500 towards the society's costs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the presidential election: the race now looks very different
The presidential election now looks very different after the shock withdrawal of the Fine Gael candidate Mairead McGuinness. The front-runner among the candidates declared so far, McGuinness said in a statement yesterday that she was dropping out of the race for health reasons. Her departure leaves just one candidate, Independent TD Catherine Connolly, who has enough support to be sure of a place on the ballot paper. She has the backing of the Social Democrats, Labour and People Before Profit. A number of potential Independent candidates are circling, though it is unclear how many could achieve a nomination. The race for the presidency was already slow getting under way, with Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin still considering their options. Now Fine Gael needs to think again, too. Potential Independent candidates will also be mulling the changed outlook for the poll. The big parties need to realise that choice is important for the voters. McGuinness, with a long and high-profile career in public life – most recently as a European commissioner – had shown up well in initial opinion polls. Of course, the field has not yet been declared and past experience shows that the campaign can change everything, in what has often been a brutal process. Nonetheless, Fine Gael would have been confident of a strong showing and for voters the presence of McGuinness and Connolly would have provided two contrasting options. READ MORE Fine Gael, which always seemed well-placed to put forward a candidate, will now need to look to its 'bench' and figures like Seán Kelly and Frances Fitzgerald may come back into the frame. Observers have felt all along that Fianna Fáil would, eventually, put up a nominee. With a left-wing candidate already in the field, Sinn Féin's intentions will also be closely watched. Any nominee from one of the big three parties starts with a support base – and would thus have to be taken seriously. As they are able to guarantee a nomination, the big parties, while not in complete control of the process, have a strong hand to play. And they can also – between them – block Independents from entering the race, if they choose to do so. This does not mean Independents will not feature – nor that one or two might not do well. But they first have to jump the high bar of getting on the ballot. Voters will need to consider what they want from the president and what qualities they value. And it is important that the process delivers them a good choice. The job requires a mix of political nous, judgment and an ability to reflect the national mood. Michael D Higgins has been popular in part because of his willingness to speak out. With the departure of McGuinness, the race to succeed him has now got even more unpredictable.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Schoolteacher who defrauded colleagues of €2,000 barred from teaching for at least five years
A primary schoolteacher who defrauded three of her work colleagues of more than €2,000 and who owes almost €1,000 to the school where she worked has been removed from the register of teachers for at least five years. The teacher may not apply for readmission for five years, and the panel 'cannot say when, if ever' she would be readmitted, said chairman Paul Moroney. The inquiry concerned allegations that the teacher dishonestly induced a teaching colleague and two Special Needs Assistants (SNAs) at the school to give her more than €2,000 in September and October 2021 for Apple goods which were not subsequently delivered. The teacher received, via Revolut, €1,102 from her teaching colleague and €375 and €545 from the two SNAs, respectively. READ MORE The inquiry also heard allegations that the teacher received two payments of €500 each at the beginning of September 2021, by way of a loan from the school board of management. Only €50 has been repaid. At a previous hearing in May of this year, the inquiry heard that these payments were made as the teacher had recently started at the school and by then had not received any wages from the Department of Education. The inquiry also heard that for a prolonged period, the teacher had falsely represented that she had put in place a system to repay the money owed to the board of management. At the hearing in May, the panel found that the allegations were proven in fact and that they amounted to professional misconduct and breaches of the Code of Conduct for Teachers. Mr Moroney said that the behaviour of the teacher in the first three allegations related to the Apple money was 'disgraceful [and] dishonourable'. Regarding the money owed to the board of management, Mr Moroney said that the teacher was trusted to repay these funds, the non-repayment of which served to deprive the students of the school of this sum. Mr Moroney further noted that the teacher appeared to have a lack of empathy for her victims and that she provided 'little or no expert report' regarding the mental health ground advanced as a mitigating factor. Consequently, the panel was not persuaded that there was any health issue regarding mitigation. The inquiry had heard that at the time the allegations occurred the teacher was suffering from a gambling addiction and that she had been affected by several personal tragedies, including the loss of family members and relations and a burglary at her apartment carried out by two criminals. While the panel in its reasoning for its decision also noted that the teacher had made a limited apology, Mr Moroney said that even now, the teacher demonstrated no meaningful insight. The panel acknowledged, as an additional mitigating factor, that the teacher repaid her three work colleagues. The teacher, school and witnesses could not be identified, by order of the panel. The director of the Teaching Council, who was represented by Fieldfisher Solicitors, made the complaint against the teacher, who did not attend today's proceedings and was not represented. The teacher has already appeared in court concerning the allegations of deceiving her colleagues, for which she did not receive a conviction. After a plea of mitigation, the Probation Act was applied. The teacher has resigned from her position at the school.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the report on roads policing: a matter of life and death
The Crowe report into Roads Policing, commissioned by An Garda Síochána and published yesterday , makes for grim reading. At a time when road deaths have been rising, it paints a picture of an essential policing function hampered by weak management, inadequate resources and, in some quarters, a worrying absence of professional commitment. The review found striking disparities in productivity between divisions, with some officers recording twice as many 'Lifesaver' detections - speeding, intoxicated driving, mobile phone use, and failure to wear seat belts – as others. While many gardaí in the Roads Policing Units are described as dedicated and effective, a minority are openly disengaged, sometimes to the point of disabling equipment or avoiding patrols altogether. Underlying this, according to the report, is a flawed interpretation of the Garda's Performance, Accountability and Learning Framework (PALF), which is seen as preventing supervisors from monitoring individual performance. This, combined with fear of industrial relations fallout, has created a culture in which poor work habits go unchallenged. The operational picture is equally troubling. Too much time is devoted to static checkpoints – often close to base and at predictable times – leaving remote areas under-patrolled and missing opportunities for intelligence-led enforcement. Vehicles and vital equipment are often outdated. READ MORE These are not minor management quibbles; they are matters of life and death on the country's roads, and of public confidence in policing. The report recommends a transformation plan addressing supervision, staffing, training, equipment and operational priorities, led by a senior officer. When new Garda Commissioner Justin Kelly takes up office in September, he cannot let this report gather dust. Acting swiftly on its recommendations will be essential both to reversing the rise in road fatalities and to restoring public faith in the professionalism of the force. On the evidence presented, delay would not just be damaging – it would be dangerous.
