Photo radar gets thumbs-up in CAA survey
Sixty-five per cent of drivers recently surveyed for a CAA Manitoba poll said they support the use of automatic speed enforcement cameras.
CAA Manitoba commissioned DIG Insights to conduct two polls — one on speeding and dangerous driving and the other on distracted driving — in March and February, respectively.
JOE BRYKSA / FREE PRESS FILES
The use of automated traffic cameras to curb speeding, particularly in school zones, is supported by most Manitobans, a recent survey suggests.
'Speeding continues to be a significant problem in Manitoba and according to our survey, automatic speed enforcement… can be part of the solution,' said Ewald Friesen, spokesperson for CAA Manitoba.
'Manitobans widely believe — 71 per cent of us — that (cameras) can help deter speeding and slow drivers down. There is also, generally, support for the use of (speed cameras).'
He noted 80 per cent of those polled support the use of automated speed cameras near schools, in particular.
Friesen said photo enforcement should accompany other tools to rein in speeders, such as signs that advise it's a photo-enforced area, traffic calming measures such as speed humps and education programs.
'We are of the opinion that photo radar should not be used as a revenue-generating tool; it should be used as a tool that slows people down on the roads,' said Friesen. 'Posted speed limits are there for a reason.'
In Ontario, Premier Doug Ford has criticized the use of automated speed cameras as a 'revenue source,' and is considering changes to how the devices are deployed.
In Manitoba, there have been hints the provincial government will change legislation on photo enforcement.
The Winnipeg Police Service has been pushing for years to get its antiquated equipment updated. The technology used in its cameras is obsolete.
In a recent report to city council, the police service said 'progress' has been made on getting legislation changed to allow for the use of modern technology.
Currently, Winnipeg is the only municipality in the province where photo radar is permitted.
'There is, of course, vocal and somewhat heated debate on the use of photo radar in the province. We understand this, obviously, but… there is support,' said Friesen. 'That struck us as something noteworthy.'
Wednesdays
A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom.
CAA's distracted driving poll found wide concern — 88 per cent of those polled — about the issue, while 46 per cent of those surveyed admitted to driving while distracted at times.
Manitoba Public Insurance recently said distracted driving is the No. 1 cause of fatal collisions in the province, Friesen noted.
The speeding and dangerous driving was conducted online March 7 to 19. It surveyed 500 Manitoba drivers 18 or older. Based on the sample size of n=500 and with a confidence level of 95 per cent, the margin of error for that research is plus or minus three per cent.
The firm's distracted driving survey was conducted online from Feb. 11 to 21 with 506 drivers. Based on the sample size of n=506 and with a confidence level of 95 per cent, the margin of error for the distracted driving research is plus-or-minus three per cent.
erik.pindera@freepress.mb.ca
Erik PinderaReporter
Erik Pindera is a reporter for the Free Press, mostly focusing on crime and justice. The born-and-bred Winnipegger attended Red River College Polytechnic, wrote for the community newspaper in Kenora, Ont. and reported on television and radio in Winnipeg before joining the Free Press in 2020. Read more about Erik.
Every piece of reporting Erik produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Cars and tax fairness
Opinion Let's go car shopping in Manitoba: The first car is a brand-new Ford Mustang Mach-E that costs more than $55,000 and the second is a used 2008 Toyota Corolla for $8,500. Which of these cars do you think comes with a $4,000 cheque from the Manitoba government? It's not the used Corolla. That's right, the Manitoba government has been bankrolling electric vehicle buyers since last year. When someone buys a new EV costing up to $70,000, the government sends them a $4,000 cheque. Used EV buyers can expect $2,500. The government initially was spending $25 million on the subsidy, but in Budget 2025, the government revved up the spending by $14.8 million. That's almost $40 million worth of cheques going to Manitobans who can afford EVs. Like a reverse Robin Hood, the government is taking tax dollars from people who can't afford a new EV and handing it over to wealthier people who can. All the Corolla buyer gets is a seven per cent retail sales tax bill from the provincial government. After the person saved up $8,500 to buy the used Corolla, they will have to fork over about $595 extra to the government. It doesn't matter how many times the used vehicle has been bought and sold and taxed before. Every time a vehicle changes hands in Manitoba, the government sends an RST bill, even if the tax has already been paid multiple times before. And the sale price is not the only thing the government considers when sending you your tax bill. If the government's black book value shows the car is worth more than you paid for it, it sends you an RST bill for that amount, instead of the deal you got. However, if you paid more than the black book value, the government expects an RST cheque for the higher amount. The government doesn't care if you shopped around to find a deal on your latest car, it expects to get its full cut. Manitobans who can afford to purchase a brand-new EV don't need cheques from the government. But Manitobans looking to buy used could definitely use a break on their taxes. That's because the majority of EV owners earn more than $100,000 per year, according to government briefing notes. The average Manitoban earns about $60,000. A quick look at AutoTrader shows more than 200 gas- or diesel-powered vehicles for sale in Manitoba under $10,000. There are less than five used electric vehicles available under that price. However, none of them would even qualify for the government's subsidy because they are more than four years old. And even if you could find a used electric car that's new enough and in your price range, it's unlikely to fit most Manitobans' needs. If you work a job that requires carrying stuff in your vehicle or live somewhere without EV chargers, a used Nissan Leaf compact car isn't going to cut it, regardless of the government subsidy. The federal government doesn't even charge GST on vehicles bought through private sales. Alberta doesn't charge sales tax on any vehicle, because it doesn't have a provincial sales tax. Manitobans aren't usually buying a used Corolla because it's their dream car, they are buying it because it's a necessity to get to work or take their kids to school. It's already ludicrous to get a tax bill when you purchase any necessity, but it is especially unfair when the tax has already been paid on the vehicle, potentially multiple times. And it just adds insult to injury that your wealthy neighbour is getting a $4,000 cheque from the government for their luxury EV purchase. Instead of trying to take as many tax dollars as possible by taxing the same used vehicle multiple times, the government should cancel its multimillion-dollar handout to wealthy EV buyers and axe the sales tax on used vehicles to give buyers a break on their next car purchase. Gage Haubrich is the Prairie director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.
Calgary Herald
5 days ago
- Calgary Herald
Alberta's new auto insurance system lacks clarity on whether or not there will be cost savings: experts
Article content Fred Litwiniuk, chief growth officer at Litco Legal Support Organization, said the numbers can be misleading since they mainly say the maximum amount those in vehicle accidents could receive, but might not. Article content 'They also reference the province of Manitoba in there. I would want to know how much Manitobans actually get paid, versus what the benefits are on paper,' Litwiniuk said. Article content 'People get lured in by the big numbers, because the care-first system numbers that they've outlined, some of the numbers look pretty big. The question is, where's that money going to come from if the insurers are already pleading poverty,' he said. Article content Injury lawyers bracing for impact Article content Officials at a Wednesday technical briefing said the new system reduces the need for litigation because of how high the benefits are. Article content Under the new model, Albertans injured in collisions will only be able to pursue litigation in select cases such as for pain-and-suffering damages if the driver was convicted of an offence under the Criminal Code or Traffic Safety Act, or those who have to pay out of pocket beyond the benefits provided by the policy will also be able to sue the at-fault driver for those expenses. Article content Article content According to the report, by reducing the cost of litigation, Albertans can 'expect to see a stabilization of rates and a reduction in the premiums they pay for third-party liability coverage under their auto insurance policy.' Article content Personal injury lawyer Mark McCourt, who has been advocating against the reforms, said in his 30 years practising at McCourt Law Offices, there has been one person who has received the current maximum $50,000 payment in medical expense benefits. Article content 'There's there's a reason there are lawyers in the system. Lawyers are there to keep wrongdoers honest and with the lawyers out of the picture, the wrongdoers and the representatives of those wrongdoers, in this case insurance companies, are going to be able to act with impunity,' McCourt said. Article content McCourt said once the new system is implemented on Jan. 1, 2027, it could mean the end of the line for his business. Article content Article content 'I don't think my business is going to be able to survive with a 99 per cent decrease in revenues, and that would go for every other injury law firm in the in the province,' McCourt said. Article content Alberta NDP affordability critic Sharif Haji criticized the province's lack of clarity on how the reforms will reduce premiums, despite the government's claims about affordability. Article content Article content
Edmonton Journal
5 days ago
- Edmonton Journal
Alberta's new auto insurance system lacks clarity on whether or not there will be cost savings: experts
Fred Litwiniuk, chief growth officer at Litco Legal Support Organization, said the numbers can be misleading since they mainly say the maximum amount those in vehicle accidents could receive, but might not. 'They also reference the province of Manitoba in there. I would want to know how much Manitobans actually get paid, versus what the benefits are on paper,' Litwiniuk said. 'People get lured in by the big numbers, because the care-first system numbers that they've outlined, some of the numbers look pretty big. The question is, where's that money going to come from if the insurers are already pleading poverty,' he said. Officials at a Wednesday technical briefing said the new system reduces the need for litigation because of how high the benefits are. Under the new model, Albertans injured in collisions will only be able to pursue litigation in select cases such as for pain-and-suffering damages if the driver was convicted of an offence under the Criminal Code or Traffic Safety Act, or those who have to pay out of pocket beyond the benefits provided by the policy will also be able to sue the at-fault driver for those expenses. According to the report, by reducing the cost of litigation, Albertans can 'expect to see a stabilization of rates and a reduction in the premiums they pay for third-party liability coverage under their auto insurance policy.' Personal injury lawyer Mark McCourt, who has been advocating against the reforms, said in his 30 years practising at McCourt Law Offices, there has been one person who has received the current maximum $50,000 payment in medical expense benefits. 'There's there's a reason there are lawyers in the system. Lawyers are there to keep wrongdoers honest and with the lawyers out of the picture, the wrongdoers and the representatives of those wrongdoers, in this case insurance companies, are going to be able to act with impunity,' McCourt said. McCourt said once the new system is implemented on Jan. 1, 2027, it could mean the end of the line for his business. 'I don't think my business is going to be able to survive with a 99 per cent decrease in revenues, and that would go for every other injury law firm in the in the province,' McCourt said. Alberta NDP affordability critic Sharif Haji criticized the province's lack of clarity on how the reforms will reduce premiums, despite the government's claims about affordability. 'I think taking away the right to sue is problematic … but other than that, it doesn't provide any substantive way to see that how much premiums will go down,' Haji said. Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the news you need to know — add and to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters . You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. The Edmonton Journal | The Edmonton Sun
