Malaysia downplays Huawei deal as US aims to curb China AI power
[KUALA LUMPUR] Malaysia declared it will build a first-of-its-kind AI system powered by Huawei Technologies chips, only to distance itself from that statement a day later, underscoring the Asian nation's delicate position in the US-Chinese AI race.
Deputy Minister of Communications Teo Nie Ching said in a speech on May 19 her country would be the first to activate an unspecified class of Huawei 'Ascend GPU-powered AI servers at national scale.'
Malaysia would deploy 3,000 units of Huawei's primary AI offering by 2026, she said in prepared remarks reviewed by Bloomberg News. Chinese startup DeepSeek would also make one of its AI models available to the South-east Asian country, the official added.
The project, first reported by the local outlet Malaysia-China Insight, caught the attention of the White House, which is working to prevent Beijing from capturing foreign AI markets.
'As I've been warning, the full Chinese stack is here,' David Sacks, President Donald Trump's AI and crypto czar, wrote on X. The Trump administration was rescinding Biden-era global semiconductor curbs, which restricted chip sales to Malaysia, 'just in time,' he said.
When reached for comment by Bloomberg News on Tuesday (May 20), Teo's office said it was retracting her remarks on Huawei without explanation. It is unclear whether the project will proceed as planned. Huawei did not provide immediate comment.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business
Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The unusual about-face comes after the US Commerce Department released – then tweaked – guidance warning overseas companies against using Huawei's Ascend. The use of those chips 'anywhere in the world' could violate US export controls, the agency originally said, before removing that globally focused language during a spat with Beijing.
Malaysia is in many ways the perfect test of the Trump administration's new-fashioned AI diplomacy. The idea, championed in part by Sacks, is to proliferate American AI hardware across the world – with security guardrails – to ensure that companies building data centres in South-east Asia or the Middle East do not turn to Chinese alternatives. The US has limited time to entrench itself in those markets, Sacks argues, as Huawei makes progress in catching up with industry leader Nvidia.
At the same time, the Trump administration has promised to crack down on illegal shipments of advanced Nvidia chips to China via third countries. Officials have identified Malaysia as a particular concern.
The Trump administration's urgency stems in part from the growing prowess of Huawei, which has emerged as China's national semiconductor champion since its breakthrough in processors for the Mate 60 Pro in 2023. The company has since expanded into adjacent arenas from EVs to AI, where it's begun making chips it hopes can compete with Nvidia.
Huawei's Ascend lineup is thought to be so far largely confined to use in China by domestic firms that otherwise cannot legally access Nvidia's cutting-edge products. The Ascend chips are still quite capable, though, particularly in running AI services, according to industry experts.
Jensen Huang, Nvidia's chief executive officer, called Huawei one of the world's most formidable technology companies and said China was 'right behind' the US in the AI race.
That race ramped up last week during Trump's whirlwind trip to the Middle East. His administration announced deals to ship tens of thousands – and likely upwards of a million – advanced Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices chips to the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Those two Gulf nations have huge AI ambitions and long been a focus of Washington's semiconductor policy.
The deals, which still require licences for actual shipments, have sown divisions within the Trump administration and drawn bipartisan criticism from Capitol Hill. China hawks worry the agreements could benefit Beijing, which has deep ties in the region. Some policymakers are also concerned the projects, which include a UAE data centre that could be one of the world's largest, may undermine efforts to ensure the most significant AI progress happens on American soil.
As Trump officials hammer out the fine print of the Gulf accords, they're drafting a replacement for former President Joe Biden's so-called AI diffusion framework.
Those regulations, which Sacks mentioned in his post, were a dramatic expansion of chip curbs originally focused on China. They imposed new licence requirements for many countries including Malaysia, as well as national caps on the volume of sales that could be approved – with ways for companies to bypass those limits in exchange for security guarantees.
Malaysia is a high priority. US firms including Oracle are planning massive data centre clusters in the nation, and are keen to import high-end Nvidia chips for those facilities – in volumes that may not have been possible under Biden-era rules. The regulations barred American hyperscalers from housing more than 7 per cent of their global capacity in any one nation outside the US and a handful of close partners. Oracle was set to blow past that limit in Malaysia, according to the research firm SemiAnalysis.
One element of Trump's replacement regulations, Bloomberg News has reported, will be chip controls on countries suspected of diverting US hardware to China – including Malaysia.
Trump officials this year pressured Malaysian authorities to crack down on semiconductor transshipment to China. The country is also in the crosshairs of a court case in Singapore, where three men have been charged with fraud for allegedly disguising the ultimate customer of AI servers that may contain high-end Nvidia chips barred from China. Malaysian officials are probing the issue. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
32 minutes ago
- Straits Times
China says it is working with France on trade differences, no sign yet of a cognac deal
FILE PHOTO: Bottles of Remy Martin VSOP cognac, Remy Martin XO cognac and St-Remy XO Brandy are displayed at the Remy Cointreau SA headquarters in Paris, France, January 21, 2019. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo China says it is working with France on trade differences, no sign yet of a cognac deal BEIJING/PARIS - China and France have agreed to resolve their trade disputes through dialogue, China's foreign ministry said on Friday, though there was no indication that agreement had been reached in talks on lifting Chinese levies on European brandy. Talks to resolve the cognac dispute accelerated this week with China's commerce minister Wang Wentao meeting his French counterpart in Paris on the sidelines of an OECD conference, and technical talks on the matter taking place in Beijing. The latest round of negotiations have raised hopes of a settlement, two industry sources with knowledge of the discussions said. "The two sides have reached consensus on resolving economic and trade issues through dialogue and consultation", the Chinese foreign ministry said after a call between the Chinese and French foreign ministers. Chinese anti-dumping measures that applied duties of up to 39% on imports of European brandy - with French cognac bearing the brunt - have strained relations between Paris and Beijing. The brandy duties were enforced days after the European Union took action against Chinese-made electric vehicle imports to shield its local industry, prompting France's President Emmanuel Macron to accuse Beijing of "pure retaliation". The Chinese duties have dented sales of brands including LVMH's Hennessy, Pernod Ricard's Martell and Remy Cointreau. Beijing was initially meant to make a final decision on the duties by January, but extended the deadline to April and then again to July 5. China is seeking to strengthen trade ties with the 27-member bloc as relations with the United States have soured in the escalating trade war. "France will not compromise on ... the protection of its industries, such as cognac," French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said after talks with Wang on Wednesday. Chinese officials, meanwhile, signalled to industry officials during three rounds of technical meetings in Beijing this week they wanted to settle the matter, one of the sources said, but added some sticking points remained. With annual imports of around $1.7 billion last year, China is the French brandy industry's most important measured by value and the second-largest by volume after the United States. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
34 minutes ago
- Straits Times
China issues rare earth licenses to suppliers of top 3 US automakers, sources say
New cars are seen in the yard of the General Motors factory in Gravataí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. PHOTO: REUTERS BEIJING/WASHINGTON - China has granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top three US automakers, two sources familiar with the matter said, as supply chain disruptions begin to surface from Beijing's export curbs on those materials. At least some of the licenses are valid for six months, the two sources said, declining to be named because the information is not public. It was not immediately clear what quantity or items are covered by the approval or whether the move signals China is preparing to ease the rare-earths licensing process, which industry groups say is cumbersome and has created a supply bottleneck. China's decision in April to restrict exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets has tripped up the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. China's dominance of the critical mineral industry, key to the green energy transition, is increasingly viewed as a key point of leverage for Beijing in its trade war with US President Donald Trump. China produces around 90 per cent of the world's rare earths, and auto industry representatives have warned of increasing threats to production due to their dependency on it for those parts. Suppliers of three big US automakers, General Motors, Ford and Jeep-maker Stellantis got clearance for some rare earth export licenses on June 2, one of the two sources said. GM and Ford each declined to comment. Stellantis said it is working with suppliers 'to ensure an efficient licensing process' and that so far the company has been able to 'address immediate production concerns without major disruptions.' China's Ministry of Commerce did not immediately respond to a faxed request for comment. China's critical-mineral export controls have become a focus on Mr Trump's criticism of Beijing, which he says has violated the truce reached last month to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. On June 5, Mr Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping had a lengthy phone call to iron out trade differences. Mr Trump said in social-media post that 'there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products.' Both sides said teams will meet again soon. US auto companies are already feeling the impact of the restrictions. Ford shut down production of its Explorer SUV at its Chicago plant for a week in May because of a rare-earth shortage, the company said. The approval for the auto suppliers follows a green light granted to a US electronics firm's suppliers last week and another one issued earlier this week to suppliers of a US non-auto company, the first person said, declining to name the companies. 'We have to give the Chinese the benefit of the doubt that they're working through this. It's up to them to show that they are not weaponizing it,' said the person. Reuters reported on June 4 that China has introduced a tracking system for its rare earth magnet sector in a move to improve its control over the sector and crackdown on smuggling. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump asks US Supreme Court to let him dismantle Education Department
US President Donald Trump's move to dismantle the education department is part of a campaign to downsize the federal government. PHOTO: KENNY HOLSTON/NYTIMES WASHINGTON - Mr Donald Trump's administration asked the US Supreme Court on June 6 to permit it to proceed with dismantling the Department of Education, a move that would leave school policy in the United States almost entirely in the hands of states and local boards. The Justice Department asked the court to halt Boston-based US District Judge Myong Joun's May 22 ruling that ordered the administration reinstate employees terminated in a mass layoff and end further actions to shutter the department. The Justice Department said the lower court lacked jurisdiction to 'second-guess the Executive's internal management decisions,' referring to the federal government's executive branch. 'The government has been crystal clear in acknowledging that only Congress can eliminate the Department of Education. And the government has acknowledged the need to retain sufficient staff to continue fulfilling statutorily mandated functions and has kept the personnel that, in its judgment, are necessary for those tasks. The challenged (reduction in force) is fully consistent with that approach,' the filing said. The department, created by a US law passed by Congress in 1979, oversees about 100,000 public and 34,000 private schools in the United States, though more than 85 per cent of public school funding comes from state and local governments. It provides federal grants for needy schools and programmes, including money to pay teachers of children with special needs, fund arts programmes and replace outdated infrastructure. It also oversees the US$1.6 trillion (S$2 trillion) in student loans held by tens of millions of Americans who cannot afford to pay for college outright. Mr Trump's move to dismantle the department is part of the Republican president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. Closing the department long has been a goal of many US conservatives. Attorneys-general from 20 states and the District of Columbia, as well as school districts and unions representing teachers, sued to block the Trump administration's efforts to gut the department. The states argued that the massive job cuts will render the agency unable to perform core functions authorised by statute, including in the civil rights arena, effectively usurping Congress's authority in violation of the US Constitution. Mr Trump on March 20 signed an executive order intended to effectively shut down the department, making good on a longstanding campaign promise to conservatives to move education policy almost completely to states and local boards. At a White House ceremony surrounded by children and educators, Mr Trump called the order a first step 'to eliminate' the department. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon announced plans on March 11 to carry out a mass termination of employees. Those layoffs would leave the department with 2,183 workers, down from 4,133 when Mr Trump took office in January. The department said in a press release those terminations were part of its 'final mission.' Mr Trump on March 21 announced plans to transfer the department's student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education, nutrition and related services to the US Department of Health and Human Services, which also is facing deep job cuts. Mr Joun in his ruling ordered the administration to reinstate the laid off workers and halt implementation of Mr Trump's directive to transfer student loans and special needs programs to other federal agencies. The judge rejected the argument put forth by Justice Department lawyers that the mass terminations were aimed at making the department more efficient while fulfilling its mission. In fact, Mr Joun ruled, the job cuts were an effort to shut down the department without the necessary approval of Congress. 'This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself,' the judge wrote. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields called the judge's ruling 'misguided.' The Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals on June 4 rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by Mr Joun. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
