Southport councillor's wife Lucy Connolly who was jailed for racist tweet is being 'mistreated' in prison, Reform's Richard Tice claims
Lucy Connolly has been mistreated by prison officers who have handcuffed and stripped her of privileges, Richard Tice has claimed.
Reform UK's deputy leader made the claims after visiting Connolly today at HMP Peterborough, where she is serving a 31-month sentence for posting a racist tweet in the wake of the Southport attacks.
The former childminder, who is the wife of Tory councillor Ray Connolly, posted an online rant about migrants hours after Axel Rudakubana murdered three young girls in Southport on July 29 last year.
Her sentence, which she unsuccessfully appealed, has been criticised by senior politicians including former PM Boris Johnson and Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.
Mr Tice has even proposed a bill - named 'Lucy's Bill' - which would allow people to mount mass appeals against punishments they deem to be too severe or lenient.
Connolly's alleged mistreatment happened after she was told she wouldn't be transferred to an enhanced wing with full privileges, but would instead be thrown into a 23-hour-a-day lockdown in the 'Nutters Wild Wing' with the most violent prisoners.
When she challenged the decision, she was allegedly restrained by officers with handcuffs and taken to her new cell.
After visting Ms Connolly in prison, Mr Tice told reporters: 'Five days after the incident, the bruises on her wrists are still significant – yellow. It was obviously horrible what she went through.
Reform UK's deputy leader made the claims after visiting Ms Connolly today at HMP Peterborough, where she is serving a 31-month sentence for posting a racist tweet in the wake of the Southport attacks
'On Thursday, she was manhandled, mistreated with no provocation. She was denied enhanced accommodation to which she was entitled and they gave her, frankly, the Nutters Wild Wing – druggies, violence.
'You have to think it's politically motivated. I think the next few weeks before her release are going to be very challenging, worrying. I think it would suit the authorities to want to provoke a violent reaction from Lucy. I told Lucy to be very careful.'
The deputy Reform leader said he met with HMP Peterborough's security, explaining: 'He is looking at the complaint seriously. When we get the result of that complaint – if they have 'lost' the bodycam footage or any of that funny business then I will escalate the complaint and meet the Governor.'
Mr Tice added: 'I genuinely fear that she is actually being treated as a political prisoner for political purposes.'
It comes after Connolly was jailed for posting on X: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care ... if that makes me racist so be it,' in the wake of the Southport stabbings.
An appeal against her sentence was dismissed at the Court of Appeal last month.
Mr Tice said he would be raising his 'serious concerns' in the Commons tomorrow when he introduces his 'Ten-minute Rule Bill'.
The ten minute rule allows a backbench MP to make a case for a new Bill in a speech lasting up to ten minutes. An opposing speech can also be made before the House decides whether or not to introduce the Bill.
If Mr Tice is successful, the Bill is taken to have had its first reading.
The Bill will be introduced to the House of Commons on Wednesday and would mean campaigners could get the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to reconsider cases deemed unduly harsh.
He said he hoped the Bill would enable a 'treble check' on sentences.
'The whole point about justice is it has to have the confidence of the British people,' Mr Tice said.
'We're not calling into dispute the brilliance of our legal system and our judges.
'What we're just saying is, sometimes, however good you are, you might not quite get it right, and it's not unreasonable to have a treble check of the sentence itself.'
He said that the number of people required to sign the petition could be up for debate.
He added: 'To get 500 signatures on a form is not an easy thing. You've got to explain it to 500 people, and they've got to be convinced.
'You can always say at the margin something might be abused. That doesn't mean you shouldn't talk about it.'
When asked why the public should get a say in legal cases, Mr Tice said: 'Never underestimate the common sense of the Great British public and their gut instinct for where something is fair or not fair. We're all human, judges can get things wrong, and sometimes there can be political pressure.
'In this situation, we had a prime minister that effectively ordered the judges to give very strict sentences, and people have very serious concerns about that.
'There's a lot of concern amongst the British public that Lucy Connolly and others were the victims of two-tier justice.'
Under the Bill, campaigners would need to get 500 people to sign a petition against a punishment handed down in Crown Court.
Those cases would be considered for eight weeks by the CCRC, which may refer them to the Court of Appeal for a decision.
Mr Tice said of choosing the CCRC over the Attorney General: 'The Attorney General is a busy person and ultimately a political person, whereas the (CCRC) should not be that.
'It could potentially be extra work but it wouldn't be very many cases a year. It might be an opportunity for the CCRC to say 'We actually need to relook at our competences, how we operate, our procedures. Are we getting it right? Can we improve ourselves?'.
He did not say how much the proposal could cost the taxpayer but added: 'I want to have the debate and the discussion and give the British people the ability to have ever more confidence in our justice system.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
BBC staff told impartiality means they must represent ‘unpalatable views'
BBC staff have been told they must be willing to represent 'unpalatable' views. The broadcaster has released updated editorial guidelines stating that a range of views, including 'minority' opinions, should be taken into account to ensure output is impartial. Updated clauses tell staff to be aware of potentially silenced opinions that the public may be 'reluctant to express', or opinions rarely expressed because 'opportunity to do so is limited'. Staff have been told to do so even if some groups might find these opinions offensive. The guidance reminds journalists that impartial output may 'require the inclusion of opinions which some […] communities or groups may argue ought not to be included, because they find them unpalatable or offensive'. The revisions update 2019 guidance, and come after years of 'cancel culture', which some believe enforced a mainstream consensus on issues such as immigration and gender identity. The BBC itself upheld a complaint against presenter Justin Webb in 2024 when he called trans women 'males' on air, a biological definition of gendered terms which has since been supported by a Supreme Court ruling. Last year the Migration Observatory in Oxford urged the BBC to better reflect the public views on immigration. The organisation claimed that some BBC journalists were anxious that reporting on concerns about migration could appear 'hostile' to migrants. It comes after the BBC backed Martine Croxall, the news presenter, when she corrected her script from 'pregnant people' to 'women' live on-air. The UK Supreme Court ruling in April was said to have encouraged staff to speak up for women. Earlier this month, BBC bosses met to discuss how best to rebuild trust with Right-leaning audiences. This followed Reform UK's success in the local elections, and immigration becoming a key political issue after both legal and illegal migration reached record highs. BBC staff have been told in fresh guidance that they should be aware that 'opinion may change over time', and to try to accurately reflect altered public opinion in their coverage However, guidance makes clear that while the consensus should be questioned and not presumed, fringe opinions do not need to be given the same weight as viewpoints that are backed up by greater evidence. The new editorial guidelines, updated roughly every five years, have been welcomed by Tim Davie, the director-general. He said that they would 'provide editorial values and standards that make the BBC distinctive and reliable'. He added in a foreword: 'The BBC is committed to freedom of expression but this doesn't mean that anything goes. In a world of misinformation and disinformation, the BBC's editorial values of accuracy, impartiality and fairness are more crucial than ever. 'So too, in the context of the ugliness of much social media, is the fundamental decency embodied in sections like Harm and Offence or Children and Young People.' These sections continue to warn staff to be mindful of broadcasting views that could be considered offensive, and to ensure there are appropriate content warnings on iPlayer. Reflecting the emergence of new technology, the guidance also contains new rules on the use of AI. One new rule stipulates: 'A senior editorial figure must be responsible and accountable for overseeing the deployment and continuing use of any AI. 'They should seek advice from Editorial Policy, who may consult the AI Risk Advisory Group, before any decision to deploy the AI.'
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The gun-toting Palestine Action activist who says ‘resistance is not terrorism'
An Al-Yassin 105 is an anti-armour missile developed by Hamas. Named after the terrorist group's spiritual leader, Ahmed Yassin, it was first used in October 2023 against the Israeli army following the October 7 attacks. A powerful weapon, it was reportedly based on a Russian rocket and modified by Hamas to go from an armoured vehicle destroyer to be able to destroy the Israeli Merkava tank. Strange, then, to find its name co-opted on social media by a man called Paul from Dumfries. It's less incongruous, however, when you delve a little deeper and find an interest in both weaponry and pro-Palestine activism that appears to extend beyond an Instagram handle. Paul Shortt is a Scottish activist and member of Palestine Action, the group which now stands to be proscribed as a terrorist group. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said on Monday she would lay an order to make support for the group illegal before Parliament next week. It was reported this week that he has previously posed with a gun. The Times published a picture which had been posted on Shortt's Instagram. It appeared to show his finger on the trigger. Seeming to invoke the Hamas missile by using the handle @yassin105_73, Shortt wrote: 'Resistance is not terrorism! Resistance is justified. When people are occupied. Resist! By any means necessary.' Shortt, who bears a tattoo of a red triangle on his middle finger – a symbol often used by groups such as Hamas – posted photographs wearing a shirt in the colours of the Palestinian flag and holding a pistol across his chest, the paper reported. In another photo, posted in March, he appears to hold a gun over a keffiyeh. Over the post a song called Intifada plays, the lyrics of which include a reference to 'a fascist settler entity on a killing spree'. The track is by the rapper Lowkey, who has been criticised by Sir William Shawcross, whose independent review of the Prevent counterterrorism scheme alleged his lyrics promoted 'what I regard to be an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory about the 'Zionist lobby''. Shortt's Instagram account is listed as no longer available and it is not clear whether the gun in either photograph is real or an imitation. But whether or not he was indeed holding a weapon, the posts seem to send a clear message: when it comes to this brand of activism, violence is part of the process. Direct action Shortt certainly seems to have proved himself to be a useful foot soldier for Palestine Action. The group prides itself on direct action – last week, two of its members broke into RAF Brize Norton under the cover of darkness, damaging two military aircraft in a major breach of national security – and its supporters have been imprisoned for their activism, which has included targeting banks, universities and insurance firms. For his part, Shortt received a suspended 23-month sentence last year for property damage and burglary. Then 50 and living on the outskirts of Dumfries, it was a conviction he earned alongside several other campaigners from the group. On May 15 2022, he was one of seven activists who broke into the Bristol HQ of Elbit Systems UK, an international defence technology company. Palestine Action claims Elbit supplies equipment to the Israeli army; in court, the company denied this. Shortt and his fellow protesters used sledgehammers to smash windows and barricaded themselves in. They caused thousands of pounds worth of damage and spray-painted walls and windows. Lord Walney, who was the last government's independent adviser on political violence and disruption and was commissioned to conduct a review on the subject, recommended banning Palestine Action in 2024. He says there has been 'an edge of militant violent menace with Palestine Action's activities for a number of years'. Having the group proscribed is 'overdue', he tells The Telegraph. As for the photograph, which appears to show Shortt holding a gun: 'It's a shocking image that clearly depicts a violent threat and it demonstrates that Palestine Action are trying to deceive people when they say that they are a harmless non-violent organisation.' It's an image which might shock ordinary people, and it is behaviour like this which has led to politicians from both sides of the house to call for the group to be proscribed. But banning it has historically been difficult because 'the bar for full terrorist proscription is set very high', adds Lord Walney. 'You can have an organisation like this progressing for years, committing acts that fall under the definition of terrorism, they're dealt with through counter-terror police, but the system has judged thus far that you need an extremely high level of evidence for that full terror proscription.' Twin causes Shortt, 52, has tattooed the cause he is fighting for on his body. A big black tattoo extends from his wrist to his elbow – a filled-in map of the area in the region which some say should be Palestine and which includes the state of Israel. The Times reported he had also posted pictures of pro-Israel campaigners with red triangles over them – the symbol which has come to denote Hamas's targets. On X, an account which appears to belong to Shortt, bearing the same handle – @Yassin105_73 – has the Palestinian flag, the flag of Lebanon and the Saltire in the bio, along with two red arrows. 'Join the resistance,' he writes, with a link to join Palestine Action Scotland. There are also links to direct action training days, a Zoom link to join a 'crash course' on direct action, and to support funds for Palestine Action members who are on trial or who have been imprisoned. The profile picture is a man in a black and white balaclava with a keffiyeh print. The geolocation has him not in Dumfries but in 'Occupied Scotland'. Scottish independence appears to be a twin cause for Shortt. Last year, he appeared to comment under a post by Reform UK MP Lee Anderson using the hashtag '#SNLA', the acronym often used by the so-called Scottish National Liberation Army, a paramilitary group nicknamed the Tartan Terrorists. The group fell by the wayside in the early 2000s after being condemned by the UK government and the SNP. While many have come to pro-Palestine activism by way of Extinction Rebellion, Shortt's campaigning seems to dovetail with his alliance with his home country. 'I'm Scottish, I know about colonialism, I know about land grabs, about ethnic cleansing,' he told The Electronic Intifada ahead of his sentencing last year. 'We used to do supposedly 'democratic' protests, it just didn't work. Direct action was the only way.' To an observer scrolling back through the X account, he seems to display a consistent hatred for 'Zionists'. 'You're a Zionist, not a Jew,' he appeared to say in a post addressed to television presenter Rachel Riley in November 2023. Last year, he seemingly published what he called the 'Zionist modus operandi' – namely 'murder, torture, rape, steal'. On the day of the October 7 attacks, the account posted a cartoon with a red fist breaking out of chains emblazoned with the Israeli flag. 'Long live the resistance. From Scotland to Gaza.' A day later, the account posted a picture of Shortt raising his tattooed arm and making a fist against the backdrop of a Palestinian flag. Hours later, it also posted an image of the Israeli flag with the word 'Terrorism' across it in red lettering. More recently, the account which appears to belong to Shortt has focused on retweeting inflammatory posts. A video of students at the University of Manchester shows people protesting 'UoM's complicity in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians'. Another shows a woman crying after losing her house in Tel Aviv. The post retweeted by Shortt reads: 'Zero empathy. If you don't wanna lose your house, don't live on stolen lands where you pay tax to a genocidal regime.' History of activism Shortt's activism doesn't appear to have always been quite so aggressive. In 2018, he wrote a letter which was published in Scottish newspaper The National. 'Are we to leave the Palestinians to stand alone, as they fight for their freedom and basic human rights in their own land?' he wrote. 'We, as a country, as people of conscience, have a duty to build and implement effective and immediate solidarity with Palestine. As Desmond Tutu said: 'If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.'' He signed it: Paul Shortt, Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign (Dumfries). In 2021, he appears to have signed a letter sent to Arlene Foster, then first minister of Northern Ireland, about a doctor and Scottish Palestinian activist who was imprisoned in Northern Ireland during the pandemic and was suffering with health problems. Since then, there is little trace of Shortt under his real name online, save for a photograph posted on Facebook last year by a clothing brand that makes Palestine football shirts. 'Paul K Shortt repping the new Toro Sportivo Saoirse Edition shirt', the post says. 'Paul who is part of Palestine Action Scotland commented 'beats any football shirt I've ever worn!'' Meanwhile, a picture of Shortt shows him looking sternly into the camera, his bicep flexed, his tattoo on full show.
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Schoolgirl 'raped' at underpass as she walked at night: Police launch manhunt for attacker
A schoolgirl has reportedly been raped at an underpass after walking in the area at night. The Metropolitan Police has launched a manhunt for the attacker after their officers assisted the victim, 15, at the scene in east London on Sunday night. They were called to St Edmund's Way, Romford after reports of a rape and arrived there at 11.36pm. The teenager is currently being treated by specialist officers and a crime scene remains in place. A Met Police spokesperson said: 'We understand the concern this has caused in the community and people can expect to see an increased police presence in the area. 'No arrests have been made at this early stage. An investigation has been launched and anyone who has information that may assist police is asked to call 101 quoting CAD 8238/22June.' Councillor David Taylor of Havering Council, meanwhile, said on Facebook: 'I am devastated by the news, which will leave many women feeling afraid to walk alone in our town and I pray for justice for the woman assaulted.' No arrests have been made and police enquiries continue.
