Union Pacific to reshape US freight rail with $85 billion deal for Norfolk
If approved, the deal would be the largest ever buyout in the sector and combine Union Pacific's stronghold in the western two-thirds of the United States with Norfolk's 19,500-mile network that primarily spans 22 eastern states.
The two railroads are expected to have a combined enterprise value of $250 billion and would unlock about $2.75 billion in annualized synergies, the companies said.
The $320-per-share price implies a premium of 18.6% for Norfolk from its close on July 17, when reports of the merger first emerged.
The companies said on Thursday they were in advanced discussions for a possible merger.
The deal will face lengthy regulatory scrutiny amid union concerns over potential rate increases, service disruptions and job losses. The 1996 merger of Union Pacific and Southern Pacific had temporarily led to severe congestion and delays across the Southwest.
The deal reflects a shift in antitrust enforcement under U.S. President Donald Trump's administration. Executive orders aimed at removing barriers to consolidation have opened the door to mergers that were previously considered unlikely.
Surface Transportation Board Chairman Patrick Fuchs, appointed in January, has advocated for faster preliminary reviews and a more flexible approach to merger conditions.
Even under an expedited process, the review could take from 19 to 22 months, according to a person involved in the discussions.
Major railroad unions have long opposed consolidation, arguing that such mergers threaten jobs and risk disrupting rail service.
"We will weigh in with the STB (regulator) and with the Trump administration in every way possible," said Jeremy Ferguson, president of the SMART-TD union's transport division, after the two companies said they were in advanced talks last week.
"This merger is not good for labor, the rail shipper/customer or the public at large," he said. The SMART-TD union's transport division is North America's largest railroad operating union with more than 1,800 railroad yardmasters.
The companies said they expect to file their application with the STB within six months.
The North American rail industry has been grappling with volatile freight volumes, rising labor and fuel costs and growing pressure from shippers over service reliability, factors that could further complicate the merger.
Union Pacific and Norfolk's shares were down about 3% each.
The proposed deal had also prompted competitors BNSF, owned by Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa.N), opens new tab, and CSX (CSX.O), opens new tab, to explore merger options, people familiar with the matter said.
The Union Pacific merger would create a railroad with the largest market share across most commodities, according to Jason Miller, interim chair of the department of supply-chain management at Michigan State University's business college.
"I can't help but think this would create pressure for BNSF Railway and CSX to explore a merger possibility."
Agents at the STB are already conducting preparatory work, anticipating they could soon receive not just one, but two megamerger proposals, a person close to the discussions told Reuters on Thursday.
If both mergers are approved, the number of Class I railroads in North America would shrink to four from six, consolidating major freight routes and boosting pricing power for the industry.
The Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen raised concerns over safety, transparency, and employee treatment after the deal announcement, saying it would push for safeguards as regulators review the deal.
The last major deal in the industry was the $31 billion merger of Canadian Pacific (CP.TO), opens new tab and Kansas City Southern that created the first and only single-line rail network connecting Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.
That deal, finalized in 2023, faced heavy regulatory resistance over fears it would curb competition, cut jobs and disrupt service, but was ultimately approved.
Union Pacific is valued at nearly $136 billion, while Norfolk Southern has a market capitalization of about $65 billion, according to data from LSEG.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump tariffs: India has 20 days to avoid 50% levies - what are its options?
India has unexpectedly become a key target in Washington's latest push to pressure Russia over the Ukraine Wednesday, Donald Trump doubled US tariffs on India to 50%, up from 25%, penalising Delhi for purchasing Russian oil - a move India called "unfair" and "unjustified". The tariffs aim to cut Russia's oil revenues and force Putin into a ceasefire. The new rate will come into effect in 21 days, so on 27 makes India the most heavily taxed US trading partner in Asia and places it alongside Brazil, another nation facing steep US tariffs amid tense insists its imports are driven by market factors and vital to its energy security, but the tariffs threaten to hit Indian exports and growth all of India's $86.5bn [£64.7bn] in annual goods exports to the US stand to become commercially unviable if these rates sustain. Most Indian exporters have said they can barely absorb a 10-15% rise, so a combined 50% tariff is far beyond their effective, the tariff would be similar to "a trade embargo, and will lead to a sudden stop in affected export products," Japanese brokerage firm Nomura said in a note. The US is India's top export market, making up 18% of exports and 2.2% of GDP. A 25% tariff could cut GDP by 0.2–0.4%, risking growth slipping below 6% this year. India's electronics and pharma exports remain exempt from additional tariffs for now, but the impact would be felt in India domestically "with labour-intensive exports like textiles and gems and jewelry taking the fall", Priyanka Kishore of Asia Decoded, a Singapore-based consultancy told the BBC. Rakesh Mehra of Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (Citi) called the tariffs a "huge setback" for India's textile exporters, saying they will sharply weaken competitiveness in the US tensions now escalating, experts have called Trump's decision a high-stakes gamble. India is not the only buyer of Russian oil - there are China and Turkey as well - yet Washington has chosen to target a country widely regarded as a key what changed and what could be the fallout? India's former central bank governor Urjit Patel said that India's "worst fears" have materialised with the recent announcement. "One hopes that this is short term, and that talks around a trade deal slated to make progress this month will go ahead. Otherwise, a needless trade war, whose contours are difficult to gauge at this early juncture, will likely ensue," Mr Patel wrote in a LinkedIn post. The damaging impact of the tariffs is why few expect them to last. With new rates starting 27 August, the next 20 days are critical - India's moves in this bargaining window will be closely watched by anxious key question is whether Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government will quietly abandon trading ties with Russia to avoid the "Russia penalty" or stand firm against the US."India's efforts to reduce its dependence on Russian military hardware and diversify its oil imports predate pressure from the Trump administration, so Delhi may be able to offer some conciliatory gestures in line with its existing foreign policy behaviour," according to Dr Chietigj Bajpaee of Chatham House. He says the relationship is in a "managed decline", losing Cold War-era strategic importance, but Russia will remain a key partner for India for the foreseeable some experts believe Trump's recent actions give India an opportunity to rethink its strategic ties. If anything the US's actions could "push India to reconsider its strategic alignment, deepening ties with Russia, China, and many other countries", says Ajay Srivastava of the the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), a Delhi-based think will visit China for the regional Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit - his first since the deadly 2020 Galwan border clashes. Some suggest a revival of India-Russia-China trilateral talks may be on the immediate focus is on August trade talks, as a US team visits India. Negotiations stalled earlier over agriculture and dairy - sectors where the US demands greater access, but India holds there be concessions in areas like dairy and farming that India has been staunchly protecting or could the political cost be too high?The other big question: What's next for India's rising appeal as a China-plus-one destination for nations and firms looking to diversify their supply chains and investments?Trump's tariffs risk slowing momentum as countries like Vietnam offer lower tariffs. Experts say the impact on investor sentiment may be limited. India is still courting firms like Apple, which makes a big chunk of its phones locally, and has been largely shielded since semiconductors aren't taxed under the new tariffs. Experts will also be watching what India does to support its exporters."India's government so far has not favoured direct subsidies to exporters, but its current proposed programmes of favourable trade financing and export promotion may not be enough to tackle the impact of such a wide tariff differential," according to stakes high, trade experts say only top-level diplomacy can revive a trade deal that seemed within reach just weeks now the Indian government has put up a strong front, saying it will take "all actions necessary to protect its national interests". The opposition has upped the ante with senior Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi calling Trump's 50% tariffs "economic blackmail" and "an attempt to bully India into an unfair trade deal".Is Modi's touted "mega partnership" with the US now his biggest foreign policy test? And will India hit back?Retaliation by India is unlikely but not impossible, says Barclays Research, because there is precedent."In 2019, India announced tariffs on 28 US products, including US apples and almonds, in response to the US tariffs on steel and aluminium. Some of these tariffs were eventually reversed in 2023, following the resolution of WTO disputes," Barclays Research said in a note. Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.
Economist
28 minutes ago
- Economist
Duty regime: America's consumers will foot the tariff bill
As yet another tranche of Donald Trump's tariffs takes effect, we look at why the duties might outlast him—and how American consumers will ultimately shoulder the trade war's costs. Our correspondent visits US Space Command, which is preparing for a new age of combat in the heavens. And Gen Z's obsession with big, personalised water bottles.
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Germany's auto association says EU-US trade deal must take effect now
BERLIN, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Germany's VDA auto association said on Thursday that the promised trade agreement between the EU and the United States needed to be implemented now so the industry could receive some relief. Sectoral tariffs of 27.5% "remain in place and place a significant burden on German automakers and automotive suppliers, as well as on transatlantic trade," said VDA President Hildegard Mueller in a press release. The EU Commission and German government must vigorously advocate for the U.S. to withdraw sectoral tariffs, she said. A source familiar with the EU-U.S. negotiations had said on Wednesday that the EU will likely have to wait a few more days for an executive order by U.S. President Donald Trump.
