Penn State board backs plan to close 7 campuses, saying low enrollment, financials leave no other choice
Penn State's Board of Trustees approved the closure of seven campuses Thursday, putting into motion a process that will impact thousands of students and more than 500 employees.
Citing declining enrollments and financial challenges, the university will close the DuBois, Fayette, Mont Alto, New Kensington, Shenango, Wilkes-Barre, and York locations after May 2027.
Ahead of the vote, President Neeli Bendapudi told the board that closing the locations was a strategic and humane decision.
'We are spreading our students, faculty, and staff so thin that we jeopardize the quality of education and the support that we can offer,' Bendapudi said. 'We are subsidizing decline at the expense of growth.'
The board passed the president's closure plan by a vote of 25 to 8.
Trustees Ted Brown, Donald Cairns, Lynn Dietrich, Barry Fenchak, Chris Hoffman, Anthony Lubrano, Jay Paterno, and Nicholas Rowland voted against the measure. The three state secretaries on Penn State's board — Cynthia Dunn, secretary of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources; Carrie Rowe, acting secretary of education; and Russell Redding, secretary of agriculture — did not attend the meeting due to a perceived conflict of interest, said board Chair David Kleppinger.
Multiple trustees said this was a difficult, but necessary decision for Penn State's future.
The move brings some finality to months of uncertainty and consternation among university officials and employees. Under Bendapudi, Penn State made steep budget cuts to its statewide system, centralized leadership and administrative positions, and paid some employees to leave. However, internal documents obtained by Spotlight PA suggest those moves did not stem financial losses at the campuses.
In February, the university began to review closing up to 12 of its 20 statewide campuses. Some faculty bristled at the perceived lack of transparency from the administration about the factors and data informing which locations it chose to review. Initially, Penn State said Bendapudi would decide which campuses to close. Then, in April, the university announced the governing board would approve the closure plan.
Leading up to Thursday's vote, some trustees challenged Penn State's reasons and goals for shutting down locations. Hundreds of people signed an open letter to trustees asking them to consider other options for the campuses.
Earlier this month, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported the list of seven campuses the president wanted to close. Spotlight PA obtained nearly 250 pages of internal Penn State records, including the full text of the university's recommendation and related materials informing the board's private discussions.
Those records revealed Bendapudi envisions a Penn State that is more regionalized and that maintains the campuses with the largest enrollments, those in areas with growing populations, and ones that generate revenue or are near self-sustaining. The campuses Bendapudi recommended for closure did not meet these criteria. Following Spotlight PA's story, Penn State publicly shared the recommendation report.
Kleppinger, the board chair, said trustees met privately for nearly four hours in two executive sessions this month to answer dozens of trustee questions on Bendapudi's plan. Transparency advocates have questioned the board's use of executive sessions to restrict public access to those gatherings. Melissa Melewsky — media counsel for the Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association, of which Spotlight PA is a member — said that closing campuses was 'the exact type of discussion that should be happening amongst the board at a public meeting.' A former university trustee wrote in StateCollege.com this week that someone living locally should take legal action against the board for one of its private gatherings.
Thursday afternoon was the first time trustees discussed the topic at a public meeting. For more than an hour, some trustees applauded the university for taking action on the topic, while others voiced concern with how the closure plan would be implemented or whether the administration considered other options.
'This is a decision that's been facing us for decades, and we're finally getting to it,' said Naren Gursahaney, a trustee representing business and industry. 'And I see no upside to waiting at this stage. I think the sooner we move forward, the sooner we can impact this … and avoid having to make the false tradeoffs we've had to make over those last 15 to 20 years.'
Rowland, the academic trustee, said he would've liked to see more creative solutions. 'Voting to close these campuses is more than a fiduciary decision. I think it's a statement,' he said. 'It's a statement about who we are. It's a statement about who we choose to serve and who we're going to leave behind.'
The board's Thursday meeting was held on Zoom without an in-person component, a practice legal experts had previously said could run afoul of Pennsylvania's open meetings law. If the gathering's legality was challenged in court, a judge could overturn any decision made at the meeting.
Kleppinger said trustees received hundreds of emails ahead of Thursday's vote. Additionally, more than 150 people submitted written public comments to the board, with most asking the board to reconsider the proposal and sharing their experiences at Penn State's various locations. Bendapudi said passion does not change reality. 'Maintaining the status quo is not sustainable,' she said.
The internal records previously obtained by Spotlight PA say that Penn State does not anticipate political or financial fallout from the decision. The university also does not think the hundreds of millions of dollars it receives each year in taxpayer funds, now under consideration, are in jeopardy.
In a press conference following the meeting, alumni-elected trustee Jay Paterno said that, under Pennsylvania law, the state secretary of education must also approve the closure plan.
and help us reinvigorate local news in north-central Pennsylvania at spotlightpa.org/donate. Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability and public-service journalism that gets results.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
6 days ago
- USA Today
Penn State's poll rankings point to college football parity
Without definitive explicit evidence, the US LBM coaches poll and preseason AP Poll have both revealed their thoughts on parity in college football. Penn State could certainly be at the center of this case study. After being considered a potential candidate for the no. 1 overall ranking in both polls, the voting systems and discussions surrounding how deep college football is this season may have altered their preseason perception. At least enough to anger fans and cause debate among analysts on whether or not the topic of parity has gained real momentum within the college football landscape. Consider the fact that the Nittany Lions were just two first-place votes behind the Texas Longhorns in the AP poll but still lost out to them because of the overall point system. While the Longhorns garnered 1,552 overall points, the Nittany Lions only had 1547 points, coming up just sort in a system that proves that there are so many votes that can go around to the best teams. In the coaches poll, at least the discrepancy was larger as first-ranked Texas garnered 28 first place votes to second-ranked Ohio State's 20, but the AP poll had the benefit of time on its side. This begs the question: would both polls have looked similar had they come out around the same time? Penn State's ranking certainly lends itself to more intrigue surrounding that question. After all, being perhaps the most experienced of the top 5 teams in both polls, would it not make more sense that given more time for decision-making, voters believed in them more for the AP poll over the coaches poll? Or is it just because the AP poll has more room for more votes, therefore inflating ANY team's chance of higher rankings and more votes? Penn State are not the only team that may have either benefitted or have been slighted once the AP poll came around. Consider the Big 12 where because of their highly spilt vote share, Arizona State found themselves outside of the top 10. Meanwhile, teams such as Michigan or South Carolina, who have a lot of faith from pundits, yet still have more questions than answers in their squad, have benefitted highly from the split committee, remaining squarely in the top 15. Overall, while many teams can make the case that parity will be the key to this college football season, Penn State's tenuous rankings tell the average fan a lot about how what many consider the best team in college football can both fall victim to and benefit from baffled voters. While fans may be displeased now, there may be a myriad number of chances for the Nittany Lions to prove themselves on the field. What these preseason poll rankings most importantly offer us is a chance for this college football season to be much more unpredictable than previously imagined.
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
State College area restaurant temporarily closed after vehicle crashes into dining room
A State College area restaurant remains temporarily closed after a vehicle crashed into its dining room early Tuesday morning, causing the owners to joke that a new drive-thru doesn't seem like a good fit. Bonfire Old Fashioned BBQ, located about a mile from Nittany Mall, was forced to close its doors Tuesday after a car wrecked through the front of its brick building around 2 a.m. The College Township restaurant posted photos of the crash on its Facebook account, showing a dining room filled with knocked-over tables and chairs next to piles of bricks. The vehicle appeared to be in one piece. But the front-right wheel was missing, based on photos. No one was in the restaurant at the time of the crash, a co-owner told the Centre Daily Times. The driver also did not suffer serious injuries and is not under suspicion of operating the vehicle under the influence of drugs or alcohol, according to State College police. 'They just lost control,' Lt. Ted Hubler told the CDT. 'The investigation is ongoing.' Andrea Murray, one of the co-owners, said the restaurant will remain closed until it receives approval to reopen from the food inspector, county code enforcement and others. So, for now, that means the restaurant remains closed for both takeout and dining in. No immediate timeline for reopening was available. But Murray said updates would be posted on their Facebook page, and they hoped to offer a tentative idea of their reopening later Tuesday. 'Right now, we're just worried about cleaning up,' Murray added. According to Murray, worried customers have been calling the business since 6 a.m. — and Murray has been dilligently answering the phone to respond to whatever questions she can. She said longtime customers have been stopping throughout the day to check on the business, and that's meant a lot. 'Everyone's been reaching out, and we all appreciate everyone asking if we're all right,' Murray said. 'Definitely makes it feel like Bonfire's a family. And I really appreciate my Bonfire family.' Updates to the status of Bonfire Old Fashioned BBQ (2609 E. College Ave.) can be found at Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
11-08-2025
- Yahoo
Trump administration seeks more Pa. voter information, raises potential legal concerns
This article is made possible through Spotlight PA's collaboration with Votebeat, a nonpartisan news organization covering local election administration and voting. Sign up for Votebeat Pennsylvania's free newsletters here. The U.S. Justice Department is asking Pennsylvania to turn over its complete voter rolls, a request that appears to encompass voters' personal information, including Social Security and driver's license numbers. The request, which Pennsylvania officials received in a letter this week, is part of a recent push to get states to turn over voter registration information, which the federal government says is aimed at enforcing election law. But one expert told Votebeat and Spotlight PA that the federal government is likely asking for more information than it needs, and that it would be potentially illegal for states to turn over this kind of personal data. The letter, sent to Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmidt on Aug. 4, was first reported by The Philadelphia Inquirer. It asks the state for a copy of its voter rolls — which it had not requested in its previous communications with Pennsylvania about election security — as well as information on the state's answer to a survey about election administration. 'We write to you as the chief election official for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to 'Request information regarding the Commonwealth's procedures for complying with the statewide voter registration list maintenance provisions of the National Voter Registration Act,' the letter said. Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School in California and former civil rights official in the Justice Department, said he thinks the request oversteps the federal government's authority. The letter cites the National Voter Registration Act, which provides for voter registration information to be public. But the law doesn't say that 'all fields' in the voter rolls can be made public, as the letter requests. Pennsylvania's voter rolls are available online and can be downloaded for $20, although that version does not contain personal information such as driver's license and Social Security numbers. Levitt noted that courts have repeatedly ruled that the law doesn't require the release of private information. Levitt said the Justice Department doesn't need specific voters' information, as the letter requests, to ensure that states are complying with the NVRA. 'Knowing whether or not Justin Levitt is on the rolls and Justin Levitt's Social Security number tells you nothing about whether a state has a general program of list maintenance,' he said. The Justice Department recently sued Orange County, California, in part for redacting driver's license and Social Security numbers in responding to a department request for voter registration information. Releasing those parts of the voter rolls has also been met with legal resistance in the past in Pennsylvania, based on privacy concerns. Levitt said another issue with the letter is that the department has not disclosed publicly or to Congress why it is seeking this data, which it is required to do under the Privacy Act of 1974. In a statement to Votebeat and Spotlight PA, Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for civil rights, said clean voter rolls and election safeguards are 'requisites for free, fair, and transparent elections.' 'The DOJ Civil Rights Division has a statutory mandate to enforce our federal voting rights laws, and ensuring the voting public's confidence in the integrity of our elections is a top priority of this administration,' the statement said. The letter from federal officials also seeks information about some answers from Pennsylvania to the Election Administration and Voting Survey. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission conducts that survey of election officials every two years to collect data on various aspects of election administration, including list maintenance. Previously reported communications between the Justice Department and Pennsylvania did not mention EAVS data, but the Aug. 4 letter asks Schmidt to explain the state's survey responses, including why it reported fewer-than-average duplicate registrations and why so few voter registration applications came from military recruitment offices. Additionally the letter asks for the voting history of any noncitizen, person with felony conviction, or individual deemed incompetent who was removed from the rolls since the 2022 midterm election. The letter asked the Department of State to respond within 14 days. As of Thursday evening, a spokesperson for the department said it had not yet responded. Carter Walker is a reporter for Votebeat in partnership with Spotlight PA. Contact Carter at cwalker@ Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
