
Congress MP Renuka Chowdhury moves Rule 267 notice in Rajya Sabha, seeks discussion on SIR in Bihar
MP
Renuka Chowdhury
on Friday morning moved a notice under Rule 267 in
Rajya Sabha
, demanding suspension of house business to discuss the Special Intensive Revision (
SIR
) exercise being carried out by the Election Commission (EC) in
Bihar
ahead of the upcoming assembly elections.
Chowdhury expressed concerns that the ongoing voter list revision drive in Bihar poses a "risk of disenfranchising millions" and raised questions about the "fairness" of the process due to "opaque guidelines."
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Healthcare
Artificial Intelligence
Degree
PGDM
Digital Marketing
Leadership
Design Thinking
Product Management
Finance
MBA
Data Science
Data Analytics
Public Policy
Others
Technology
Data Science
Operations Management
others
CXO
Cybersecurity
Management
MCA
healthcare
Project Management
Skills you'll gain:
Financial Analysis in Healthcare
Financial Management & Investing
Strategic Management in Healthcare
Process Design & Analysis
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Certificate Program in Healthcare Management
Starts on
Jun 13, 2024
Get Details
According to the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of State (Rajya Sabha), MPs can give a notice under Rule 267 to suspend all listed business and discuss various burning issues.
"This exercise poses a significant risk of disenfranchising millions, especially migrant workers, students, and economically vulnerable groups, who face insurmountable challenges in meeting the stringent documentation requirements. The lack of adequate documentation, particularly for those living in flood-prone or remote areas, makes it impossible for these citizens to prove their eligibility and could lead to mass exclusion from the
electoral rolls
," the notice read.
"The opaque guidelines for this exercise raise serious doubts about its fairness. There's a growing fear that this revision could be a disguised citizenship test, further marginalising the poor and vulnerable who already face significant socio-economic challenges. This threatens to strip citizens of their constitutional right to vote, disproportionately affecting communities in rural, border, and migrant-heavy areas, whose electoral participation is essential for a functioning Democracy," it added.
Live Events
Congress Rajya Sabha MP Akhilesh Prasad Singh on Friday gave a Suspension of Business notice under Rule 267 and demanded a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists in Bihar.
The INDIA bloc has flagged the Bihar SIR in the
monsoon session of the Parliament
and demanded a discussion. The Opposition also staged a protest outside the Parliament on Thursday.
Yesterday, proceedings in both houses of Parliament were adjourned for the day amid protests by the opposition, demanding a discussion on SIR in Bihar.
The Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill was being discussed in the Rajya Sabha when MP Bhubaneshwar Kalita, chairing the House, adjourned it following sloganeering by the Opposition, who were protesting against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voter list in Bihar.
Krishna Prasad Tenneti, chairing the
Lok Sabha
, adjourned the House amidst the ruckus by the Opposition during a discussion on the Readjustment of Representation of Scheduled Tribes in Assembly Constituencies of the State of Goa Bill, 2024.
On the fifth day of the Monsoon Session, the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha will reconvene on Friday at 11 am.
Expressing the Opposition's views on the issue, Congress General Secretary KC Venugopal accused the EC of being "biased" in its conduct of the SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the upcoming assembly elections.
The Congress MP also criticised the Union government, claiming it had failed to take its own members into confidence over the SIR process, and warned that the exercise could prove to be a "disaster" for the country.
"The government cannot even convince their own members, even they are saying this exercise is going to be a big disaster for democracy.
ECI
is completely biased. This is what the country is witnessing now," Venugopal told ANI.
The Monsoon Session of the Parliament began on July 21 and will continue till August 21.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
SC to hear pleas challenging Bihar electoral roll revision on August 12, 13; says ‘will step in if there is mass exclusion'
The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will hear on August 12 and 13 pleas related to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voters' list being carried out by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in Bihar and sought to assure petitioners who challenged the process that 'if there is mass exclusion, we will step in'. Hearing the matter on Monday, a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, while refusing to stop the ECI from publishing the draft revised list, had asked the parties to inform it on Tuesday how much time they will take to make their submissions so that the court can fix a date. As the court took up the matter on Tuesday, Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the ECI, submitted that the draft has been advertised and given to political parties. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) MP Manoj Jha, said those who have been left out must have a chance to submit objections. 'They will have the right. Who said they won't?' Justice Kant said, adding, 'The moment they deviate from the notification, we will interfere.' To this, Sibal said, 'We don't know who has been left,' and asked if the ECI had given the names of those excluded. Dwivedi replied, 'It won't be given to you. Take from the website.' Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioner Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), submitted that according to the ECI, 65 lakh people have not submitted the enumeration forms as they are either dead or have permanently shifted elsewhere. Contending that those excluded will have to apply afresh, he wondered how they will come to know whether they are in the draft. Justice Kant said that the ECI is a constitutional body and 'we would deem their action will be in accordance with the law.' He assured that the court is there to take care of any concern. 'We are here, we will hear you,' he stated. Justice Bagchi said, 'January 2025 list is the starting point if there was no SIR. Draft list will be published by ECI. Your apprehension is 65 lakh-odd voters will not feature… They (ECI) are seeking correction vis-a-vis 2025 entry. We are overviewing the thing as a judicial authority. If there is mass exclusion, we will step in. Bring 15 people saying they are alive but left out.' The ECI counsel, however, said there is a 30-day window for filing objections and that the petitioners should help with adding names. Justice Kant stated that political parties should operate like NGOs during the process. Sibal said the petitioners will have no problem if the ECI mentions who were excluded. Justice Kant then said, 'If the draft list is conspicuously silent, you will bring (it) to our attention.' Dwivedi said the final number would be made public only after the objections are considered. 'Once objections are considered, a real picture would come as to who has been excluded. At least by September 15, we are expecting (the final list),' he added.


The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Gogoi's Parliament speech proves he acts on behalf of Pakistan: Himanta
Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Tuesday (July 29, 2025) claimed that Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi's speech in Parliament "proved beyond doubt that he acts on behalf of Pakistan". Mr. Sarma alleged that with Mr. Gogoi's wife and both kids having foreign citizenship, he can leave India any time. "Speech delivered by our MP from Jorhat in Parliament yesterday proved beyond doubt that he acts on behalf of Pakistan. His secret trip and close ties with the Pakistani establishment speak volumes," the CM posted on X. speech delivered by our MP from Jorhat in Parliament yesterday proved beyond doubt that he acts on behalf of Pakistan. His secret trip and close ties with the Pakistani establishment speak volumes. With his wife and both the kids holding foreign citizenship, he can leave India… — Himanta Biswa Sarma (@himantabiswa) July 29, 2025 "He is a disgrace to Assam and a betrayal of our pride as proud (sic) Indians," he added. Gogoi, during a debate on Operation Sindoor in Parliament on Monday, had criticised Defence Minister Rajnath Singh for allegedly failing to answer basic questions about the April 22 Pahalgam attack. He had also questioned the government's alleged silence over internal security lapses and the origin of the Pahalgam attack that claimed the lives of 26 people. The CM has been attacking Gogoi for months, alleging that his wife Elizabeth Colburn has a connection with Pakistan's spy agency ISI.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
Voter number, guns, chocolate…: Amit Shah lists proofs Pahalgam terrorists were Pakistanis
Amit Shah rebutted P Chidambaram's claim that the Pahalgam terrorists could be 'homegrown', saying in Parliament that there is clear proof, including voter IDs and rifles, linking them to Pakistan. read more Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Monday hit out at Congress leader P Chidambaram over his recent remarks questioning the identity of the Pahalgam attackers, asserting that India has irrefutable proof that the terrorists killed in the operation were from Pakistan. Speaking in Parliament debate on Operation Sindoor, Shah said the government had concrete evidence, including Pakistani voter ID numbers, rifles, cartridges, and even Pakistan-made chocolates, linking the April 22 Pahalgam terror attackers to Pakistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'NIA had already arrested those who gave them shelter. Those who fed them were detained. When the terrorists' dead bodies reached Srinagar, they were identified as the three people who carried out the terror attack in Pahalgam. The FSL report of the cartridges from the terror attack was already ready. Yesterday, the rifles of the three terrorists were seized and matched with the FSL reports. Further tests were carried out in Chandigarh yesterday, after that it was confirmed that these three were those who carried out the terror attack,' Shah told the House. VIDEO | Parliament Monsoon Session: Union Home Minister Amit Shah (@AmitShah) during debate on Operation Sindoor says, "I was pained yesterday when former Home Minister P Chidambaram raised the question that what was the proof that the Pahalgam terrorists came from Pakistan? What… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) July 29, 2025 Hitting out at Chidambaram directly, Shah said, 'Yesterday, Chidambaram ji raised the question, what proof is there that the terrorists came from Pakistan? This question was raised just before the discussion was to take place in Parliament. I ask, what will you gain by protecting Pakistan?' We have their voter IDs..: Amit Shah He further accused the former Home Minister of giving a 'clean chit' to Pakistan, 'I want to tell Chidambaram ji that we have proof , those involved in this attack were from Pakistan. We have their voter ID numbers, and the rifles and cartridges used were made in Pakistan. The former Home Minister of this country is giving Pakistan a clean chit in front of the entire world.' Pahalgam attackers could be 'homegrown terrorists': Chidambaram The controversy was sparked by an interview Congress leader P Chidambaram gave to The Quint, where he questioned the government's claims linking Pakistan to the April 22 terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which claimed 26 lives, mostly civilians. 'Have they identified the terrorists? Where they came from? I mean, for all we know, they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do you assume that they came from Pakistan? There's no evidence of that,' Chidambaram had said in the interview. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD