Minister: Reservoir levels stable, no flood-like situation in Punjab
He was responding to a call attention motion by MLA Rana Inder Pratap Singh who raised concerns over the growing flood threat. Speaking during the Zero Hour, the MLA revealed that in the past six months, he has identified 12 to 15 critical locations between Harike and Dhilwan where the embankments are alarmingly weak and highly susceptible to breaches during rising water levels in the reservoirs of the dams.
Rana Inder Pratap Singh told the House that these vulnerabilities were shared in detail with the deputy commissioners and the cabinet minister, and reminders were also sent. 'However, no concrete steps were taken even at the sites most in need of urgent reinforcement,' he told the House.
The minister said that for flood preparedness, the water resources department has executed measures to tackle any potential flood situation. 'The government has allocated funds worth ₹204.5 crore for flood mitigation. Utilising SDMF, MGNREGA and departmental funds, 599 projects have been taken up', the minister said.
According to Rana Inder Partap Singh, during the previous flood season, an isolated embankment spanning nearly 125 acres near the Goindwal bridge had obstructed the natural water flow. 'As a result, all the water pressure converged at a single point, increasing the risk of a breach. He urged the Punjab government to undertake de-silting in this area to prevent a similar crisis from occurring again.
He further sounded the alarm over ongoing illegal mining activities within the embankment zones, particularly in areas where temporary structures have been erected by locals.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bombshell letter claims Governor Walz's involvement as Vance Boelter is indicted for politically motivated killings of Melissa and Mark Hortman
Federal prosecutors on Tuesday(July 15) filed murder and stalking charges against Vance Boelter, 57, in connection with a politically motivated attack that left two prominent Minnesota political figures dead and two others critically wounded. Boelter is accused of killing former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark Hortman , and of shooting state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette Hoffman, at their Champlin home during the early morning hours of June 14. The attack, which prosecutors say was premeditated and politically motivated, has shaken lawmakers across the country. 'Vance Boelter planned and carried out a night of terror that shook Minnesota to its core,' said Acting US Attorney Joseph Thompson. 'He carried out targeted political assassinations the likes of which have never been seen in Minnesota.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 이 게임은 대부분의 TV 프로그램보다 더 재미있어요 – 게다가 무료예요. Raid: Shadow Legends 플레이하기 Undo According to the indictment, Boelter was found with multiple firearms, tactical gear, and a list of dozens of elected officials, including Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin and Michigan Reps. Inside his vehicle, authorities discovered five firearms, including assault-style rifles and a 9mm pistol, along with law enforcement-grade body armor and emergency lights. The letter Live Events A two-page handwritten letter found in Boelter's abandoned car has stunned investigators and fueled political outrage. Addressed to FBI Director Kash Patel, the letter contains rambling, conspiratorial accusations, including a claim that Gov. Tim Walz directed Boelter to assassinate Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Sen. Tina Smith to secure political power. 'Tim Walz wanted me to kill Amy Klobuchar,' Boelter wrote, also alleging covert 'off-the-books' military assignments in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. Boelter claimed he refused Walz's request and was threatened in return: 'He said he would hurt my family if I didn't play ball.' Prosecutors dismissed the letter as delusional, but confirmed its authenticity. 'The letter is filled with pure fantasy,' a Justice Department spokesperson said. 'Boelter acted alone, driven by political extremism.' Boelter was apprehended without incident after a two-day manhunt in Green Isle, Minnesota. Officials say he had been preparing for a standoff and living in near-seclusion. Hoffman and his wife were seriously wounded in the attack but survived. The couple had been shielding their daughter during the shooting, authorities said. The Hortmans were killed less than two hours later at their home in Brooklyn Park. The shootings drew national condemnation and renewed concerns over politically motivated violence. Former President Joe Biden paid his respects as the Hortmans lay in state at the Minnesota Capitol. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who had met with Melissa Hortman just hours before her death, called the killings a 'wake-up call' on the dangers of violent political rhetoric. Authorities have not yet confirmed whether they will pursue the death penalty. Boelter appeared in federal court on Tuesday and pleaded not guilty. A grand jury indicted him on charges of murder, attempted murder, stalking, and firearm violations. 'Today, a grand jury indicted Boelter with the most serious of federal charges for these heinous political assassinations,' Thompson said. 'Let me be clear: Boelter will see justice.'
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Bondi needs to explain: US House Speaker calls for disclosure of Epstein files
US House Speaker Mike Johnson has called for the release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier who died in jail in 2019. Johnson's remarks come as President Donald Trump and his administration are under fire from conservatives who demand full disclosure in the Epstein a podcast, Johnson told conservative host Benny Johnson, "It's a very delicate subject, but we should put everything out there and let the people decide it." He added, "I agree with the sentiment that we need to put it out there."advertisementThe statement marks a rare split from Trump's stance, who has otherwise enjoyed strong support from Johnson. It'll add pressure on Attorney General Pam Bondi, who previously claimed the list of Epstein's clients was "sitting on my desk right now to review." "She needs to come forward and explain that to everybody," Johnson said. "We need the DoJ focusing on the major priorities. So let's get this thing resolved."Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide in 2019 in federal custody awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Last week, the Department of Justice concluded once again that there was no foul play involved. It also stated there would be no public release of client names or further has been building among Trump's base, many of whom had expected his administration to fully expose Epstein's network. Some Republicans now want the Justice Department to come clean and make the documents Johnson's call, House Republicans blocked a Democratic effort to include Epstein-related disclosures in new legislation. However, Democrats are still committed. Members of the House Judiciary Committee have demanded a hearing with Attorney General Bondi, her deputy, and FBI officials to discuss the matter in AND BONDI TRY TO COOL THE BACKLASHTrump has tried to downplay the controversy, saying people should move on. "Let's keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about," he wrote on Truth he offered support for Bondi, saying, "She's handled it very well, and it's going to be up to her. Whatever she thinks is credible, she should release."Bondi refused to directly address Epstein-related questions when speaking to NBC News. When asked about the criticism from Trump's Maga supporters, she shifted focus, saying, "We're going to fight to keep America safe again... We've got a war on drugs. We've got a war on human trafficking, we've got cartels in this country we have got foreign adversaries around this world as well, and we're all going to work together as a team."At a separate press conference focused on drug enforcement, Bondi declined to take any questions on Epstein. "Today is about fentanyl overdoses throughout our country and people who have lost loved ones to fentanyl," she said. "That's the message that we're here to send today. Not Epstein. Not going to talk about Epstein."- EndsWith inputs from Agencies Must Watch
Indian Express
7 hours ago
- Indian Express
US Senate to vote on Trump funding cuts, AIDS program funding preserved
The US Senate is due to begin voting on Tuesday on President Donald Trump's request to slash billions in spending on foreign aid and public broadcasting previously approved by Congress, the latest test of Trump's control over his fellow Republicans. However, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought told reporters it will no longer include a plan to cut funds designated for PEPFAR, a global fund to fight HIV/AIDS, bringing the size of the package of cuts to $9 billion from $9.4 billion. Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the chamber's Republican majority leader, said he expected the first procedural voting on Tuesday. He had said that some members of his party had wanted changes in the bill. The Senate has until Friday to act on the rescissions package, originally a request to claw back $8.3 billion in foreign aid funding and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting. Otherwise, the request will expire and the White House will be required to adhere to spending plans passed by Congress. Approving the Senate bill without the PEPFAR cuts means the measure must go back to the House of Representatives for a vote before it can be sent back to Trump to sign into law. Thune said he expected the House would act quickly to pass the measure. The amounts at stake are extremely small in the context of the sprawling federal budget, which totaled $6.8 trillion in the fiscal year ended September 30. Yet the proposed cuts have raised the hackles of Democrats and a handful of Republicans who saw an attempt to erode Congress's Constitutionally mandated authority over spending. The foreign aid initiatives in Trump's request for cuts included lifesaving support for women and children's health and the fight against HIV/AIDS that have long had strong bipartisan support. The package also cuts funds supporting public broadcasting, which can be the main source of news and emergency information in rural parts of the US. Critics of the cuts said the amounts of money involved were small but funded essential programs that should not be cut. 'What is going on here? Does anyone stand up to these horrible, horrible cuts that hurt the American people?' Senator Charles Schumer of New York, the chamber's Democratic leader, said on Monday. Trump has threatened to withhold his endorsement from any member of Congress who does not vote for the measure without changes. Standalone presidential rescissions packages have not passed in years, with lawmakers reluctant to cede their constitutionally mandated control of government spending. During Trump's first term in 2018, Congress members rejected Trump's request to revoke $15 billion in spending. Trump's Republicans hold narrow majorities in the Senate and House. So far, they have shown little appetite for opposing his policies. The rescissions legislation passed the House by 214-212 last month. Four Republicans joined 208 Democrats in voting against it. Some Republican senators had expressed concern about some of Trump's requests. Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who chairs the Appropriations Committee, had said she opposed Trump's request to cut funding for the global programs to fight HIV/AIDS. Democrats have warned that the foreign aid and broadcasting cuts, which overturn spending agreements between Republicans and Democrats, could make it more difficult to negotiate the package of spending bills that must pass by September 30 to fund the government next year and avoid a shutdown. 'How are we supposed to negotiate a bipartisan deal if Republicans will turn around and put it through the shredder in a partisan vote?' asked Senator Patty Murray from Washington, the top Democrat on the appropriations committee. Appropriations bills require 60 votes to move ahead in the Senate, but the rescissions package needs just 51, meaning Republicans can pass it without Democratic support.
