Chad court jails ex-PM, opposition leader for 20 years
The court in N'Djamena jailed Masra, one of President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno's fiercest critics, for his role in inciting inter-communal violence in which 42 people were killed on May 14.
Most of the massacre victims were women and children in Mandakao, southwestern Chad, according to the court. On Friday, the state prosecutor had called for a 25-year sentence.
Masra was arrested on May 16, charged with "inciting hatred, revolt, forming and complicity with armed gangs, complicity in murder, arson and desecration of graves".
He stood trial with nearly 70 other men accused of having taken part in the killings.
Originally from Chad's south, he comes from the Ngambaye ethnic group and enjoys wide popularity among the predominantly Christian and animist populations of the south.
Those groups feel marginalised by the largely Muslim-dominated regime in the capital N'Djamena.
During the trial, Masra's lawyers argued that no concrete evidence against him had been presented to the court.
He went on hunger strike in jail for nearly a month in June, his lawyers said at the time.
Masra had left Chad after a bloody crackdown on his followers in 2022, only returning under an amnesty agreed in 2024.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
14 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Australia's Albanese says Netanyahu ‘in denial' over suffering in Gaza
Albanese criticizes Netanyahu's stance on Gaza humanitarian crisis Public sentiment in Australia shifts towards Palestinian recognition Former NZ PM Clark criticises lack of action By Alasdair Pal Australia will recognise a Palestinian state at next month's United Nations General Assembly, Albanese said on Monday, a move that adds to international pressure on Israel after similar announcements from France, Britain and Canada. Albanese said on Tuesday the Netanyahu government's reluctance to listen to its allies contributed to Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state. 'He again reiterated to me what he has said publicly as well, which is to be in denial about the consequences that are occurring for innocent people,' Albanese said in an interview with state broadcaster ABC, recounting a Thursday phone call with Netanyahu discussing the issue. Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state is conditional on commitments received from the Palestinian Authority, including that Islamist militant group Hamas would have no involvement in any future state. Albanese said last month he would not be drawn on a timeline for recognition of a Palestinian state, and has previously been wary of dividing public opinion in Australia, which has significant Jewish and Muslim minorities. But the public mood has shifted sharply after Israel said it planned to take military control of Gaza, amid increasing reports of hunger and malnutrition amongst its people. Tens of thousands of demonstrators marched across Sydney's Harbour Bridge this month calling for aid deliveries in Gaza as the humanitarian crisis worsened. 'This decision is driven by popular sentiment in Australia which has shifted in recent months, with a majority of Australians wanting to see an imminent end to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza,' said Jessica Genauer, a senior lecturer in international relations at Flinders University. Neighbouring New Zealand has said it is still considering whether to recognise a Palestinian state, a decision that drew sharp criticism from former prime minister Helen Clark on Tuesday. 'This is a catastrophic situation, and here we are in New Zealand somehow arguing some fine point about whether we should recognise we need to be adding our voice to the need for this catastrophe to stop,' she said in an interview with state broadcaster RNZ. 'This is not the New Zealand I've known.'
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
Malema wants prostitution legalised
EFF leader Julius Malema has called on the government to decriminalise prostitution. Speaking to party supporters at a Women's Day rally in Mpumalanga, Malema said sex workers deserved access to protection by law enforcement agencies, including being able to open cases against rapists or other types of abusers without disrespect from police. 'The government must legalise prostitution. Prostitution is the oldest profession in the world. You may be a Christian; whether you like it or not, prostitution is a job and there are people who work in it. Respect those people, they too must have protection and workers' rights,' he said. There has been an ongoing debate about legalising prostitution to enhance health and safety for sex workers and protect their rights. In 2022, the cabinet approved the publication of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Bill regarding the decriminalisation of sex work for public comment. The passage of the bill has since stalled. Malema said all women should be protected from being victims of abuse. 'We must ensure we protect our women in every space we occupy. Women get raped in churches, schools, workplaces and social places. They do not rape themselves — they are raped by men. Men have to stand up and by standing up you don't have to do anything — just stop raping women.' He called on men to take a stand against gender-based violence, saying: 'We don't want men who are cowards, who are scared of people their age and gender and go and exercise their power over powerless women. No man should lay a hand on a woman. We must protect them, respect them and provide for them.'
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Hiroshima and Nagasaki Exposes the Simmering Inequities in the UN System
A young boy watches as his paper lantern floats out on the Motoyasu River past the Atomic Bomb Dome (back R) to mark the 80th anniversary of the world's first atomic bomb attack, in the city of Hiroshima on August 6, 2025. Image: AFP Abbey Makoe The first week of every August in history exposes, in my view, the depths of the failures and deep-seated false pretences of international diplomacy as a vehicle for civil resolution of differences and a consensus-building mechanism. It was on August 6 and 9, respectively, 80 years ago, when the US dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki within three days apart, killing and maiming tens of thousands of innocent people in an unprecedented and unexpected jiffy. Many around the world often place tremendous importance on the total fatalities from the nuclear bombardment of the two Japanese cities in 1945. However, what I think of greater significance is the world's response in the aftermath all these years later. It is in the lackadaisical global response that I take umbrage. The disingenuity and deceitful nature and form of diplomatic engagements that have followed the dreadful events in Hiroshima and Nagasaki have steadfastly exposed what social scientists refer to as the disordered faults of progress in the post-WWII international world architecture built on the cooperative nature of the UN Charter. Every year on August 6 and 9, Japan holds 'Peace Ceremonies' in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is a painful period of annual reflection for the entire Japanese nation. It is a time when historical wounds are reopened. History revisited with tears and heartbreak. Over and above, it is a time to mitigate the pains of lingering yet unanswered questions: Why did the US bomb the cities and secondly, perhaps more importantly, why has the US not apologised throughout 80 years? For the uninitiated, let me recap: From Hiroshima alone, then a city of 350,000 people, America's atomic explosion killed a total of 140,000 innocent civilians. In Nagasaki, 74,000 people perished shortly after the US pilots had dropped the atomic bombs on the city. This year, Russia, a leading global nuclear power, expressed its exasperation with the seeming double standards in international relations that have permeated every sphere of society, including the highest office at the UN. In a Global North-dominated world order, led by the US through its hegemony dating back to immediately after the end of World War II in 1945, the narrative around Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been dominated by the West, which has refrained from blaming the US for the atomic bombings. Responding to Washington's failure to apologise for the unprecedented atomic bombardment in Japan, and the world's failure to demand accountability, Russia's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova was vividly livid. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ She said Western politicians deliberately echo one another, consciously avoiding mentioning that it was the US that dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Instead, added Zakharova, they push a line that says 'both the US and Russia had failed to learn lessons from those mistakes'. She called it an unbelievable fake narrative. 'And yet the UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres,' she charged, followed suit, stating on the occasion of this tragedy that fully omitted any mention of the United States.' She added that the narrative was intended to erase the Hiroshima and Nagasaki guilt from the US, and in doing so, they apportion blame to Russia. It is the West's nuclear hypocrisy, she said. Zakharova further asked: 'What does lack of condemnation mean for the US? It creates a comfort zone for them. It doesn't push them out of it. It keeps them in it so they don't have to wonder over questions like: Do you regret it? Would you do it again?' Emmanuel Pastreich, President of the Asia Institute, said the 80th commemoration of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings should mark a time for truth and accountability. He said the 1945 bombings 'weren't militarily necessary – they were a demonstration – a test of power, a message to the world and a geopolitical gambit targeting the USSR'. He added: 'Eighty years later, the US still refuses to apologise, clinging to nuclear dominance as a rickety crutch. Instead of disarmament, they have modernised those weapons, spending trillions while science and ethics decay.' The Western narrative over Hiroshima and Nagasaki continues to be domineering to such an extent that, now a close ally of the US and a member of the US-led G7, it finds itself egg-dancing around the authentic history of bombings. At this week's ceremony at the atomic memorial site of the tragedy, the Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba could only express mourning for '100,000 precious lives' but never named the US, the nation that everybody knows had dropped the bombs. Such is an example of the manifestation of bogus diplomacy that dominates the US-led unipolar world order. This blatant attempt to misrepresent history cannot succeed. It has been correctly documented by upright historians, and instead of tweaking the naked facts, the US and the West would do well to own up and do good by the people of Japan, who still hurt to this day. In an ideal international world order based on the UN Charter of equality and mutual regard for one another, the spectre of unilateralism would never have succeeded to the point where the G7 has all but replaced the UN governance system.
