
Frustrated with continued high drug costs, Trump demands 17 companies lower prices in 60 days
Trump sent letters to 17 major pharmaceutical company CEOs on Thursday with a list of demands, including that the manufacturers extend so-called 'Most Favored Nation' pricing — the lowest price paid for a drug in a peer country — to all drugs provided to Medicaid enrollees. He also wants the companies to guarantee that Medicaid, Medicare and commercial-market insurers pay such prices for all new drugs. The president gave the companies 60 days to comply.
The directive stems from an executive order Trump signed in May, when he demanded drugmakers start offering US patients those lower prices or face consequences. Prices for some brand name drugs in the US are more than three times those in other developed nations, according to the administration.
In that executive order, he also directed the Department of Health and Human Services to come up with price targets within 30 days. But Trump implied that the discussions between HHS officials and the companies did not yield acceptable results.
'Most proposals my administration has received to 'resolve' this critical issue promised more of the same: shifting blame and requesting policy changes that would result in billions of dollars in handouts to industry,' he wrote in the letters, which were posted on Truth Social. 'Moving forward, the only thing I will accept from drug manufacturers is a commitment that provides American families immediate relief from the vastly inflated drug prices and an end to the free ride of American innovation by European and other developed nations.'
'But if you refuse to step up, we will deploy every tool in our arsenal to protect American families from continued abusive drug pricing practices,' he continued. 'Americans are demanding lower drug prices, and they need them today.'
The May executive order outlined some potential ramifications if manufacturers do not make significant progress in lowering prices. Those included directing HHS to craft a rule implementing the policy, allowing more drug importation into the US, reviewing drug exports, and having the Food and Drug Administration modify or revoke approvals granted for drugs that may be 'unsafe, ineffective, or improperly marketed.'
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the industry's main trade association, did not immediately return a request for comment. The drug prices for several of the companies that received the letters, including Eli Lilly, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, GSK and Amgen, slipped between 1% to 4% in mid-afternoon trading. The S&P 500 Pharmaceuticals Industry Index was down a little more than 2%.
It's unclear what authority the president has to demand certain prices, particularly in the private market and without Congress' involvement. Some industry experts have described the May executive order as more bark than bite.
Trump's effort to establish a 'Most Favored Nation' rule for certain drugs in Medicare during his first term was quickly blocked by federal courts for procedural reasons before being rescinded by then-President Joe Biden in 2021. The May executive order goes far beyond that measure since it is not limited to drugs purchased by Medicare nor to a certain number of pharmaceuticals.
In the letters, Trump also demanded that drug companies return revenue from operations abroad to lower prices in America through 'an explicit agreement with the United States.' Plus, he ordered the manufacturers to participate in programs to sell certain drugs directly to consumers or business at 'Most Favored Nation' prices.
Drugmakers have long complained that foreign governments, which are more involved in price setting, demand very low prices to gain access to their markets.
It's not the only way the Trump administration is squeezing drugmakers — officials have also looked to impose tariffs on pharmaceutical imports, which had been exempted from such levies enacted during the president's first term. The tariffs could exacerbate shortages of certain drugs, particularly generic medicines, and eventually raise prices, experts have warned.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top South Dakota official apologizes for releasing voter data
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) — South Dakota's top elections official has apologized for the state releasing information about voters who also were seeking public assistance, such as food aid. Secretary of State Monae Johnson made the voter registration rolls of more than 600,000 voters public last month to comply with a new state law. But the spreadsheet of voter information also included a field for source of registration, which disclosed whether an individual registered to vote at a public assistance agency, such as those offering housing help and food assistance. Federal law prohibits the government from releasing information about those receiving public assistance. The data leak drew condemnation from across the state, and the American Civil Liberties Union called it an 'egregious violation of voters' privacy rights.' Johnson apologized on Friday. 'As Secretary of State, I take full responsibility for the release of this information. My office is committed to both transparency and protecting voter privacy," Johnson said in statement. 'Upon discovering the issue, we acted immediately to remove the data and prevent further dissemination.' The information was taken off the website Friday, the day after the ACLU sent a letter to the office demanding the state fix the issue. Individuals who had their information disclosed have been notified by mail, and those with access to the information will be asked to delete it. The secretary of state also clarified that registering at a public assistance agency does not necessarily mean an individual is receiving benefits. In South Dakota, a person can register to vote at driver's license exam stations, disability service offices, military recruitment centers and county auditor offices in addition to public assistance agencies. The ACLU is now encouraging those who were impacted to fill out their legal intake form. "Essentially, voters who exercised their right to register to vote at public benefits offices were punished for it through this substantial privacy violation,' ACLU South Dakota Advocacy Manager Samantha Chapman said. South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley is appointing legal counsel to represent the Secretary of State's office and the state legislature in case of potential lawsuits. Sarah Raza, The Associated Press
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tyson Foods hasn't seen 'material' impact from Trump tariffs as consumer protein push lifts results
Tyson Foods (TSN) reported results Monday that were better than expected for its fiscal third quarter. A consumer focus on protein and a lack of immediate impact from President Trump's tariff policies boosted results. "Consumers are prioritizing protein ... over other foods, but they're also prioritizing food as essential versus the non-essential things like apparel, ... bigger ticket items," Tyson Foods CEO Donnie King said. As far as the impact of President Trump's tariffs, King said, "I would not call anything we've seen from tariffs today, not only beef, but in pork, chicken. I don't see a material impact from that at this point." In the quarter, Tyson reported sales grew 4% to $13.88 billion, topping forecasts for revenue to tally $13.55 billion, according to Bloomberg data. Adjusted earnings per share were $0.91 in the quarter, ahead of forecasts for $0.78. The company also said its sales for its fiscal year 2025, which wraps up during the current quarter, will rise 2% to 3% from last year, better than its previous outlook for sales to be flat to up 1%. Tyson Foods stock rose about 3% following the results on Monday. Year to date, the stock remains down over 5%, trailing the S&P 500's roughly 7.5% gain. Read more: Live coverage of corporate earnings Chicken was the company's strongest category during the quarter, with volumes rising 2.4% alongside an average price increase of 1.1%. Consumers leaned into frozen items like Tyson Simple Ingredient nuggets, which have higher protein. Tyson's fresh chicken business grew volume by 2.3%. Tyson now expects its chicken segment to post operating income of $1.3 billion to $1.4 billion for the year, up from the previously expected range of $1 billion to $1.3 billion. "Our chicken business is obviously running a lot better than it has," King said. "This has been a multiyear journey, but it's running more efficiently." King said the company is also seeing the benefit from the closure of four chicken plants two years ago. Its pork business is having a moment too. Volume for that segment grew 1.5% against forecasts for a 2.3% decline. Pork delivered its strongest third quarter adjusted operating income for the company in four years. All the momentum offset a more challenging quarter for its beef business. The average price for beef increased 10%, higher than the 7.3% jump expected. Volumes declined 3.1%, more than the 2% expected, as the tightened cattle supply made fewer available for Tyson to buy and drove costs higher. Still, King said its beef consumer "has been very resilient" in the face of higher prices. For ranchers, higher beef prices have been good news, according to Texas A&M professor David Anderson, as these prices reverse the situation "for ranchers who have dealt with low prices, high costs, and drought in recent years." Fewer imports from Mexico have hit the US cattle supply, however, creating another challenge for Tyson. "I expect the tariff and retaliatory tariffs from China have introduced more struggles in [the ranchers'] business," Anderson said. "I should say it's not just high prices but fewer cattle that make it hard to get enough cattle to operate." Brooke DiPalma is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @BrookeDiPalma or email her at bdipalma@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former DOJ Trump ‘loyalty test' prosecutors are planning to run for office and fight back
At this time last year, Ryan Crosswell was hard at work trying to put New York City's mayor in prison on corruption charges while serving as a prosecutor in the Justice Department. But after resigning in protest over the Trump administration's decision to drop the case against Mayor Eric Adams and cut back on prosecutions of public corruption cases, he's looking at a switching careers to making laws instead of enforcing them. According to CBS News, Crosswell, a U.S. Marine Corps veteran, left the department in February amid the uproar over the dropping of charges against Adams, a move which at the time was framed as a way to enable the mayor to better assist the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts. Four months later, he announced a campaign for the House of Representatives seat for Pennsylvania's seventh district against Republican Ryan Mackenzie, telling the television network: "If you're a Marine and you're a former prosecutor, you are protecting people." Crosswell is just one of a number of ex-federal prosecutors looking to continue public service careers by seeking election to various offices across the United States. The former prosecutors all have one thing in common — they left federal service in the tumultuous opening months of the Trump administration amid what have been described as loyalty tests as a condition of remaining in the government. Erika Evans, the granddaughter of Olympic track-and-field medalist Lee Evans, left the Department of Justice in March on account of the changes made to the Civil Rights Division under Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon. Dhillon, a longtime GOP activist, has made it a priority to refocus the division away from protecting racial minorities towards pushing back on alleged anti-white discrimination. Evans told CBS she resigned after receiving emails asking for DOJ employees to report colleagues involved in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion work that the Trump administration has banned. "We received emails requiring that we report any colleagues doing diversity work in the office. We had 10 to 14 days to report them or we would get in trouble ourselves," Evans said. "That was pretty disgusting." Now, she's looking to resume her public service career as Seattle's elected City Attorney. In a video released by her campaign, she says she'll 'take on Trump' if elected and 'demand the community safety we deserve' from the federal government. She explained how she'd wanted to spend her career in public service but felt she had to leave because of the Trump administration's priorities. "When I realized that that was not going to be possible any longer with the values that the Trump administration was having for the department, I knew I needed to shift,' she said.