We thought we'd planned for a successful early retirement — but we're picking up side hustles just a few years in
My husband and I retired at 55 and did a lot to prepare for it, like paying into pension plans.
But unexpected bills, rising costs of essentials, and lifestyle creep have stretched our budget.
We've already dipped into our savings and began working side gigs to help maintain our lifestyle.
My husband and I thought we did all the right things to prepare for successful early retirements at age 55.
We worked hard for over 30 years in our respective careers and both had pension plans. Plus, we invested in RRSPs (popular retirement savings plans in Canada) for extra cushion.
Before we retired, we paid off almost all of our debts and purged 30 years' worth of accumulated belongings. An inheritance and the sale of our acreage also allowed us to build our new forever home without taking on a mortgage.
Over the years, we've sought advice from different financial advisors, who all assured us that retiring at age 55 and living a comfortable life thereafter was attainable. Now, we're not so sure.
Despite all of our planning, we found ourselves worrying about money
In 2015, my husband retired at 55 and helped out with his nephew's construction business until I joined him in retirement a few years later in 2023 when I turned 55.
At first, early retirement was off to a great start.
As empty nesters without a mortgage, we suddenly found ourselves with more free time and extra disposable income. In a way, we experienced a lifestyle creep.
We upgraded our vehicles and went out to concerts, on day trips, and even occasional cross-border shopping expeditions. We planned future vacations to the US, thinking we'd "made it" and that we'd fairly easily be able to maintain this lifestyle from here on out.
Several major appliances broke down in our home within just a few months and we paid for unplanned home renovations to accommodate our son's family after a devastating house fire.
Soon, we were withdrawing huge sums from our emergency savings account. We didn't expect to touch those savings for several years, but our monthly cash flow is limited now that we're both retired.
On top of the unexpected bills, tariffs and inflation mean many essentials, like fuel and food, cost more than we'd anticipated. Soon, we began dipping into our savings to help pay off credit-card bills, too.
For now, I'm grateful that we have skills and assets to help keep us going
Although we receive my husband's payments from his Canada Pension Plan, mine haven't kicked in yet. And, like many in our age group, our net worth consists mostly of assets and investments.
When we realized our pensions alone would not sustain us, we began finding ways to supplement our income.
My husband works seasonally in construction and sells woodworking projects. Since I'm a retired teacher, I can choose to take substitute teaching gigs. I also have freelance writing and translation contracts that allow me to pick and choose my work days.
These gigs have helped us get back some of the freedom and flexibility we sought in retirement — and we're still available to help with our grandkids as needed.
Fortunately, we're in good health and we've found joy in creatively using our transferable skills to our advantage during retirement.
Hopefully, these gigs won't be necessary forever. As we get older, additional Social Security benefits, like Old Age Security, should kick in to give us extra income and stability.
For now, we're trying not to take our situation for granted. We're fortunate to have pension plans and no mortgage, plus assets we could sell to maintain our current standard of living if needed.
We don't know how long we'll live or what other surprise expenses may come up, but we're trying to be way more careful with our spending in the meantime.
It's probably for the best that we learned early on how important it is to keep reassessing our desires, needs, and budgets if we really want to reap the rewards of retirement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cision Canada
a day ago
- Cision Canada
Fraser Institute News Release: This Sunday, June 8, is Tax Freedom Day, when Canadians finally start working for themselves
VANCOUVER, BC, June 5, 2025 /CNW/ - This Sunday, June 8, Canadians will celebrate Tax Freedom Day, the day in the year when they start working for themselves and not government, finds a new study published by the Fraser Institute, an independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think-tank. "If Canadians paid all their taxes up front, they would work the first 158 days of this year before bringing any money home for themselves and their families," said Jake Fuss, director of fiscal studies at the Fraser Institute. Tax Freedom Day measures the total annual tax burden imposed on Canadian families by federal, provincial, and municipal governments. In 2025, the average Canadian family (with two or more people) will pay $68,266 in total taxes. That's 43.1 per cent of its annual income ($158,533) going to income taxes, payroll taxes (including the Canada Pension Plan), health taxes, sales taxes (like the GST), property taxes, fuel taxes, "sin" taxes and more. Represented as days on the calendar, the total tax burden comprises more than five months of income—from January 1 to June 7. On June 8th—Tax Freedom Day—Canadians finally start working for themselves, and not government. But Canadians should also be worried about the nearly $90 billion in deficits the federal and provincial governments are forecasting this year, because they will have substantial tax implications in future years. To better illustrate this point, the study also calculates a Balanced Budget Tax Freedom Day—the day of the year when the average Canadian finally would finally start working for themselves if governments paid for all of this year's spending with taxes collected this year. In 2025, the Balanced Budget Tax Freedom Day won't arrive until June 21. "Tax Freedom Day helps put the total tax burden in perspective, and helps Canadians understand just how much of their money they pay in taxes every year," Fuss said. "Canadians need to decide for themselves whether they are getting their money's worth when it comes to how governments are spending their tax dollars." Tax Freedom Day for each province varies according to the extent of the provincially and locally levied tax burden. 2025 Provincial Tax Freedom Days The Fraser Institute is an independent Canadian public policy research and educational organization with offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Montreal and Halifax and ties to a global network of think-tanks in 87 countries. Its mission is to improve the quality of life for Canadians, their families and future generations by studying, measuring and broadly communicating the effects of government policies, entrepreneurship and choice on their well-being. To protect the Institute's independence, it does not accept grants from governments or contracts for research. Visit SOURCE The Fraser Institute
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Can Bianca afford to retire at 66 with a mortgage?
Bianca* is 65, enjoys her job and knows her employer would love her to stay as long as possible. However, she turns 66 at the end of this year and thinks this might be the right time to retire – if her investment portfolio can generate $6,000 a year in after-tax dollars. Is this a pipe dream? Would she be better off working an additional year or two, especially given the high cost of living and the fact she has a mortgage? Bianca was mortgage-free until she recently purchased her $800,000 forever home in Ontario to be closer to her daughter. She is making accelerated payments of $2,564 a month at 4.59 per cent on her $232,000 mortgage, which matures in nine years. While Bianca says having a mortgage at this stage in life is not ideal, it is manageable on her annual income of $140,000 before tax. Her current total monthly expenses are about $5,200. Each year Bianca contributes 10 per cent of her base salary and her employer contributes three per cent to a registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) that is now worth $825,000 and is invested in bank stocks. The employer portion of the savings plan — $164,000 — is locked in. When she retires, Bianca plans to direct 50 per cent of those locked-in funds into a life income fund (LIF) and 50 per cent to her RRSP, which she will convert to a registered retirement income fund (RRIF) when she turns 71. If she does retire at 66, she will also receive an employer pension of $46,000 a year before tax (the pension is not indexed to inflation) and is eligible to receive $1,377 a month in Canada Pension Plan (CPP) payments. She has delayed CPP and Old Age Security (OAS) because she is still working, and wonders when she should start drawing both government benefits to avoid facing any recovery tax or clawback. 'I do not have any plans for what I will do in retirement and I know that is not a good thing. I think it's why I keep working,' said Bianca. 'My expenses are likely to stay similar to what they are now. I don't see anything changing. Will I be able to maintain a comfortable retirement if I retire at the end of this year?' 'Bianca is asking the right questions and has the right concerns. The effects of inflation over the next 30 years will be significant and since almost half her gross retirement income is from a defined benefit pension that has no indexing, she needs to be confident the other sources of income can bridge this future gap,' said Eliott Einarson, a retirement planner at Ottawa-based Exponent Investment Management. 'A retirement plan will integrate inflation and taxes into all assumptions to determine what's possible given what's available. Without a plan you really enter retirement blind. Often, people neglect to withdraw adequately from their registered assets for retirement income, which can create tax problems in the future for themselves and the estate.' The good news is Bianca's investment portfolio combined with her pension and government benefits will more than meet her income needs after tax. Right now 40 per cent of her income needs are tied to the mortgage. At her current accelerated payment rate, Einarson estimated this will be eliminated about 10 years post retirement, providing increased flexibility and more future savings power — likely double the income she needs in her mid 70s and beyond. Einarson said that, rather than deferring additional registered income to age 71 and then withdrawing the minimum, she should strategically draw down enough registered assets in addition to other income sources to meet her total income goal of $6,000 net per month and maximize TFSA contributions. 'Why wait until age 71? She can benefit now from more income. Once the mortgage is paid she will have more than enough income.' As for CPP and OAS, Einarson said if she does retire at 66 she can start her benefits then and should not be in danger of the clawback on OAS if the income from the RRIF is managed well. Bianca should consider making changes to her portfolio construction to determine if it is appropriate for her future needs, Einarson said. 'If it is all invested in bank stocks, she may want to look at diversifying both geographically and by industry. Canadian bank stocks offer good dividends but investing in only one industry is a major investment mistake.' She may want to consider engaging a firm with a tailored portfolio management approach if she doesn't want to assume the responsibilities of managing her retirement income portfolio when she leaves her employer's plan, Einarson said. Couple approaching 65 with a mortgage worry tariff war will torpedo retirement Couple wonders: Start investing or stick with rental income to build nest egg? 'A good firm will also provide the retirement income planning up front and updates to the plan as her life circumstances evolve,' he said. 'Engaging in retirement planning is going to help Bianca clarify her future and her idea of retirement, while also building confidence. Her biggest risk now might be not taking advantage of her financial position and enjoying these early retirement years.' *Name changed to protect privacy. Are you worried about having enough for retirement? Do you need to adjust your portfolio? Are you starting out or making a change and wondering how to build wealth? Are you trying to make ends meet? Drop us a line at wealth@ with your contact info and the gist of your problem and we'll find some experts to help you out while writing a Family Finance story about it (we'll keep your name out of it, of course). Sign in to access your portfolio
Hamilton Spectator
4 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Ford government is still underfunding education despite budget increase, school boards say
School boards say they are still facing a shortfall of $404 per student despite a boost in funding from the Ontario government. Although the province will spend $30.3 billion on per-pupil funding in 2025-26 — a 2.6 per cent increase which is expected to meet or exceed inflation — it doesn't make up for years where funding didn't keep up with inflation, says the Ontario Public School Boards' Association after conducting its own analysis of last month's Ontario budget announcement . 'While this year and last year represent a step in the right direction, the challenging reality is that funding still falls short of closing the gap that has developed since 2018,' said OPSBA president Kathleen Woodcock. 'We are also concerned by projections in the budget document that suggest education funding will plateau in the years ahead. This would be a step backward at a time when the needs of students, the demands on school boards, and cost pressures continue to rise.' Woodcock said the government's spending increases on cybersecurity, busing and portables have helped, but that the province has not provided funding for mandatory contributions that have also gone up, including Canada Pension Plan and Employment Insurance. Emma Testani, press secretary for Education Minister Paul Calandra, said 'this year, Ontario is providing a record $30.3 billion in core education funding to school boards. We expect all boards across the province to spend every dollar of these funds directly on students, parents and teachers.' She added 'that is why last week, we introduced legislation that, if passed, would strengthen government oversight, accountability and transparency in school boards. Parents deserve confidence that boards are making decisions in the best interests of their children's education,' referring to a proposed bill that critics have characterized as a ' power grab .' The OPSBA said that when the Ford government took power in 2018, per-pupil funding was $12,282, and in the upcoming school year will be $14,560 — but when adjusted to 2018 dollars, funding has actually dropped, leaving a $693-million gap for the province's 31 English public boards alone. (The association noted, however, that the per-pupil funding increase in the 2024-25 school year actually exceeded inflation, after earlier estimates projected it would not.) School boards have incurred extra costs in particular in areas such as special education and in keeping small schools open because of a province-wide moratorium on closures, the association says. On Monday at Queen's Park, New Democrat MPP Chandra Pasma, her party's education critic, accused the Ford government of underfunding the education system by billions of dollars over the years. Students 'need teachers, books, and safe and healthy schools,' she said. 'You know what the people of the province of Ontario want to see? … They want to see that $6.5 billion returned to our education system.' She also slammed the government's proposed bill, adding parents 'want to have a say in the decisions that affect their kids' schools, but this minister is taking that away from them and giving himself the power to push aside democratically elected school boards for literally any reason he feels like.' During the legislature's daily question period, Calandra fired back. 'I don't need school boards or trustees writing curriculum. I don't need them opining on global affairs,' he said. 'You know what I need them doing? Sitting at their desk putting money back into the classroom. Anything else, I don't need them to do.'
