An Oklahoma toddler fights for her life after contracting multiple strains of E. coli after swimming at Keystone Lake
A 2-year-old is fighting for her life after contracting three strains of E. coli while swimming in Keystone Lake, her family says.
Toddler Elisabeth Faircloth was swimming and boating with her family in Oklahoma in early June when she started feeling sick. The child was prescribed antibiotics for strep throat, but her condition only worsened.
"It's a nightmare, and it happened so fast — within like a week, we're here," Suzanne Faircloth, the girl's mother, told KOTV. The antibiotic actually aggravated her infection, she told the outlet.
At the emergency room, doctors told her family that the child had contracted three strains of E. coli, leading to Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS), an infection that affects the kidneys, according to Cleveland Clinic.
"It blows our minds, because we've never even heard of anything like this ever happening," Faircloth said. "We've heard of E. coli — but usually in hamburgers."
The little girl is still in the intensive care unit.
"They are working night and day — the staff is amazing — just to keep her stable," Faircloth told KOTV about the hospital staff. "It kind of feels like you're drowning and you get brief moments of air just enough to keep you alive, but there's no end in sight."
Melissa Lynne, the child's aunt, wrote in a social media post last week that her kidneys have been 'most severely' impacted. 'She is currently on dialysis and has been medically paralyzed in order to give her little body the best chance at conquering this thing,' she wrote. 'Although the prognosis is hopeful, it will be a very long battle to get her well again and it's uncertain if she will ever recover 100% or if there will be permanent kidney and/or brain damage.'
She now is fighting an infection in her lungs, the family wrote on Facebook Monday, noting that doctors can't use the typical treatment — antibiotics — since that will only worsen her condition.
In a social media post, they added: '[We] just can't imagine another child fighting for their life or parents living through this hell, when we could have warned families. Stay vigilant parents and get your kids in early if symptoms arise after a lake day.'
'The faster you get your kids in the better the odds,' they said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Residents of toxic town Love Canal suffered devastating deformities after chemical dumping
The residents of the now deserted toxic town of Love Canal in upstate New York suffered miscarriages, birth defects, and diseases including cancer in a horrific environmental disaster. Love Canal was built as a model town in 1890 on a three-block patch of land on the eastern edge of Niagara Falls, and is named after its founder William T Love. A few years later work began on a canal to link lakes Erie and Ontario, but it was abandoned after only one mile was dug. In the 1940s the canal was bought by the Hooker Chemical Company, which made dyes, perfumes, and solvents for rubber and synthetic resins. Between 1942 to 1953 the company used the canal as a landfill and dumped around 22,000 tons of toxic byproducts there. Love Canal was sold to the Niagara Falls City School District for 1$ in 1953, and developed into a 'charming' rural neighborhood. After leaving the site, the Hooker Chemical Company, which closed in 1968, covered the 16-acre hazardous waste landfill with a 2ft bed of clay, and around 100 homes and a public school were built on top of this. Eckardt Beck, an administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency visited the area in 1979, and reported meeting one woman who had two grandchildren with birth defects. The girl was born 'born deaf with a cleft palate, an extra row of teeth, and slight retardation', while the boy had an eye defect. Beck met two other men whose children had birth defects, and spotted 'puddles of noxious substances' which had 'a faint, choking smell'. He continued: 'Children returned from play with burns on their hands and faces.' People in the surrounding areas of Niagara Falls say toxic waste still impacts the residents. In a Facebook group about the town, a resident named Sally Ann wrote: 'The sad thing is that people believe that it's all 'fixed' and the chemicals don't go past the fence. 'It's still leaking into the ground. There are still active tank trucks that are pulling chemicals out of the ground. 'The part of the 102nd street dump on the river is visible from my dad's dock on Cayuga Island and I can see it from there. Everyone that lives around here is sick. 'My mother died from a rare autoimmune illness and my father has three different kinds of cancer. This is not coincidental. 'It's sad what they did to this area so many years ago. The repercussions will last forever.' In the same Facebook thread, Susan Rufrano Waitzman revealed how her aunt lived in the town and got mouth cancer, which resulted in the palate of her mouth being removed. Heidi Czewicz Barnett described how she had equally haunting memories of the place, writing: 'Lived on the corner of Colvin Boulevard and 97th Street. One of the original built houses. 'The fumes in the basement were so bad my mother used to pass out because of it and would always fall down the stairs to do laundry. 'My sister had boils all the time. My father used to watch contractors dig foundations for new homes and would ask what the green stuff was coming out of the ground. 'They told him to mind his own business. I myself came across some white rock that I thought was chalk and gave me a chemical burn all over my body. It's terrible.' William T Love had planned the community around the canal as an energy supply, but the project was ditched due to economic fluctuations. The EPA report noted that: 'In the 1920s the seeds of a genuine nightmare were planted [and] the canal was turned into a municipal and industrial chemical dumpsite.' It is believed that 82 different compounds were dumped in the site, including 11 suspected carcinogens. But after residents started complaining about chemical leaks and strange substances surfacing in their yards and basements that they said were leading to health problems, an investigation was launched. Tests revealed that there were high levels of toxic chemicals in the soil, air, and water, prompting government action. As a primary organizer of the Love Canal Homeowners Association, Lois Gibbs helped to bring wide public attention to the environmental crisis in Love Canal. Both of her young children started to suffer from health issues, including asthma and seizures, after moving to the town. After much campaigning, on August 7, 1978, the then-New York Governor Hugh Carey announced that the state would purchase the homes of residents affected by the Love Canal chemical contamination. This decision came after a public health emergency was declared due to the hazardous waste site. The state's purchase aimed to facilitate the relocation of families from the most contaminated areas. In his 1979 report, Beck noted that he was 'very pleased' with how the Love Canal relocation initiative was actioned. But he concluded: 'But this is not really where the story ends. Quite the contrary. 'We suspect that there are hundreds of such chemical dumpsites across this nation. 'Unlike Love Canal, few are situated so close to human settlements. But without a doubt, many of these old dumpsites are time bombs with burning fuses - their contents slowly leaching out. And the next victim cold be a water supply, or a sensitive wetland. 'Love Canal can now be added to a growing list of environmental disasters involving toxics, ranging from industrial workers stricken by nervous disorders and cancers to the discovery of toxic materials in the milk of nursing mothers.'
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Urgent nationwide recall for cough medicine contaminated with deadly bacteria
Children's cough medicine has been recalled for potentially containing deadly bacteria. New York-based Medtech Products Inc voluntarily recalled five lots of its Little Remedies Honey Cough Syrup because they were found to contain Bacillus cereus, which causes two types of stomach virus: diarrheal and emetic (vomiting). The former causes stomach cramps and diarrhea that start eight to 16 hours after consuming contaminated food, while the other leads to nausea, stomach cramps and vomiting within one to six hours. Though most healthy adults and children recover on their own, exposure to high levels of Bacillus cereus can produce toxins that attack the liver and bloodstream, causing death. The five contaminated lots were distributed nationwide through various retailers and online from December 14, 2022, through June 4, 2025. The UPC code is 7-56184-10737-9. The bacteria makes the medicines no longer shelf stable, according to the FDA 's notice. No illnesses have been reported. Scroll down to see all lot numbers and expiration dates. Bacillus cereus causes about 63,000 illnesses a year in the US. However, research suggests it has only killed a handful of people in the last decade, and specific figures are not reported. In these rare cases, enterotoxins produced by the bacteria can attack the liver and cause it to fail. It may also cause a bloodstream infection that triggers multi-organ failure. It spreads to food via soil, food and marine sponges. It's typically found in boiled or fried rice, cooked vegetables and meats, pasta, custards, casseroles, pastries, salads, soups, ice cream, vanilla sauce and herbs and spices, according to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). The contaminated syrup is packaged in a four fluid-ounce amber bottle and sold in an outer carton with the lot code on both the bottle and carton label. It's unclear how many bottles are in each lot. Consumers who have purchased the recalled cough syrups should stop using them immediately and contact their doctor if they have any symptoms. Medtech will issue refunds to customers who purchased contaminated products. Consumers with questions can contact Medtech via email at medicalaffairs@ through its website or by phone at (800 754-8853 Monday through Friday from 8:30am to 5:30pm EST. online form or by mail or fax.
Medical News Today
an hour ago
- Medical News Today
Can drinking raw milk make a person sick?
Raw milk describes milk that has not undergone the pasteurization process. As pasteurization removes disease-causing germs from milk, it is not advisable for people to drink raw milk. Raw milk, also known as unpasteurized milk, comes directly from animals, such as cows, goats, and sheep. Raw milk has not undergone pasteurization. This is a process that involves heating the milk to kill potentially harmful bacteria. Proponents of consuming raw milk may suggest that it provides additional health benefits. However, pasteurized milk offers the same nutritional benefits, without the risk of raw milk consumption. While good practices on farms may help to reduce contamination in milk, they cannot guarantee safety from bacteria without the pasteurization process. As such, due to the potential risks of consuming raw milk, it is advisable for people to instead drink milk that has undergone pasteurization to avoid the risk of milk-borne is the process of using heat to destroy pathogens present in food. The most common method of pasteurization in the U.S. is High Temperature Short Time (HTST) pasteurization. This method uses metal plates and hot water to raise milk temperatures to at least 161° F for no less than 15 seconds, then rapidly cooling the milk. This process kills the potentially harmful bacteria that may be present in raw milk. Some evidence suggests that it may be possible to produce raw milk with a lower risk of milk-borne illness. However, no scientific research supports that any possible benefit of raw milk outweighs the potential risks or safety concerns, particularly for certain people. people aged 65 or over pregnant people infants and small children people with a weakened immune system Proponents of drinking raw milk suggest that it tastes better, is nutritionally superior, and may also provide more health benefits than pasteurized milk. They note that these benefits may include: However, the FDA emphasize that there is no scientific evidence to support these claims. Additionally, as there are no federal standards for raw milk, and it does not undergo pasteurization, there is no way to guarantee that the raw milk is safe to consume. The FDA highlight that individuals consuming raw milk are instead at a higher risk of becoming ill or even dying from foodborne illness due to drinking raw milk. To avoid foodborne illnesses and other potentially serious health risks from drinking raw milk, people should instead choose to consume pasteurized milk and dairy products. People can check the labels of milk products to ensure they have undergone pasteurization. Other tips to avoid food poisoning can include : refrigerating perishable foods at a suitable temperature to slow bacterial growth avoid leaving perishable foods out for long periods throwing away any expired or spoiled foods Raw milk is milk that has not undergone the pasteurization process. This is a process that uses heat to kill potentially harmful bacteria that may be present in food. As such, health experts do not advise consuming raw milk. Proponents suggest that raw milk may possess additional health benefits. However, no scientific evidence supports these claims. Consuming raw milk can make people very ill, particularly those with weaker immune systems, such as children, older adults, pregnant people, and immunocompromised people. Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses Nutrition / Diet
