Ontario seeking primary care teams for 300,000 patients in plan to match people with doctors
Ontario is looking for up to 80 new or expanded primary care teams to serve 300,000 patients, as it plans to build a system that automatically attaches people to a family doctor or nurse practitioner team based on their postal code.
Health Minister Sylvia Jones says the province is launching a call for proposals on Thursday, with $213 million attached to create or expand the 80 teams as part of a $1.8-billion announcement she made on the eve of the provincial election.
Jones and former federal Liberal health minister Jane Philpott, who the Progressive Conservative government has tapped to be the head of a provincial primary care action team, announced in January that Ontario would spend that money over the next few years to give all Ontarians access to primary care by 2029.
The government plans to achieve that by creating a system that automatically connects people to a primary care team based on postal code, and this call for proposals is targeted to the postal codes that have the highest number of people without a primary care provider.
Jones says the 80 new or expanded primary care teams will be expected to pull from the Health Care Connect waitlist to fill their rosters.
She says today's announcement builds on a previous one from early 2024, when 78 new or expanded primary care teams were announced.
"What's exciting is we've already seen some of those teams are completely operational and actually exceeding their commitment to matching patients who are looking for primary care clinicians," Jones said in an interview.
"[This] announcement really builds on that. Up to 80 teams is what we hope to be able to approve, frankly, by summer and again, if the February announcement is any indication, they're ready, and they're ready to get started, and they're ready to hire and to take on those patients."
2.5 million Ontarians don't have family doctor: association
Jones and Philpott's plan would connect two million more people to primary care, which they say would fulfil the goal of attaching everyone to a family doctor or nurse practitioner.
The Ontario Medical Association says there are 2.5 million Ontarians without a family doctor right now and the number is expected to rise to 4.4 million in a year, but Jones cites data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, which says that 90 per cent of Ontarians have a regular health-care provider. This plan would cover that last 10 per cent, she says.
WATCH | Over 1,000 people lined up to try to get a family doctor in Walkerton, Ont., in January:
Hundreds wait in the snow to get a family doctor in rural Ontario
3 months ago
Duration 2:03
The primary care teams would include a family doctor or nurse practitioner, and other health-care professionals such as nurses, physician assistants, social workers and dietitians. Operating models include family health teams, community health centres, nurse practitioner-led clinics, and Indigenous primary health-care organizations.
The list of 125 postal codes where the need is highest is just the start of the location-based plan, Philpott said.
"There are needs everywhere, but in some cases, the numbers of people who don't have access to primary care are higher than in other areas," she said.
"We all wish that we could fill these gaps overnight, but it's going to take a little bit of time, and so with these very significant investments that the government is making, we wanted to make sure that, as we start to roll it out, that it goes to the places where there are very high numbers of unattached."
Ontario is also putting an additional $22 million toward helping existing primary care teams meet rising costs for their facilities and supplies, and $37 million in Ontario Health Teams.
The government expects to do a second call for proposals in September.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
a day ago
- National Observer
Paying the price for our toxin addiction
'How badly are we messing up? Badly. Can we stop? It's hard: we're addicted to our own toxins. What are the penalties for not stopping? Severe.' So said Margaret Atwood, reflecting on our toxic chemical habits. By mid-summer, the scent of soil is joined by something far more troubling: chemical traces from weed killers, pesticides and other toxins saturating farms, parks and gardens. This raises urgent questions: why are these substances still so widespread, and who is paying the price? The short answer: private sector interests continue to drive chemical use, often at the cost of human and ecological health. From soil to system The impact of these toxic chemicals is made clear in numerous reports documenting dramatic declines in insect populations, as well as the birds and other animals that feed upon them. A recent study of US imperilled species found that while land and sea use change and climate change were the most prevalent threats, pollution was the fourth-most important factor and most species were threatened by a combination of several factors. The combination of toxic pollution, climate change and biodiversity loss (' triple planetary crisis ') has put human health and well-being in danger. Scientists have documented that the Earth is now beyond the safe operating limit to support humanity with six out of nine planetary boundaries exceeded, one of which is 'novel entities' such as pesticides and other toxic chemicals. The commercial determinants of health Business, market and political practices, favourable policy environments and global drivers such as market-driven economies and globalization have contributed to the ill health and injustices associated with hazardous chemicals. Why are pesticides still so widespread, and who is paying the price? write Jane McArthur, Raquel Feroe and Trevor Hancock A greater understanding of the impact of private sector activity on human health originated in the 2010s with the concept of commercial determinants of health. This field, situated within public health, recognizes that commercial strategies, shaped by both political and economic systems, can significantly influence health outcomes, social inequality, climate change and pollution, positively and negatively. The concept of commercial determinants of health shows how corporate strategies — enabled by political and economic systems — can shape health, inequality, climate change and pollution, both positively and negatively. Indigenous peoples and children are particularly affected Indigenous Peoples are directly impacted by pesticide use. For example, glyphosate and other herbicides are widely used in forestry, which disrupts traditional Indigenous harvesting and violates harvesting rights. As such, Indigenous communities have advocated for action by governments on pesticide spraying, but little action has been taken. The federal government's own survey data reveals that Indigenous Peoples in Canada have less confidence that Health Canada is doing a good job of protecting human health and the environment from pesticides, compared with non-Indigenous people in Canada. Indigenous knowledgekeepers and land stewards have asserted that ' pesticides have no place in Indigenous stewardship.' This begs the question to what extent, if any, is there a place for pesticides given the current triple planetary crisis? Unions, such as the United Food and Commercial Workers, have expressed their concern about pesticide overuse, especially as it impacts workers in the agricultural and food processing sectors, who face health consequences. Overuse of dangerous pesticides is linked to a growing reliance on vulnerable labour such as migrant workers, a move that has been criticized by UN Special Rapporteurs. Pesticide exposure is especially harmful to children due to biological and developmental factors. As well, children may face greater exposure to pesticide residue found indoors due to behavioral factors (crawling, mouthing etc.). Adverse health impacts for children exposed to pesticides include altered behaviour, liver cancer, brain tumours, endocrine system impacts and effects on puberty. In light of those concerns, the widespread use of pesticides in the home and garden to kill dandelions or ants is a frivolous and unnecessary practice. Canada can take concrete steps and reverse the status quo As the host country, Canada played a leadership role in negotiating the Global Biodiversity Framework, aiming to halt and reverse biodiversity loss to sustain life on Earth. Under the Framework, Canada agreed in Target 7 to reduce overall risk from pesticides and highly hazardous chemicals by at least half by 2030. However, Canada currently lacks the infrastructure to systematically manage the growing number of chemical products approved for use. To meet its commitments under the Framework, Canada must move beyond pledges and take concrete regulatory and policy action. Health Canada should invest in data collection, safer alternatives, and incentives for industry innovation, while swiftly removing hazardous products containing PFAS, genotoxins, neurotoxins and endocrine disruptors. The Pesticide Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) should raise registration fees, and the federal government must enforce the polluter-pay principle so the costs to public health of our chemical addictions can be mitigated. For the children who play in the dirt, the workers who farm the soil, and the Indigenous communities who maintain a life-giving connection with the land — as well as the rest of us — reducing the development, registration, sale and use of pesticides and other toxic chemicals is necessary. World leaders are not ignorant of this fact. Jane McArthur is toxics program director at the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE).
Canada News.Net
a day ago
- Canada News.Net
Low vaccination drives measles surge in North America, says PAHO
WASHINGTON, D.C.: The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) noted that measles cases are surging across the Americas, with North America seeing the sharpest rise and 18 deaths recorded so far this year in Mexico, the United States, and Canada. As of August 8, PAHO confirmed 10,139 measles cases across 10 countries in the region, a 34-fold increase compared to the same period in 2024. Of the 18 deaths, 14 were in Mexico, three in the United States, and one in Canada. Many of the fatalities in Mexico were among Indigenous people aged 1 to 54. The agency attributed the outbreaks largely to low vaccination coverage, noting that 71 percent of reported cases occurred in unvaccinated people, while another 18 percent involved individuals whose vaccination status was unknown. "Measles is preventable with two doses of a vaccine, which is proven to be very safe and effective," said Daniel Salas, PAHO's immunization lead. "To stop these outbreaks, countries must urgently strengthen routine immunization and conduct targeted vaccination campaigns in high-risk communities." Measles is one of the most contagious diseases in the world and spreads quickly among unvaccinated populations, especially children. PAHO has urged governments in the region to ramp up immunization efforts to contain the spread. In the United States, vaccination coverage has slipped. A recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study found that rates for measles, diphtheria, and polio declined among kindergartners in the 2024–2025 school year compared to the previous year.
CTV News
a day ago
- CTV News
Crime rate around Somerset supervised consumption site lower than government suggested when announcing closure
The Somerset West Community Health Centre on Eccles Street is seen in this undated file image. (CTV News Ottawa) The crime rate around the Somerset West Community Health Centre did not rise to the figures put forward by the provincial government last year when announcing the closure of its supervised consumption site. The drug consumption site at 55 Eccles St. was one of the first sites the government announced last year would close because it was within 200 metres of a daycare. In a news release announcing the move, dated Aug. 20, 2024, the province said, 'the crime rate near the Ottawa site was 250 per cent higher than the rest of the city.' Health Minister Sylvia Jones also told the Association of Municipalities of Ontario conference that year that violent crime was up 146 per cent near the Eccles Street site. CTV News Ottawa asked Jones's office for the source of the statistics that were shared in 2024 but has yet to receive a response. Following the province's statements last year, CTV News Ottawa filed a freedom of information request with the Ottawa Police Service for crime statistics in the 200 metres immediately surrounding 55 Eccles St. The results show that the crime rate and the number of violent crimes reported to police in 2023 were not as high as the minister suggested. The Ottawa Police Service said the crime rate in 2023 for the West Centretown neighbourhood, where 55 Eccles St. is located, was only 14 per cent higher than the citywide average. The rate was 5,078.83 per 100,000 residents, compared with 4,430 per 100,000 residents citywide, according to police statistics. Police also said there were 20 violent crimes reported in the 200 metres around 55 Eccles St. in 2023, down from 26 in 2022, a 23 per cent decline. This represents 0.2 per cent of all violent crimes reported citywide in 2023. The number of violent crimes reported in 2017, the year prior to the supervised consumption site opening, was 12. The total number of calls for service—not including cancelled calls, false alarms, and false 9-1-1 calls—was 905 in 2023, up 18 per cent from 764 in 2022 and down from 1,047 in 2021. There were 586 calls for service in the 200 metres around 55 Eccles St. in 2017. There was a 158 per cent jump in the number of violent crimes reported in the area in 2018, going from 12 to 31. The number of violent crimes rose to 37 in 2019, then fell to 21 in 2020, and rose again to 35 in 2021, before falling in 2022 and 2023. The exact nature of each crime is unknown. Data for 2024 was not included in the request because the request was filed last summer. The Somerset West Community Health Centre was granted approval in early January to transition to a homelessness and addiction recovery treatment (HART) hub, which will not offer safer supply services, supervised drug consumption or needle exchange programs. The health centre's supervised drug consumption site closed in March.
