Broad coalition lays out impacts of potential cuts to medicaid
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (NEXSTAR) — Three million people are enrolled in Medicaid in Illinois, and their coverage could be impacted if congress decides to make cuts.
'We've got to keep this program going, not just for our seniors, as we've got people with disability, we've got the children, we've got the young families, and it's a lot of them,'
House Republicans in Washington D.C. passed a resolution that asked certain federal agencies to cut $880 billion dollars in spending over the next 10 years. The resolution does not explicitly mention Medicaid. Experts say that number can't be reached without cutting the state based health insurance plan for the elderly, children and those with disabilities.
'I think that the fact that it's such a large amount, $880 billion over ten years, there's no way they can cut that much out of the federal budget without touching Medicaid,' Rep. Anna Moeller (D-Elgin) said.
Lawmakers in Springfield held a hearing to highlight the impacts these cuts could have, but little can be done at the state level to curb the hit, which led republicans to question the motivations of the hearing.
'I think, this is performative. We don't know what will happen. There's a lot of things that we have no control over budget negotiations going on at the national level,' Rep. Bill Hauter (R-Morton) said.
It wasn't just politicians speaking though. Hospital executives warned that this could lead to closures.
That would lead to less reimbursement to hospitals when we're already not being paid the full cost of care,' Executive Director of the Illinois Hospital Association A.J. Wilhelmi said.
Health insurance companies showed up to say cuts to Medicaid could result in private health insurance costs going up. they said less people on the state sponsored plans means more people on subsidized private plans, and the subsidies come from people paying those premiums.
Basically you create more costs into the system and all kind of things are financed different ways, but they're coming out of the same pockets,' Laura Minzer, President of the Illinois Life and Health insurance council
Minzer used a Montana study as evidence for the prediction. Under the Affordable Care Act, there was an expansion for who can be on Medicaid. Montana went through with the expansion, but put a sunset clause in the expansion. When it close to ending, they conducted a study on what the impacts could be.
Congress has until March 14th to pass a spending plan. The resolution that called for the cuts has not passed the Senate.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Several anti-Trump ‘No Kings Day' rallies planned in WV this weekend
Hundreds showed up to the West Virginia Capitol in Charleston on Saturday, April 5, 2025, to take part in a nationwide Hands Off rally to protest the actions of the Trump administration. (Zachary Hiser | West Virginia Watch) As the nation's capitol prepares for a massive military parade to mark the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary and President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, organizers in several West Virginia cities are planning to mark the day with anti-Trump protests. 'No Kings Day of Action' rallies are planned for cities around the country, including Berkeley Springs, Bluefield, Buckhannon, Charleston, Elkins, Huntington and others. The events are in response to what the organization calls 'increasing authoritarian excesses and corruption' from the president and allies. 'In America, we don't do kings,' reads a statement on the website for a grassroots organization made up of hundreds of local groups. 'They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services. The corruption has gone too far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings.' An estimated 200,000 attendees, 150 military vehicles and 50 aircraft are expected for Trump's military parade in Washington, D.C. Saturday, according to news reports. The spectacle will cost an estimated $45 million, including $16 million to repair the streets of D.C. following the event. A spokesman for the West Virginia National Guard said Wednesday that the agency will not send personnel or equipment to participate in the military parade, but they do plan to send 200 members of the CERF-P team to support the Nation Capitol Region, at its request, as part of the Guard's standing missing to support events of its size. Trump has defended the cost of the event, calling it 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it,' in a recent interview with NBC News. 'We have the greatest missiles in the world,' Trump said. 'We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it.' To Dr. Kate Waldeck, one of the organizers for Saturday's rally in Huntington, the parade is another example of the 'massive' amount of money that Republicans want to divert from people who need it. The Trump-backed, 'big, beautiful bill' that passed the House of Representatives and is making its way through the Senate would cut billions in funding to Medicaid and food assistance to low-income Americans. 'We're seeing, increasingly, that our social safety net is going to be stripped away,' Waldeck said. 'And obviously, we hope that this political situation is temporary, but in the meantime, the reality is that we're going to have to build new networks for our people. So our theme for this [rally] is 'No Kings,' but we are taking that and extending it to just to… 'No kings, just community.' Huntington's event will include speakers, music, guided meditation for kids, bystander and Narcan training as well as a goods drive for Lily's Place, Harmony House and the local city mission, she said. 'We want to have a good time with our community, and we want to show our neighbors, especially even the ones that don't feel safe coming to events like this, so people who are minorities or noncitizens, that we're thinking of them,' Waldeck said. She added that everyone is welcome at the nonpartisan, nonviolent protest event 'as long as they adhere to the ground rules of no racism, no homophobia and transphobia.' Debra Kilgore of Mercer County Indivisible, is helping organize the event in Bluefield. 'I couldn't stay silent any longer,' Kilgore said of her reasons for protesting. 'I couldn't hope that someone else will take care of these issues and make and hold our representatives accountable, because it's not happening, especially in our state, where we have our Republican representatives in the federal government who are going along with everything. The Constitution grants Congress the power to levy tariffs, but they've allowed Trump to 'run the tariff show,' she said. 'They're letting it happen,' she said. 'And so, watching, I'll call them the enablers. I can't rely on somebody else to do something anymore.' While Mercer County, like the rest of West Virginia, voted overwhelmingly to elect Trump to a second term, Kilgore said as the year wears on, she's hearing from people that they no longer support the president. 'More and more people are saying, 'You know, I may have voted for Trump, but I didn't expect this,'' she said. 'Or people who never voted for Trump but in this area are afraid to say 'I'm not a Trump voter,' are starting to make their presence known.' The events Saturday come as protests against Trump's immigration policies continue in Los Angeles. The Trump administration is sending nearly 5,000 National Guard troops and Marines to the city, against the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Newsom, a Democrat, called Trump's move a 'brazen abuse of power,' according to news reports. In Texas, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott deployed the National Guard across the state as more demonstrations are expected there Wednesday. 'Peaceful protest is legal,' Abbott wrote on the social media platform X. 'Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest. [The Texas National Guard] will use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order. Waldeck said she's concerned about the National Guard being deployed to respond to protests against Newsom's will, but she's not concerned about the protests themselves becoming violent. 'We are aware of the national situation obviously, and [host organization] 50501 is unwavering in its commitment to peaceful protest, so we will have event staff there trained in de-escalation in the event there are counter protestors etc,' Waldeck said. Cindy Stemple, chair of the Randolph County Democratic Executive Committee, said the event they're planning for Elkins will be a 'peaceful celebration of our country and flag.' The event will feature speakers and musicians. Anyone who wants to sing or play an instrument will be allowed to do so. 'I think the protests are generally going to be peaceful unless Trump and everybody incites the people,' Stemple said. 'That's kind of my feeling. Now, I'm not in LA, I don't know. I'm not in Texas. I'm not in D.C., but when you have somebody threatening a first right, First Amendment right, which is a right to peaceful protest, there's a problem.' Stemple said Saturday's event will be the Elkins community eighth anti-Trump and 'pro-Democracy' rally. At each one, they've also collected donations for community needs like flood relief for Southern West Virginia or contributions to the local food pantry, she said. 'We are trying to do something good most every time that we hold one of these — and I call it a celebration,' she said. 'We become friends [and] allies just standing up for our country and enjoying the time together.' The rallies are planned for: Noon to 1:30 p.m. at the Morgan County Courthouse in Berkeley Springs Noon to 1:30 p.m. at the corner of King and Queen Streets in Martinsburg Noon to 3 p.m. Saturday at Bluefield Downtown Park, Federal and Commerce Streets in Bluefield Noon at Hart Avenue and Kanawha Street in Buckhannon 10 a.m. at WVU Coliseum in Morgantown 1 to 4 p.m. at Heritage Station in Huntington Noon to 2 p.m. at the state Capitol in Charleston Noon to 2 p.m. at Washington Street West and Jefferson Street in Lewisburg Noon to 1:30 at the Randolph County Courthouse in Elkins 1 to 3 p.m. at the Hampshire County Courthouse in Romney 3 to 4:30 p.m. at McMurran Hall in Shepherdstown 12:30 to 2:30 p.m. at Madison Elementary School in Wheeling More information is available at SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX


Axios
25 minutes ago
- Axios
Incensed House Democrats plan ICE funding war
House Democrats, incensed at being repeatedly denied access to ICE facilities, are warming to the idea of using the appropriations process to force policy changes at the agency if they retake Congress. Why it matters: ICE-focused protests and pressure from their grassroots are forcing Democrats to inch away from their instinctively defensive crouch on immigration. But there is internal division on how far to go. "You've got a situation where our base is demanding more and more of us every day," said one House Democrat, speaking on the condition of anonymity. The lawmaker added that "a number of us have been told by constituents that we have to be willing to get shot" while trying to conduct oversight at ICE facilities and "be able to make news out of it." Many Democrats are still scarred by GOP attacks on the #AbolishICE movement and hesitant to take steps that appear to be aimed at dismantling or downsizing the agency. State of play: Just over the weekend, House Democrats in California and New York were refused access to ICE facilities in their respective states to perform checks on detained migrants. Reps. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) and Norma Torres (D-Calif.) have alleged that ICE officials even sprayed "some type of irritant into the air to push us back." Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) is being prosecuted by the Justice Department for allegedly assaulting law enforcement — which she denies — during a visit to an ICE facility in her state during which she was initially refused entry. What they're saying: Congressional Hispanic Caucus chair Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.) said he believes Democrats should "reassess the funding possibilities. Absolutely." He said of being denied access to an ICE facility this weekend: "They ask for money, right? And then ... I go there and they don't allow us to go and check out the facilities." Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.), a member of Democratic leadership, told Axios, "Everybody's on board with the fact that what's going on right now is not right, and ... reform is needed." "This administration is ... rounding people up by mistake — they don't care," said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.), chair of the center-left New Democrat Coalition. "We can't let that happen." Zoom in: Key Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee signaled that ICE is on the table as part of a broader effort to scrutinize Trump administration spending. "There will be a review of everything ... looking at what are the kinds of things we can do to get our government back on track," said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), the panel's ranking member. Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.), the ranking member of the homeland security subcommittee, told Axios: "We're going to look at all funding. ... What's happening right now is really bad." Between the lines: A clash is already brewing over how far to go — with some progressives eyeing actual funding cuts as moderate border hawks draw a bright red line in opposition to that idea. "Some of us would like to see it completely broken down ... I've been talking about reducing funding," said Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.). Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) criticized "hypocrisy" among Democrats, "where folks want to campaign against ICE when we're in the minority, but then when we're in the majority, we continue to funnel unfettered funds with absolutely no guardrails." Centrist Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), a member of the Appropriations Committee, told Axios he is "sure there will be a push," but he "will not support reducing ICE" funding. The bottom line: Even centrists like Cuellar aren't ruling out supporting potential policy riders to appropriations bills to try to reform the agency. "It's a policy. The men and women, they're the same. It just depends what policy comes down," he told Axios. Ramirez, for her part, was clear-eyed that "you're not going to see an abolishing of ICE" even though "some of us might want that."


Axios
25 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Schumer targets Trump budget bill on gun silencers deregulation
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) will fight to strike a provision making gun silencers more easily accessible from the GOP's "big, beautiful bill," Axios has learned. Why it matters: The House-passed version of the bill removes silencers from the National Firearms Act, scrapping a $200 customer and manufacturer tax on firearm silencers and wiping out federal registration requirements. The gun silencer provision is just one part of a wide array of policies shoved into the GOP's mega budget reconciliation bill that Democrats argue violate congressional rules. The process Senate Republicans are using only allows for budget-related items in the bill, in exchange for being able to pass with just 51 votes. Any policies deemed unrelated to the budget will be excised. Schumer will argue the silencer provision violates that rule, and should be tossed out of the Senate's version of the package. He will rally gun violence victims and gun advocacy groups on Thursday to oppose the measure. The big picture: Getting rid of the silencer regulations has long been a goal for grassroots gun groups, and the provision is supported by the NRA. John Commerford, Executive Director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action, applauded the provision passing the House last month: "This represents a monumental victory for Second Amendment rights, eliminating burdensome regulations on the purchase of critical hearing protection devices." But silencers have been used in a number of mass shootings over the years, including a 2019 Virginia Beach shooting that killed 12 and a 2023 California shooting that killed 11. Silencers are meant to reduce the sound, recoil and flash of a firearm. Democrats and gun control advocates argue the silencers make it harder for law enforcement to respond to an active shooter. "There's a reason silencers have been regulated for nearly a century: They make it much harder for law enforcement and bystanders to react quickly to gunshots," said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety, after the House passed the bill last month. Between the lines: Schumer and Senate Democrats are turning to procedural challenges to cut away at the GOP's mammoth tax and spending cut bill.