Hunters, anglers and tribes see win in Ferguson's Fish and Wildlife Commission picks
(Photo by Jonny Armstrong, courtesy of Oregon State University)
Hunters, anglers, and a bloc of 20 tribes in western Washington are among those pleased with three nominees Gov. Bob Ferguson announced this week for the state's Fish and Wildlife Commission.
In January, shortly after he took office, Ferguson halted two nominations former Gov. Jay Inslee made to the commission, including the reappointment of Tim Ragen, a retired marine mammal expert who had served as the panel's vice chair since last year and had strong support from wildlife protection groups.
Though Ferguson removed him from the nine-member commission, Ragen remained in the running for the job alongside 13 other eligible candidates, but the governor ultimately cut him loose. And he nixed Inslee's other nominee — Lynn O'Connor, who operated a sign company in northeast Washington for two decades and was a former park aide and ranger.
Instead, he reappointed two commissioners — Jim Anderson and Molly Linville, who O'Connor would have replaced. Both Anderson and Linville are backed by hunting and fishing groups and a coalition of tribes that support hatchery fish production. Some environmental groups in Washington oppose fish hatcheries, pointing to evidence that they are a threat to wild fish populations.
Ferguson also appointed Victor Garcia, who is less known to key groups lobbying the governor's office on the nominations. Garcia, a retired teacher, is a longtime hunter and fisherman who worked earlier in his career as a commercial fisherman in the Bering Sea region.
'We're going to have people that we can work with again,' Ron Garner, state board president for Puget Sound Anglers, said by phone on Tuesday. 'I'm excited.'
Lisa Wilson, vice chair of the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission and a member of the Lummi Indian Business Council, said she was, 'Just really happy with feeling heard by the new governor.'
'We did have concerns about the appointments that Inslee left us with,' she added. 'It took a lot of footwork to reverse that.'
But for wildlife advocates and those who want to see the commission expand its focus beyond species that are hunted and fished, to look more at broader issues around the ecological value of wildlife and strengthening biodiversity, Ferguson's picks were a deep disappointment.
'Governor Ferguson, by aligning himself with special interests of hunting and angling … has taken a step backward from a more forward-thinking agency that will protect the wildlife trust for current and future generations,' said Fred Koontz, a former commissioner who resigned in 2021 after clashing with hunting interests.
The group Washington Wildlife First, which had pressed for Ragen's reappointment, issued a statement saying that they felt 'betrayed' by Ferguson's actions.
'Governor Ferguson insisted that he wanted to create a more 'balanced' Fish and Wildlife Commission, but instead, he has tilted it away from the values of Washingtonians, and toward the powerful special interests that have long controlled state fish and wildlife policy,' the group said in a statement shared on Wednesday.
The Fish and Wildlife Commission establishes policy and provides oversight for the state Department of Fish and Wildlife. The commissioners are appointed by the governor and serve six-year terms.
While for many state residents the commission is a lesser-known government entity, it's a frequent venue for thorny debates. For example, last year, the commission took sharply divided votes to maintain state-level endangered species protections for gray wolves. At a meeting last week, commissioners were dealing with hunting rules for cougars and black bears.
Ferguson said he opted to pull back Inslee's nominees because of a December report from the nonpartisan William D. Ruckelshaus Center that highlighted criticism of the commission, and after 'outreach from multiple individuals, entities, and tribes.'
The Ruckelshaus Center report included findings from more than 100 interviews with people familiar with the agency. It said interviewees described the commission as 'dysfunctional, politically polarized, and caught up in conflict,' and specifically raised concerns about a lack of transparency and selection criteria for commissioners.
'Molly, Jim and Victor offer deep and varied experience, as well as unique perspectives,' Ferguson said in a statement. 'The Ruckelshaus report raised serious concerns about the commission, and we believe these individuals will help to address those issues.'
The governor's office has emphasized that the Senate granted unanimous approval for the governor's request to cancel Inslee's nominations of Ragen and O'Connor.
One group to pressure Ferguson on the nominations is known as the Hatchery Coalition. It consists of four tribes — the Lummi, Tulalip, Upper Skagit and Squaxin — as well as Puget Sound Anglers, and a sport fishing charter company based in Ilwaco. Garner and Wilson were both involved in the coalition's outreach to the governor's office.
The coalition backed the reappointment of Anderson and Linville. They also wanted to see former state lawmaker Brian Blake appointed. Here, Ferguson didn't go along. The Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission pushed for the same three candidates.
In another camp were advocates like those with Washington Wildlife First, which describes itself as wanting to 'transform Washington's relationship with its fish and wildlife from an approach centered around consumptive use to a more democratic paradigm that values science, recognizes the intrinsic value of individual animals, and prioritizes protecting, preserving and perpetuating wild lives.'
Advocates on this side pressed for the reappointment of Ragen, who was previously the executive director and scientific program director of the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission.
In mid-March, 74 scientists, conservationists, and environmental advocates wrote to Ferguson urging him to reverse his removal of Ragen from the commission.
'Now more than ever, Washington's Fish and Wildlife Commission needs leaders with a strong record of decision-making grounded in science,' they wrote.
Ragen's 'unparalleled experience and deep understanding of marine ecosystems — particularly those critical to the survival of Southern Resident killer whales and wild salmon — make him uniquely qualified to guide complex fisheries and wildlife management decisions,' they added.
Koontz was one of the people who signed onto the letter and suggested Ragen, with his credentials as a Ph.D. conservation scientist, had become a symbol of efforts to move the commission in a new direction. 'The status quo is not moving us forward,' he added.
But during his time on the commission, Ragen had frictions with those involved with the Hatchery Coalition, particularly Wilson, who flagged concerns she had with Ragen in a letter last year to Inslee. That letter was later forwarded to Ferguson's office.
Dane Czarnecki, a hunting rights activist, was among those unhappy with recent shifts at the commission. 'They moved away from hearing their traditional stakeholders,' he said.
'We can hopefully start bridging these divides,' Czarnecki added.
Anderson, one of the two commissioners Ferguson reappointed, has been on the commission since 2019. He served as executive director of the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission from 1985 to 2005 and has hunted and fished since childhood.
Linville has also been on the commission since 2019. In the early 2000s, she worked as a wildlife biologist for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and now runs a 6,000-acre cattle ranch near Wenatchee that she and her husband took over after her father-in-law passed away.
Garcia, Ferguson's new appointee, taught biology and other science courses in Washington public schools, most recently in Anacortes. He's originally from Gray's Harbor County and has a bachelor's degree in marine zoology from the University of Washington and a master's in science education from Vanderbilt University.
'I grew up digging razor clams, dipping smelt up at Kalaloch, crabbing, hunting deer and elk, hiking, kayaking, everything that one does around here when you really love being outdoors,' he told the Standard in a phone interview on Tuesday.
Garcia said he left behind commercial fishing in the 1990s when he started a family. He also worked over the years as a biologist for the National Marine Fisheries Service.
He suggested his background and interests give him a unique perspective to bring to the commission. 'I do citizen science, I work on eelgrass assessment, salmon spawning surveys. I'm a hunter, but I'm also in Audubon,' he said. 'I've gone all over the world to view specific birds. But, every now and then, I do hunt some of them.'
'I think my job is to really listen and look at the science,' he added, 'and not go into it with any one polarized, preconceived notion.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Washington governor wants agencies to look for deeper cuts
The Washington state Capitol on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Jacquelyn Jimenez Romero/Washington State Standard) Just weeks after signing a budget that relied on spending cuts and new taxes to balance, Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson is telling state agencies to tighten their fiscal belts even more. The warning from the Democratic governor comes amid an increasingly gloomy budget outlook and underscores that the state's financial difficulties are not over. 'We will very likely continue to face a challenging state budget environment in the coming year and anticipate increasing caseloads and ongoing uncertainty in the economy and federal funding,' reads a June 4 memo from Ferguson's budget director to agency leaders and presidents of higher education institutions. The letter penned by K.D. Chapman-See, director of the Office of Financial Management, precedes departments and colleges submitting funding requests that they hope Ferguson will support heading into next year. Those submissions are due by Sept. 15. Ferguson will release his proposed spending plans in December and the Legislature will consider them in the 2026 session. The letter says requests should only be for 'critical and emergent costs' that cannot be covered within their existing budgets. It urges them to look for 'additional options for efficiencies, reform, administrative savings, or reductions in non-essential services and programs.' The tone of Chapman-See's memo echoes a directive issued a year ago by her predecessor in which agency directors were told to focus on maintaining current programs, while not seeking money for new ones or expansions. Five months later came the November memo that, for the first time, identified a projected budget shortfall between $10 billion and $12 billion over the next four years. Once Ferguson settled into office, he started saying the chasm had widened to $16 billion. Democrats used their majorities in the House and Senate to pass a two-year $78 billion budget that was balanced with spending cuts and billions of dollars in new and higher taxes. The tax package Democrats assembled totals around $9.4 billion over four years to fully cover the gap. Ferguson, whose vetoes left the state with a little less savings, warned the fiscal situation could worsen when the next forecast of state tax collections is released on June 24. On Tuesday, Washington chief economist David Reich offered a sense of what to expect when he delivered his quarterly review of the economy to the Economic and Revenue Forecast Council, a bipartisan panel of state lawmakers and agency executives, including Chapman-See. It didn't sound good. Tax collections are coming in lower than predicted in March. Uncertainty surrounding tariffs, trade and federal policies are having a chilling effect on exports, consumer spending, and general activity across many sectors. While there was an uptick in sales of new vehicles, Reich said, it might have been folks rushing to beat new or higher tariffs. Sales of expensive properties generated a few more dollars than anticipated, he said. But new housing starts are behind March projections. Prior to his presentation, the council adopted a new four-year outlook showing Washington will have less money on hand at the end of the next budget cycle than previously estimated. The state will have an ending balance of $80 million in its main operating account at the end of the 2025-27 biennium, down from the $225 million penciled in before lawmakers approved the budget in April. Projections show the operating account will be in the red to the tune of $56 million in the 2028 fiscal year before rebounding to a positive sum by July 1, 2029. Washington isn't in any immediate budget danger and has more than $2 billion in emergency reserves. Still, Chapman-See said the financial situation is why agencies are being pressed to further reduce spending. And, she said, it is anticipated that travel, hiring and contracting freezes imposed this fall will remain in place. Democratic budget writers from the House and Senate who serve on the council said there's nothing for lawmakers to do, yet. 'I'm not sure what we can do before January,' said Sen. June Robinson, D-Everett, the lead budget writer in the Senate. 'There are a lot of pieces of information that will be collected and considered, including what the federal government might do between now and then.'


Axios
18 hours ago
- Axios
Divorcing in Trump's Washington? Good luck
When Washington couples split up today, they're facing a super volatile party in the courtroom. No, not their ex — it's President Trump's policies. The big picture: Divorce is already stressful. But add federal layoffs, a saturated job market, an uncertain real estate landscape and a possible recession? Buckle up, divorce lawyers tell Axios. Zoom in: Trump's fast-paced decision making is particularly impacting Washingtonians' finances — and money is a big sticking point for couples who are splitting. "When the income takes a dip, how do you calculate alimony? How do you calculate child support? How long is the decrease in income going to last? Nobody knows," says lawyer Jessica Markham, whose client list includes many former and current federal employees. "When the economy is not doing well, you have less options on how to problem-solve untangling two people's financial lives." What they're saying: Some of Markham's clients who've been fired from the federal government, forced to retire early, or are scared of layoffs are now requesting short- or long-term alimony from their exes — something she says wouldn't have happened a year ago. "It's such a new dynamic to their relationship," she says. "They were previously in a very secure position, and in those cases, it's harder to settle, because it's so shocking." Other wannabe-divorcés are delaying the process because they want more security about their employment status before they put themselves on the hook for something they can't afford. Housing is another issue. Some divorcing feds are worried about buying a new single-person pad because they're unsure of their future. One of Markham's federal clients initially had trouble getting a mortgage because the lender was worried they wouldn't be a safe borrower — their agency employer was doing layoffs, Markham says. Others are holding onto homes to see if Washington's real estate market dips, making it cheaper to buy their former spouse out, says lawyer Maria Simon. Also a problem: Child care. Now that feds are back in the office full time, some are asking the ex for help with day care or a nanny and getting pushback, says Simon. "[The partner is saying,] 'Well you never needed it before. Why do I have to pay for it now?'" Zoom out: There's no tax bracket that isn't affected. Lawyer Cheryl New says her Washington power-player clients are worried about how Trump's policies are affecting the valuation of their assets, businesses and investments, and how that will affect their divorce settlements. "[They're thinking,] 'Am I going to be able to pay my employees? Am I going to be able to afford the four homes that I bought and the three kids in the private school?'" New says. The intrigue: New's client list includes some divorcing politicos in Trump's orbit, she tells Axios — who are equally freaked by the effects of his policies on their own breakups. "What you see in the press and what you see on television is not precisely what I'm seeing behind closed doors," she says. "[They're] just as worried, if not more, because there's some insider information there." New says she also represents lawyers who left their jobs at some of the white-collar law firms working pro bono with Trump — and who are now worried about how their lack of income will affect their divorce proceedings. What we're watching: Simon anticipates that custody battles will begin to feature former feds who have to leave the DMV to find work in a less saturated market — and want to take the kids with them, she says.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
NAACP voices concerns as Ferguson votes to cut funding for consent decree
FERGUSON, Mo. – The NAACP of St. Louis County is raising concerns after the Ferguson City Council voted to cut funding for a 2016 federal consent decree, which mandated sweeping reforms to the city's police and municipal courts after the death of Michael Brown. The decree took effect after years of protests following Brown's death, who was shot and killed by a Ferguson police officer in August 2014. According to FOX 2's news partners at the St. Louis Post Dispatch, earlier this week, the Ferguson City Council voted 4-3 to reduce the amount the city spends on the decree. The move aims to cut some decree-related spending for the next fiscal year, starting July 1, from $412,700 to $206,350. NAACP St. Louis County President John Bowman released a statement on Saturday to FOX 2, which reads, in part: 'While we can acknowledge the efforts made over the last nine years by all parties, particularly the community in learning to trust Ferguson's law enforcement officers, elected officials, and community leaders, there is still a long way to go. Trying to escape the federal consent decree too soon by cutting the budget and rushing remaining mandatory reforms says that you prioritize checking off boxes over achieving the necessary results to make Ferguson safer and more united.' He added that cutting funding says the council prioritizes 'checking off boxes' over achieving results. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.