
NAPLAN 2025: WA Education Minister Sabine Winton says teachers facing more students with complex needs
The results, released today, found about one in three children across Australia did not meet the proficiency benchmark, meaning they were unable to read, write or solve maths problems at the basic level for their age.
WA's Year 3 performance prompted concerns from education analysts, with 37.6 per cent failing to meet expectations for children their age in reading, and 38.5 per cent failing to meet the proficiency benchmark in numeracy.
WA Education Minister Sabine Winton said it was pleasing to see the results remained stable compared to last year, and highlighted improvements in the Year 5, 7 and 9 cohorts from their average scores two years ago.
'And that really is where the power of NAPLAN, from my perspective, lies in terms of assessing improvements made over time,' she said.
'In all of our year levels, that has occurred.'
On the Year 3 results, Ms Winton said schools were most focused on the students in the lowest band, who needed additional support.
In Year 3 reading, the percentage of students needing additional support increased from 11.3 to 13.9 in two years.
She said the WA Government was supporting early intervention through its Phonics Initiative, which includes a requirement introduced in 2023 for all public schools to undertake a Year 1 phonics assessment.
The Government has also selected 350 schools to take part in a new small group tuition initiative for students who need extra support.
'We know that if we support and invest in the early years of education, it will have lifelong benefits, and that's why we will continue to drive change that will support that,' she said.
'Whether it's through trialling full time free kindy, providing more supports to schools, and I know personally as a teacher and anecdotally talking to many, many teachers in schools, we are seeing more children in the young years presenting to school with development delays, more complex needs, and that's why our government is investing in early childhood education.'
This year marked the third NAPLAN (National Assessment Program — Literacy and Numeracy) under a new reporting system which scores students across four bands; needs additional support, developing, strong and exceeding.
Students in the top two bands are considered to have met expectations for their age.
Children in the 'developing' band have not met expectations for their age group but are working towards it.
Ms Winton said WA's results were on par with the national average.
'I think it's a development that you're seeing right across Australia in terms of children with complex needs, with development delays, all sorts of things happening,' she said.
'We have had the COVID experience, and many kindy teachers tell me that that is also having an impact. So there's something happening at the national level, and I don't accept it's more exposed in Western Australia than anywhere else, but having said that, I accept that it is an area that governments need to continuously invest in.'
Ms Winton said there was also a role for parents to play in connecting with teachers and reading to children from an early age.
'We have the conversation about getting back to basics in school, but we also need to get back to basics with our children in our community.'
'It's around, actually, all of us acknowledging there are many, many things that go into that magic pot in a child that then results in them achieving great outcomes in literacy and numeracy testing.
'Schools and the work that teachers do each and every day in their classrooms is critically important, but there is so much more.'
Federal Education Minister Jason Clare said the national results showed encourage signs but there was more work to do.
The Commonwealth has signed a $16 billion agreement with all states and territories to fix school funding, which is tied to reforms such as Year one phonics and numeracy checks.
WA is the only State that has not signed up to numeracy checks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
11 hours ago
- West Australian
Federal Ag Minister's Indonesia visit leads to signing of wheat protocol and export of rendered products
Australia will start exporting animal-rendered products to Indonesia for the first time in seven years following a successful trade visit by Federal Agriculture Minister Julie Collins. The breakthrough comes after Ms Collins travelled to Jakarta and West java last week to finalise a series of agriculture and biosecurity agreements, building on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's earlier visit in May. A new bilateral protocol, signed during the visit, clears the way for six Australian establishments to restart exports of rendered products — including meat and bone meal from cattle and sheep — used primarily in animal feed. The trade is worth more than $100 million annually to Australian producers. Exports have been suspended since 2018 after the Indonesian Government raised concerns about the presence of pork material, traceability issues, and third-party packaging. Six Australian establishments have been approved by the Indonesian Government to export rendered products. Rendered products consist of meat and bone meal from bovines and ovines, and with the products primarily used for animal feed. Wheat exports were was also on the agenda, with a protocol to maintain Australia's export accessibility to Indonesia and ensure high biosecurity standards. Export of wheat to Indonesia was valued at $1.76 billion in 2023-2024. A mangosteen operational workplan was also agreed upon during the visit, ensuring biosecurity risks will be managed and providing an export route of the fruit. Ms Collins additionally signed a memorandum of understanding between the two countries on biosecurity cooperation activities, and re-established a bilateral Forestry Working Group with the new Indonesian Ministry of Forestry. Ms Collins said the Albanese Government continued to 'strengthen' Australia's partnership with Indonesia. 'It was great to travel to Jakarta to meet with my ministerial counterparts, where we finalised a number of two-way agricultural trade and biosecurity agreements,' she said. 'These agreements will ensure more of our world-class products are on Indonesian tables and will unlock significant benefits for farmers and producers in both of our nations.' The two-way agricultural trade between Indonesia and Australia was valued at $5.5 billion in 2023-2024. As part of the visit Ms Collins participated in trade events and and visited a feedlot in West Java. 'The quality, safety and reliability of Australia's agriculture, fisheries and forestry industries are valued by our friends in Indonesia, and it's great to see how our products support Indonesia's food security,' Ms Collins said.


West Australian
11 hours ago
- West Australian
Krissy Barrett: AFP chief Reece Kershaw's shock resignation paves way for first female police boss
Reece Kershaw's shock resignation as Australian Federal Police Commissioner has has paved the way for the force's first female boss and a strong focus on counter terrorism and espionage. At a surprise press conference at Parliament House on Monday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced Krissy Barrett would be appointed as the new AFP commissioner. Ms Barrett starts the job in early October, after Mr Kershaw announced he would finish up his post a year earlier than expected. Mr Kershaw's resignation became public days after rumours began to swirl on Friday that he had quit, yet the AFP would not answer questions, saying only he had 'not submitted his resignation'. However, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke on Monday said Mr Kershaw told him a couple of weeks ago that he wanted to retire this year. He said he was surprised by the revelation. Mr Kershaw, who was initially appointed for five years in 2019, had his term extended last year until October 2026. 'I wasn't expecting the conversation, I wasn't expecting the announcement from him, but he leaves with his head held high and on the best possible terms with the Government,' Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said. The Prime Minister said the Government was 'deeply grateful' for Mr Kershaw's service and that the police officer had made an extraordinary contribution to the nation. 'On a personal note, as the incoming Prime Minister, can I say that the personal relationship that I've enjoyed with the Commissioner as well during particular events – all of which we would rather not have to deal with – Commissioner Kershaw had been absolutely on call, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with his commitment to his fellow Australians,' he said. Mr Kershaw said nearly 11 years leading police forces — including five years as the NT Police commissioner — had taken its toll on family life. 'Being a grandfather has changed me dramatically, and I need to be there for my family. Policing is such a hard profession that we work in, and we sacrifice a lot, in particular our family, including their careers – my wife included, she gave up her career to support me,' he said. 'It's time for me to give back.' Mr Kershaw came under intense scrutiny earlier this year over the Dural caravan incident, which was originally thought to be an anti-Semitic terrorism plot but later revealed as a 'criminal con job' by organised crime figures for their personal benefit. Before the revelation, Mr Kershaw faced sustained questioning from Coalition politicians about what he had told Mr Albanese and when about the discovery of the caravan laden with explosives in Sydney's north-west in January. He insisted he had briefed ministers at the 'appropriate time' and in an appropriate way. He also cautioned senators that providing details in public, 'whether it seems innocuous or not, can have an impact on investigations' and give suspects knowledge of what police knew and when. The AFP was shuffled back into the Home Affairs portfolio after the May election, having been under the Attorney-General's purview during Labor's first term, in what some observers saw as an admission the caravan incident had shown up the weaknesses of splitting the police force from the rest of the intelligence community. One national security insider thought Mr Kershaw would have been happier with the AFP's return to Home Affairs. Ms Barrett is currently the deputy commissioner managing the national security portfolio — a role that meant she was the officer charged with publicly revealing that the Dural caravan plot was a fake. She became deputy commissioner in March 2024 after leading the counter-terrorism and special investigations teams, including tackling foreign interference and espionage. Unusually, her career with the AFP started in a non-uniformed role as an administrative assistant in Melbourne. Her career included service in the Solomon Islands and the Bali bombing investigation, for which she received the Police Overseas Medal and Operations Medal. This experience brings her to the force's top job at a time when the international policing environment is shifting focus to deal more with threats from terrorism and spying, and less on traditional territory such as drugs, one observer believed. 'The AFP's remit, experience and capabilities have changed dramatically over the years. We now police in an ever-changing and ever-challenging environment,' Ms Barrett said. 'But despite these challenges, the AFP's agility and innovation has ensured that we are a constant and dependable source of protection for Australians and Australia's way of life.' As if underscoring this, hours after Ms Barrett's elevation was announced, the AFP and ASIO announced they had charged a Chinese woman in Canberra with reckless foreign interference. Police alleged the woman was tasked by China's Public Security Bureau to covertly gather information about the Canberra branch of Buddhist association Guan Yin Citta. Ms Barrett also pledged to be a champion for the AFP members, whose dedication and selflessness she said made her proud every day. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and shadow Home Affairs minister Andrew Hastie jointly congratulated Ms Barrett on her appointment, saying she was 'well-equipped to lead the AFP in its important work in defending Australia's national security'. They thanked Mr Kershaw for having 'tirelessly served' the Australian community for three decades and wished him the best for his future endeavours.


The Advertiser
11 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'Lawyers' picnic' looms over right to work from home
An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state. An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state. An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state. An Australian-first plan to legislate the right to work from home could become a "lawyers' picnic", experts warn. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation in 2026 to create a right for employees to work from home two days a week. The laws are yet to be drafted but the right is slated to apply to all Victorian public and private sector workers who can reasonably do their job from home. Carve-outs in the Fair Work Act allowed for protections under state anti-discrimination laws, employment lawyer Daniel Victory said. But how wide the state Labor government cast the net could open the proposed laws to legal challenge, particularly from the private sector. "The broader they make the right the greater the possibility of a challenge," Mr Victory told AAP. Employers trying to "squeeze" staff to return to the workplace after the COVID-19 pandemic was a major "bone of contention", Maurice Blackburn's principal lawyer of employment and industrial law in Melbourne said. He described working from home as a "fact of life" and said enshrining it as a right would help make it a "cultural norm" for businesses to reflect. Industrial relations laws are set by the federal government and regulated by the Fair Work Commission. Section 109 of the constitution dictates that if a state law conflicts with a Commonwealth law, the latter prevails. Joellen Riley Munton, an expert in labour law at the University of Technology Sydney, noted the commission assessed working-from-home clauses in awards and enterprise bargaining agreements. "It would be a very easy thing for someone who objects to the state law to just say 'I only have to abide by the federal laws'," Professor Munton told AAP. "That will be the obstacle for the effectiveness of any Victorian law." Former Fair Work Commission vice president Graeme Watson agreed the proposed right, if as general as initially described, was headed for a clash with federal laws. If Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act was chosen as the vehicle to legislate the right, he said the laws would have to establish what discrimination they were guarding against. "Then you're proceeding into a bit of maze," the King & Wood Mallesons strategic counsel told AAP. "It's either going to be clearly invalid or likely unworkable, but probably both." Mr Watson said arbitration existed for disputes over flexible work arrangements and argued a need to change that remedy had not been demonstrated. He compared the proposal to Victoria's wage theft laws, which were subject to High Court challenge before their repeal after the Albanese government instituted federal legislation. "This is a lawyers' picnic," Mr Watson said. "Why are you creating all this work for lawyers?" She defended her claim Liberals across the country were "drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office". Opposition Leader Brad Battin denied it was a touchy subject internally after Peter Dutton backflipped on ending working from home for public servants during the Liberals' disastrous 2025 federal election campaign. The state Liberal leader is waiting to see the detailed legislation before the party decides its stance. Senior federal minister Tanya Plibersek said the Albanese government wasn't going to give its Labor colleagues' plan a "tick or a cross" when asked if it would step in to overrule the state.