Senior Canadian diplomat compares Trump's Golden Dome missile program to a 'protection racket'
OTTAWA, Ontario (AP) — Canada's ambassador to the United Nations compared U.S. President Donald Trump's Golden Dome missile defense program to a 'protection racket' on Wednesday after Trump said America's northern neighbor could pay $61 billion to join the program or it could be free if the country agrees to annexation.
Trump posted on social media on Tuesday that if Canada becomes the 'cherished 51st State' it won't have to pay to join the proposed U.S. missile defense system.
Ambassador Bob Rae took exception to Trump's comments in two social media posts, comparting it to something organized crime does.
'In another context, this would (be) called a 'protection racket,'' Rae said of Trump's post.
Rae later posted that both Canada and the U.S. signed the U.N. charter in 1945 that states: 'The Organization is based on the sovereign equality of all nations.'
'Threats to sovereign integrity also prohibited,' Rae noted.
In his post, Trump said: 'It will cost $61 Billion Dollars if they remain a separate, but unequal, Nation, but will cost ZERO DOLLARS if they become our cherished 51st State. They are considering the offer!'
Trump made his comments on the same day King Charles III said Canada is facing unprecedented challenges in a world that's never been more dangerous as he opened the Canadian Parliament with a speech widely viewed as a show of support in the face of annexation threats by Trump.
The king is the head of state in Canada, which is a member of the Commonwealth of former colonies. Trump's repeated suggestion that Canada become the 51st state prompted Prime Minister Mark Carney to invite Charles to give a speech from the throne outlining the Liberal government's priorities for the new session of Parliament.
Canadians are largely indifferent to the monarchy, but Carney has been eager to show the differences between Canada and the United States.
The king's visit clearly underscores Canada's sovereignty, Carney said.
A spokesman for Carney responded to Trump's post on Tuesday by saying the prime minister 'has been clear at every opportunity, including in his conversations with President Trump, that Canada is an independent sovereign nation, and it will remain one.'
'Canadians gave the Prime Minister a strong mandate to negotiate a comprehensive new security and economic relationship with the United States,' the statement said. 'To that end, the Prime Minister and his Ministers are having a wide ranging and constructive discussions with their American counterparts. These discussions naturally include strengthening NORAD and related initiatives such as the Golden Dome.'
The newly elected Carney won the job of prime minister by promising to confront the increased aggression shown by Trump. He met with with Trump in the Oval Office earlier this month.
'Some places are never for sale,' Carney said to Trump and the media. Canada is one of them, he added, and 'it won't be for sale, ever.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysts assess the potential impact of Trump's surprise 50% steel tariffs
-- U.S. President Donald Trump unexpectedly announced on Friday that steel and aluminum tariffs will double to 50%. The move, set to come into effect on June 4, was unveiled during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania. It was later confirmed on TruthSocial and comes amid broader debates around U.S. industrial policy and foreign investment. Analysts are now evaluating the implications of this surprise decision, with most agreeing that the immediate domestic effects may be less severe than the broader geopolitical risks. JPMorgan's Tatsuya Maruyama said the direct impact on major Japanese steelmakers such as Nippon Steel Corp (TYO:5401), JFE Holdings, Inc. (TYO:5411), and Kobe Steel, Ltd. (TYO:5406) is expected to be limited, given that 'the U.S. accounts for about 4% of Japan's steel exports.' Maruyama pointed out in a Monday note that Nippon Steel and JFE export only about 1% of their total shipments to the U.S., while Kobe Steel exports about 3%. Still, he warned that 'rising global protectionism' is a growing concern, noting that a wave of anti-dumping measures and safeguards in regions like South Korea, the EU, and India could further strain global trade dynamics. 'If such countermeasures gain momentum, Japanese steel products may also be targeted and the export environment may worsen,' Maruyama continued. Meanwhile, analysts at BMO Capital Markets believe the sudden tariff hike could jolt domestic markets. 'The doubling of import tariffs, if maintained, is likely to create a panic in the market and trigger a restocking cycle that in our view has the potential to push prices >$1,000/st in the near-term,' the analysts said. However, they believe the spike would be temporary given macro uncertainty and seasonal demand trends. The broker upgraded Nucor (NYSE:NUE) to Outperform but downgraded Algoma Central (TSX:ALC), which it called 'a relative tariff loser.' The aluminum market may be more exposed, according to BMO. The U.S. covers only about 20% of its own aluminum consumption domestically, making it more vulnerable to supply disruptions. 'If tariffs do double, this is expected to put material upside pressure on the Midwest premium (MWP),' BMO wrote, estimating it could reach '$0.75/lb-plus' in theory, although higher aluminum cost will likely weigh on demand and thus offset some upside pressure. That said, the brokerage sees Century Aluminum (NASDAQ:CENX) as well positioned to benefit from a rise in the Midwest premium, while Alcoa (NYSE:AA) could see a negative impact of $1–2 per share, or 4–7%, due to its reliance on Canadian production. Still, BMO expects Alcoa may redirect some of its Canadian output to the EU market. Related articles Analysts assess the potential impact of Trump's surprise 50% steel tariffs Street Calls of the Week VIDEO: How to analyze a stock like a pro with the CEO of HF Foods
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 Value Stock on Our Buy List and 2 to Approach with Caution
Value investing has created more billionaires than any other strategy, like Warren Buffett, who built his fortune by purchasing wonderful businesses at reasonable prices. But these hidden gems are few and far between - many stocks that appear cheap often stay that way because they face structural issues. Identifying genuine bargains from value traps is something many investors struggle with, which is why we started StockStory - to help you find the best companies. Keeping that in mind, here is one value stock with strong fundamentals and two best left ignored. Forward P/E Ratio: 14.5x Synonymous with "dad shoe", Skechers (NYSE:SKX) is a footwear company renowned for its comfortable, stylish, and affordable shoes for all ages. Why Is SKX Risky? Constant currency revenue growth has disappointed over the past two years and shows demand was soft Estimated sales growth of 7.4% for the next 12 months implies demand will slow from its two-year trend Poor free cash flow margin of 4.4% for the last two years limits its freedom to invest in growth initiatives, execute share buybacks, or pay dividends Skechers is trading at $62.04 per share, or 14.5x forward P/E. Dive into our free research report to see why there are better opportunities than SKX. Forward P/E Ratio: 9.9x Established in 1878, Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) is a leading producer of floor-covering products for both residential and commercial applications. Why Are We Out on MHK? Core business is underperforming as its organic revenue has disappointed over the past two years, suggesting it might need acquisitions to stimulate growth ROIC of 3.5% reflects management's challenges in identifying attractive investment opportunities, and its decreasing returns suggest its historical profit centers are aging Diminishing returns on capital from an already low starting point show that neither management's prior nor current bets are going as planned At $100.61 per share, Mohawk Industries trades at 9.9x forward P/E. Check out our free in-depth research report to learn more about why MHK doesn't pass our bar. Forward P/E Ratio: 3.7x Pioneering treatments for a devastating childhood muscle-wasting disease that primarily affects boys, Sarepta Therapeutics (NASDAQ:SRPT) develops and commercializes RNA-targeted therapies and gene therapies for rare genetic disorders, primarily Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Why Are We Bullish on SRPT? Annual revenue growth of 51.3% over the last two years was superb and indicates its market share increased during this cycle Earnings per share grew by 38.8% annually over the last five years, massively outpacing its peers Cash burn has decreased over the last five years, showing the company is becoming a more self-sustaining business Sarepta Therapeutics's stock price of $37.50 implies a valuation ratio of 3.7x forward P/E. Is now the time to initiate a position? Find out in our full research report, it's free. Market indices reached historic highs following Donald Trump's presidential victory in November 2024, but the outlook for 2025 is clouded by new trade policies that could impact business confidence and growth. While this has caused many investors to adopt a "fearful" wait-and-see approach, we're leaning into our best ideas that can grow regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Take advantage of Mr. Market by checking out our Top 5 Strong Momentum Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Kadant (+351% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today for free. Sign in to access your portfolio

Wall Street Journal
27 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Podcast: Trump's Plan B After Trade Court Setback
Last week, an obscure trade court dropped a bombshell ruling: President Trump didn't have the authority to issue sweeping tariffs under a 1977 law. The government has appealed the court's decision. WSJ's James Fanelli and Gavin Bade dig into the ruling and what it could mean for the future of Trump's trade agenda. Annie Minoff hosts. 🎧 Listen here to The Journal podcast.