Ex-CM Gehlot urges Raj govt to implement gig workers law
1
2
Jaipur: A day after Karnataka's Platform-based Gig Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Ordinance received the governor's nod, former Rajasthan chief minister
Ashok Gehlot
said the Rajasthan govt should enforce the pioneering legislation that was passed by the Congress govt in 2023.
The law, he said, aims to ensure social security and dignified living standards for gig workers.
"We feel proud and are extremely happy that in keeping with the sentiments of Rahul Gandhi, the Gig Workers Welfare Act was made for the first time in the country in 2023 under the Congress govt in Rajasthan. It was appreciated and discussed all over the world. This law has provisions for a welfare fund, insurance, working hours, etc.,
for gig workers," Gehlot wrote on 'X'. "Rahulji is fighting a long battle for the rights of the weaker sections.
..for the social security of lakhs of youth working in internet-based companies like Ola, Uber, Swiggy, and Zomato. We should strengthen his hands. I want to appeal to the govt of Rajasthan to implement this law made by our govt in 2023 and give gig workers the right to social security and respectable living," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court Expands Reverse Discrimination Claims for Majority Groups, ET LegalWorld
A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, siding with an Ohio woman who claims she didn't get a job and then was demoted because she is straight. The justices' decision affects lawsuits in 20 states and the District of Columbia where, until now, courts had set a higher bar when members of a majority group, including those who are white and heterosexual, sue for discrimination under federal law. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for the court that federal civil rights law draws no distinction between members of majority and minority groups. Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis. Download ETLegalWorld App Get Realtime updates Save your favourite articles Scan to download App "By establishing the same protections for every 'individual' - without regard to that individual's membership in a minority or majority group - Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone," Jackson court ruled in an appeal from Marlean Ames, who has worked for the Ohio Department of Youth Services for more than 20 he joined Jackson's opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas noted in a separate opinion that some of the country's "largest and most prestigious employers have overtly discriminated against those they deem members of so-called majority groups."Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, cited a brief filed by America First Legal, a conservative group founded by Trump aide Stephen Miller, to assert that "American employers have long been 'obsessed' with 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' initiatives and affirmative action plans."Two years ago, the court's conservative majority outlawed consideration of race in university admissions. Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump has ordered an end to DEI policies in the federal government and has sought to end government support for DEI programs elsewhere. Some of the new administration's anti-DEI initiatives have been temporarily blocked in federal opinion makes no mention of DEI. Instead, she focused on Ames' contention that she was passed over for a promotion and then demoted because she is heterosexual. Both the job she sought and the one she had held were given to LGBTQ people. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars sex discrimination in the workplace. A trial court and the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against 6th circuit is among the courts that had required an additional requirement for people like Ames, showing "background circumstances" that might include that LGBTQ people made the decisions affecting Ames or statistical evidence of a pattern of discrimination against members of the majority appeals court noted that Ames didn't provide any such Jackson wrote that "this additional 'background circumstances' requirement is not consistent with Title VII's text or our case law construing the statute."
Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Tesla stock slides over 8% after Elon Musk criticizes Donald Trump, President says he's disappointed
Tesla shares plummeted by over 8% following escalating tensions between CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Musk's criticism of Trump's tax legislation, labeling it a "disgusting abomination," ignited the conflict. Trump expressed disappointment, claiming Musk opposed the bill only after learning about the electric vehicle mandate cuts. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tesla Shares Drop Over 5% Amid Musk-Trump Fallout Donald Trump Is Very Disappointed With Elon Musk Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it! undefined Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Musk Denies Being Consulted on the Bill Analysts Weigh In on Risks for Tesla FAQs Tesla shares dropped over 8% on Thursday after investors noticed the growing tensions between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and US president Donald Trump, as per a report. The slide comes as Musk openly criticized Trump's massive tax legislation, stirring speculation that the once-friendly relationship between them may be coming to an end, according to a Reuters who called himself Trump's 'First Buddy' and led the administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative, took to his social media platform X to call the legislation a 'disgusting abomination,' as per the report. The Tesla CEO said, "It more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the DOGE team at great personal cost and risk," as quoted by responded by pointing out that Musk was upset because the bill would remove the electric vehicle mandates and said, "Don't know if we'll have a great relationship anymore," as quoted in the READ: Cargo ship carrying electric vehicles catches fire off Alaska – key points you need to know The US president also told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday that, "I'm very disappointed with Elon. I've helped him a lot. He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem & he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut EV mandate," as per a post shared by Musk on his X went on to respond to Trump's accusations on X, by saying, "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" as per Musk's X a portfolio manager at Argent Capital Management, Jed Ellerbroe told Reuters, "The budget bill contains bad stuff for Tesla with the end of the EV credits, and just generally his falling out with Trump has risks for Tesla and Elon's other companies," as quoted in the are worried because Elon Musk publicly criticized President Trump's tax bill as the tension might hurt Tesla's called it a 'disgusting abomination' and said it cancels out cost savings his government efficiency team worked hard to achieve.
India Today
32 minutes ago
- India Today
Operation Sindoor is not Operation Lotus: Punjab Congress leader attacks BJP, AAP
As a political showdown continues over India's Operation Sindoor precision strikes against Pakistani infrastructure, Punjab Congress chief Amarinder Singh Raja Warring attacked both the BJP and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), accusing them of politicising the military success of the armed Raja launched an offensive on the saffron party, saying Operation Sindoor was not 'Operation Lotus', he slammed the AAP of questioning the success of the military operation that was carried out in response to the Pahalgam attack, which claimed the lives of 26 is way too clear that the AAP and the BJP are two sides of the same coin. Now both of them are trying to do petty politics in the name of Operation Sindoor', Warring said in a statement on Thursday, pointing out that while the BJP was trying to take political mileage out of it, the AAP was trying to question the success. While Prime Minister Narendra Modi and several BJP leaders have spoken about Operation Sindoor success, in which the Indian armed forces destroyed nine terror launchpads and killed over 100 terrorists on May 7, at various political events, many opposition parties, including the Congress, have questioned the success of the that the BJP leaders were behaving as if they had physically fought on the border and defeated Pakistan, Warring said, "Operation Sindoor is not Operation Lotus".advertisement'Operation Lotus' is a term often used by the BJP's political opponents to accuse it of horse-trading other parties' legislators to topple governments."We do acknowledge your dirty skills that you employ during Operation Lotus, but please, for the sake of the dignity and glory of our Defence Forces, don't try to lay your claim on their victory for your petty political ends", he said while indirectly addressing the to AAP leader and Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann reportedly questioning the success of Operation Sindoor, Warring said, "This was quite unfortunate and unbecoming of the Chief Minister, as the whole world has acknowledged that Indian defence forces have dealt a heavy blow to Pakistan".'You have every right and reason to question the BJP's intentions and motives, but dare not question the capability of our defence forces", Warring top Congress leaders like party president Mallikarjun Kharge, Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, party leaders Jairam Ramesh, and Pawan Khera, among others, have questioned Operation Sindoor's grand old party has also been at loggerheads with its own MP, Shashi Tharoor, who has praised the Modi government for military retaliation on several occasions. The party has, at times, disapproved of Tharoor, saying he is speaking out of party Watch
